Tech | December 01, 2008 | 66 comments

Pentagon to build 'ethical' robot soldiers

Image
abbym0308
Because history has taught us that we are incapable of going to war without our front line soldiers succumbing to fear and seeking vengeance often in the form of war crimes (how dare they), the Pentagon has pulled together a massive budget and hired some British robotics experts to build "autonomous systems" (Pentagon-speak for robots) that won't violate the Geneva conventions. Go Defense Department!
  1. groups:
    Tech,   Green,   Science,   Current News US
  2. tags:
    Green Tech Science War 6 more
  3.     
    |

66 comments // Pentagon to build 'ethical' robot soldiers

  • Cynic2
    • 0
      Cynic2  
    • I wonder if they'll be deployed to fight dinosaurs?? If we don't fight 'em over there, we'll have to fight 'em over here, you know. Before you readers say I'm crazy, I'm alluding to DC Comics' STAR SPANGLED WAR STORIES, which was popular when I was a kid. There, the Army used android-type robots. One, named Joe, would obey vocal commands from his/its human partner. They were stationed in the Pacific, so they had to fight the Japanese as well as the dinosaurs. The other, named Jake, in the same comic, i believe, but later, just fought the Japanese. Art imitates life imitates art.

    • 3 years ago
  • lazloman
    • 0
      lazloman  
    • There are two problems with this:
      1) They don't really know what will happen when they deploy these things
      2) Although I'm in favor of getting humans off the battlefield. I'm afraid that using robots will make it a lot easier to go to war.

    • 3 years ago
  • ximalim
    • 0
      ximalim  
    • Ethical? So a whole bunch of robots are going to be programmed with American ethics? With all this bull floating around I'm wondering if its worth thinking to live past 40.

    • 3 years ago
  • ColdWorld
    • 0
      ColdWorld  
    • Since when can a machine be ethical? Is it in the same way a bomb can be smart? Oh, I get it, only unethical guns kill people.

    • 3 years ago
  • megagrigg
  • livejelly
    • 0
      livejelly  
    • don't agree with this because it is unnecessary. we do not need to improve on war or how to kill better. we do not need more machines like this. & the money can be used for something else. I hope current pres. elect & team are prepared to question this type of project firmly. they have to solve little problems first before strating on this type of thing. similar to spending billions for space projects when most of the problems on earth are not solved. that wuld create problems continuing even if we go to space. point: so before building robot soldiers, we need to spend money to solve problem of war & to not have war. Then we should get to vote on it & the vote should be a lound NO!

      They cannot judge truly, this is not a solution by looking at all sides, it is a quick fix and in addition waste of space & precious metals. is it fair to have robot soldiers fight human soldiers of 'enemies'?--a big sympathy for other side cause humans identify with humans. OR is the nex thing robots fighting each other.
      then it is easy!
      Warmongers, why don't you all get together and play a war video game- world of warcraft perhaps or
      Call of Duty modern warfare wuld be right up yr alley.

      Play nice :-P

    • 3 years ago
  • Dmitri_Molotov
  • ILiveonaClock
  • charmedkitten
  • Dmitri_Molotov
  • CalgarC
    • 0
      CalgarC  
    • great so now america can do all the killing from the comfort of their own couch. you wil seenew soldiers and fresh troops operating these things like videogames.

    • 3 years ago
  • purplefox
    • 0
      purplefox  
    • you mean robots that're more ethical than some of the troops that're already on the ground? here's hoping, though coming from the Pentagon, I'll only believe it when I see it.. I guess at least robots shouldn't derive a sadistic pleasure from torture and humiliation...

    • 3 years ago
  • PamelaSC
    • 0
      PamelaSC  
    • Pentagon.....ethical....talk about an oxymoron....emphasis on the "moron" part. Our tax dollars at work, people! Hope they think to install Norton on those robocops....oh, WAIT. No one could hack into the Pentagon soldiers, right? OMG.....

    • 3 years ago
  • manfreddrake
    • 0
      manfreddrake  
    • So they would ignore Asimovs prime directives, thus putting the robot in the position of chosing between ethics and mission. Have they not seen what the result of this is in the movies-the anniliation of the annihilation of the human race!

    • 3 years ago
  • Alex_French
  • oneofthree
  • damnneargenius
  • thejesse2011
  • idealist
    • 0
      idealist  
    • ethical is the key word.. im sure they will be built that way but allso they will leave room for attachments.. like big ass guns! yaaaa!

    • 3 years ago
  • cwhite
  • Twana
    • 0
      Twana  
    • I'm kinda scared that this could turn into an I Robot thing. All of a sudden the robots will go haywire and start killing people left and right and they wont be killing “ethically” anymore.

    • 3 years ago
  • L1beration
    • 0
      L1beration  
    • This is a pipe dream. As others have already posted, AI just isn't this far along yet. And for that matter if a robot makes a mistake, who will be held responsible? A smarter move would be remotely controlled "bots." Since this would remove the troops from the front line, it would provide an emotional disconnect. What motive does a professional soldier remotely controlling a robot have to commit war crimes? Problem solved.

    • 3 years ago
  • quizads
  • crob80227
    • 0
      crob80227  
    • Robots will never be sophisticated enough to handle the delicate task of stacking POW's into naked pyramids and then ass raping them.

      We will always needs humans (and a Republican President) in order to "ethically" ass rape our Prisoners of War.

      No machine can replace that human touch!

