Ten good reasons why GMOs are not compatible with organic agriculture
source: http://www.rodaleinstitute.org/20100412_nfoped_Ten-good-reasons-why-genetic-engineering-is-n...
-
-
- JanforGore
- added this
Here are 10 essential points that I believe show why GMOs are incompatible with organic production:
1. Basic science. Humans have a complex digestive system, populated with flora, fauna, and enzymes that have evolved over millennia to recognize and break down foods found in nature to make nutrients available to feed the human body. GMO crops and foods are comprised of novel genetic constructs which have never before been part of the human diet and may not be recognized by the intestinal system as digestible food, leading to the possible relationship between genetic engineering and a dramatic increase in food allergies, obesity, diabetes, and other food-related diseases, which have all dramatically increased correlated to the introduction of GMO crops and foods.
2. Ecological impact. Organic agriculture is based on the fundamental principle of building and maintaining healthy soil, aquatic, and terrestrial ecosystems. Since the introduction of GMOs, there has been a dramatic decline in the populations of Monarch butterflies, black swallowtails, lacewings, and caddisflies, and there may be a relationship between genetic engineering and colony collapse in honeybees. GMO crops, including toxic Bt corn residues, have been shown to persist in soils and negatively impact soil ecosystems. Genetically modified rBST (recombinant bovine somatrotropin, injected to enhance a cow’s milk output) has documented negative impacts on the health and well being of dairy cattle, which is a direct contradiction to organic livestock requirements.
3. Control vs harmony. Organic agriculture is based on the establishment of a harmonious relationship with the agricultural ecosystem by farming in harmony with nature. Genetic engineering is based on the exact opposite -- an attempt to control nature at its most intimate level - the genetic code, creating organisms that have never previously existed in nature.
4. Unpredictable consequences. Organic ag is based on a precautionary approach - know the ecological and human health consequences, as best possible, before allowing the use of a practice or input in organic production. Since introduction, genetic modification of agricultural crops has been shown to have numerous unpredicted consequences, at the macro level, and at the genetic level. Altered genetic sequences have now been shown to be unstable, producing unpredicted and unknown outcomes.
continued
-
- groups:
- Community, Tech, Green, Earth and Science, 6 more
-
- tags:
- Politics, Environment, Climate Change, Pollution, 22 more
-
-
slage
-
That article made quite a few assertions but didn't give any supporting evidence.
This is a recent study done by the National Research Council that's pretty good.
"Since genetically engineered (GE) crops were introduced in 1996, their use in the United States has grown rapidly, accounting for 80-90 percent of soybean, corn, and cotton acreage in 2009. To date, crops with traits that provide resistance to some herbicides and to specific insect pests have benefited adopting farmers by reducing crop losses to insect damage, by increasing flexibility in time management, and by facilitating the use of more environmentally friendly pesticides and tillage practices. However, excessive reliance on a single technology combined with a lack of diverse farming practices could undermine the economic and environmental gains from these GE crops. Other challenges could hinder the application of the technology to a broader spectrum of crops and uses.
Several reports from the National Research Council have addressed the effects of GE crops on the environment and on human health. However, The Impact of Genetically Engineered Crops on Farm Sustainability in the United States is the first comprehensive assessment of the environmental, economic, and social impacts of the GE-crop revolution on U.S. farms. It addresses how GE crops have affected U.S. farmers, both adopters and nonadopters of the technology, their incomes, agronomic practices, production decisions, environmental resources, and personal well-being. The book offers several new findings and four recommendations that could be useful to farmers, industry, science organizations, policy makers, and others in government agencies."
You can read a full summary here: http://www.nap.edu/nap-cgi/report.cgi?record_id=12804&type=pdfxsum
I really recommend reading it since it gives a fairly full summary of the current state of the major GM crops: along with their advantages/disadvantages, what challenges need to be overcome, and sources for the data they based their findings on.
If you believe this is just GM propaganda, I would still suggest reading it.
- 2 years ago
-
slage
-
-
Trauzer
-
slage:
Very dense, but interesting to see. I like to think that GE crops / GMOs can bring more good than bad, if given enough time to develop. Thank you for sharing.
- 2 years ago
-
Trauzer
-
-
JanforGore
-
slage:
You want evidence it's out here and it's on here. Go look for it.
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
mindcruzer
-
Trauzer:
If you still think that, you need to research it more. Whenever you screw with the balance of nature, nature always wins.
- 2 years ago
-
mindcruzer
-
-
CalgarC
-
:D GMO's suck... I sure hope other people on this planet... maybe our governments understand some of the "big" words and "science" in this article lol
- 2 years ago
-
CalgarC
-
-
zephyrwind
-
Just Say No to GMO!!!!
- 2 years ago
-
zephyrwind
-
-
JanforGore
-
http://www.gmwatch.org/gm-crops-research-documenting-the-limitations-risks-and-a...
This link also has a treasure trove of information about scientific studies, and the limitations, risks, and alternatives to GMOs as well as explaining the propaganda put out by GMO enthusiasts that genetic modification is just like traditional plant breeding, which is patently false.
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
This is an excellent article describing all of the dangers of GMOs and the reasons why they are not needed. I also especially liked reason number seven: UNNECESSARY.
- 2 years ago
-
JanforGore
