Tech | August 11, 2009 | 102 comments

New Chevy Volt to get 230 MPG city

Image
ebindelglass
General Motors Corp. said Tuesday its Chevrolet Volt rechargeable electric car should get 230 miles per gallon of gasoline in city driving, more than four times the mileage of the current champion, the Toyota Prius.
  1. groups:
    Community,   Tech,   Green,   Current Tonight,   7 more
  2. tags:
    News News and Politics Green Environment 12 more
  3.     
    |

102 comments // New Chevy Volt to get 230 MPG city

  • theauthor
  • Wetdog
    • 0
      Wetdog  
    • ---------------"Sure, the car has to run off of electricity which is produced by a plant that emits tons (literally) of CO2 emissions, but it's a step forward."-------------

      FORWARD???????? A few more steps forward like that and we'll have backed over the cliff.

      GM has promised this car for years------still no car.

      I really question the engineering quaification of a company that measures electricity in gallons. That is just too plain stupid for words.

      Not to mention that there is no assurance that there will even BE a GM next year, let alone a Volt.

      Using GMs logic---the VW Passat bifuel will get 260 miles per gallon, and costs around $20,000.

      http://green.autoblog.com/2008/02/28/geneva-08-preview-volkswagen-passat-variant...

      http://www.carfolio.com/specifications/models/car/?car=197527#a_chassis

      Golf Plus comes in bi fuel model and is on sale now.

      http://www.worldcarfans.com/109061219908/vw-reveals-golf-plus-bifuel--lpg-or-pet...

      Clean Diesel offers superior performance with economy equal to or greater than hybrids with no batteries. VW has four Clean Diesel models and plans to offer Jetta with factory installed natural gas bifuel early next year. With a comparative octane of 120, natural gas can make full use of the performance and high efficiency of diesel engines. As a gas fuel, natural gas will make diesel engines easy to start and run in cold conditions.

      http://tdi.vw.com/clean-diesel-vehicles/?sem=208416580;

      Factory installed diesel/natural gas vehicles will have none of the problems associated with liquid diesel only---and both liquid diesel and natural gas can use a mix of bio source fuels in any proportion with no loss of perfomance or economy up to and including 100% bio. With no modification needed.

    • 2 years ago
  • mgerlach22
    • 0
      mgerlach22  
    • Great. Now we've got a car aimed at lowering emissions and reducing the carbon footprint. Where does all the extra electricity come from that will be needed to recharge these cars? Oh that's right, coal and oil power plants. Gee, what a great concept. Is the point to reduce energy consumption, or shift the foces from emissions to power plant productivity?

    • 2 years ago
  • manfreddrake
  • rachelmfd
  • QuestionGeek
    • 0
      QuestionGeek  
    • Prijedor I doubt if they pump up the price of this car so people can't buy it. Flat Screen tvs were just as ridiculously priced when they were first introduced to the market back in the late 1990's

      The price of the car is probably pumped up so they can see what people will pay for it eventually and recoup as much of what they can on their initial investment which is very expensive.

    • 2 years ago
  • hunzedog
    • 0
      hunzedog  
    • it is a shitty car. GM is a shitty company for moving to mexico and overseas so they didnt have to pay competitive wages or insurance or retirement.(REMEMBER NAFTA ?) now "boo hoo" they make shitty cars and nobody wants em.CASH FOR CLUNKERS ACTUALLY HURTS POOR PEOPLE !!!YOU ONLY HELP RICH PEOPLE BY DESTROYING POOR PEOPLES RESOURSES..... stupid should be painfull ; so people know when they have IT !!!!!

    • 2 years ago
  • wierdobeardo
    • 0
      wierdobeardo  
    • A boycott of GM is not smart. Neither is hoping for it's demise. It is a big part of our economy and many people make a living off of them. We all have a stake in the future and the public is now basically shareholders. As so we need to demand quality. So what if it uses electricity it's a step forward. It will take them a while to make the products that we are all demanding from this company. All we can do is move forwards and once again put American companies at the forefront again and be prosperous again. The public transportation problem in the us now is because of our local governments not gm so aim your criticisms in a constructive way. We need to focus on solutions not problems to get ahead.

