Tech | June 12, 2008 | 82 comments

Students eat cat, kicked off Facebook

Image
Swiyyah
Students from the Danish School of Journalism posted 30 pictures of themselves cooking and eating a cat. Though the students were protesting the way pigs and cattle were raised for meat, animal rights lobby took offense and Facebook regulated on them.



(Picture is not of the actual students or the cat just adds to the story and it's funny)
  1. groups:
    Tech,   WTF,   Random,   Animal Videos and News,   4 more
  2. tags:
    WTF Not News Random Tech 9 more
  3.     
    |

82 comments // Students eat cat, kicked off Facebook

  • dariusvons
    • 0
      dariusvons  
    • Meat doesn't have to be from a cow, pig, chicken or turkey. some people eat goats, some eat rabbits, some eat fish.... bear, frog, cat, horse... it's a dietary choice. around here cats are fat trash eating vermin... why wouldn't we eat them?

    • 3 years ago
  • PatrickEdwardMurray
    • 0
      PatrickEdwardMurray  
    • I have two cats and I think these kids are sick,sick, sick!
      When I see this kind of stuff, I wonder just how long the good Lord above will wait before the final days...?

      No excuse for this , none at all!

    • 3 years ago
  • paddedwalls
  • squeege
    • 0
      squeege  
    • this is just fucked up. in so many ways. by the way. how do you protest something by commiting an even more cruel and hainess act than the original injustice. and "shock value" is not an acceptable answer.

    • 3 years ago
  • Nefri
  • flygirl618
    • 0
      flygirl618  
    • although I think that killing the family pet is sick and wrong on more than one level I looked at the pictures and you all might not like this but I have been a hunter and killed rabbits and deer and such and skinned them and that wan not so much different than that other than having to see the cat's face you wouldn't have known it was a cat it looked like rabbit but I will say that I do not agree with what they did at all it was wrong the pictures just didn't gross me out that bad.

    • 3 years ago
  • Ice_cream_Man
  • annabell
  • phatboi1091
  • SLindsayM1991
    • 0
      SLindsayM1991  
    • I think they were trying to prove a very valid point, why are some animals considered okay to eat and other's not? Now I'm not saying they did it in the best fashion but if we're going to eat animals we should eat all or none, I say. Weird... I guess

    • 3 years ago
  • johnmcstupid
  • BooksBrown
  • runsarahrun82
  • diabolical44
    • 0
      diabolical44  
    • congratulations facebook! i wonder if soon you'll be kicking people off for being "terrorists".

      its only a matter of time before the internet has no freedom of speech left.

    • 3 years ago
  • sgwhites
    • 0
      sgwhites  
    • This is horrible. Animal rights are important, yes, but you can't compare cats to cows because we have domesticated cats and made them pets in our society.

      Also, just because someone eats meat doesn't mean they don't understand where their food comes from or care about animals.

      I'm an animal lover, and I have two incredibly spoiled cats (one of the reasons I'm so horrified by this) but I'm also a meat-eater. I'm very aware of the fact that an animal has died to be my food, and try to be mindful of that and buy local/small-farm food as much as I can. Vegetarianism doesn't work for everyone, and humans were designed to eat meat, though not in the quantities most people do now.

      Instead of criticizing or demonizing people for eating meat, wouldn't we accomplish more if people demanded higher standards for the treatment of animals being raised for food, and more ethical and humane methods of slaughter?

    • 3 years ago
  • wehearthawkins
  • Ogaal
    • 0
      Ogaal  
    • I don't know/ can't decide what's worse, The video of the /Marines throwing the puppy off the cliff or the photos of these students cooking and eating a cat.

    • 3 years ago
  • hereandnow
  • Sevia
    • 0
      Sevia  
    • This picture is not funny. Although, I think that anyone who would eat a cat and then put in the news is a sick piece of shit!

