Wikipedia: Fast Food for the Brain?
source: http://edition.cnn.com/2007/TECH/11/02/perils.wikipedia/index.html
-
-
- abbym0308
- added this
-
-
meadowking06
-
I don't understand the reason for any controversy regarding Wikipedia. It's an excellent starter source for information on ANYTHING. That's it's biggest advantage over any other encyclopediaregardless of the topic, it's assumed that Wikipedia will have an article on it. Also, it's free!
Is it always going to be the most accurate source? No. Who cares?That's not what it is promising. If the credibility and quality of sources is important, the information in articles found on Wikipedia is cited. If not, then it's probably not credible Wikipedia alerts users with a banner stating that the article does not cite it's sources. If doing a research paper, don't cite Wikipedia as a source, but use the sources cited on Wikipedia articles as your source!
- 4 years ago
-
meadowking06
-
-
weakmassive
-
In the case of Wikipedia, the strengths of the wiki model far outweight the weaknesses. As with ANY information, it's advised to check it against multiple sources. Like the article said, "no encyclopedia will ever be perfect", Britannica included.
- 4 years ago
-
weakmassive