    • 2 years ago
  • hunzedog
  • papersydney
    • 0
      papersydney  
    • Everytime I see this ad I wonder.. only 23MPG.. I can ride a Bike and get better MPG.. with a buritto.. the ad agency definately needed to think that through.maybe putting the plug inside a "ZERO"

    • 2 years ago
  • specked
    • 0
      specked  
    • Too bad the Nissan Leaf is said to get 367 MPG.

      Telsa Motors is the really interesting American car company to follow.

    • 2 years ago
  • evready
  • rickm8
    • 0
      rickm8  
    • So it uses a battery eh? OH good, so they have to still mine the nickel and copper for the power.

      I heard that open cast mining is AWSOOOMMEEE for the environment. **rolls eyes**

      And that electricity is all from renewable resources! **pushes in news caster ear piece** wait, nope, its not. Still throwin' coal in the old furnace for the car to run.

      Get off your extremely tall horses and recognize that you're not helping shit, well, except your ego.

    • 2 years ago
  • krush_productions
  • QuestionGeek
    • 0
      QuestionGeek  
    • Who in the hell at this point trusts GM's integrity?? Almost everything they touch turns to manure. They're going to mess this project up too. Just watch.

      And does anyone else find it suspicious that instead of all the hype that GM wants to make about their 95% pipe dream Chevrolet ; they did not reintroduce the EV1? IF the EV1 were re-introduced it would be a instant mega hit. However it would be the EV2 by this time. But no, we can't OFFEND the oil companies can we? 40 miles on electricity people is no big whoop. Many of us, especially on the west coast, drive much further distances than that. And most of us are probably tired of internal combustion engines. I know I am.

      If this car is really going to get this high mileage, their competition is ready to smack them down to bankruptcy again. Just watch.

      And another person on here put it in an eloquent, although vulgar tone, about the corruption when it comes to USA business --> IF THE USA AUTO COMPANIES WOULD TAKE THE OIL INDUSTRY'S DICK OUT OF THEIR MOUTH FOR 2ND, we might really see some effort towards driving cars with a variety of engine technologies on the road. This is what the youth of USA wants, and it's what the environment needs.. And since youth drives the future, we need to start thinking about what they are going to want to buy and coddle. And to be fair a lot of us that are middle aged and older want to see change when it comes to automobile engine technology too.

      Heil Tesla! But GM? --- Phooey. I defecate on them, and so do many if not most of us.

    • 2 years ago
  • Nephwrack
  • futurehempfarmer
  • hunzedog
    • 0
      hunzedog  
    • and it wont even go 40 whole miles if you like to use things like.the radio, the headlights, (usefull at night) or the air conditioner ! that sucking sound you hear is your country going down the toilet.

    • 2 years ago
  • hunzedog
    • 0
      hunzedog  
    • if the US would get big pharma's dick out of their mouth for a second. we could have cars that are grown from the ground. hows that for eco friendly ?

    • 2 years ago
  • hunzedog
    • 0
      hunzedog  
    • yes i said i would never buy a chevy, but it looks like i am anyway! with 7500 dollar rebates and billions of dollars of my money going for commercials and deals with ebay.......screw them ! talk about your ponzi schemes , huh. ? go to canada and mexico where they make em ! the only people getting helped by buying junk for 5 times what its worth is the government !

    • 2 years ago
  • benway
    • 0
      benway  
    • After watching "who killed the electric car" and doing additional research on GM's gestapo tactics as regards muscling their vehicles into markets that were already served by electric trolleys and buses, I wouldn't buy another car from them even if they weren't overpriced, overweight, underbuilt and just plain ugly as hell.