    • 3 years ago
  • joshuaheller
  • parisinla
  • bornproof
    • 0
      bornproof  
    • I wonder why certain people feel that its their right to take gross to a new level and share it with the world. Where is the prosecutor that charged Michael Vick when you need him? Where's peta? Oh well i guess these assholes aren't famous enough. LOL

    • 3 years ago
  • mzbugalot
    • 0
      mzbugalot  
    • it is very true... animals are treated in certain ways and one kind being treated differently out of the ordinary doesnt seem right. but in the same sense cats are just another animal and some poeple really do eat cats as a normal meal.. i dont understand why its such a big deal. We do that same thing to cows and pigs but god for bid we di it too cats?? makes no sence!
      -julie

    • 3 years ago
  • Mark701
  • phukna
  • Skyscraper08
    • 0
      Skyscraper08  
    • This is slightly off topic - but I was thinking about surivival and the consumption of animals in order to survive. If your a meat eater and cats/dogs were the only meat around, wouldnt you feast? Its not like they're terribly endangered species.

      but anyway its an interesting topic - I think its all to do with the psychological relationship we as humans have built over the years with such animals.

    • 3 years ago
  • silverkinguk
  • BloxParty
  • Owwmykneecap
  • BloxParty
    • 0
      BloxParty  
    • How is this any different to killing and eating a pig or a rabbit again?

      What makes an animal okay for food? Cuteness, intelligence, fluffiness? What?

      They were making a valid point - I myself don't eat meat but I support the statement they were trying to make.

      Any carnivores that are outraged by this should probably have a good think about why.

    • 3 years ago
  • J_Jammer
  • BloxParty
    • 0
      BloxParty  
    • BloxParty:

      Seems like a pretty effective way of highlighting a double standard to me.

      If you're fine with frying up bacon, watching cookery shows with meat, going to the butchers then fine.

      But you can't pick and choose. An animal is an animal.

      Also - THE CAT WAS ALREADY DEAD. Much like your leg of lamb is already dead when you buy it. The difference is that these people had the guts to skin and clean their own meat.

      People that squeal and cry and throw around outrage and accusations when they see the reality of what meat is and then happily chomp into a turkey sandwich for lunch really irritate me. - Surely the hypocrisy there is obvious?

    • 3 years ago
  • Allsunday
    • 0
      Allsunday  
    • BloxParty:

      Animals like pig and cattle have been specifically bred over thousands of years to be our food and labor animals. Without our interference, they would still be bison and boar. Cats, on the other hand, were bred from wild cats down to a smaller, convenient size, not to be food but to be our companions. Killing a cat for food is disgusting because they are members of our families, but killing a cow for food is why cows exist in the first place. In some cultures it's fine to kill a cat, but in this one it's not. It isn't a double-standard, it's an inherent difference.

    • 3 years ago
  • BloxParty
    • 0
      BloxParty  
    • BloxParty:

      So it's only okay to eat animals when they've been specifically bred for meat?

      By that logic you'd see the intensive and undeniably cruel practice of intensive farming for the fast food industry as preferable to the hunting and eating of wild game by local communities.

      People keep pigs as pets. Cows are kept and cherished as pets by some religious groups.

      If people eat meat it's up to them. But they should at least accept the reality of what happens to make their food. Animals die. It could be a lamb or a kitten - it's the same thing. Either accept the reality of it to the point that you're ready to kill a small animal for food with your own hands or give it up.

      It wasn't long ago that I faced up to this and decided to switch away from meat. And I don't even like animals that much.

    • 3 years ago
  • atarikg
  • xx_leela
    • 0
      xx_leela  
    • It looks pretty much like deboning and cooking a rabbit. I hope this cat was shot by a farmer as they say. It would be too much of a contradiction if those students wanted to draw attention to how pigs are treated and then kill a cat in such a horrible way. Anyway, i'm a big cat lovers, but i do understand the point they're making. I just think things won't change, you could say "it is in our genes" to eat an animal rather than another.

    • 3 years ago
  • bennyfilm
    • 0
      bennyfilm  
    • I'm a vegetarian myself but think it is perfectly acceptable to eat meat. I don't think though I am so open to the idea of eating a cat, unless of course you were starving to death.

      I'm wondering did they kill the cat before they ate it? Also do you think as many people would still eat meat if they had to kill it first, I mean we all did at one point but how about in todays supposedly civil society?

    • 3 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • I like how people start getting all Philosophical about eating animals. How uninteresting.

