Image
lookatmypix
This was an issue I posted a while ago that still goes on:
http://current.com/items/89771759_shouldnt-water-be-cleaned-for-free/25.htm


Here I come back with the good news that small actions are being taken like this one at the link above: http://www.insidethebottle.org/banning-bottled-water-will-universities-take-plun...


Let's take action and ban "plastic water" as I define it.

Just posted in my previous post: Water scarcity is now taking a toll on our world and that is not the focus of this post but certainly number one priority issue.

May be both problems could be linked in one miracle solution.


One more link: http://current.com/items/90773124_take-back-the-tap-debunking-the-myth-of-bottle...

Join Organic
http://current.com/groups/organicgreen/
  1. groups:
    Community,   Tech,   Green,   Current Tonight,   5 more
  2. tags:
    News Politics Green Environment 5 more
  3.     
    |

79 comments // Ban plastic bottled water!

  • WisconsinNorm
    • 0
      WisconsinNorm  
    • Changing the topic a little and to again demonstrate how stupid a nation we have become in some areas, I just had a short conversation with the FedX driver.
      In the good old days, they were working 10-11 hour days, five sometimes six days a week.
      Now they work only 32-40 hours a week and have closed some "unproductive" routes, or combined these routes with stronger ones.
      My comment to him was why don't you just work 4 days a week instead of 5? Think of the gasoline/diesel fuel you would save...Like no one suggested that? Like FedX wouldn't want to run a national add campaign explaining how "Green" they have become...?
      Dumb asses.

    • 2 years ago
  • nursediesel
    • 0
      nursediesel  
    • Don't the Britta filters have plastic in them? Aren't the Britta pitcher/filter contaiers plastic?
      How do we get away from this crap touching our food and water?

    • 2 years ago
  • kjoknoswazzup
    • 0
      kjoknoswazzup  
    • I feel so guilty now about drinking bottled water. I try to use my britta filter but when I'm on the run, I confess that I grap a bottled water from the fridge if I'm in a hurry. Although I try not to by having water ready to go in a traveling bottle.

      Water from the tap is not safe and those who think it's the same as when we were kids, are in denial of how crappy the environment is due to the massive population size. And yes, plastic is not a good thing but it's here to stay. Therefore, we should give up our plastic water bottles because I'm not giving up plastic trash bags. No way. I draw the line there (but I am fine with using resuable grocery bags).

      So, here are some websites I found:

      http://www.potableaqua.com/

      http://www.cleanairpurewater.com/

      http://www.allwaterpurification.com/

      http://www.aqua-sun-intl.com/

      http://www.aquasana.com/

      As an interior designer I can testify to the fact that you can have a plumber install a water purification system for about $200 that costs about $200 and it will purify the water that comes out of every tap opening in your house. This is assuming you live in the average amount of Square Footage. If not, you will probably need more than one system so that means buying more than one replacement filter about every 6 months, which isn't so bad when you think about how much bottled water costs and of course, that bottled water may not be as safe as we think it is. Plus, plastic should be used for things that we don't throw away after chuging 8 oz. of liquid anyway.

    • 2 years ago
  • privateibber
    • 0
      privateibber  
    • Plastic that sits in a hot truck for days and weeks cannot be safe. Why can't we just fill up a couple of glass bottles and re use them? Perrier bottles work fine.
      Fill them with filtered water if your tap water is not of your liking. Get a cooler if you like it cold. And as someone said here...WHY THE HECK ARE WE PAYING FOR WATER TO BEGIN WITH. WHEN DID THIS STYLE BEGIN???? The Evian, the Flashdance headband and folded workout socks, the cute little velvet sweats, God are we the phoniest people on earth or waht? And yes, the studies are well documented re the leakage of poison from the plastic in all except even MORE expensive botteles.

    • 2 years ago
  • WisconsinNorm
    • 0
      WisconsinNorm  
    • privateibber:

      There is another product that blew me away when introduced--the disposable razor. I thought for sure it was destined to fail but didn't. I don't want glass soda bottles ever again. "Cuts" were an everyday occurrence when I was a kid from shards virtually everywhere.
      Agreed. The plastic bottle of water... that is going too far down La La Lazy Lane.
      Another thing worthy of a little criticism is the cosmetic counter. How much of that crap does the American culture need to face the day?
      I don't know about you, but I like women to just smell clean and have a natural tone. It keeps me from sneezing and eyes don't water. They never believe you when you say they are great looking without make-up or touting their natural hair color. I will not comment on designer clothing other than give simple cotton another look. Blue jeans, a white tee, clean slightly frizzy hair and that low heel confident walk with focused mischief in your eye..man, that's hot! I digress, it's for the environment trust me.
      Tons and tons of high priced crap in every store from coast to coast. Get rid of 90% of it. Then eat more home made vegetable soup with fresh fruit and whole milk. Your skin will glow.
      You don't like the way I look? F you! Women like that, I love 'em! For the environment.
      Relax please. Just assess what you really need to buy and why you are really buying it.