    • 2 years ago
  • jac1992
    • 0
      jac1992  
    • Hell,, if they want to spend taxpayers money on a car you don't have to go to the garage for 1000 miles at least, i say go ahead

    • 2 years ago
  • QuestionGeek
    • 0
      QuestionGeek  
    • Gee, isn't this the same company that had an electric car a few years ago called the EV1, but they crushed them all, and prosecuted those with legal action that wanted to keep them. Now we are supposed to be all warm and fuzzy over the Chevy Volt, which by the way is 10 years behind the competition.

      They can take their Volt and shove it up their derriere's for all I care. People should NOT support this corporation. They're sinister and lie through their teeth. They are the reason the U.S.A. does not have an interconnected and efficient public transportation system like Europe does.

      For those fools that wanna yell support GM and buy American (there are plenty of those) Well, your American car darlings sell their crap in every corner of the modern world and have robbed you of more than $50billion to soak into their successful China business ventures.

      They don't give a damn about the USA. The USA roads are merely their test track. Yeah, that's how big of a company they are.

    • 2 years ago
  • jackscrack99
    • 0
      jackscrack99  
    • i just know that sooner or later we will have to make that complete jump to electric cars. its only a matter of time until it truly forces us to do so. the capability of creating such cars is easily accessible. its just whether or not they do it, and if the customers will be willing. willingness from the United States will not come easy.

    • 2 years ago
  • Randle51
    • 0
      Randle51  
    • In June 9, 2006, “NOW” by PBS had a program titled, Timeline: Life and Death of the Electric Car and on November 14, 2006 was a documentary titled, “Who Killed the Electric Car?” by Sony on DVD. In that documentary, Victor Wonk built the first full-sized hybrid automobile in the United States, ironically a Buick Skylark supplied by G.M. in 1970, as part of the Federal Clean Car Incentive program.

      In 1988, Roger Smith, CEO at G.M. agrees to team up with AeroVironment of California to build a practical consumer car called the “EV1” (Electronic Vehicle). Between the years 1996-2000, a few thousand all-electric cars were manufactured by automakers, such as: Honda EV Plus; G.M. EV1; Ford Ranger pickup EV; Nissan Altra EV; Chevy S-10 EV; and Toyota RAV4 EV.

      There was just one little catch, though; none of the vehicles were for purchase, just for lease. By the early 2000’s “all” the major automakers production of all-electric cars were discontinued; why? G.M. announces that it will not renew leases on the EV1 models, saying, it can no longer supply the parts to repair the vehicles” and it plans to reclaim all the cars by the end of 2004.

      Now, after receiving billions in "Taxpayer Bailout" money, GM has decided to manufacture a few hundred-a- month, 230 mpg Chevy "Volt" cars to compete with the pricey $40,000 Toyota "Prius." The only thing is, this is just another hybrid car and not an "all-Electric" automobile; like the earlier EV-1. Not only that, but once again, the battery only keeps a charge up to a distance of 40 miles before the gasoline-driven internal combustion engine begins to guzzle petro.

      The answer to kicking the addiction to fossil fuels altogether is in the continued development of lithium-ion, solar fuel cell technology, or some other form of energy, possibly chemical to replace using fossil fuels for our transportation needs.

    • 2 years ago
  • newbeginnings
  • whodeydray
  • whodeydray
    • 0
      whodeydray  
    • China contributes the most damage to the sulfur emissions and stratospheric haze in the world. (google: Beijing smog). Mr. President said he wants "green energy" for Americans. With an optomistic view, GM might have the "auto-of-the-future"...

    • 2 years ago
  • larrysnotes
  • jjkenjr
    • 0
      jjkenjr  
    • I am blown away at how negative everyone is on the price....New technology is always expensive. Doesn't anyone remember the zack morris cell phone. Now Cell phones are free. I believe the future will be in natural gas and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles but at least this is something different than what is already out there.

    • 2 years ago
  • s_peak
    • 0
      s_peak  
    • So sick of this "carrot on a stick" BS. Chevy got us into this mess and continues to make it worse... buying this car will only screw us further. We HAVE TO phase out combustion engines, people need to get different jobs, we need to start making serious change... and this is just more garbage to add to the pile that's already falling over. Sick of it!