      People are always going to eat animals no matter what the animal is. But you must remember where you are. If you went to India and you filmed yourself killing and skinning a cow i don't think people would respect you for doing that since they value cows.

      The same where people value cats as a pet. If you pick one, skin it and such and expect to be understood then you're not really understanding where you are and who'll be seeing it.

      there are ways to kill animals and be kind to them in the process. Stating that one shouldn't eat animals is dumb because guess what Lions eat animals, are we going to regulate them?

      Random Research note....they did a study on yawning and those who ate meat yawned (animals) and the animals that ate plants didn't yawn. So if you yawn you're a meat eater in denial if you aren't eating meat.

    • 3 years ago
  • chet_arthur
  • J_Jammer
  • Frier_peppino
  • mattbrawn
    • 0
      mattbrawn  
    • A great point there Ronen, the only difference lies in that some we have domesticated, others we haven't.

      If we'd domesticated cows and pigs then things would be different I'm sure. But just think, if we had domesticated pigs, there'd be no bacon. :-o

    • 3 years ago
  • RonenA
    • 0
      RonenA  
    • As fucked up as this, the point is very clear. Why is it gruesome and nasty to do this with a cat and yet when people do this is a chicken, a pig or a cow its tasty? Why is this illegal and immoral and the other is legal, socially acceptable and absurdly common? There is absolutely no difference.

    • 3 years ago
  • Seafarer
    • 0
      Seafarer  
    • I don't see the sense at all in what they did. You try to protect life by not eating something once alive yet you eat something once alive to say you shouldn't eat anything alive? I mean I get what their aim is but way off the mark getting there.

    • 3 years ago
  • jakes_green
  • johnmcstupid
  • rajajajamjar
  • PoisonTheMonkey
    • 0
      PoisonTheMonkey  
    • As a vegetarian, I couldn't agree more with them...they just picked a terrible way to protest. They should have faked the video then pointed to everyone crying out as hypocrits.

      Poor cat...

    • 3 years ago
  • Neghie
    • 0
      Neghie  
    • We must seem disgusting to Indians, eating the sacred cow and all. We see our meet packaged nicely and stocked beautifully on the shelves in the grocery stores and think nothing of the fact that it was once alive, farmed, killed and mutilated just so we can stuff our faces. If you've ever seen a sink full of chicken feet and heads, you'd realize, it's all nasty.

    • 3 years ago
  • Disable
    • 0
      Disable  
    • He does make a good argument, but the whole let's-eat-a-cat-to-change-everybody's-mind thing didn't work out so well.

    • 3 years ago
  • BruceBruce
    • 0
      BruceBruce  
    • not gonna like this boys and girls but it was outstanding (the pics of course) There is something to be said about shock value to make your point. We are all smart enough to know that there are different cuisines all over our world. My thinkin is that you woulda freaked no matter what type of animal it would have been, being they prepared it from scratch and in such detail.... You know, in Korea I had some KA GO GEE..and I still play with my dog, Q. Maybe somethings wrong with me?

    • 3 years ago
  • taylorblue
  • shroomfairy
  • taylorblue
  • malathion
  • wiredbirds
  • pogschampion
    • 0
      pogschampion  
    • Hypocrites. Trying to protest for animal rights by eating cats. Somehow I don't understand how that works out. So if I'm missing something, let me know.

    • 3 years ago
  • fuckbush
  • lemonsun12
    • 0
      lemonsun12  
    • i just saw the photos.
      i don't really have words, im just really horrified.
      but i really don't think this is worse than the typical slaughter of animals for food purposes.
      im saying this, of course, as a vegetarian.
      i just really don't understand the point they were trying to make. this was supposed to be an ANTI- animal cruelty protest!? what!?

    • 3 years ago
  • aphid_killer
    • 0
      aphid_killer  
    • I recently returned from those places in the world where eating "domesticated" animals is accepted, but it never seemed that people advertised the eating of these animals (mostly dogs). i believe that this has more to do with socio-economic issues rather than taste or texture. I never tried dog, but close friends who did said it was awful, cold and very grisly. anyway, i agree with databaze about acceptance, and i've tried frog, bat, bugs, etc. and they were all really good. it's all about where you live and how you survive there.