    • 2 years ago
  • WisconsinNorm
    • 0
      WisconsinNorm  
    • I purchased an electric distilled water maker from Sears. It cost less than $20.00. (Of course that was yesteryear.) It makes about one gallon at a crack. You add tap water a to the gizmo at night and by morning one gallon of distilled water at room temperature awaits you. Then you can flavor the stuff if desired. It costs about one and one half cents/gallon to produce and it fits easily on your countertop. When you look at the crap that is left behind after distillation you will feel warm and fuzzy realizing you just didn't drink it. It is probably mostly lime, but occasionally you will see something unrecognizable like the cyanide tab your wife put in it the night before.
      Incidentally, there are high speed manufacturing machines that can make two liter plastic bottles at the rate of 6/second. That is quite quite a contraption. That beautiful factory is just down the street from me and the company is going strong. So are the soft drink companies also just down the street.
      Make your own drinks--distilled water is a good start!

    • 2 years ago
  • Mymicz1
    • 0
      Mymicz1 [removed]  
    • PLASTIC = OIL = Terrorism = Dead Babies all around. Use copper pipes? Nope, ruining the Congo. We are fucked any way you look at it. But bottled water is not a good thing no matter how you spin it.

    • 2 years ago
  • lookatmypix
    • 0
      lookatmypix  
    • To Plusaf:
      All you just said in your whole comment above is that water takes production, energy, time and because of that it costs money.

      Really?

      Is that true?

      What a revelation!

      Who do you think you are?
      Lecturing people when you know nothing about this topic, you barely read throughout both posts and all comments, no wonder if you have spent ten minutes on this in the past ten years.
      And you want me to take you seriously?
      You, the one that thinks to be better than these Canadians?
      The one that thinks it's okay for these multinationals to legally steal water, treat it no more or less than your local water treatment facilty does and sell it?

      Where in that statement and ALL YOUR STATEMENTS do you explain that these chemicals are not dangerous, where do you explain why it's right to take possession of a lake which is public property only to rob people's health and pocket?

      WHERE?

      I have been on this for years, you show up with your cynicism and ignorance and dismiss everything, years of scientific work, years of work from the great minds of our time, years of raising awareness for what's right for the people and our Nature and all you can say is "but where is the solution?" or not even knowing the meanings of the word "ban" or saying "Alternatives are a fantasy".

      You don't give a damn about pollution, the endangered people's health and the growing power of these greedy,cruel corporations.

      Call me a dreamer, go ahead but I will not fall victim of greediness and destruction.

      You are only here to boycott this.

      People like you do not want things to be changed because you are one of them.

      I could waste thousands of words on what solutions out there could work best and what we could do to create a healthy and just system but you won't even try to see all of this.

      I despise you.

      You know better, you are the great mind that has offered zero solutions to this and said zero positive comments about this and that does not dream.
      And dreams are everything.
      Something you do not know.

    • 2 years ago
  • lookatmypix
    • 0
      lookatmypix  
    • lookatmypix:

      Your comments have been one insult after an other, insinuating and stating "the stupidity" and ignorance of my post.
      From calling it "moral crap" to lecturing the obvious, no substantial argument has been offered.
      All because you are in disagreement with it.

      No further communication is needed.
      All your future attempts to boycott my post will be flagged as irrelevant and inappropriate.

    • 2 years ago
  • lookatmypix
    • 0
      lookatmypix  
    • Actually Plusaf if you would have payed attention to my comments you would have read about an available alternative to plastic bottles.
      You can do the research your self.

      Banning is the first step people should take to pressure these powerful corporations to stop poisoning us, getting rich at the expense of people's health.

      You would see a change, they would have no choice but start using alternatives and lose a bit of their trillions or shall I say a bit of their greediness?

    • 2 years ago
  • lookatmypix
    • 0
      lookatmypix  
    • Continue:
      that is however understandable to a certain degree but saturated with a sense of resignation towards this problem.

      I hope you will start to imagine and consider some solutions to this sad and somehow complex reality as the old saying:
      " If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem"

      and a little optimism would help you also.

    • 2 years ago
  • lookatmypix
    • 0
      lookatmypix  
    • And now I will express what I think in regard to what you wrote to Csmount not that he can't speak for him self:

      Your words:

      " This is stupid.
      The mentality is that if we ban "sold in the store" bottled water, that people would start bottling their own water with reusable stainless steel bottles . . . and that is an effing *huge* leap in logic.
      People buy bottled beverages for their convenience, plain and simple. If water isn't available at the convenience stores and groceries, then more than likely the consumer will just buy another bottled beverage (like soda) which consumes even more water in the production."

      More of your words:
      "Yes, you would see an increase in the number of people that would bottle their own water if bottled water was forcibly removed from store shelves . . . but that would be drastically outweighed by the people that would just chose another bottled beverage, like soda, that actually takes more water to produce than bottled water. Hence, far more water being consumed overall by an increase in the consumption of soft drinks. The idea of banning bottled water is idiotic."

      And all of that is not true, matter of fact:

      “High profile tap water campaigns across many US states, and bottled water bans by public institutions have resulted in consumers reverting to tap and filtered water,” stated the analyst. “This is being mirrored in some major European markets such as France and the UK, with the economic conditions reinforcing this trend.”
      More:
      http://www.beveragedaily.com/Industry-Markets/Packagers-seek-water-pack-alternat...

      They also offer an alternative push:

      "It is in this market that a number of packaging groups are attempting to look to other methods of providing mineral waters in order to offset potential environmental criticisms.

      After launching carton packaging for mineral water products in 19 countries, packager Tetra Pak says it is now pushing a fully recyclable carton on to the US market through collaboration with producer Plant It Water."
      It is supposed to be 100% recyclable.