      Fuck the Chevy Volt, and fuck Chevy for continuing to baby step us away from their subsidiaries because they KNOW the timeframe and money associated with buying new cars. We're never gonna make progress with these assholes holding back the floodgate on the inevitable shift that MUST happen in every industry in the world towards efficiency and uprooting the rotten industries that are dug in so deep and intertwined beneath us. If it's not revolutionary... say no! The money has to go to a more deserved place.

      The Aptera is coming out in October!!! It's almost here! Google it! THAT'S a step in the right direction.

      Also... the cheaper Tesla is coming next year, too, right?

    • 2 years ago
  • S3th
  • whodeydray
  • j_chataigne
    • 0
      j_chataigne  
    • I fell like this is a great PR move but as with every Chevy move it has a fatal flaw. Does the company really know the market for a 40k electric car? Because I feel like if they did know they would realize their market is small.

    • 2 years ago
  • Drach
    • 0
      Drach  
    • My VW gets almost 50 MPG and it's 5 years old.

      The TDI costs a little more, but I've noticed I've saved a lot in fuel costs when compared to my previous car.

      The Prius isn't the only car that can boast 50 MPG.

      Good to see some progress though.

    • 2 years ago
  • GreeneConsulting
    • 0
      GreeneConsulting  
    • Sounds like some one figure it out finally.. good for GM but for all you that feel that you will never buy from them good go ahead and then think about this GM dies as is most of the companies and along with that all those places that sell those cars and fix those cars and the people who make the parts and so on.. you buy a Prius and you kill off OUR ECONOMY.. Yes it will cost more as they are not making part in third world countries but who cares. and yes some could make the same car parts that are ion the shelf now(gee all those people back in the 70's and 80's say this could be done and we just sent those the loony bin oops we were wrong) Yes there tons of people who made can that run on Alt power but they never got them o market I had friend that built a engine that could drive car from California to New Orleans on one tank of gas and back but did he put on the marker no he tried but no one believe him even with working engine. He died some year later poor and thought to be crazy for even trying to do do what he did.

      We need more crazy people like him here in this country and we need to start buying cars made here I won't get Ford I like GM even with their stupid bail out BS but if we don't support American made products were going to all be learning Chinese or Japanese or both We need to stop send Jobs and all out of the US NOW . So if you don't like a good car that will get the job done made here then just don't buy it and for the Record i like the Prius as it set the bar but that bar need to be over taken now but companies here oh and Ford Gas Electric is a the Pruis tech the Lic from Toyota so even ford could not make their own that work and GM did so why not get it .
      ok that all I have to say Good for GM on doing something right now lets hope the price goes down.

      CG

    • 2 years ago
  • QuestionGeek
  • hayckuh
  • twoon
  • BFAM_RVS
  • Drach
  • H3BR3WTHUND3R
  • wierdobeardo
    • 0
      wierdobeardo  
    • I'm shocked at all the rediculous complaints about a car that gets good gas mileage. Personally I think this is a good move from a company that we are all shareholders in now. Nothing will be perfect but this is progress. Some of you people would be pissed if you won a million dollars because you would have to buy a new wallet.

    • 2 years ago
  • wierdobeardo
    • 0
      wierdobeardo  
    • I'm shocked at all the rediculous complaints about a car that gets good gas mileage. Personally I think this is a good move from a company that we are all shareholders in now. Nothing will be perfect but this is progress. Some of you people would be pissed if you won a million dollars because you would have to buy a new wallet.

    • 2 years ago
  • QuestionGeek
    • 0
      QuestionGeek  
    • wierdobeardo:

      Maybe there wouldn't be such vehement premature complaints about this vehicle if the General Motors name weren't attached to it. Their reputation is beyond sour. It's about as fresh and respected as leachate in the U.S.A.

