Tech | October 14, 2009 | 10 comments

When Man & Machine Merge

Image
RFIDemocracy
Technological visionary Ray Kurzweil discusses the future of humanity and its place in a world of super-intelligent machines and super-human intelligence.

...Over the past four decades, Ray Kurzweil has established himself as one of the world's most prolific and influential inventors. His specialty is pattern recognition — teaching machines to classify data and learn. He created the first program to enable computers to read text — the basis of modern scanning — as well as the first program to translate text into speech. Stevie Wonder, a close friend of Kurzweil, calls the inventor's print-to-speech technology a "breakthrough that changed my life." In 1983, with Wonder as an adviser, Kurzweil built the Kurzweil 250 — a synthesizer that revolutionized the music world with its uncannily realistic re-creations of acoustic orchestral instruments.
For his contributions to artificial intelligence, Kurzweil has been enshrined in the Inventors Hall of Fame and has received White House honors from three presidents — including the highest prize in his field, the National Medal of Technology. But nothing he has done in the past has shaken the scientific community as profoundly as his latest prediction. In our lifetime, Kurzweil believes, machines will not only surpass humans in intelligence — they will irrevocably alter what it means to be human. Cell-size robots will zap disease from our bloodstream. Superintelligent nanotechnology, operating on a molecular scale, will scrub pollution from our atmosphere. Our minds, our skills, our memories, our very consciousness will be backed up on computers — allowing us, in essence, to live forever, all our data saved by super-smart machines.
"Right now, people think it's irresponsible not to back up our PCs," Kurzweil says. "But increasingly, we'll be backing up the information in our brains. People will think it was remarkable that we couldn't back up our brains in 2010."
Kurzweil is very specific about when this epic shift will take place. By 2045, he predicts, machines and humans will merge, redefining life as we know it. The moment is known as the Singularity, referring to the term used in astrophysics to describe the point inside a black hole where the ordinary laws of physics cease to apply. To prepare himself and the rest of the world for the era of conscious machines, Kurzweil has turned himself into the chief prophet of the coming Techno Rapture. He crisscrosses the globe to rally top scientists, hosts an annual Singularity Summit that draws leaders from places like Google and MIT, and has even developed his own line of nutritional supplements to extend people's lives until the day when their existence can be endlessly preserved by technology. At 61, Kurzweil pops 150 of his own pills every day, determined to live long enough to see the day when, thanks to machines, he will never age.

To say that Kurzweil's prediction is controversial is to understate the scientific firestorm it has generated. No less a pragmatist than Bill Gates has hailed Kurzweil's vision, calling him "the best person I know at predicting the future of artificial intelligence." But to other leading thinkers, Kurzweil has gone off the deep end, venturing into an almost messianic fervor with his promises of life everlasting. "The Singularity is a new religion — and a particularly kooky one at that," says Jaron Lanier, a top computer scientist who pioneered the realm of virtual reality. "The Singularity is the coming of the Messiah, heaven on Earth, the Armageddon, the end of times. And fanatics always think that the end of time comes in their own lifetime."

Kurzweil shrugs off such criticism: He has the self-confidence of a man who is used to being so far ahead of the curve that others can't see where he's headed. The only time he falters is when he's asked if he could be wrong about the Singularity. For a moment he stares blankly into space, as if receiving an otherworldly transmission.

More...
  1. groups:
    Tech,   SF&F and Comics,   The Future,   dream on
  2. tags:
    Computers Inventions Nanotechnology Genius 7 more
  3.     
    |

10 comments // When Man & Machine Merge

  • PAUL1UZ5
  • EdJoyProductions
  • royulery
  • RFIDemocracy
  • RFIDemocracy
  • iamfree
    • 0
      iamfree  
    • I don't think so....I've read a few of Kurzweil's books and his predictions are logically sound if you rule out change.In our little human world we design and think in linear lines.This truth can be viewed by observing modern man's creations;specifically our languages of communication and advances in technology.
      Nature however, manifest itself through the use of diverse patterns and cycles.This truth can be observed by viewing how a bird creates her nest,or bees creating their hives,flowers blossoming,seasons changing or the Evolution of species.The patterns and cycles of nature govern all life that exist on this planet.The truth of the matter is that the conscious human mind is only a small fragment of the totality of the complete human consciousness.We totally block out our "sub" conscious during our waking state; where we process and distribute more lines of code.Our sub-conscious however;processes information in accord with nature's diverse patterns and cycles.To view this truth though, one must detach themselves from the linear way of processing information.(warning open mind required),a pendulum when held between one's fingers can reveal the location of objects that the conscious mind was completely unaware of.I know that might sound a bit whacko but a bit of "hands-on" research into the field will validate what i'm saying.You can also view this by observing the migration of birds.They go not because they calculated their road trip but because the information stored in their Dna is in direct communication with nature.After understanding the above statements i made one must ask,is the correct path for human kind one of linear creation through technology or self discovery that will change how we process information all together?I'd go with the latter.I won't explain my own reasoning behind this unless asked since it would take alot more time to explain.Ray and I (my name's ray also:-) do share one common concept.There is a merge coming,but i would argue that we are in the process of converging with ourselves...not machines.

    • 2 years ago
  • remanns
    • 0
      remanns  
    • Whoa,..(wow?)---BACKUP!

      "But increasingly, we'll be backing up the information in our brains. People will think it was remarkable that we couldn't back up our brains in 2010."

    • 2 years ago
  • RFIDemocracy
  • unimatrix0
  • Progresshiv
more from Tech:

top videos