    • 3 years ago
  • Dragunov316
    • 0
      Dragunov316  
    • And by the way, why are we giving billions to England, when the gov't subsidizes MIT for this very thing.

      Japan makes robots that cook, and we're making robots to kill.

    • 3 years ago
  • Dragunov316
    • 0
      Dragunov316  
    • No American trust the government, which is why confidence levels are at an all time low.

      The American gov't will use the robots to kill whatever they won't and then claim that it was a computer malfunction. Since the robots have no consciousness, much like the gov't, there will never be anyone charged for war crimes and no need for psychiatric therapy.

      On the brighter side, thinks of all the American lives it will save.

    • 3 years ago
  • extracrazykiwi2008
  • netstorm2k8
  • no_bull
    • 0
      no_bull  
    • The headline assumes making war is ethical. Who is going to program the ethical warrior? Are they to be modeled after the Trojans so the Generals can over ride the Ethics chip and still have plausible deniability?

    • 3 years ago
  • AlbeeYap
  • gizmoismeno
    • 0
      gizmoismeno  
    • if it wasn't hard enought to go to sleep know i have to think about this. the world minds could make a robot to help surgen, but in stead the goverment is using it money and power to make a robot that can kill on it own. then again anything that could save more of are soldiers life. i don't like this idea

    • 3 years ago
  • Tayllerand
    • 0
      Tayllerand  
    • Did you people not learned your lesson with robocop...machines can not make the right judment
      specially if we are talking about life.

    • 3 years ago
  • seanalyn
  • current89
    • 0
      current89  
    • The problem with going to war with robots is that , the human element is lost. And once the human element is lost, war truly just becomes a game for the one using the A.I. or robots.

    • 3 years ago
  • div
    • 0
      div  
    • Whose ethics are they going to use to determine the ethics of these robots? 'Cause my ethics probably ain't the same as that of the US gov't.

    • 3 years ago
  • naznuff
  • maha_aba
  • SushiBandit
  • Leonidis
  • partyrager
  • petarro
  • samthesixth
  • unimatrix0
    • 0
      unimatrix0  
    • Sexy headline, but a robot can be neither ethical or unethical unless it has intelligence and a sense of self. Clearly the technology in Artificial Intelligence is not that far along. To be ethical implies the ability to make rational choices as well as belonging to some sort of community.

      I don't think an autonomous system necessarily qualifies as an ethical agent.

    • 3 years ago
  • IMMININT
  • ClareW
    • 0
      ClareW  
    • That's scary, it's so much like Asimov's I Robot, except they obey the Geneva Convention, slightly more complex than the three laws...

    • 3 years ago
  • NoGodsNoMasters
  • flyingkick
    • 0
      flyingkick  
    • This is the Eisenhower's Military Industrial Complex in action.
      It's also how we've developed most of our technology in general since WW2.
      The high tech industry gets a Pentagon subsidy for research that will ultimately benefit the private sector.
      We probably won't see any robot soldiers for a while, but corporations will have the technology to develop better artificial intelligence for consumers.

    • 3 years ago
  • Sons_Of_Liberty
    • 0
      Sons_Of_Liberty  
    • Sound like a story line from the great Fallout games, namely Fallout 3 were we nuke out world and then all it's left is robots, humans (infrected), and super mutants, a ethical robot, doubtful.

    • 3 years ago
  • thejesse2011
  • patient215norcal
    • 0
      patient215norcal  
    • Making robot killing machines is what
      our armed forces do best. Just now we
      do it without humans. Do robots suffer
      from p.t.s.d. or just the programmers?

    • 3 years ago
  • Illari
  • Stunner1
  • bss05g
  • eldamon
  • Yoshi1
    • 0
      Yoshi1  
    • Ethics for military robots? What happens if the general (or whoever) wants the robot to do something that is in violation of the ethics rules it has been programed with? Is there an over ride for the military higher ups? As humans we aren't always going to be ethical so having a human oversee these robots will cause problems. Well it'll cause problems if and when something like this actually gets released.

    • 3 years ago
  • Ken1138
    • 0
      Ken1138  
    • LOL, talk about putting the cart before the horse. They might want to spend some of that trillion-dollar Pentagon budget on creating "robot soldiers" that don't resemble tinker-toy go-carts with cameras and machine-guns slapped on top with duct tape and baling wire. Whenever people talk about "robot soldiers" I always think of the Robin Williams movie "Toys".

      Small steps, army guys...gotta take the small steps...

      On another note, I think we should start ensuring that iPhones are programmed with the Three Laws of Robotics...can never be too careful.

    • 3 years ago
  • AutifK
    • 0
      AutifK  
    • Hmm... It's like my cartoons are coming to life... Anyway, I agree with the couple posts in regards to the question of what is it that the Pentagon considers ethical.

    • 3 years ago
  • Stradius
    • 0
      Stradius  
    • Robots are only as ethical as their owners make them. I'm sure they're also imagining that since robot soldiers aren't humans they don't count if they're used to violate human rights.

    • 3 years ago
  • kur_zyr
  • Moopak
    • Moopak  
    • This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
  • NeogenesisFortuna
  • ackra
  • Wesnology61
  • current89
  • denzuko
    • 0
      denzuko  
    • ackra:

      not even close, sorry to say but the DOD is more after "droids" than "gundam". The gundam mechs are no more than over evolved tank/samuri armor hybrids. But still a fun anime to watch.

    • 3 years ago
  • thejesse2011
more from Tech:

top videos