      Your fear of people turning into soda because of the lack of plastic bottled water on the shelves is not "idiotic and stupid" requoting your insulting attempts to my post, that is
      Cont. below

    • 2 years ago
  • CalPerr
  • lookatmypix
  • lookatmypix
    • 0
      lookatmypix  
    • Continue:
      How about you go talk to these people in Michigan, they wouldn't be very happy with you, here is why:
      Nestle' takes water from them to sell it to shenanigans like you:
      " A loophole in a recent interstate compact leaves the door open for bottled water companies to take what they wish.
      Northern Michigan Rep. Bart Stupak, a Democrat, on June 16 introduced a resolution (H. Res. 551) that would put the nation's legislative body on record against any claims of private ownership of Great Lakes water in the wake of last year's federal approval of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin Water Resources Compact. The compact sets rules for water withdrawals and conservation and prohibits most transfers of water out of the Great Lakes watershed.

      Stupak called the taking of water from the Great Lakes watershed for bottling alarming. He added: "Of much greater concern is a potential trade dispute between the United States and any multinational corporation or foreign government interested in diverting our water. We owe it to the people of Michigan, and the entire Great Lakes Basin, to ensure that Great Lakes Compact preserves and protects the quality and quantity of Great Lakes water." More: http://www.alternet.org/water/140946/will_bottled_water_companies_suck_the_great...

      Water is the liquid gold of the 21st century.
      While corporations urge local governments to privatize municipal water, communities around the world are organizing to ensure affordable access to this life sustaining resource. THE WATER FRONT is the story of one community's determination to fight the seemingly inevitable path of water privatization.
      More at:
      http://water-is-life.blogspot.com/2009/02/water-front.html

    • 2 years ago
  • lookatmypix
    • 0
      lookatmypix  
    • To Lucidstone in response to your comments to me and Csmount:

      I was very precise in my response to EmperorThan, quoted below:

      "Well you haven't taken the time to inform your self about Bisphenol-A and PVC, contained in most plastic bottles, including the ones we use to feed our children."
      As you can see from the statement above I say both bisphenolA and PVC are contained in MOST PLASTIC BOTTLES including the ones we use to feed our children which stands true.
      If I had made a post about the dangers of BisphenolA I would have made sure to mention and detail the numbers listed at the bottom of the plastic or "resin identification code" which indicates the different chemical composition of the material used and to aid recycling. It was a response to EmperorThan.
      My both posts(old and current) focus on something else that is as important as the dangers of these chemicals which are based on water for free as a human right, replicating the great purification processes used by a few of the private water companies and bring it to our municipal water. The idea was and is to save pollution, money in the LONG RUN, and safeguard our health.
      You can read more at the link as you should have before attempting to insult my degree of knowledge and my thought about this topic.

      Back to the resin identification code one listed under the plastic bottle as you said is used for plastic bottled water and soda that does not contain BisphenolA but indeed contains PET or PETE.

      It is thought to be safe just like it was mercury and asbestos and research has proven PET or PETE listed under number one to be toxic as well as bisphenolA.
      You forgot to mention the above important update to the story shenanigan.
      That makes you credible.
      Here it is:
      The “Discovery Channel” reports new evidence suggests that plastic water bottles may not be so benign after all as scientists in Germany have found that polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastics — the kind used to make water bottles, may also harbor hormone-disrupting chemicals that leach into the water. It is reportedly possible that some as-yet unidentified chemicals in these plastics have the potential to interfere with estrogen and other reproductive hormones, just as the infamous plasticizers bisphenol A (BPA) and phthalates do."
      More http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2009/04/28/water-bottles-health.html

      "Toronto’s “Globe and Mail” reports researchers in Germany have found traces of an unknown estrogen-mimicking chemical leaching into mineral water from polyethylene terephthalate, or PET, a widely used type of plastic bottle. Scientists detected estrogenic activity in 78 percent of polyethylene terephthalate samples, according to a study published online in Environmental Science and Pollution Research. The study, conducted at Johann Wolfgang Goethe University in Frankfurt, is the first to find consistent contamination of bottled water with a hormonally active substance leaching from polyethylene terephthalate, one of the world’s most popular packaging materials."

      Continue below

    • 2 years ago
  • nursediesel
    • 0
      nursediesel  
    • I'm just looking for a few easy to carry by hand glass bottles I can fill with water to take with me, use as needed during my day, then return home and wash in my eco-friendly cycle to sterilize them and reuse them over and over. So the caps have to be reusable. I use a stainless steel thermos for my hot liquids but want a clear glass for my water to drink out of directly.

    • 2 years ago
  • CalPerr
  • nursediesel
  • jaidi1
    • 0
      jaidi1  
    • Versa you've got the right idea. Banning
      stuff is always a touchy thing but just getting people to take 2 seconds and really ask themselves if they need to buy/
      throw away another bottle is key.

      On a side note, lots of states have a successful deposit/recycle program for
      carbonated
      beverages. Why not extend this practice in more states and apply it to all consumable liquids? We like it in Michigan- throw a party and take all your beer bottles back to the store, and you have enough $$ for breakfast in the morning.
      Everyone wins!

    • 2 years ago
  • lookatmypix
    • 0
      lookatmypix  
    • To Hostile:
      I invite people to ban the sale of plastic bottled water for its dangers to the human health, for our human right to free and clean water and the degrading of our nature.

      Vote me and this campaign down if you don't like it.

