Tech | December 20, 2009 | 4 comments

Is the moon really grey or full of colors?

lookatmypix
Is the moon really a lifeless and grey planet?

The moon has always captured people's attention.

I stumbled across this documentary and found it very interesting.
True or not what they say, I just loved to see those pictures of a Moon full of colors!
I like the idea very much.

The documentary also shows many photo's anomalies of the moon that certainly are mysterious and worth investigating.
These photos are the same ones used by Google and by NASA (Clementine), readily available online for anyone to see.
It makes you wonder.

I am aware that many times we associate this kind of film with the "conspiracy theory" and simply drop it but I am not sure this is the case entirely.

I found a colored image of the moon:
"To bring out the differences between the various regions, the color saturation has been greatly enhanced," but the colors are real says the photographer.
http://www.rc-astro.com/photo/id1018_big.html


and this:
"How to capture the color of the moon"
The author guides you step by step
http://www.colormoon.pt.to/

which proves in a way the existence of a Moon full of colors.


The documentary also mentions that the logo used by NASA (a red vector) is shared by many other countries space agencies in a similar form.
I thought:
Well, that is kind of obvious, it does represent the shape of a space ship that is reaching for the sky but then again, why would different countries (competitive ones) want to copy the same logo instead of creating their own original, distinctive one?

Coincidence or ...?

Watch it, make up your own mind and write a comment.

Is there life on the moon?
What are they hiding?

I thought may be there are remains and/or signs of ancient extra terrestrial civilizations on the moon and this far advanced technology is secretly treasured by our government.

Perhaps the two questions that still perplex me are:
Why don't we have any colored image of the moon from the Hubble telescope?
And why were the crosshair of the camera eliminated from some of the moon photos?




“Once I started the colorizing process on the photos by adding earth tones and colors to the moon landscapes, the structures and towers began to pop out! I was so overwhelmed at what I was seeing that I stayed up all night to colorize as many of the photos from the archives as I could. I have spent as much as two days colorizing a single photo because there are so many things there to see.” — Jose Escamilla.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjyJe-UkeqQ



Join Universe:
http://current.com/groups/universe/
  1. groups:
    Community,   Tech,   Green,   Earth and Science,   6 more
  2. tags:
    Politics Government Space Software 9 more
  3.     
    |

4 comments // Is the moon really grey or full of colors? // Video

  • S3th
    • 0
      S3th  
    • Image
    • The only problem with Escamilla's film is in his conclusions. Let's say the moon is full of colors. Then it only proves that the grey moon models NASA used in their APOLLO SIMULATION PROJECT, prove they faked the missions from the get go. But, when you listen to ESCAMILLA, he tries to prop up Apollo as genuine, but with blacked out sky to hide the alien artifacts...This is clearly a case of a fly in the ointment of truth. Or perhaps a case of disinformation being spread, with an iota of truth to it, in order to prop up Apollo? Perhaps the moon is full of color, but then let's not try to prop up milli vanilli space exploits, with alien artifact explanations. Call Apollo what it was....A fraud to embezzle billions from hard-working Americans.

      Watch a few space programs about the deadly hazard of radiation in space before you finish your hypothesis Mr. Escamilia!

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bqv4q35QqUg

    • 1 year ago
  • lookatmypix
    • 0
      lookatmypix  
    • Image
    • S3th:

      Thank you for your thoughts about this. Not many people wonder about the moon and so many other things as we take these for granted.

      I do have a question that continues to puzzle me and that is:

      "Why don't we have any colored image of the moon from the Hubble telescope?"

      The Hubble telescope and our technology today could photograph the moon in all areas and show precise details. Why then the only images we keep seeing are the ones taken years ago?

      Is the moon this empty grey space? I do not believe the fact that only now we discover that there is water on the moon. The Hubble telescope can see out to a distance of many billions of light years but this is all I could find: http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/1999/14

      Thanks again.

    • 1 year ago
  • lookatmypix
    • 0
      lookatmypix  
    • "Because of weathering and the possibility of detection and
      interference by the inhabitants of earth it would be preferable
      not to erect such a base on the earth's surface. The moon seems
      one reasonable alternative.

      Forthcoming photographic reconnaissance of the moon from space
      vehicles - particularly of the back - might bear these
      possibilities in mind."

      By Carl Sagan

    • 3 years ago
  • S3th
more from Tech:

top videos