    • 3 years ago
  • JanforGore
  • wiredbirds
  • slicedbread
  • Peewong
    • 0
      Peewong  
    • I have to agree with what some people said above; if it were a cow, a pig, or a chicken, I'm sure it would be shocking but because of the stigma around eating a domesticated animal it is that much more disturbing.

      But really, what is adding the pain and suffering of an innocent animal going to do to help the cause? Make a statement, sure. Stop the slaughtering of other animals...doubt it.

    • 3 years ago
  • kaseymarie2
  • natedawson
  • power_packed_ro
  • Argon18
  • parisinla
    • 0
      parisinla  
    • power_packed_ro:

      I dissagree Ro. I mean, this is something that happens every day in some asian cultures. I dont think they went to their neighbors house and killed some old ladies only source of LOL.

      I dont necessarily think that this is cool or normal but i recognize it as a valid form of protest and expression and i think facebook should honor that. But if the material is so offensive then they have the option to remove it but not suspend/ban the user. Microsoft should really weigh in on this.

    • 3 years ago
  • cerealforeal
  • databaze
    • 0
      databaze  
    • It was probably taken because you can see the raw cat skinned on a platter and the cut paws in the sink. if they just showed the skinned cat without the head of paws it could have been chicken. I don't think is cruel to eat a cat or any other animal, i think it is just not globally accepted because of it being a pet.
      I like deer, frog, wild boar, shark, goat, cow, chicken, fish, snake, and these are just a few things that i have tried; not counting the insects hehe..

    • 3 years ago
  • SpookyFish
    • 0
      SpookyFish  
    • While it is unnecessary to kill any animal for food and while I am fully aware of Facebook's right to ban them on their terms of use violations, this incident does bring up an interesting point.

      The same people who kicked them off Facebook most likely eat cows, chickens, and other animals, all of whom were abused their entire life and killed in some of the most horrific ways imaginable just so they could end up as a burger or a chicken nugget for someone who could have just as easily eaten something else.

      While I certainly don't condone the student's killing, cooking, and eating of this cat, it raises the question: why is it considered perfectly alright to pay for and, thereby, participate in the abuse of certain animals (cows, pigs, chickens, etc.), but not others?

      It's a crime when someone forces a dog to fight, but it's fine when someone pays for and consumes the abuse of a cow.

    • 3 years ago
  • DJSoundBored
  • Argon18
    • 0
      Argon18  
    • I guess it depends on how it was presented, if it was for shock value like that then a cow, chicken, pig, lamb etc. would've been taken off as well.

    • 3 years ago
  • donkeyfly69
    • 0
      donkeyfly69  
    • well it does raise the question of which animals is it ok to eat. in some places it is ok to eat cats. domestic cats are not endangered anywhere that i know of.

      if you censor them eating cat, why can't you censor someone eating pig or horse or bat?

    • 3 years ago
  • J_Jammer
    • 0
      J_Jammer [removed]  
    • donkeyfly69:

      They killed, most likely, someone's pet to prove a stupid point.

      If killing to them is wrong then why did they kill a cat? They are caught in a gruesome web of hypocrisy and inconsistency that they will never get out of.

      People do eat cat. People do eat other animals but people who claim to be activist for animals shouldn't go out of their way to kill another animal to prove how it's just wrong to kill other animals....it's lame.

      Move to China if you want to eat cat. Just like if you want to eat Cow you don't move to India.

      It's common sense.

    • 3 years ago
  • jubal
  • piff
    • piff [removed]  
    • This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
  • merasyad
  • videogirl_mai
  • clarity_kat
    • 0
      clarity_kat  
    • These guys should really learn to read the Terms of Service (TOS) that they sign when registering for Facebook, or any other site. A lot of them say you are not allowed to post things that are obscene, violent, illegal, graphic or lewd in nature, or show the harm of human or animals. Mainly umbrella terms that ensure the images and texts are suitable for all their community.
      I hope they will think of a different way to get their message across.

    • 3 years ago
  • huntre
    • 0
      huntre  
    • Thanks for the added info on that photo. Whew!
      For a moment...
      This story is an excellent example of how even the best intentions can backfire.

    • 3 years ago
more from Tech:

top videos