Tech | September 23, 2008 | 24 comments

Genetically modified crops' days may be numbered

Image
JanforGore
Pressure from the president of the European Commission has not succeeded in advancing the cause of transgenic crops. In spite of the power wielded by the executive organ of the European Union, the bloc's member countries are gradually discontinuing the use of genetically modified seeds.

This is due in large measure to the difficulty of convincing European farmers to adopt the transgenic crop production model, which is being promoted by biotech giants, but also to increasingly vociferous protests from civil society, which is demanding that governments take an active role, according to an expert interviewed by IPS.

Genetically modified (GM) organisms, also called transgenics, are made in laboratories by inserting genes from other species of plants or animals into their original DNA, in order to improve their properties or confer resistance to external factors like pests or insecticides. Vectors, often viruses or bacteria, are used to insert the foreign genes.

In Spain and Portugal, which have the largest areas in the EU devoted to GM maize cultivation, people are beginning to question the benefits of sowing and harvesting transgenic varieties of maize, a crop native to the Americas which was the staple food of a number of indigenous cultures.

Maize was slow to be introduced in Europe, because the Central American areas where it was grown were colonised by the Spanish at the time when the Roman Catholic Church was conducting the Inquisition, and they believed that Europeans should not eat the same food as indigenous peoples because, in their view, the latter were not "children of God."

Widely used now as feed for animals, maize has been the subject of fierce controversy within the European Commission.

On the one hand, Commission President Jos; Manuel Duro Barroso is in favour of significantly increasing the production of GM maize within the EU. On the other, European Commissioner for the Environment, Stavros Dimas, is dead set against it.

The European Commission works like a cabinet government and is made up of 27 Commissioners, one from each EU member state, although they must represent the interests of the EU as a whole, not just their home country.

In October 2007, Dimas opposed European Commission approval for cultivation in the EU of two GM varieties of maize, Bt-11 and 1507, because "possible long-term risks to the environment and biodiversity are not completely known, and environmental effects resulting from the cultivation of the GM maize lines are unacceptable."

"However, the majority of the Commissioners are in favour of GM maize, and the final decision has been postponed twice because a consensus could not be reached," Portuguese biologist Margarida Silva, the national coordinator of Plataforma Transgnicos Fora, comprising 12 Portuguese non-governmental organisations working on agriculture and the environment and networking with likeminded NGOs in the EU, told IPS.

Duro Barroso tried to convince Dimas to withdraw his objections in April, while simultaneously requesting an assessment by the European Food Safety Authority, "with the purpose of undermining the legitimacy of Dimas' stance," according to Silva, who is also a university professor.

Silva said that "the movement against transgenics is growing in civil society throughout Europe, and GM crops have already been banned in several countries."

snip

A huge, unified movement of people in favour of declaring a moratorium on the cultivation of GM crops has emerged in Spain and Portugal, following a similar decision taken in March by the French government that invoked the "safeguard clause" allowing an EU member state to bypass a community directive.

Silva said France based its decision "on a set of 25 scientific studies indicating risks to the environment, farming and human health derived from the cultivation of GM maize."
_______________

Photo credit:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/tony_penfold/2657046712/

  1. groups:
    News and Politics,   Tech,   Green,   Earth and Science
  2. tags:
    News and Politics Green Tech Earth and Science 15 more
  3. recommended by:
    Vierotchka
  4.     
    |

24 comments // Genetically modified crops' days may be numbered

  • 3oc
    • 0
      3oc  
    • Do we really want to stop GM?

      If the answer is yes (I hope it is) then we need to find ways of determining what is and what isn't a GM product. In the US this isn't going to be easy but it is doable. It's somewhat easier in other countries at present but I believe that will soon change under the new proposed trade agreements penned by Codex Alimentarius and being pushed by the WTO and WHO.

      It would take some research and leg work. Too much in fact for any one person but if everyone interested started looking into where products you buy come from, how they are manufacture and by whom and shared their findings we'd be half way home.

