Tech | July 10, 2008 | 18 comments

Big Brother gets the greenlight

Image
bansheewail
FTC says it won't intervene to protect Internet user privacy

WASHINGTON — The Federal Trade Commission indicated Wednesday that it would leave it to data-mining Web companies and Internet marketers to decide how best to protect users' privacy.

"Self-regulation may be the preferable approach for this dynamic marketplace," Lydia Parnes, the director of the commission's Bureau of Consumer Protection, told a Senate committee.

The FTC's decision not to step in — even as Microsoft and Google representatives testified that some regulation would be helpful — means that Washington won't address the matter before a new administration and Congress take office in January.

At issue is what privacy rights consumers have when data-mining companies use their Web browsing patterns to target them for ads. It's a gold mine for online advertising and Internet marketing, but consumer and e-privacy groups say it's intrusive.

NebuAd, a media company based in Redwood City, Calif., has been in the hot seat for partnering with Internet service providers to deliver personalized ads to users' computer screens.

The company's chief executive officer, Bob Dykes, told the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee that there's no privacy lost in the process.

"NebuAd's systems are designed so that no one, not even the government, can determine the identity of our users," Dykes said.

Leslie Harris, the chief executive for the Center for Democracy and Technology, a Washington-based civil liberties group, said that NebuAd and other data-miners shouldn't be able to track browsing patterns without advance consent from computer users.

She also fears that privacy will be lost as more companies enter the field and their techniques become more sophisticated.

"Self-regulation is a piece, but self-regulation alone is not enough to protect privacy, and we need to have some baseline legislation in place," Harris said.

Microsoft and Google representatives said they supported a privacy protection scheme that included advance consent, encryption of identities and clear notification of what information was being collected.

Federal regulation would be easier for Internet companies to live by than inconsistent state and local regulations.

"There's just this emerging patchwork of federal and state privacy laws," said Michael Hintze, associate general counsel for Microsoft.

  1. groups:
    Tech,   Big Brother
  2. tags:
    Tech Internet Government Legal 16 more
  3.     
    |

18 comments // Big Brother gets the greenlight

  • BentFranklin
    • 0
      BentFranklin  
    • Don't forget you are also free to give out disinformation about yourself. Why not program a bot to surf random sites while you sleep? That should screw them up but good.

    • 3 years ago
  • AdventureBTV
  • synjun
  • J_Jammer
  • damnneargenius
  • Rainfall_Media
  • Ricky84
    • 0
      Ricky84  
    • Rainfall_Media:

      Exactly dude I was just about to post the same thing until I read your response. if you want to protect yourself from Data-mining you should download Tor. I use it all the time its great.

    • 3 years ago
  • PoisonTheMonkey
  • TexasPatriot67
  • pissedoffinarkansas
  • macdontcare
    • 0
      macdontcare  
    • Take a cookie( ha, ha, ha ) and pay via the honor system. We are entering unchartered waters. We are already be monitored. This sometimes comes in the guise of protection. The government themselves have or are in the process of perfecting this. Everyday the data world is evovling, yet we can't keep up.
      Criminals are always two steps ahead.

    • 3 years ago
  • osiris326
    • 0
      osiris326  
    • Self regulation? Yeah tell companies to be responsible and do the right thing, but hey if you don't you can make tons of money. What do you think they are going to do.

    • 3 years ago
  • TexasPatriot67
    • 0
      TexasPatriot67  
    • I agree with Bansheewail when will data profiling start.Is there no freedom no more will this lead the police and federal authorities to come to your house and ask what books are you reading and what music are you listening too, Will I-tunes start tracking what music you listen too and download and see if its subversive to see if you are a threat

    • 3 years ago
  • PaperTigerTrax
  • macdontcare
  • sonnydenbow
    • 0
      sonnydenbow  
    • PaperTigerTrax:

      For me, it was when Ronald Reagan was elected, but it probably dates back to the Nixon era. Nixon didn't believe Congress should have the authority to tell him what to do. Cheney has been quoted as saying pretty much the same thing. As long as the Supreme Court refuses to defend the Constitution, as they are suppose to, then the Constitution is just words on paper.

    • 3 years ago
  • bansheewail
    • 0
      bansheewail  
    • Everything you do is fair game. Every book you check out of the library, every search on the web, every flight you take, every parking ticket, every internet purchase, .......everything! If you think racial profiling is terrible, just wait until we are violated by "data profiling". It's coming.

    • 3 years ago
more from Tech:

top videos