Tech | August 20, 2009 | 2 comments

NASA Nukeships for OffWorld Exploration?

Image
pjacobs51
NASA is looking at bringing nuclear power to other planets. It's an intelligent option, perfectly suited to off-world exploration, and is being rigorously tested - so look forward to headlines screaming "NASA NUKING SPACE SHOCKER OUTRAGE!"


The thing to remember is NASA aren't idiots - they are literally an organization of rocket scientists, and nuclear power is an excellent option for offworld energy. The technology is well known, it's the most power bang per fuel mass buck available, and the small size and off-world nature of any space reactors means that's the only "bang" there could actually be. And in case you haven't noticed, off-world exploration is the most incredible and envelope-pushing mission mankind is capable of. It would be imbecilic to rule anything out.

The system works off a Stirling engine, one of the original heat engines (built as a rival to steam designs) which operates off the difference between a hot and cold location. The small nuclear fission pile provides the heat, conducted by liquid metal, and the cold is conveniently provided by being in space - or at the very least, being on a planet that's not as hot as nuclear reactions. The liquid metal is a sodium potassium mixture, and yes, this does mean that NASA are not only cooler than the T1000 but are actually using it to do work.

The system still needs a radiator, a forty-by-sixty meter cooling fin which will get rid of excess heat. It's important to remember that a heat engine doesn't convert hot into electricity - "hot" isn't actually a thing, and the point of the nuclear power is to provide a constant high temperature region. If you let the temperature get to high you'll run into all sorts of awful melting things, especially in space - it's extremely capable of cold, but there's no conduction or convection, so it's extremely easy to overheat if you don't work to radiate.

Solar power is perfect for some space applications but not everything we want to do lives in the light (or can afford the weight of batteries to store excess power for night-side operations). Until we come up with something better, nuclear power is our only option if we don't want to become reverse-vampires who have to hide in the sunshine. The Fission Surface Power (FSP) project has tested all the parts of this power source individually and is gearing up for full scale trials in 2014.

But don't let little things like logic, strict controls, or rigorous testing of proven hardware distract you. Look forward to lunacy as soon as news of nuclear hits the anti-everything crowd, and use it to discriminate between intelligent environmental activists and those who hear buzzwords and start screaming. Nuclear weaponry is undeniably the scariest thing we've ever achieved, and power plants need the very strictest of standards, it's true - but surely even if you hate nuclear material you'd be in favor of getting it off the planet?
  1. groups:
    Community,   Tech,   Current Tonight,   Upstream,   5 more
  2. tags:
    Science Technology Space NASA 2 more
  3.     
    |

2 comments // NASA Nukeships for OffWorld Exploration?

  • RojoGatto
    • 0
      RojoGatto  
    • nuclear power can do anything it has powered the sun for like 5 billion years i say we should use it for a little more than killing
      LETS NUKE MARS!

    • 2 years ago
  • NeutronActivation
    • 0
      NeutronActivation  
    • The thing to remember is NASA makes mistakes just like any other humans; space shuttles explode, Orbiters crash into Mars and the Hubble Space telescope needed "glasses" the day it was launched.
      The Mars orbiter crashed because one engineering team used metric units while another used English units for a key spacecraft operation. DUH!

      Ever heard of SNAP-9A, SNAP-19, SNAP-27, Transit 5-BN3, Cosmos 954, Cosmos 1402? They were all nuclear powered spacecraft that crashed back into the Earth.

      Cosmos 954 was the first case of Space law in history when Canada sued Russia for damaged incurred from contamination, luckily the satellite didn't crash into a populated area.

      What happens when your nuke rocket explodes like half of our space shuttle fleet did? Those shuttles were designed for 100 launches, one made 9 the other 27 then BOOM! Rockets fail all the time during development and even proven designs can fail. When we can use a Star Trek style transporter to get nuclear material off the planet I'll be glad to see it go until then I'd just as soon see it stay under the Earth's surface undisturbed.

    • 2 years ago
more from Tech:

top videos