      Perhaps a good place to start would be here:-
      http://todayyesterdayandtomorrow.wordpress.com/category/eating-can-kill-you/shop...

      They have more info on the home page:-
      http://todayyesterdayandtomorrow.wordpress.com/

      If you know of other sites please post em.

      The only way we will get rid of GM food is if we stop buying it!

      More info on Codex Alimentarius here:-
      http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php?page_id=157

    • 3 years ago
  • jubal
  • WisconsinNorm
  • 3oc
    • 0
      3oc  
    • WisconsinNorm:

      Sorry WinsonsinNorm I should have made this clearer. The two ears are a genetic MUTATION caused by side effects of the GM process. The problem in eating this stuff is that the GM process creates altered DNA and therefore altered Long Chain Proteins. Our bodies have evolved to process and digest the regular LCP's and not the genetically altered variety. If you want to be a Guinea Pig for Monsanto there may not be a problem in your lifetime. It may be your great grandchildren that are born with long stalks and twice as many ears.

    • 3 years ago
  • WisconsinNorm
    • 0
      WisconsinNorm  
    • WisconsinNorm:

      It's refreshing you returned this comment to me, I was going to contact you as well regarding terminology of concepts regarding genetics.

      I am truly baffled by genetics of the "mutational variety" versus "messing around". and what the future could hold. Both good and bad as usual!

      It is hard to fathom how all dog breeds are still wolves and how a Kenyan marathon runner is still the same genetic structure as a Chinese gymnast.

      Have you ever read the book "Guns, Germs, and Steel?" Talk about genetics! Talk about a new spin on history! I think a "must read" for everybody.

      I can only hope that common sense prevails regarding food intake and production. I have a bugaboo about fast food restaurants and national chains serving foods in general. I haven't been in one for thirty years...Trust me, everyone my age asks me why my wife and I look and feel as well as we do and as of yet neither of us take no medications for anything--I attribute it in part to our boycott of processed/mass produced foods and staying out of Wal-Marts (Wal-Mart is another 30 year old issue I'll save for another time)

      Right now, I think we all need to press for accurate product labeling and know whether the food we are eating is a mutational variant or an engineered specimen...I do not like hormones in anything that aren't "natural" or integrated "natural defenses" coded into any plant not obtained through mutation.

      Scary stuff, but I will miss watching the future develop.

      Unfortunately, without a major reduction of population, the future of agriculture will be intense. Just think about 7 billion plus people wanting organic foods from small, controlled plots...There is not enough farmland to pull that one off--maybe most future humanity will live under and over the sea.

      I like the young, they "got problems" and they "got solution"--I hope!

    • 3 years ago
  • 3oc
    • 0
      3oc  
    • WisconsinNorm:

      It pleases me to hear that you and your wife are experiencing above average health. It is rare these days. Perhaps you could share more details for other readers.

      Genetics in plant and animal populations when controlled by nature results in stronger healthier generations or the strain dies off preventing further problems. When man intervenes and futzes with the building blocks of life, DNA, the end results are indeterminate and can take generations to show up. If nature found ways to blend Moth genes

      The labeling of GM good should be a big toxic waste sticker warning people to leave it alone.

      Overpopulation is less of a problem than the consummate waste, government subsidy, international trade agreements, biofuels and gluttony. Not to mention the transgenic mutations in natural crops caused by cross pollination from GM varieties.

      I feel for the generations to come. Our western society has brought about so many problems through short term thinking that these issues will be around for generations to come.

      GM food should be outlawed now!

      Good health to you all.

    • 3 years ago
  • 3oc
    • 0
      3oc  
    • Sorry to disappoint you WisconsinNorm but the long stem, multi eared corn is a GM variety. Most of the corn grown in the USA and many other countries is already GM. Watch the documentary "The World According to Monsanto" part one above.

    • 3 years ago
  • WisconsinNorm
    • 0
      WisconsinNorm  
    • Finally, csmonut has touched on the real issue. If someone could get posted the United Nations projections on world hunger and its relationship to present levels of agricultural output, you will see the same thing---more, more, more, people and product. The UN is always concerned...particularly when unknown climate change is factored.

