Tech | July 28, 2008 | 78 comments

Virtual Strip Search

This video is no longer available.
Image
dmandel
How do you feel about airport security seeing you naked?
  1. groups:
    News and Politics,   Tech,   Green,   Earth and Science,   2 more
  2. tags:
    News and Politics Green Tech Earth and Science 6 more
  3.     
    |

78 comments // Virtual Strip Search

  • bmltv
    • 0
      bmltv  
    • I think the joke is on the TSA screeners that will be doing the viewing. Depending on their gender and orientation, I say that the majority of travelers that a screener would view in a day would not be a pleasurable experience! All jokes aside, I do believe this to be excessive, yet another step in the wrong direction for personal privacy in the US.

    • 4 years ago
  • shortbusgeek
  • AnaMireles
  • orivv
    • 0
      orivv  
    • whats next? are they gonna have them at schools and hospitals? Just another way the govt. treats us like animals!

    • 4 years ago
  • moliska
    • 0
      moliska  
    • so, is this the booth that shoots little blasts of air on you? then I was asked to go through it as dallas fortworth. Still us ladies always have the "natural safe". I'm waiting for the complimentry pap-smear!!

    • 4 years ago
  • ab92
  • OregonDuckMike
    • 0
      OregonDuckMike  
    • Yea this could help airport security i guess, but honestly, this is more of the government and media focusing on the wrong issues. Terrorism is terrible, but it's not that big of a problem in the scheme of things when compared with poverty, world-wide health crises, healthcare, global warming and the energy crises. Waste of money and a distraction from our real problems.

    • 4 years ago
  • Eri_Soulja
  • surfinfatemus
  • stvn_watkins
    • 0
      stvn_watkins  
    • With all the $$$ spent on machines such as this one, you'd think the TSA and airlines would pay more attention to the upkeep and upgrading of the airplanes. That'll help make air travel safer too...

    • 4 years ago
  • sublimeuniverse
    • 0
      sublimeuniverse  
    • 9/11 brought many changes. If you are going to fly, there are restrictions. This isn't a government office, this is private enterprise and it is part of the price we pay for the convenience and carbon emissions of flying.

    • 4 years ago
  • Mafioso
  • petarro
  • petarro
  • lcdoll920
    • 0
      lcdoll920  
    • I've personally experienced this before and it's really not that bad. I didn't feel invaded at all whatsoever. I didn't even know what was going on. I just stood there, followed the directions and was on my way. I never saw the person who got to see me 'naked' and they didn't see me either. And it's not likely that someone is going to take a picture of a half assed black and white naked picture on a computer of someone you can't even recognize. And God forbid someone did, what the hell would they do with it?

      Personally, I'd rather go through that machine than have someone pat me down. If that's what it takes to keep our planes safe, then so be it.

    • 4 years ago
  • alicynx
    • 0
      alicynx  
    • lcdoll920:

      Have you thought for a minute that our planes are already pretty damned safe, and that this invasion of your privacy is completely unwarranted?
      If you don't mind someone looking at you naked, then if someone took your picture while you were in the shower you'd be fine with that? What if you have something that easily identified you in the image? Say a scar, a disfigurement, or a birth defect that is covered by your clothing? If for some odd reason the TSA inspector thought it was funny, or interesting, and he/she posted it, even if just in the breakroom, is it still okay?
      I know this is a lot of questions, but there's a lot more to think about than just a momentary sneak peek at your goodies, and you have more at stake than ten seconds in a machine before going on your way.

    • 4 years ago
  • tasmonia
    • 0
      tasmonia  
    • This is outrageous. Flying is already incredibly safe and theses machines are unlikely to make it any safer. Between this out-of-hand security nonsense, the skyrocketing prices, and the ever-growing list of a la carte charges, I think I'm done with air travel.

    • 4 years ago
  • alicynx
    • 0
      alicynx  
    • As a mother of two who spends hours in the airport twice every month, I have serious concerns about this new technology. How old does a person have to be to avoid this technology being used on them? My daughter is seven and flies unaccompanied - they will scan her like this over my dead body, I don't care who they think they're saving!
      I would love to be able to thumb my nose at the TSA and avoid air travel, but then my child would never see her father. For some of us there is no choice, but I'll be damned if I allow strangers to look at my daughter this way.

    • 4 years ago
  • Empty_Tank
    • 0
      Empty_Tank  
    • honestly i think this is one step closer from us being sodimized by our government. they can just say its for our safety, which would give them all power to then violate of our constitutional amendments.

    • 4 years ago
  • intercitty
    • 0
      intercitty  
    • Hooray for making people the lab rats of new technology,

      a) "Is it harmful ?"
      b) "I don't know lets test it on humans at the airport."
      a) "Word."

    • 4 years ago
  • vixen0078
    • 0
      vixen0078  
    • That's fine. It really doesn't matter to me. I can choose to fly or not to fly. It's not like I am forced to walk through the machine every day to get to work or school. That would be a different story.