    • 2 years ago
  • lookatmypix
    • 0
      lookatmypix  
    • lookatmypix:

      Plusaf this is non sense anger, I have encountered it before from you.

      Your words:
      "if you get a bunch of people together to ban plastic bottled water, you are removing their right to BUY plastic-bottled water if they so desire.
      what gives you the right to eliminate other peoples' choices?"

      LOL

      Here you are telling me to not ban anything and give the people the right to choose.
      Who do you think I am?
      The president of the United States?

      Mine is an invitation, you are free to join or not.
      Nobody is pointing the gun at you.
      Again if you don't like it all you have to do is ignore it or vote me down.
      Don't announce aloud that you voted me down as an attempt to hurt my feelings because you won't and it is very pathetic. Do not ignore my answers to your questions either if you want a debate.

      Of course nothing is for free, we all pay with our TAXES but water privatization and commercialization is WRONG.
      "Because Canada manages the largest freshwater resources in the world, companies are lining up to pump, bottle and privatize our water for their profit. Despite the increasing threat to our water, the Canadian government has not updated its national water policy in over 15 years. Instead, governments over this period of time have continued to support free trade agreements that only further threaten our ability to safeguard our water for people and nature."

      For more: http://www.canadians.org/water/issues/right/index.html

    • 2 years ago
  • lookatmypix
    • 0
      lookatmypix  
    • lookatmypix:

      Definition of Ban:
      "A public proclamation or edict; a public order or notice, mandatory or prohibitory; a summons by public proclamation; Second definition: social pressure

      Learn before playing teacher.

      "virtually all "rights" anyone's ever enjoyed have come from agrements between people to decide what's a right and then enforce the "right" to that freedom."

      You said it your self. Nothing is written on stone.

      People agree together on what's right.

      Your words:
      "no one should be able to control it or expropriate it for profit."
      Then by logical conclusion you agree that privatization of the water is wrong, is this correct?

      Answer to this first.

    • 2 years ago
  • bailey78
  • Hostile
    • 0
      Hostile  
    • You tell 'em, EmperorThan. What gives anybody the right to go around banning my decisions from me? If you want to stop people buying bottled water, you need to start an information campaign for them, not a legislation campaign against them. Don't make yourself the enemy of your audience.

    • 2 years ago
  • lookatmypix
    • 0
      lookatmypix  
    • To EmperorThan:
      How did you manage to ignore these links among hundreds out there?

      Is that what you do?
      You quote a random sentence from the statements above and ridiculize them by saying:

      "The staff inside plastic bottles does not cause cancer"
      Who says?
      Who are you to ignore years and years of scientific work and your only argument to it is:

      "The staff inside plastic bottles does not cause cancer"

      Are you explaining why?
      Did you forget to mention the researches that were done about it and what were the results?


      " I'm guessing all of these studies done on in-utero animals bombarded the BPA into the animal's uterus at a much higher dose than anyone..."

      Did you just start your sentence by saying :"I am guessing..."

      Years of research and you are guessing.

      Hippy, how about you take a book written on this topic and read something, how about you do the research your self instead of GUESSING.

      You said:" And to say that "obesity, behavioral problems, impaired fertility, early puberty, and cancer" are all caused by the stuff in water bottles is ridiculous. Not only because all of those things existed in the world before water bottles existed, but because they don't cite what mechanism in the body is creating these effects directly because of the chemicals in water bottles"

      Obesity, behavioral problems, impaired fertility, early puberty, and cancer existed before plastic bottled water so mercury,asbestos and many other chemicals.
      What's your point?
      I never said that bisphenolA was solely the responsible factor in cancer,obesity and etc.

      Never said that either about eutrophication.

      I believe too our genes are sometimes responsible for these illnesses above but where in that statement are you explaining that bisphenolA is not dangerous and not responsible for the accelerated growing rate of cancer, obesity,impaired fertility etc?

      Scientists do not explain the exact mechanism of bishenolA activating cancer cells just as they do not know the exact mechanism that initiates cancer in the first place.
      And just because of that let's ridiculize their results as a logical consequence and your statement to do so is:
      " The stuff inside plastic bottles doesn't cause cancer"
      and " I am guessing..."
      Even the FDA at the moment does not reccomend the use of plastic bottles containing bisphenolA.
      It's mentioned on their website.

      Well, you have a serious stand and I am not laughing.

      You know better than them.

    • 2 years ago
  • EmperorThan
    • 0
      EmperorThan  
    • "• In a peer reviewed and published commentary, 36 scientists who are experts on BPA
      research revealed serious flaws in two large industry funded study that found no
      developmental toxicity with current levels of BPA exposure (Myers et al 2009)"

      I love statements like that, they never say what the flaws were. A very vague statement that everyone will copy and paste when someone like me retorts. The stuff inside plastic bottles doesn't cause cancer, generalized environmental pollution does.

      Let's say for instance I did a study and found that 100% of people who got cancer also breathed Oxygen. Then I told you "The government of Argentina recently classified 'Oxygen' as a hazardous chemical because of my recent study's findings."

      Would you believe me then if I said Oxygen was a dangerous toxin? NO! Because everyone fucking breathes oxygen!!! If everyone is doing something it doesn't mean that thing is directly causing the said problem you're trying to diagnose. Water is toxic to every human at a high enough amount, I'm guessing all of these studies done on in-utero animals bombarded the BPA into the animal's uterus at a much higher dose than anyone could ever possibly get from a single bottle of water or possibly all the bottles of water they drank over their entire life.

