tagged w/ Individual Mandate
-
Well, okay, it’s all over but the crying. The decision more than likely made mid-hearings is just a ruling that is a work in progress. The partisan decision was made without the benefit of the justices even reading it---after all the law is 2700 pages long. What are the justices to do but vote their respective partisan penchant instead? Certainly we can’t expect that justices appointed for life would take their oaths, purpose of office seriously. That really would be naïve. Read the Affordable Care Act law? Why when you can just rule on it?Well, okay, it’s all over but the crying. The decision more than likely made... more
-
-
As you mostly likely know by now the three day (total six hour argument time) long Supreme Court hearings on the Affordable Care Act a/k/a Obamacare closed yesterday.
Wednesday 28 March 2012 day three, the final day of hearings on Obamacare the court heard arguments on the issue of whether the balance of the (Affordable Care Act) law can be upheld if the “individual mandate” provision is judged “unconstitutional” by the Supremes just as it has been by the majority population.As you mostly likely know by now the three day (total six hour argument time) long... more
-
-
Is it constitutionally permissible for those in governance, “the government” to force you and me to buy health care insurance? That’s the question that was at the center of Tuesday’s, (day two) of the Supreme Court hearings on ObamacareIs it constitutionally permissible for those in governance, “the... more
-
-
Today the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) held its second day of hearings on the Affordable Health Care Act, aka “Obamacare”, Jeffrey Toobin the legal analyst for CNN is describing today's SCOTUS hearings which covered the individual mandate in the Affordable Care Act as a "train wreck" for the Obama Administration and is predicting a 5-4 decision (no surprise).
"This was a train wreck for the Obama administration," he said. "This law looks like it's going to be struck down. I'm telling you, all of the predictions including mine that the justices would not have a problem with this law were wrong... if I had to bet today I would bet that this court is going to strike down the individual mandate."
Video and Links here:
http://www.examiner.com/democrat-in-las-vegas/video-supreme-court-hearing-on-obamacare-described-as-a-train-wreckToday the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) held its second day of hearings... more
-
-
In the 2012 GOP presidential primary campaign, which will likely be all but wrapped up when the voting is over with tonight, former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney has consistently avowed that the individual mandate his "Romneycare" health bill, instituted during his time in the state house, was meant as a solution for his state and was never intended to be offered as a national solution.
"...even though Romney argued that his plan was based in the idea of “personal responsibility,” he opposes such a rule at the national level, arguing that the decisions on how to manage and regulate health care should be left up the states. Romney has said that as president, he would repeal the national health care law that was modeled partially after his state’s plan."
Continue reading on Examiner.com Questions about health care mandate dog Romney's march to Super Tuesday - Baltimore liberal | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/liberal-in-baltimore/questions-about-health-care-mandate-dog-romney-s-march-to-super-tuesday#ixzz1oLYqNr1qIn the 2012 GOP presidential primary campaign, which will likely be all but wrapped up... more
-
-
The U.S. Supreme Court has officially scheduled oral arguments regarding the constitutionality of President Obama’s landmark Affordable Care Act, particularly the healthcare reform’s individual mandate. The announcement confirms earlier speculation that the high court would issue a ruling on the healthcare law next year, during the heat of the 2012 presidential campaign.
http://veracitystew.com/2011/12/19/supreme-court-schedules-three-day-review-of-healthcare-reform/The U.S. Supreme Court has officially scheduled oral arguments regarding the... more
-
-
-
-
*Hopes this clarifies the founders' intent and any Constitutionality questions.*
In July of 1798, Congress passed – and President John Adams signed - “An Act for the Relief of Sick and Disabled Seamen.” The law authorized the creation of a government operated marine hospital service and mandated that privately employed sailors be required to purchase health care insurance.
Keep in mind that the 5th Congress did not really need to struggle over the intentions of the drafters of the Constitutions in creating this Act as many of its members were the drafters of the Constitution.
And when the Bill came to the desk of President John Adams for signature, I think it’s safe to assume that the man in that chair had a pretty good grasp on what the framers had in mind.
Here’s how it happened.
During the early years of our union, the nation’s leaders realized that foreign trade would be essential to the young country’s ability to create a viable economy. To make it work, they relied on the nation’s private merchant ships – and the sailors that made them go – to be the instruments of this trade.
The problem was that a merchant mariner’s job was a difficult and dangerous undertaking in those days. Sailors were constantly hurting themselves, picking up weird tropical diseases, etc.