    • 4 years ago
  • lapineart
    • 0
      lapineart  
    • i don't really travel enough to care, but aren't those who do travel often find themselves surrendering their privacy everyday....and at a price? perhaps one may think about the other end and consider the fact that this is a "calculated precaution" intended for our own good.

    • 4 years ago
  • crashboy
    • 0
      crashboy  
    • They say the images are protected, but not from a user with a cell phone camera. it's just another invasion of privacy. Since its needed i don't mind.

    • 4 years ago
  • osiris326
    • 0
      osiris326  
    • I would rather sail across the ocean then let the government scan my body just so I can fly overseas. It starts here and slides down to a much scary police state.

    • 4 years ago
  • AroundTheWorld
    • 0
      AroundTheWorld  
    • I don't understand what they are supposedly "protecting" us from. Terrorists? Because that is not the real threat. Us letting the government step in and take more control over our freedom after every major disaster is the problem. Go to YouTube and watch Zeitgeist the Movie: World Trade Center parts 1-4.

    • 4 years ago
  • damnneargenius
  • myhead
  • Ation
  • reneelikeshugs
    • 0
      reneelikeshugs  
    • i feel the same way about the airport seeing me naked as i do seeing myself naked. i don't really care. i don't have anything to hide, be it weapons or body parts. i just think they're pushing it a little when they could have developed the machine to locate metals on the body rather than create an actual 3d physical map of your body.

    • 4 years ago
  • eldamon
    • 0
      eldamon  
    • I want to know what those that protest really have to hide. Or perhaps it's what they DON'T have that's causing the issue.

    • 4 years ago
  • seary6579
    • 0
      seary6579  
    • Personally, I love the idea of total strangers being required by the terms of their employment to gaze at my junk. Maybe I'll pack a hard salami down my trousers just to mess with em...

    • 4 years ago
  • JanaPokana
    • 0
      JanaPokana  
    • I am not an exhibitionist and it is kind of awkward, but as long as the new machine helps to ensure the safety of passengers, who cares. I seriously doubt anyone is going to get any pleasure out of this, so it really is nothing more than a job.

    • 4 years ago
  • SonicSubculture
  • diode
  • Ben_Ben
    • 0
      Ben_Ben  
    • Have any of you who like the idea of this virtual strip search ever read any of the personal stories of those who work FOR TSA?????

      I wouldn't trust ANY of those people for ANY REASON. You are telling me that they can be trusted to be professional? You telling me that they can be trusted to not inappropriately take photos??? You telling me that some schmoe off the street can be hired to do something that most doctors do not even do??? Sure, the imager doesn't save photos...but cell phones sure do.

      I would bet money that if this actually goes live across the US that within the 18 months, there will be a number of outrageous actions by TSA screeners and/or misuse by them.

    • 4 years ago
  • peterpants
    • 0
      peterpants  
    • The way I see it...

      The screener who sees the body scan at their station never sees "you", you're walled off, obfuscated, and their hi-tech job shows them body scan after body scan for an entire shift, with the occasional hitting a button and clicking a location to have the face-to-face screeners investigate you with sticks, chemicals, rubber gloves, and other weird things you're thankful their not touching you with if you pass the body scan.

    • 4 years ago
  • HighT3chR3dn3ck
  • kewal91
    • 0
      kewal91  
    • guys guys guys.... calm down..... look at the pictures... they are in GRAYSCALE... you cant exactly jack off on that.. plus how you SEEN America 2day? most people are fat or ugly .. (sorry).. you may think ur the next jessica alba but most likely you're not... so after being exposed to thousands of fatty pictures.. i dont think tsa security are going to enjoy most of the experience... and so what if your insecure about less-than-normal penis size or i just mentioned it up there ..ur fat ass or whatever....they're not going to remember who you were... your not going to be walking down the street and have an-ex agent come up to you and say...
      ""u were guy with a 2 mm penis.... good job man u set a record!!!"

      plus i rather have the 30-second scan than a guy come up to ans start rubbing himself against me all over for more than 2 min.......

    • 4 years ago
  • Dr_Dank_Thumb
  • helloimcat
    • 0
      helloimcat  
    • I wanna say that United Airlines has something like this. It actually looks like the clear and blue American Express card, and you just step into this big white step thing.
      I don't know if this is the technology they used, but I imagine it to be.

    • 4 years ago
  • onechance
  • Juas
  • Juas
    • 0
      Juas  
    • Next in airport security - we are going to taze you until you fall unconscious then we will pile you up like cattle and get you to wherever the heck you need to go.

    • 4 years ago
  • ElizabethIlia
    • 0
      ElizabethIlia  
    • Safer is a joke. All that sh!t is is an illusion of safety. I can still think of a million ways to get illegal things and things that make things go boom onto a plane.
      Next week I'm so getting a letter from the rcmp about that.

    • 4 years ago
  • shroomfairy
  • ninja_tiger
    • 0
      ninja_tiger  
    • This is scarey, invasive and down right rude....they won't be satisfied untill we are all traveling stark naked with our destinations and vital statistics tatooed to our ass.
      Enough to make you sick....they are terrorizing our entire traveling population for some threat that they should have been able to prevent in the first place. Maybe that 490 billion should have been spent teaching the administration to listen to the intelligence which would have thwarted the 911 attacks, instead of ignoring it. This is a huge waste of taxpayers money....bet we can all guess which good buddies are making a killing off of the secutity devices they terrorize us with.