    • 2 years ago
  • alicynx
    • 0
      alicynx  
    • wierdobeardo:

      If GM had made a product that could even remotely compete in the public sector, I don't think there would be as big an uproar. If they had been honest in their advertising, there would probably be cheers coming from the peanut gallery, if caveat one was met as well.
      They don't suck because their name is GM, they suck because they're putting out inferior product at outlandish pricese, and lying to us in the process. Top it off with the fact that our taxes enabled this, and you have a pissed off public.

    • 2 years ago
  • bluestranger
  • shocksopping
  • hunzedog
  • Eleganza
  • CalgarC
  • hunzedog
    • 0
      hunzedog  
    • last year they spent 2.3 billion on advertising. how do you think they are acting with our checkbooks. this is our new country ?

    • 2 years ago
  • hunzedog
    • 0
      hunzedog  
    • how much money did that massive publicity stunt cost us..? how much was spent on this commercial that is lies and deciet? no wonder we dont trust em !

    • 2 years ago
  • S3th
  • S3th
  • HaloedGriot
    • 0
      HaloedGriot  
    • S3th:

      My mind is blown. I have been interested in these types of technologies for about 5 years now. The fact he did it with a '72 Datsun (510?) is just more amazing.

    • 2 years ago
  • S3th
    • 0
      S3th  
    • S3th:

      Yep. Not the most aerodynamic car he could have chosen. Just imagine if he would take an even lighter vehicle, such as one with fiberglass instead.

    • 2 years ago
  • Chheang
    • 0
      Chheang  
    • Anyone really look into the volt? it's 40 miles on electricity, then kicks in the motor. Honestly, how can one make such outlandish claims?

      In response to what about the carbon footprint, the efficiency of power plants producing electricity is MUCH higher (80%+) than the 25% efficiency you get from your car.

      Oh, BTW, there's no way all of america can go electric on cars. We don't have the power capacity for all the vehicles. Studies have shown that we'll need an estimated 900 B kWh of increased power producing capacity. Today, US produces about 900 GW of power... 1 average nuclear reactor produces about 1 GW. You do the math.

      Don't get me wrong. I agree, we need to go electric / alt energy. However, we're not talking about overnight change. AND we need to stop these GM crooks from publicizing their "INNOVATIONS." For truth's sake, the volt goes 40 miles on electricity! That's what they should be required to publish! For reference, the Tesla Roadster goes 244 miles per charge!

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_Roadster

      BTW, before you start hammering me on the figures I quoted, read up on some MIT energy studies: http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/topic/energy.html

      http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=11797

    • 2 years ago
  • nkeg87
  • monsieurturtle
    • 0
      monsieurturtle  
    • Chheang:

      I do think that the presentation is misleading, but not necessarily untrue.

      Supposedly, the average daily commute for 75% of all drivers is 33 miles.

      While this is satisfied entirely by the battery life (and would lead to cases where gasoline may only be put into use several times a month), the range of this percentage of drivers would put many above the 40-mile mark.

      Here is where the 230 MPG figure starts to make some sense (although again, it is still misleading):

      "So let's say the car is driven 50 miles in a day. For the first 40 miles, no gas is used and during the last 10 miles, 0.2 gallons are used. That's the equivalent of 250 miles per gallon. But, if the driver continues on to 80 miles, total fuel economy would drop to about 100 mpg. And if the driver goes 300 miles, the fuel economy would be just 62.5 mpg."

      It would seem that the EPA accepts this sort of logic in determining the MPG rating for hybrid vehicles.

      Is "equivalency" an acceptable basis for determining MPG? I'm not sure if it is on a basis of simple numbers. Practically, however, it does make some sense.