      And to say that "obesity, behavioral problems, impaired fertility, early puberty, and cancer" are all caused by the stuff in water bottles is ridiculous. Not only because all of those things existed in the world before water bottles existed, but because they don't cite what mechanism in the body is creating these effects directly because of the chemicals in water bottles. "This enzyme when reacting to BPA breaks causing the initiation of a tumor cell." or "these neuro synapses when in contact with BPA release this chemical in the brain causing behavioral problems." It's all a very bland and vague statement. What kind of timeline are we even looking at for those symptoms? How long do they last? None of that is explained. That's not how science works.

      I'm pretty sure they also said recently that eutrophication from sewage runoff causes early puberty and malformed testicles in infant humans. So which is it? Is it plastic bottles or is it sewage runoff? Get your story straight. Obesity in America is genetic, meaning on our genes. So please explain to me how BPA initiates RNA to transcode our entire genomes to alter our DNA in every cell of our body to make us fatter BEFORE it leaves our body?

      Sure I'm not offering any answers to these problems, but I'm also not arbitrarily calling for the banning of plastic bottles. And thats' the key.

      "Do you think these are rumors? Think again." Don't say smug shit like that either, it makes you into the walking cliche hippy I assumed you were. I actually laughed aloud when I read it.

    • 2 years ago
  • CalPerr
    • 0
      CalPerr  
    • EmperorThan:

      I agree with you almost 100%
      Bans of any kind are bad(im not an anarchist)
      I didnt laugh at anyone though.
      Would you be cool with a boycott?
      $2.00 for 12 oz of water though, wtf thats worse than gasoline.
      I say use a filter are refill stuff to take with you.
      Glass bottles keep the water cold longer, and are just as easy to get. Best of both plastic and metal.(i have swing top grolsch beer bottles) You can still forget it somewhere and not care at all.

    • 2 years ago
  • lookatmypix
    • +1
      lookatmypix  
    • To EmperorThan:

      Somehow it seems to me this post made you feel threatened, made your freedom seem threatened. I really do not get why.

      Your rant does not help me in anyway.

      You said: "Besides not a single study has shown any conclusive proof waterbottles cause any problems in the human body."

      Well you haven't taken the time to inform your self about Bisphenol-A and PVC, contained in most plastic bottles, including the ones we use to feed our children.

      It has been researched over and over again, FDA and EPA have approved these chemicals without a single test in the past. How crazy is that?

      You tell me, is this hippy non sense?

      Is this propaganda?
      Plastic bottles water companies bring home billions every year.

      Now these substances have been overly proven with scientific research to be extremely dangerous.
      These are just a few among the hundreds scientific data out there that prove these chemicals to cause cancer, hormonal dysfunction and many more diseases:
      Watch the video. Just a small overview.
      "ScienceDaily (June 12, 2009) — Exposure during pregnancy to the chemical bisphenol A, or BPA, found in many common plastic household items, is known to cause a fertility defect in the mother's offspring in animal studies, and now researchers have found how the defect occurs."
      More at http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090610124428.htm

      "Papers from the past 10 years cover a wide variety of topics, including estrogenic activity and other toxic effects of BPA in rats, mice, and humans. These effects include increased susceptibility to prostate carcinogenesis and epigenetic regulation of phosphodiesterases in rats, meiotic aneuploidy and altered development and tissue organization of mammary glands in the mouse, advanced puberty in human females, and genital abnormalities in human males.
      More at: http://sciencewatch.com/ana/st/bis/

      "In 2008 the Canadian government classified BPA as a Toxic Substance, and announced
      measures to reduce infant exposures. These include a ban on polycarbonate baby bottles and
      steps to limit BPA leaching into liquid infant formula packaged in metal cans. In announcing
      these actions Canadian Health Minister Tony Clement remarked “We have concluded that early development is sensitive to the effects of bisphenol A” (Health Canada 2008). As noted in the
      Proposed Risk Management document,
      “The screening assessment report concluded that bisphenol A be considered as a
      substance that may be entering the environment in a quantity or concentration or
      under conditions that constitute or may constitute a danger in Canada to human life or
      health. The basis of this proposed conclusion is that the neurodevelopmental and
      behavioural dataset in rodents, though highly uncertain, is suggestive of potential
      effects at doses at the same order of magnitude to 1–2 orders of magnitude higher
      than exposures” (Canada 2008).
      These actions by NTP, Canada, and state legislators are based on numerous animal studies
      conducted over the last decade linking in-utero and early life BPA exposures to a number of
      adverse health effects as diverse as obesity, behavioral problems, impaired fertility, early
      puberty, and cancer. In addition to actions taken by NTP,Health Canada, and state legislators, there have been some other new developments within the
      last year that we would like to bring to your attention:
      • In a peer reviewed and published commentary, 36 scientists who are experts on BPA
      research revealed serious flaws in two large industry funded study that found no
      developmental toxicity with current levels of BPA exposure (Myers et al 2009);
      • FDA’s draft risk assessment, which concluded that current BPA exposures are well below
      toxic doses, which was refuted by its own advisory Science Board and resulting in further Agency assessment to determine its safety..."
      More at:www.oehha.org/Prop65/public_meetings/pdf/BPAcomment9.pdf

      Do you still think these are rumors?

