Kerry: Renewable energy is the future, USA must lead

-
-
- WakeUpPeople
- added this
At its foundation is a new economic reality that the leaders of the 21st century will be those committed to clean energy economies.
The United States, with our innovative spirit and entrepreneurial vitality, is positioned to lead the way — if we seize the opportunity staring us in the face.
In the coming weeks the Senate will have a historic opportunity to debate legislation that will make our way easier. Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Obama are committed to make this the year that the United States finally passes comprehensive clean energy and climate legislation. Further delay would only exacerbate the risk of falling behind in the emerging global competition for clean energy jobs, manufacturing and markets. The bipartisan legislation that Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Joe Lieberman (ID-Conn.) and I have been working to complete presents an opportunity that we cannot afford to miss.
We begin not just by curbing man-made carbon emissions that are contributing to climate change at an alarming rate but by also establishing incentives for private investment in clean energy technology industries. Over the next 10 years, those investments can create as many as 1.9 million jobs, increase household incomes by up to $1,175 a year and boost the gross domestic product as much as $111 billion.
This is a national security imperative. And, as we make the transition to a clean energy economy, we will reduce our dependence on foreign energy sources, a dependence that now takes almost $500 billion a year out of our economy — about $1,400 a year for every man, woman and child in America — and ships it to too many countries that don’t share our values. In the long run, it imposes an onerous and unsustainable burden on the men and women of our armed forces who are deployed to protect our national security.
As a bedrock global economic issue, the alarm bells are just as compelling: Other countries are rushing ahead while policymakers in the United States try to reach a consensus on how to proceed forward to an economy fueled by clean and sustainable energy sources. China, in particular, is moving rapidly to become the leader of the global clean energy economy. The Chinese just raised auto efficiency standards to 36.7 miles per gallon, higher than our new target for 2016. Today its renewable capacity is only 2 percent less than the United States, and it is set to grow rapidly from almost 10 percent of its energy use to 15 percent by 2020. And last year, for the first time, Chinese investment in renewable energy exceeded ours, skyrocketing 50 percent.
The clean energy industry is still in its infancy in the United States and yet already relatively substantial in its size — with 770,000 jobs (and growing three times faster than jobs in general), venture capital exceeding $12 billion and public investments of $85 billion in direct spending and tax credits. A comprehensive national strategy for a clean energy future would produce explosive economic growth — at a time when America needs it most. And just as importantly, it will put our country on the path to sustainable long-term economic growth.
We have not lost our ability to take on big challenges. We have acted boldly in every crisis that we have faced as a nation. The New Deal helped lift America from the depths of the Great Depression in the 1930s. The Marshall Plan helped restore stability in Europe in the 1940s and ’50s. The Apollo Project put a man on the moon in the 1960s. And the Pentagon’s ARPANET program formed the backbone of the Internet that spawned the information and technology boom of the ’90s.
For nearly half a century, we were willing to pay any price and bear any burden to win the Cold War. The threat from Soviet nuclear warheads was a clear and present danger in our lives.
Just as clear and present is the danger climate change poses to our economy and national security. We cannot drill and burn our way out of danger. But we can invent and invest our way out of it by leveraging a shift to a clean energy economy that will allow America to do what America always does best — lead the way into the future.
-
- groups:
- Community, Tech, Green, Earth and Science, 6 more
-
- recommended by:
- WakeUpPeople
-
-
Wetdog
-
----------" Climate change will make things better. More CO2 is good for plant growth, and unusable tundra will become good farmland."-------
Tundra has permafrost under it. When the permafrost melts, it becomes marshes or wetlands, or lake bottoms depending on the depth of the permafrost.
You can't grow wheat or corn on marshlands or lake bottoms.
- 2 years ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
Wetdog
-
In 1990, the price of gasoline was $.73/gal.---today, the price of gasoline is $3/gal. Extend the line out another 20 years, to 2030, and the price of gasoline will be over $12/gal. This is what Peak Oil means.
Except that there is a problem with just extending the line out on the graph. Consumption(demand) drives the price of gasoline up. We consume over 2X the amount of petroleum today than we did in 1990. And demand for petroleum is rising by about 6% per year. By 2030, we will need 2.5 times as much petroleum, to live like we do right now.
And petroleum is getting scarcer. It is already running out. The US is only producing 1/2 the petroleum it did in 1990. Other nations are seeing declines in the amounts of oil they can produce also.
Our entire economy is based on cheap energy, primarily petroleum and coal. When petroleum runs out, or becomes to expensive to find, get out, and market, we will not have any coal either. Draglines, shovels, bulldozers, trucks, trains, skip loaders, conveyers and all the other equipment needed to mine and handle coal will be useless without petroleum to fuel them.
Every financial crisis that has ever happened has built for a period of time. Then when it hits, it hits overnight. "Black Friday" Forces build until they reach a tipping point. Then the whole bucket dumps at once.
The forces building due to the slowly increasing incremental costs of Peak Oil on the economic world will suddenly burst the dam. Financial markets will plummet overnight. Without financial resources to continue exploration and production, oil flowing to the market will drop from a flood to a trickle.
Everything that depends on oil will come to a halt. Airplanes, ships, trains, trucks will all grind to a halt. There will be no electricity. Without petroleum, there will be no way to get coal out of the ground and to the electrical generation plants.
- 2 years ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
tenletterz [removed]
- This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
tenletterz [removed]
-
-
WakeUpPeople
-
tenletterz:
Water is good for crops too, but what happens when you oversaturate crops? They die. The argument that "a little CO2 is good for the planet, so a lot of CO2 obviously is great for the planet" is ridiculous. You haven't considered what else might be affected by increased CO2, like ocean acidification which is currently happening faster than ever... EVER... 30% increase since the industrial revolution.
I don't recall anyone saying that we are running out of coal or natural gas, although we are about to pass peak oil in a few years which means prices will go way up as supply dwindles. The point isn't entirely about the finite nature of fossil fuels either. The green movement is more about the fact that we need to stop polluting our atmosphere, blowing up mountains, draining the lubricant for tectonic plates (oil), spilling said oil into marine and land habitats, and thus damaging fragile ecosystems across our only home planet.
- 2 years ago
-
WakeUpPeople
-
-
JanforGore
-
Hmm, so why is renewabale energy to these Senators, offshore oil drilling, "clean coal" and nuclear? They talk a good game but they never do it. And as it stands now, the CO2 emissions cuts in this bill are totally inadequate. 17% by 2020 is simply not good enough.
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
WakeUpPeople
-
JanforGore:
I agree. Of course we need clean energy, but we also need to think long term and implement clean RENEWABLE energy. We need to stop pandering to the industries that created the problems in the first place. It's time to invest in our future and put people to work. ZERO carbon should be the goal, and yes, the clock is ticking.
- 2 years ago
-
WakeUpPeople
-
-
artemis6
-
U.S.A. Inc , is stuck in a rut . Each of us will have to do it on our own , as much as we can .
- 2 years ago
-
artemis6
-
-
WakeUpPeople
-
Why are we fighting the future? We used to be the pioneers... now we are the obstacles. Renewable energy has always been the best option, but we are dragging our feet on the technology implementation. Why are we not investing in our future? America is losing its brand name. China is in the lead now.
- 2 years ago
-
WakeUpPeople
-
-
emarston
-
WakeUpPeople:
people seem afraid of change more so then ever it's very sad.
- 2 years ago
-
emarston
-
-
WakeUpPeople
-
emarston:
It's kind of pathetic too.
- 2 years ago
-
WakeUpPeople
-
-
emarston
-
WakeUpPeople:
kinda? what has happened to us?
- 2 years ago
-
emarston