    • 2 years ago
  • alicynx
    • 0
      alicynx  
    • Chheang:

      for my two cents here, I'd like to point out how this can be misconstrued: GW and KWh aren't apples and apples, in the context presented. You state that 900 billion kWh (kilowatt hours, I presume) are what we need, yet we produce 900 GW (gigawatts, I assume here) right now. Gigawatts versus kilowatt hours aren't precicely the same, like inches to inches, so it looks like a wider gap than it really is. In reality, the United States produces 4.16 Trillion kWh (2007 statistics), 49% of which is from coal. Nine hundere billion kWh from that for cars alone would be taxing, but not completely impossible; I would hope that coal would be replaced before we advance that far, however ^_^ Renewables are rising dramatically, and so long as we keep funding the research, we will have forms of electricity that we can consume guilt-free. My last source cites that growth in BTUs...

      sources:
      http://www.eia.doe.gov/kids/infocardnew.html
      http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/ep/ep_frame.html
      http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/ep/ep_frame.html#15

    • 2 years ago
  • madenosense
    • 0
      madenosense  
    • This is the latest report from the Volt field test. Here is the actual test result conducted by GM. The car is fully charged to start with. Then you plug the car in every 23 miles and charge it full again before going the next 23 miles. If somehow the battery runs out before the next charging location and the car stalls in the middle of the road(Most GM drivers have used to this already), you power the gas engine and crawl to the charging location. The GM engineers measure the gas used at the 10th charging location and find only 1 gallon is consumed. Taking the whole distance traveled was 230 miles, they report the car could run 230 miles/gallon. That is why they use the symbol 23(power plug).

    • 2 years ago
  • Agent_Alpha
  • nkeg87
    • 0
      nkeg87  
    • Agent_Alpha:

      You beat me!!! This was the first thing I thought about when I read the comments. I saw this movie on STARz when I had cable. Good movie. Glad you linked it cause people that drive should see it.

    • 2 years ago
  • ThoughtNu
    • 0
      ThoughtNu  
    • This reminds me of an ex showing up drunk at my door with a 'friend'... I think yeah nice try but why didn't you think of this before... ya know Besides I think GM has enough of my money already (bailout) i just think this should have been rolled out before the 'bailout.' Bringing such a dynamic product mere months after a restructure shows determined intent that is little more than myopic which can create other issues... like the car, not so much the company just yet.

    • 2 years ago
  • QuestionGeek
  • MizPiz
  • delas78
    • 0
      delas78  
    • Green cars are great and all. It's a HUGE step in the right direction. But they need to green their factories, manufacturing and shipping processes.

      Pointless to build a eco-friendly car in a filth spewing factory.

    • 2 years ago
  • hunzedog
    • 0
      hunzedog  
    • IT ONLY GOES 40 MILES ON ELECTRICITY, THEY ARE LYING ABOUT THOSE RESULTS. WHEN DRIVEN LIKE A CAR FOR MORE THAN 40 MILES IT IS ONLY AS GOOD AS THE PRIUS. WAY TO LIE TO AMERICANS SOME MORE !!!!!

    • 2 years ago
  • Wraak
    • 0
      Wraak  
    • hunzedog:

      When do you need to drive more than 40 miles in one trip? If you do, you should be taking public transportation (train) there and then bike the rest of the way. Electric cars aren't meant to go on 4,000 mile road trips. They're meant for responsible people who don't want to use a lot of gasoline just to drive a few miles. You can't "go green" then drive all over the place to get a few things, you have to be efficient.

    • 2 years ago
  • monsieurturtle
    • 0
      monsieurturtle  
    • hunzedog:

      "So let's say the car is driven 50 miles in a day. For the first 40 miles, no gas is used and during the last 10 miles, 0.2 gallons are used. That's the equivalent of 250 miles per gallon. But, if the driver continues on to 80 miles, total fuel economy would drop to about 100 mpg. And if the driver goes 300 miles, the fuel economy would be just 62.5 mpg."

      This is supposedly the accepted method of determining fuel economy. It is misleading if one assumes direct gasoline usage alone, but it does make sense in a practical usage sense.

    • 2 years ago
  • rockstarmillionaire
  • QuestionGeek
  • delas78
    • 0
      delas78  
    • $40,000.00 !?!?!?!