    • 4 years ago
  • DrGlass
    • 0
      DrGlass  
    • Highway fatalities account for more than 94% of all transportation deaths.

      Lets spend money bringing that number down rather than this bull shit. 99.99% of people who go through security don't have anything more dangerous than liquid soap or nail files.

      I'd venture to guess that the stress inflicted by all this crap is worse for people's health than any terrorist attack.

      The drive to the airport and the crappy fast food are the real threats to most of us.

      Plus screeners are just going to snap photo's of people with their cell phones and post them on the internet anyways.

    • 4 years ago
  • renagadeoffunk74
  • shroomfairy
  • anniefree
    • 0
      anniefree  
    • This is probably a relatively crude beginning with this kind of technology, and as the future rolls around there'll be more sophisticated machines that only scan for the information necessary. It may be uncomfortable for to some, but we have to start somewhere, especially when it means saving hundreds or even thousands of inocent lives.

    • 4 years ago
  • T_Rose
    • 0
      T_Rose  
    • so the terrorists stick the weapon/ explosive/ drugs up their ass and you still can't catch them. BTW I think the reporter would have been a better choice for the scan than the fat old lady ; )

    • 4 years ago
  • ottercraft
    • 0
      ottercraft  
    • T_Rose:

      Need to start somewhere to getting our human rights back from this police state of a government. I thought this was a free country. I feel so over protected that it feels as though a noose is around my neck, and as time passes it only gets tighter.

    • 4 years ago
  • ottercraft
    • 0
      ottercraft  
    • I have traveled many times each year within the USA since 9-11, and I don't feel any safer than I had before. The only thing that I do feel is more annoyed, impatient, and taxed for the wonderful conveniences of Homeland Security. This is a complete waste of resources.

    • 4 years ago
  • kewal91
  • Jkeentauna
  • jacijacijaci
    • 0
      jacijacijaci  
    • I don't know how I really feel about this. The idea of this scanner does seem to be less intrusive because instead of standing behind glass in the middle of the airport and removing your sweater, belt, shoes, etc and being patted down (which has happened to me and it was not fun), you're essentially standing for a few moments in a telephone booth.

    • 4 years ago
  • grandmarquee
  • MEKColeman
    • 0
      MEKColeman  
    • grandmarquee:

      It's only random right now. They're testing it out. The TSA, I think, wants to eventually replace regular metal detectors with these things. I've been in one. It's weird, but everyone is rather professional. They have to be really careful because it has the possibility of being a major law suit waiting to happen.

    • 4 years ago
  • eldamon
    • 0
      eldamon  
    • They can knock their fool selves out if I don't have to wait to get on a safer plane. I really don't see how anyone has a problem with this. It's a much prettier picture than the one of them picking up pieces of you on the evening news.

    • 4 years ago
  • marpunk
    • 0
      marpunk  
    • X-raped, you can see my body but not my face. How violating, not only are you seen naked but in the name of "safety" you are only viewed as a body without any of the conditions(emotions, rights to privacy) born through humanity. I believe that airport security has reached a new low. This is infuriating. This seems enough to motivate people not to fly.

    • 4 years ago
  • iloveravi
  • lucky2bme
  • onechance
  • Owwmykneecap
  • AnaMireles
  • McGaspa
  • littlesparrow
  • J_Jammer
  • KineDa
  • graysea
  • ohh_Donna
    • 0
      ohh_Donna  
    • I've seen it @ SFO & JFK.
      I guess they make it fair with making the bodies somewhat anonymous, but the machine alone is a little tanning booth freaky..

    • 4 years ago
  • drownthem
  • Saladin
    • 0
      Saladin  
    • Just one more abuse on your liberty.

      At least they give you the right to refuse it, but otherwise it's totally invasive and stupid.

      I can't stand to fly anymore, those people disgust me and they don't make anything safer.

    • 4 years ago
  • bss05g
    • 0
      bss05g  
    • So how do I become the security guard who works the computers? I’m already really good at looking at naked people on a computer now I can get paid for it! I love home land security

    • 4 years ago
  • bss05g
    • 0
      bss05g  
    • That’s crazy! As long as it is clearly displayed what is happening to you, then there is really nothing wrong if you don’t like then don’t o to places where they have this form of security.

    • 4 years ago
  • MoonLoon
    • 0
      MoonLoon  
    • I am sure that they would be disgusted, viewing me on the machine. Otherwise, I don't care what they see! Of course their individual screens should be posted daily for public review!

    • 4 years ago
  • pigtwostep
  • Jkeentauna
    • 0
      Jkeentauna  
    • pigtwostep:

      this will definitely help with drug trafficking, as well as money laundering.
      the items collected and "confiscated" from these happenings will more than cover the cost of the machines.

    • 4 years ago
more from Tech:

top videos