      Think again

    • 2 years ago
  • lucidstone
    • 0
      lucidstone  
    • lookatmypix:

      I call shenanigans.

      What complete rubbish it is to equate this to bottled water. Either you are woefully ignorant over what plastics actually contain BPA or you are deliberately trying to mislead us.

      Bottled water and soft drink bottles are composed of #1 PETE soft plastic which does not contain BPA at all (which is found in #7 hard plastics like many reusable Nalgene water bottles, I have several of these myself).
      http://www.thegreenguide.com/buying-guide/plastic-containers

      But seriously, either be informed before you start preaching to us . . . or stop deliberately trying to pass off falsehoods. Either way, you're not a credible person in regards to this subject.

    • 2 years ago
  • AnotherEducatedWhiteGuy
  • EmperorThan
    • 0
      EmperorThan  
    • AnotherEducatedWhiteGuy:

      I don't believe I said anything to that nature. I said I hate hippies and I hate people who try to limit what I can and can't do. Hippies are fucking morons because they echo false knowledge to people and use scare tactics to pass legislation just like fucking Republicans.

      I'm all for the environment, I grow Avocado and Elm trees.

    • 2 years ago
  • CalPerr
  • Fearzen
    • 0
      Fearzen  
    • I don't get why some people are freaked out by their own tap water...

      Yes, bottled water is bad for the environment, but other than that it's just a total scam. People pay ridiculous amounts of money for what they think is "spring water" or "water that trickled down a volcano for a month then got purified over a whole week".

      It makes more sense to buy a re-usable bottle and fill it up from your tap at home. It's not hard.

    • 2 years ago
  • EmperorThan
  • Fearzen
    • 0
      Fearzen  
    • Fearzen:

      Buying a bottle of water and re-using the bottle for a month sounds like a perfectly fine idea to me, and something I've done myself.

      I said "buy a re-usable bottle" - but any bottle can be a re-usable one.

      I personally don't think I'll get poisoned from drinking from a plastic bottle.

    • 2 years ago
  • occhipij
  • lookatmypix
  • dlester
    • 0
      dlester  
    • Lots of bottled water is just tap water from somewhere else and frequently isn't any more clean than what is coming out of the tap at home.

    • 2 years ago
  • lucidstone
    • 0
      lucidstone  
    • This is stupid.

      The mentality is that if we ban "sold in the store" bottled water, that people would start bottling their own water with reusable stainless steel bottles . . . and that is an effing *huge* leap in logic.

      People buy bottled beverages for their convenience, plain and simple. If water isn't available at the convenience stores and groceries, then more than likely the consumer will just buy another bottled beverage (like soda) which consumes even more water in the production.

      Which brings us to the conclusion that target banning water bottles is simply "stupid" because it will lead to the negative effect of having MORE water consumed by means of more soda bottles being bought in the absence of water.

      And for all the possible critics . . . yes, I do bottle my own water. I've owned quite a few Nalgenes, a couple Siggs, and a Klean Kanteen (which is my personal fav) . . . but personally I do it because I enjoy the taste of my tap water, it's healthy, and it's dirt cheap. Which are reasons enough to do and promote it without having to sell the "save the world" ideology. Just something to think about.

    • 2 years ago
  • csmonut
    • 0
      csmonut  
    • lucidstone:

      And if those plastic bottles of water began to disappear off the shelves, more people, like you, will begin to plan a bit better and fill containers to take with them when they leave the house.

    • 2 years ago
  • versasrev
    • 0
      versasrev  
    • lucidstone:

      the ultimate goal is not to ban bottled water, but to get people to realize that bottled water is wasteful and to put 2 seconds into thinking about refilling a reusable container that doesn't waste precious natural resources.

      If everyone fills their own containers with water, then there is no reason to have plastic bottles of water.

      That is what you must change, the mentality of people, if you don't you will never achieve success. Because if no one wants plastic bottles of water then there will be no plastic bottles of water.

      Although I will concede that they could just bring back the glass containers, but they probably wouldn't do that on there own, as well as that won't stop people from throwing glass containers away either.

      A hearts and minds campaign.

    • 2 years ago
  • lucidstone
    • 0
      lucidstone  
    • lucidstone:

      To: csmount

      Yes, you would see an increase in the number of people that would bottle their own water if bottled water was forcibly removed from store shelves . . . but that would be drastically outweighed by the people that would just chose another bottled beverage, like soda, that actually takes more water to produce than bottled water. Hence, far more water being consumed overall by an increase in the consumption of soft drinks. The idea of banning bottled water is idiotic.

      You want a good idea? Spend all this time and energy on campaigns to encourage people to drink more water and less soft drinks and fruit juices.

      To: versasrev

      You want me to believe that the campaigns to ban bottled water that have cropped up internationally really does not want to ban bottled water? That's 100% pure bullshit.

      Bottled water has already been banned in some cities and towns:

      [Muade] Barlow, the senior U.N. adviser on water issues, said: "We are winning some of the battle against the global corporate theft of water."

      "In my country [Canada], for instance, 53 municipalities - some of them big cities such as Vancouver and Toronto - have banned bottled water, and bottled water sales have dropped dramatically globally."
      http://www.ipsnews.net/print.asp?idnews=48077

      This is insanity. Soft drinks are not good for human health, consume more water in production than bottled water, and contribute to a much larger percentage of plastic bottle waste . . . and yet, there's no call to ban bottled soda (not that I think either should be banned).