      I could build one from scratch for cheaper than that.

      And I'm sure Toyota and Honda are thinking the same thing too.

    • 2 years ago
  • QuestionGeek
    • 0
      QuestionGeek  
    • delas78:

      Toyota will come up with something that blows the Chevy Volt out off the street, if it even makes it to the street. It hasn't even been available yet. Nissan already has a similar car almost ready for market.

      It's like ok GM, how slow and behind the competition can you be. The Volt is 10 to 12 years late. Dumb asses. If they had any sense, they would have developed the EV1, which at the time was the only GM vehicle that could compete with the Prius. They crushed the EV1 for political reasons and took a hiatus on the idea, meanwhile the Asian competition continued with different ideas.

      Toyota knows how to compete, and being ahead in the game and having more experience with hybrids, they have more experience

    • 2 years ago
  • evready
    • 0
      evready  
    • Image
    • delas78:

      You are right on. For about 10K today a person can convert about any car or truck into an EV. The link will show you what a few thousand people have converted to electric.

    • 2 years ago
  • Tyrannous
  • H3BR3WTHUND3R
    • 0
      H3BR3WTHUND3R  
    • Tyrannous:

      miles/volt isn't a useful measurement. in fact i can't even think of what that would represent. I think you mean miles/kWh. in that case it's something like 3.5 mi/kWh which is average for a full size car like the Volt.

    • 2 years ago
  • hunzedog
    • 0
      hunzedog  
    • and now America is crushing refrigerators too, geeeeeeee ? NO >>>>>>>> GE . Insider trading is illegal . it doesnt matter who does it.

    • 2 years ago
  • lifestudentno83
    • 0
      lifestudentno83  
    • 1.) If you're going to make a green car, the key is creating a low-price green car so it moves faster off the lot.

      2.) What's with the Gas-Electric hybrids? Why not pure electric, or electric-solar cars? Even France has a car powered by WATER!!

      3.) I sincerely hope that GM is making these cars in the states and not overseas. With the importing cost tacked onto the sticker price and the need for American jobs during a time of recession, GM could find themselves on the wrong end of a boycott.

    • 2 years ago
  • bombastinator
    • 0
      bombastinator  
    • lifestudentno83:

      Have you seen electric solar cars? they hold one small person, go 10 mph, and look like a bicycle dressed up as a cockroach. Might as well go with cheese burger power, skip the solar cells and just peddle the thing. It'll go faster, hold more, and except for the silly helmet you won't look like nearly as much of an idiot.

      As for a car that runs on water, I suspect shenanigans. The sort that wind up with someone moving suddenly out of the country with a lot of other people's money just as the police break down his door. That's what has happened with the other cars that run on water.

    • 2 years ago
  • lifestudentno83
    • 0
      lifestudentno83  
    • lifestudentno83:

      If you're going to invest money and technology to create cars that still run based off the combustion of harmful fuels, then what innovation is in there?

      If a gas-electric hybrid can get 230 miles, then why can't a electric-solar get 100+ and solar charge while the car is parked? The technology is there, someone just needs to be innovative. Also, there is no rule the car has to look like a "traditional" solar car. If they can change how electric cars look(i.e. the Tesla), then they can change how solar cars look.

      Lastly, water powered cars DO exist. However I doubt the American oil companies will allow them over here stateside. I can't find the French model, however, the video above is a Japanese version. This idea has been around for a while, but suppression of innovation is what profiteers do best.

    • 2 years ago
  • visualkev
  • QuestionGeek
    • 0
      QuestionGeek  
    • lifestudentno83:

      Because GM is not a leader, they're a follower. And much of the time, they are not even that. They are just scatterbrained, stubborn and ignorant. They had the chance to be pioneers with their electric car (EV1), and as expected, GM screwed that project up.

      Now with Nissan poised to release an all electric vehicle soon. Toyota will follow suit. GM will be back at square one, finding themselves unable to compete.

      If they'd take the oil company's penises out of their mouths for a 2nd, and focus on what people want, then they could sell some cars. But they don't care.