The troublesome reductions in manpower caused by back strains, twisted ankles and strange diseases often left a ship’s captain without enough sailors to get underway – a problem both bad for business and a strain on the nation’s economy.
But those were the days when members of Congress still used their collective heads to solve problems – not create them.
Realizing that a healthy maritime workforce was essential to the ability of our private merchant ships to engage in foreign trade, Congress and the President resolved to do something about it.
Enter “An Act for The Relief of Sick and Disabled Seamen”.
I encourage you to read the law as, in those days, legislation was short, to the point and fairly easy to understand.
The law did a number of fascinating things.
First, it created the Marine Hospital Service, a series of hospitals built and operated by the federal government to treat injured and ailing privately employed sailors. This government provided healthcare service was to be paid for by a mandatory tax on the maritime sailors (a little more than 1% of a sailor’s wages), the same to be withheld from a sailor’s pay and turned over to the government by the ship’s owner. The payment of this tax for health care was not optional. If a sailor wanted to work, he had to pay up.
This is pretty much how it works today in the European nations that conduct socialized medical programs for its citizens – although 1% of wages doesn’t quite cut it any longer.
PLEASE READ MORE AT LINK....*Hopes this clarifies the founders' intent and any Constitutionality questions.*... more
-
-
The lawsuit against the health care overhaul filed Tuesday by Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum is focused on a provision that has long been advocated by conservatives, big business and the insurance industry.
The lawsuit by McCollum, a candidate for governor, and 12 other attorneys general, focuses on the provision that virtually all Americans will need to have health insurance by 2014 or face penalties.
The lawsuit calls this an "unprecedented encroachment on the liberty of individuals." It states the Constitution doesn't authorize such a mandate, the proposed tax penalty is unlawful and is an "unprecedented encroachment on the sovereignty of the states."
"The truth is this is a Republican idea," said Linda Quick, president of the South Florida Hospital and Healthcare Association. She said she first heard the concept of the "individual mandate" in a Miami speech in the early 1990s by Sen. John McCain, a conservative Republican from Arizona, to counter the "Hillarycare" the Clintons were proposing.
McCain did not embrace the concept during his 2008 election campaign, but other leading Republicans did, including Tommy Thompson, secretary of Health and Human Services under President George W. Bush.
Seeking to deradicalize the idea during a symposium in Orlando in September 2008, Thompson said, "Just like people are required to have car insurance, they could be required to have health insurance."
Among the other Republicans who had embraced the idea was Mitt Romney, who as governor of Massachusetts crafted a huge reform by requiring almost all citizens to have coverage.
"Some of my libertarian friends balk at what looks like an individual mandate," Romney wrote in The Wall Street Journal in 2006. "But remember, someone has to pay for the health care that must, by law, be provided: Either the individual pays or the taxpayers pay. A free ride on government is not libertarian."
Romney was referring to the federal law that requires everyone to be treated in emergency rooms, regardless of their ability to pay.
more at link...The lawsuit against the health care overhaul filed Tuesday by Florida Attorney General... more
-
-
In recent days, GOP leaders have focused their crosshairs on the individual mandate, a key component of an effective health care reform bill. FreedomWorks chairman Dick Armey (R-TX) attacked the mandate as a “healthcare industry boondoggle”, Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) called the mandate a “stunning assault on liberty,” and Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) delayed the committee mark-up by questioning the mandate’s constitutionality.
Most notably, Sen. Chuck Grassley has suddenly become an opponent of the mandate:
HEMMER: Now as I understand it, you want stronger language preventing federal funds from going to abortion. You want stronger language to make sure illegal immigrants are not covered. If you got those two big points, would you go for it?
GRASSLEY: No, there are other points as well, but let me mention other points that you didn’t mention. And one would be the individual mandate, which for the first time would have a federal penalty against people who don’t have health insurance. I could do that through re-insurance and risk pools, to make sure we get more people insured in a voluntary way and I’m very reluctant to go along with an individual mandate.
In spite of their current rhetoric, it wasn’t long ago that Grassley and many of his Republican colleagues were strong supporters ofthe individual mandate. Progressive Media compiled a series of GOP endorsements of a mandate. (see video)
The GOP’s newfound opposition reveals that this is not a matter of policy but yet another political strategy intended to obstruct reform at any cost.In recent days, GOP leaders have focused their crosshairs on the individual mandate, a... more
-