      Campaigns to promote the virtues of consuming self bottled tap water do not need in any way to ban bottled water.

    • 2 years ago
  • versasrev
    • 0
      versasrev  
    • they make stainless steel containers. Don't use aluminum, some research suggests a link to aluminum and Alzheimers. When you use stainless you need to ensure you use BVA free (I think that's the term, respond with correct term if you know it).
      REDUCE FIRST!
      Then reuse whatever you do use.
      And finally recycle what can't be reused.

      Stainless containers are durable, don't rust, and allow you to minimize the resources you use for the purposes of drinking water. It's really the responsible thing to do.

    • 2 years ago
  • CalPerr
  • versasrev
    • 0
      versasrev  
    • versasrev:

      glass would be O.K. if it didn't have that tendency to break; although as far as recycling it, and the abundance of the resources needed to make, I will concede that it is a far superior material.

      I just feel that people are more apt to go stainless than glass(as they already do), and it happens to be very recyclable as well.

      Plus stainless does have a more stylish feel to it, and so I believe it would be easier to get people on board. Sometimes compromise is necessary to achieve a goal, in this case wasteful behavior.

      I suppose if we started off with both at the same time that would be the great compromise.

    • 2 years ago
  • allIknowis
    • 0
      allIknowis  
    • versasrev:

      The aluminum / alzheimers thing was from a very poorly done study in the 50"s or 60's, it's now considered an old wife's tale. Most pots and pans are some type of aluminum, no problems there. There are plastic water bottles that don't leach chemicals into the water. If you drink as much water as I do, it's not in the bottle long enough to leach anyway. Look at sigg.com they have lined metal bottles, not cheap but very good products.

    • 2 years ago
  • EmperorThan
    • 0
      EmperorThan  
    • I got an idea, let's not ban anything. Let's let people chose what they want to do in life. And not decide for them what's good for them.

      Maybe I want trans fats in all my food. Maybe I use plastic water bottles when I'm out running.

      Besides not a single study has shown any conclusive proof waterbottles cause any problems in the human body. This is hippy fucking propaganda to try and prevent littering. Hippies are dicks. They need to just say what they mean, not try to meander their way into getting what they want just like Republicans.

      Spread rumors and keep telling yourself the ends justify the means. I'll stick to my scientific method, thanks.

    • 2 years ago
  • phatjoe
    • 0
      phatjoe  
    • EmperorThan:

      haha nice talk.....

      but there are analysis that in plastic bottled water are 50% more of hormons structured like estrogen! (which means that they are not totaly equal but kind of isomeres....

      and till now we dont have studies for long period of time because there arent any (we know just about 1 year that we have these problems caused by plastic bottled water)

      water slugs were determined and it was proofen that these slugs had 50% more egg cells.....what effects on the descendest are possible isnt examined yet

    • 2 years ago
  • allIknowis
  • AnotherEducatedWhiteGuy
    • 0
      AnotherEducatedWhiteGuy  
    • I have to admit that my family doesn't recycle, but I, myself, am a very environment friendly minded person. I totally agree that "plastic water" should be banned. Theres no reason why you cant drink water from the tap these days with all kinds of purifiers and stuff.

    • 2 years ago
  • bailey78
    • 0
      bailey78  
    • All right I got it !! we can use goat bladders. We can go out and kill some goats an presto we got ourselves a naaa that won't work P.E.T.A. will have a fit. Man I wish I could come up with some kind of metal bottel but naaa that would never go over because people today want Disposable stuff use it one time and throw it away so as not to have to clean the same one over and over. Well when I find a self cleaning bottle thats not made of plastic and won't destroy the world as we know it today. I will get back to this at another time

    • 2 years ago
  • malathion
  • allIknowis
  • HoOkzy
    • 0
      HoOkzy  
    • we need to go back to glass,everything was better in glass anyway and its natural,but the oil industry wont make their millions...fuckin comys.......ahhh remember mtn dew in the glass?wish i had one! ,,!! o.0

    • 2 years ago
  • CalPerr
  • allIknowis
    • 0
      allIknowis  
    • HoOkzy:

      Glass is heavy, more expensive to transport, then there's the breakage thing. But can't beat the taste from glass.
      How about the Mylar haggis like box wine comes in?

    • 2 years ago
  • jaidi1
    • 0
      jaidi1  
    • I think the biggest factor of this campaign is really just awareness... the things we can do to cut down on plastic bottles --of all kinds, not just water -- are so simple and easy to implement in daily life... people lived for 1000's of years without bottled drinks, right?!!

      Same goes for plastic bags... it takes something like 40 years for them to break down in a landfill, yet we use them so excessively.

      Start small... save like 1 bag per shopping trip or forego one bottled drink a day, and get a friend to do the same, and you've made a huge difference already! :)

    • 2 years ago
  • bailey78
    • 0
      bailey78  
    • BAN THE PLASTIC BOTTLE!!??? Why what then shall I carry My water In ? Do you know how hard it is to carry water around in your hand.? Why I know you can put water in a metal container with a Lid but what shall We call this metal container?? I know we can call it a cantean! No that one is already taken.. Well I'm going to go smoke a bowl and brain storm on this a while. Best of luck on finding something to put water in besides a plastic bottle. When I think of something I will get back with you Guys.