      This Volt nonsense of theirs was born out of force, not interest on their part. It's a small hybrid. Look how far it is behind the competition. Toyota has had a hybrid of this size for years.

    • 2 years ago
  • hunzedog
    • 0
      hunzedog  
    • whats the carbon footprint of destroying cars that have allready been built ? stupid freeking wasteful greedy low-life common mother hunchers !

    • 2 years ago
  • mjcohen
    • 0
      mjcohen  
    • How many MPT (miles per ton) does the Volt get if you add in coal as an energy source for making electricity? Or add nuclear waste and the risk of its potential effects?

      Are electric cars really greening our lives in the long run or are they a re-volting form of environmental media.

      If you want to learn how to think like nature works to produce its balanced perfection, visit www.SaneEarth.com

    • 2 years ago
  • bombastinator
  • alicynx
    • 0
      alicynx  
    • mjcohen:

      Well, if you live in a state where you can purchase entirely renewable energy (fortunately I do), this becomes a moot point. As we move our energy consumption to renewable forms, this argument will become obsolete, which is something I hope happens sooner rather than later ^_^

    • 2 years ago
  • CapnDeeth
    • 0
      CapnDeeth  
    • mjcohen:

      look you damn hippy, there's nothing there about making cars that are 239mpg, let alone topless chicks and fingerpaint! go hug a tree...just kidding, but really, what was your point>

    • 2 years ago
  • kreddig
  • likeamazing
  • mojojuju
  • hunzedog
    • 0
      hunzedog  
    • Was'nt this the same company that had to move out of America to save money a few years ago? Then they went bankrupt ! Now that they are all bailed out they are spending millions of taxpayer dollars on commercials !
      I dont care if they make a car that runs on happy thoughts , I will never buy from GM again ! Toyota will make something better anyway !

    • 2 years ago
  • Ish05
  • QuestionGeek
    • 0
      QuestionGeek  
    • hunzedog:

      GM never moved out of America (unless there was a pun I didn't catch in your assumption) GM has set up shop in almost every corner of the modern world, through acquisitions and what not, and they've been selling cars all over the world for almost just as long; which renders everyone's "Buy American" commands and arguments moot. That's why I don't feel sorry for them. For instance, they are a raging success right now in China. China is a huge country with three times as many people in it as the U.S.A. China is also an economic boom country and budding their own new multi-millionaires.

      GM's problems have been brewing for decades because of their mismanagement, stubbornness, prejudice, etc. And much of their problems stem from letting themselves be raped by the UAW.

    • 2 years ago
  • hunzedog
  • lifestudentno83
  • bombastinator
    • 0
      bombastinator  
    • hunzedog:

      I will if I can find the cash.

      They're not that much more than a prius, and seem to be an order of magnitude better. This pre-assumes that gas will go back to 4$ again when the economy gets back on track.

    • 2 years ago
  • Prijedor
  • Hollow_Eyes
    • 0
      Hollow_Eyes  
    • hunzedog:

      1.) I love you for making a Megadeth pun.

      2.) You make a valid point. It's fantastic that at least SOMEONE is trying to ween us off oil. Sure, the car has to run off of electricity which is produced by a plant that emits tons (literally) of CO2 emissions, but it's a step forward.

      The problem is price, as you imply. What good is this car if it's going to cost 50 grand. Or even 30 grand. The average families can barely afford to buy groceries every week, let alone a fancy new car.

      As I said though, at least some American car company is half-assed trying to change the way cars are made and produced.

      The American car industry won't pick back up until they start making cars that people actually want to buy. The days of glitz, glamor, and "bling" are dead (thankfully). Sure, your Crossfire or Chrysler 300 might look gorgeous, but my Prius or other hybrid car gets twice the mileage of it and is better for the environment in which we ALL live in. Something a lot of people I think seem to forget, sadly.

    • 2 years ago
1 - 100 of 101
more from Tech:

top videos