      If you were to walk through a cornfield of 40 years ago and then one today, you would notice four subtle differences today 1) The corn is grown more tightly 2) The ears of corn are higher off the ground to reduce predation from "smaller ground animals i.e.pheasants, groundhogs, geese" 3) The ears of corn are larger 4) Many corn plants have two ears per stalk.

      I believe all of the above changes occurred without genetic modification other than intelligent cross-breeding

      I don't know why each stalk cannot have two or even three ears on it--it might have to do with "ear weight" collapsing the stalk prior to harvest. A GM experiment would be attempted here. If one could have a corn plant with a stronger stalk which could support three ears of corn prior to harvest---you get the picture, I hope.

      All of the above increases yield for a hungry world...

      I guess what I am trying to say is intelligent cross breeding without GM has given terrific results.

      The insecticide / pesticide / fertilizer issues--Man, be careful here...GM is experimenting into these territories. For example, what attracts a corn borer to the plant in the first place? If the corn plant could have a "natural" repellent genetically engineered into its genome, or a natural "poison" to kill the grub, but not people, which would allow less pesticide usage--isn't this a good thing?

      These are the types of GM experimentation which are going on as well...Technology will always be a double sword, but in my heart I might lean toward better pesticide research than to eat a GM food or at least a GM which has modified what we eat rather than the plant structure itself.

      As usual, a neutral answer...sorry!

    • 3 years ago
  • csmonut
    • 0
      csmonut  
    • I realize that to feed the billions of people now on this earth, and the billions more to come, there will have to be more efficient use of water, and more efficient use of crops.
      Genetic modification does not sound like the answer.
      Besides, they still use massive amounts of persticides, so what's the point of GM?

    • 3 years ago
  • futuregen
    • 0
      futuregen  
    • Thank you JanforGore for your activism and information. Corn is growing under my bird feeders from fallen seed; but I bet it is GM seed so I guess I will pull it. I was so looking forward to some free bird seed as it is quite expensive and I go through a lot of it. No telling what it is doing to the birds. Monsanto should be shut down. St Louis (home to Monsanto) is full of "Pro-Life" Catholics. That is where Pope John Paul II visited in Jan. 1999. To bad the "pro-life" Catholics won't stand up for life in all it's forms.

    • 3 years ago
  • 3oc
    • 0
      3oc  
    • I wouldn't trust any Government to keep us safe from GM foods. Government in collusion with the WHO, WTO and the Corporate GM giants like Monsanto are actively making back room deals and signing trade agreements that affect us all.

      All GM foods should be banned. The long term effects of modifying nature are devastating as can be seen by the average health of US citizens when compared to other nations where GM foods are not readily available.

      Don't take my word for it. Do a Google search for Monsanto, or watch this video:-
      http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=451097355502728465&ei=NyLaSN3oB4SKqQ...

    • 3 years ago
  • JanforGore
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • Unfortunately, their weedkilling poisons have already done their damage to our environment. Darkhorsejim I agree with you.... look at what we do here and do the opposite.That seems to be how you stay healthy. The FDA has to be one of the most corrupted agencies in this country... alongside the EPA and all the rest of them. The multinationals have been allowed to infiltrate our food, our milk, our water, our air, and it was all done without our consent.

      People in America when they are made known of GM foods on the whole do not wish to purchase them. We need a farmer revolution in this country that refuses to sign Monsanto's deceiving contract thus binding them for life to their fake food, seeds, and poisons. Farmers now who stand up however, are intimidated, have their organic crops polluted by transgenic pollination, or are bought out. There is nothing these companies won't do to make a profit. If the people then use the power they have with their voices in great numbers, perhaps we can turn back what is happening.... although, these foods have already been on the market for over a decade, and so many are still in the dark about it.

      Demanding wholesome natural food the way nature intended is our right, so I do hope to see a backlash in America as we are seeing in Europe and also in Africa. The only way transgenics will get to Africa on the whole is by playing up a food shortage, and that is exactly what the World Bank is doing in order to collude with these companies to make a profit.They don't care on whit about starving people. If they did they would be getting real food to them NOW, not making backdoor political deals.