    • 2 years ago
  • mjseydel
  • CalPerr
  • stephenk29111
    • 0
      stephenk29111  
    • see the funny thing about bottled water is, it doesn't face strict government regulations like our tap water does. And in most cases your tap water is BETTER for you than bottled water is. HMmm and did some of you people ever take the time to think where your bottled water comes from? it's a proven fact that coca-cola's bottled water Dasani comes mostly from local reservoirs.

      Your tap water isn't bad for you and for the most part besides your water bill, its much cheaper than bottled water.

    • 2 years ago
  • allIknowis
    • 0
      allIknowis  
    • stephenk29111:

      My city's water is really good on paper, as far as contaminates go, but in my house has a plastic pipe taste. I used bottles for a couple of years, but switched to britta the first of this year, just bought a couple of good lined aluminum bottles and away we go.

    • 2 years ago
  • mbk220
    • 0
      mbk220  
    • I just read yesterday that bottle water consumption is down 3%. That is due in fact to the economy I suppose and slightly from people becoming more aware.

    • 2 years ago
  • danitassin
    • 0
      danitassin  
    • Glass bottles, in abundance, will one day be trash too. Just like the plastic. DRINK OUT OF YOUR FAUCET.We have an immune system for a reason.

    • 2 years ago
  • nursediesel
  • jaidi1
    • 0
      jaidi1  
    • the smaller the container, the bigger the markup on water... so if you have to buy it bottled, buy the big gallon jug! And if you have to have your little water containers to take with you... recycle them by refilling from the gallon jug. :) Every little bit helps!

    • 2 years ago
  • bailey78
    • 0
      bailey78  
    • jaidi1:

      Yep good idea The wife and I reuse the gallon jugs for three months at a time recycle the old jugs and buy new ones an we refill our metal travel cups out of the gallons. such an easy way to save money and help the Envirment.

    • 2 years ago
  • GodsnLiberals
    • 0
      GodsnLiberals  
    • "To solve this, action must be taken from the federal, state, and local governments must protect the quality and integrity of our water resources.
      Again investing in the maintenance and renewal of municipal water and sewage treatment plants, storage, and distribution. Our water pipes and sewer lines in the United States were built in the late 1800s, the 1920s.

      Old, corroded water lines can break are not only wasting water but also opening avenues for contamination..."
      ************

      just on a side note..these same people who after decades and decades still has not addressed this issue..is going to run our healthcare system

      for thos eco friendly universal healthcare people..SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT

    • 2 years ago
  • CalPerr
    • 0
      CalPerr  
    • GodsnLiberals:

      How the hell could they be the same people after "decades and decades" dont these assholes retire?

      But seriously, its gotta be new people, the same dudes dont run the Post Office the and the Veterans Association

    • 2 years ago
  • GodsnLiberals
  • lookatmypix
  • mbk220
  • 2helenahandbasket
    • 0
      2helenahandbasket  
    • GodsnLiberals:

      Buy a good whole-house water filter. Also, a pitcher-type filter, such as Britta. Either of those, or both, would be much cheaper than bottled water, and your water would taste the same.

      It doesn't even make sense to me that so many folks like to claim they're "green" yet never mention, or they even BUY, water in plastic bottles that clutter up our landfills for generations.

    • 2 years ago
  • GodsnLiberals
  • 2helenahandbasket
  • CalPerr
  • lookatmypix
    • 0
      lookatmypix  
    • "American consumers are drinking more bottled water every year. They collectively spend hundreds or thousands of dollars more per gallon for water in a plastic bottle than they would for the H20 flowing from their taps.
      Plastic bottle production in the United States annually requires about 17.6 million barrels of oil, enough to fuel more than one million cars.
      About 86 percent of empty plastic water bottles in the United States land in the garbage instead of being recycled. That amounts to about two million tons of plastic bottles piling up in U.S. landfills each year.

      To solve this, action must be taken from the federal, state, and local governments must protect the quality and integrity of our water resources.
      Again investing in the maintenance and renewal of municipal water and sewage treatment plants, storage, and distribution. Our water pipes and sewer lines in the United States were built in the late 1800s, the 1920s.

      Old, corroded water lines can break are not only wasting water but also opening avenues for contamination. Worn out or overburdened sewage systems can overflow into our streams, rivers, lakes, and oceans, creating serious health concerns. The National Research Council recently warned of more water-borne disease outbreaks unless we make "substantial investments" in improving our drinking water and sewage storage and distribution systems.

      Every year, Congress debates proposals for funding clean drinking water. A 2007 bill provided $14 billion in federal loan guarantees over four years for water and sewer improvements. While the bill passed the House of Representatives, it has not yet passed the Senate. Unfortunately, even if it were to become law, it would still be insufficient in meeting our nation's water infrastructure needs.

      Collectively, our communities fall about $22 billion short annually of what they need to maintain and improve public drinking water and sewage systems. Federal dollars are the only way to address this clean water infrastructure funding gap estimated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Government Accountability Office, and the non-profit Water Infrastructure Network at between $300 and $500 billion over 20 years. Much of the funding gap stems from government cuts to clean water programs."
      From sustainabletable.org

    • 2 years ago
  • Bren589
    • 0
      Bren589  
    • Totally agree that plastic water bottles should be done away with. it would save so much space in the landfills. Not everyone recycles . So this would be great if we can accomplish this

    • 2 years ago
more from Tech:

top videos