Tech | March 15, 2010 | 17 comments

Help wanted: Space flight experience required

Image
DeliaTheArtist
"Bigelow Aerospace, a Las Vegas-based firm headed by hotelier Robert Bigelow, owner of Budget Suites of America, posted a recruitment notice for astronauts on its website.

Only professionals with space flight experience need apply, which limits the pool of possible applicants worldwide to little more than 500.

NASA's shuttle fleet is scheduled to be retired at the end of this year. With no successor craft on the near horizon, thousands of workers expect to lose their jobs.

Bigelow seeks staff for its planned orbital space complex, prototypes of which already are in orbit. The company plans a series of inflatable space habitats that can be used for research, tourism, manufacturing and other activities.

As part of running the Bigelow space complex, company astronauts may be tapped for spacewalks, the job note says.

The ad made no mention of salary, and the job description includes working with the marketing department to secure government and corporate clients.

The opening for an unspecified number of astronauts is among 45 positions Bigelow is looking to fill. Most are engineering and technical posts. The company is also hiring for its building and grounds maintenance team."


http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62E32L20100315

This story brings up a few other questions for me:

1. Is NASA shutting down it's shuttle fleet a bad sign for humanity?

2. Can private sector capitalism save our space exploration?
  1. groups:
    Community,   Tech,   Current Tonight,   Science,   1 more
  2. tags:
  3.     
    |

17 comments // Help wanted: Space flight experience required

  • Saladin
    • 0
      Saladin  
    • I, for one, and completely opposed to the privatization trend.

      You can't regulate their shitty behaviors enough and it's a huge drain on resources and a tax on the environment.

      And in the event that we actually start space exploration, can you imagine the land-grabs that would take place? Holy crap, it would make Portugal and Spain's Imperial claims looks like kids in a sandbox in comparison. Total privatization of land must not be allowed in space, no one can own the damn galaxy.

    • 1 year ago
  • obamaisajoke
  • Saladin
    • 0
      Saladin  
    • obamaisajoke:

      If we ever get off this rock and colonize other planets, I promise I will leave you on earth to drown in your own filth as long as you don't follow us liberals into space.

    • 1 year ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
    • +1
      DeliaTheArtist  
    • Image
    • Saladin:

      I think the land grabbing and question of galactic ownership would come into play regardless of privatization ... there was already a question of who owns the moon - http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/07/090717-who-owns-moon-real-estate...

      "The trouble is that, legally, nobody can own the moon or anything else in space, for that matter, said Tanja Masson-Zwaan, president of the International Institute of Space Law, based in the Netherlands."

      But does this hold true just for countries? What about corporations? Will we see McMoon in the future?

      I don't want to see that either, but if NASA and the US government don't have the money to fund the shuttles and other space programs, what other than private investment and space travel can take over? Richard Branson is already doing his thing - http://www.virgingalactic.com/

      We should start at least entertaining the questions, regulations and legislation involved in private space travel, exploration and colonization because I think it's inevitable.

    • 1 year ago
  • obamaisajoke
  • obamaisajoke
  • Saladin
    • 0
      Saladin  
    • DeliaTheArtist:

      Humanity would truly be a failure if corporations get out into space before well-meaning citizens do.

      The thing is, as you've mentioned, you can't even own property in space. So all of the rules and regulations that make a corporation make sense are nonsensical in space. They'd need force, a military, to make their will known.

      Plus you're wrong about the U.S. or NASA not having enough money. The money is completely there, it's the private sector that likely doesn't have the money. Corporations all deal in debt, even if they could get a steady line of credit, a single fuck-up would make the whole thing come crashing down. Only governments can deal with that kind of collateral.

      Private space travel I don't have a problem with so long as it's properly regulated. But the -privatization- of the whole trade IS a problem. Governments need to have a role in space, otherwise the whole playing field is tapped out.

    • 1 year ago
  • Saladin
    • 0
      Saladin  
    • obamaisajoke:

      Yeah, you would slap my ass wouldn't you? Just that kinda guy I guess.

      Tell you what, you and your dead end job probably pay for about a dime in the grand scheme of things. I'll be sure to flick one to you on my way out, just to repay for how "hard" you worked for your tax dollars to be "taken away."

    • 1 year ago
  • Saladin
    • 0
      Saladin  
    • obamaisajoke:

      If I were to be a part of a colony my only condition is to have people with triple-digit IQ's, I could care less about anything else.

      If that's your definition of liberal, then by all means, it'll be a liberal planet (or moon).

      You can enjoy your bloated and useless military which well over 50% for a while, but eventually you're going to run out of things to blame liberals for.

      Or not, you seem perfectly content to wallow in your own ignorance, which apparently is bliss since you feel the need to type out how much you're laughing in every post.

    • 1 year ago
  • ChunkyCheezes
  • CalPal
    • 0
      CalPal  
    • I have to admit, I think it would've been unavoidable for space and privatization to not go together. My only question would be how well they go together.

      Personally, I think that a dual relationship might occur with private and public space exploration: the public sector, as I would hope, would deal with research, exploration and planetary management, and the privatized section with resource gathering.

      What do you guys think of this kind of relationship?

    • 1 year ago
  • DeliaTheArtist
  • obamaisajoke
  • Saladin
    • +2
      Saladin  
    • obamaisajoke:

      Right, because you know liberals so well.

      You barely have two brain cells to rub together but let me try to explain something to you anyway.

      In an online discussion, it's pretty stupid to put words in someone's mouth. You have no idea what they think about something and all you do is make them defensive.

      If you're having trouble doing that, just change every sentence you have into the form of a question. You don't have to take a partisan dump in every post. It is possible to write something that at least resembles a coherent part of this discussion.

    • 1 year ago
  • obamaisajoke
  • Saladin
    • +1
      Saladin  
    • obamaisajoke:

      So let's see, you got one sentence out before exploding into stupidity and blind insults again.

      Let's get something straight here, unless you make more than $100,000 a year, you spend about a fucking dime on any program that has ever existed that will ever affect me. So you can cram this pathetic anti-tax argument right back in your ass where you pulled it out of.

      Furthermore, NASA's budget is less than 1% of the total Federal Budget, it's really NOT that high. Nor would it need to be that high to promote space exploration.

      As a member of this economy, you are a useless DRONE. You have no right to tell me that you work hard to provide for me because you contribute jack shit to my existence.

      Our government is of the people, for the people, by the people, so long as there is a majority in congress representing us your argument about "you" paying for me is a crock of shit.

    • 1 year ago
  • pjacobs51
more from Tech:

top videos