    • 3 years ago
  • desertcat
    • 0
      desertcat  
    • Maybe I am wrong but to me if they control the crops thru transgenics then what to stop them from further control thru other means. Sort of like Soylent Green. Food in little pills, eliminate the need to do large shopping, less cabinets needed etc. I might be paranoid but anytime big business gets involved I have to think why. Its not enough they are buying up the family farms they want total control. we have to stop buying the products, it may cost more for natural but in the long run our earth and health will do better.

    • 3 years ago
  • darkhorsejim
    • 0
      darkhorsejim  
    • Finally, genetically modified or engineered crops are getting the 10-foot pole treatment. Let's hope that it becomes a trend, a movement & a revelation-or revolution, whatever it takes, that topples Monsanto once & for all. The rest of the world just has to look at us & do the opposite to see how to benefit their society.

    • 3 years ago
  • queenofit
    • 0
      queenofit  
    • "Parallel Development" by Yajanua

      "You people," she says, " believe that your civilization has developed for thousands of years, that you can look back to ancient cultures in Asia and the Middle East and trace this development through Europe and into the United States. You say you've made great progress and this is true in many ways. You also look at us, the Shuar and other indigenous people, and you say that we haven't developed, that we've been static, that our lives are 'primitive'. But it simply isn't true. We've always developed. We've cultivated forest plants, learned new ways to fish and hunt; our shamans are constantly understanding new things about healing, journeying, and using herbal remedies. We've developed too -- but the difference is in how it happened. Our way has always! taken into account all other live forms and the lives of our children's children. For us the word 'progress' does not apply if it threatens other species or could possibly harm future generations. How could that be progress? So we've developed in parallel to you -- only we've done it very, very differently." (Spirit of the Shuar by John Perkins)

      How can we be so full of ourselves?

      Life is about learning perspective, and I honor that. I plan on keeping humility and sincerity as my top goals in life.

      Honoring Planet Earth as bet I can.

    • 3 years ago
  • Relevations
    • 0
      Relevations  
    • queenofit:

      ..queenofit.....thank you.....there are Universal truths that so many have been tapped into forever.....the majority of humans on this planet are so lost.....and so much wisdom has been destroyed over the ages.....but the knowledge awaits those that seek it ...Golden Ruler...Johnnie

    • 3 years ago
  • googolplexer
  • kDrew_Productions
  • dissimulator
  • intelligenceisacurse
  • dkincheloe
  • Relevations
    • 0
      Relevations  
    • ....crossing plants and self pollinating has been a part of farming for around ten thousand years.....indigenous people across the now called Americas had trade routes and traded seeds from the most hardy plants.....and they even adapted plants to grow in different climate zones....the Incas and Mayans were brilliant at this and many more things....no one has ever come close to the Incas...it mentions Spain....the Catholic church.....and the Indigenous people......try to imagine for a second what this world would be like if no group of people had ever tried to force their God on any other group...and had instead tried to learn from all those that were different from themselves.....Heaven...I guess.....an over populated Heaven....Golden Ruler...Johnnie Hargrave...

    • 3 years ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • And once again, Europe has more wisdom and caring about matters that effect humanity. It gives me hope that there are many people in this world who truly care about our environment, the health and safety of people and biodiversity. I now look for foods imported from countries where I know GM maize and soy is not being grown and used in food. There is a much better chance of not having it in breads, crackers, etc. than buying the processed foods that are made here. As long as GM corn and soy is added to at least 80% of the food here I will do what I can to boycott it. And using a 'food shortage' as an excuse to push GM crops is a true deception. We have plenty of food in the world... we just need the mechanisms to get it to people without the rich controlling its distribution to push up tariffs and put farmers in debt. Conventional, traditional, natural food is the way to go for our planet. I say, thank you people of Europe!

    • 3 years ago
more from Tech:

top videos