Obama to open 1.8 million Alaskan acres to oil drilling
source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/09/obama-to-open-up-18-milli_n_641559.html
-
-
- JanforGore
- added this
Interior Secretary Ken Salazar says the Bureau of Land Management will offer 190 tracts with bids to be opened Aug. 11 in Anchorage. The sale is one of dozens, mostly in Western states, that Salazar announced in November.
The petroleum reserve covers 23 million acres on Alaska's North Slope. That's an area slightly smaller than the state of Indiana.
-
- groups:
- Community, Tech, Green, Earth and Science, 6 more
-
- tags:
- Politics, Climate Change, Oil, Alaska, 5 more
-
-
fun_size
-
What. The. Fuck. We have an unstoppable gusher in the Gulf right now and were looking into opening up MORE land for oil drilling? This is fucking absurd! What ever happened to investing in green energies? NOW IS THE TIME!
- 1 year ago
-
fun_size
-
-
JanforGore
-
fun_size:
Well this isn't all of it either. There is a pipeline coming into Wisconsin from Alberta that will be piping in toxic bitumen tarsands crude, that may eventually be extended to the Gulf of Mexico. They are not listening to us or caring about what we think regardless of our politics. They don't give a damn about scientists' warnings regarding CO2 emissions and the coming climate tipping point should things remain the same. All they care about is their false choice. And as much as I criticize Obama on this I never expected he and this State Dept would allow TARSANDS to be piped into this country, but that is what is happening besides all of the offshore abandoned wells still leaking and the drilling you can be sure will take place in the Arctic because they don't care about culture or the indigenous peoples of this world either. They are simply heartless soulles bastards. So essentially, we are screwed as a species because THEY have to kept HAPPY.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
artemis6
-
fun_size:
There are so many people in the states who would get an e-car , IF they had access to 'em . By denying us this , they can keep ROBBING US . And that is what this is really about . Financial robbery of the masses by big oil . WHO is on a better position to invest in new energy ? The most profitable companies in the WORLD , otherwise known as Big Oil . And why not ? Because it Would cut down on short term profit . Long term profit is not their concern . The health and well being of their employees and customers , is not their concern either . It is clear what regard they have for all life on this planet . Short term profits make for STUPID business practices .
- 1 year ago
-
artemis6
-
-
TomTucker
-
Drill baby Drill is catching on
- 1 year ago
-
TomTucker
-
-
cztheday
-
I am not particularly comfortable with this action, either. I do understand that the issue is much more complex than would appear to be the case from a few of the knee-jerk responses we see here.
Obviously we cannot force American companies to sell their oil only to American distributors or other consumers. If there is a foreign purchaser who is willing to pay a higher price than an American purchaser even when the cost of shipping is added, then the company needs to be free to sell it to that foreign purchaser -- just like any other producer of goods or services.
But more specifically, Obama is faced with a difficult energy marketplace and an exponentially more difficult political environment. Like it or not, the oil industry (including refining and gas transportation, storage and distribution) is a very large segment of our economy that employs millions of people. Further, the shares of those companies are in almost every pension fund in the country. We need to shift away from fossil fuels -- but without throwing hundreds of thousands of workers out of work virtually overnight.
If Obama were to support more offshore drilling right now, he would be crucified in the next Presidential election. While the Administration has showed varying degrees of support for a resurgence in nuclear power plant construction, that is a highly divisive issue right now as well (I, for one, am not nearly convinced that plants are significantly safer than they were in the 1970s, for example).
We are also not likely to see a bunch more hydroelectric dams. Alternative fuels are great -- but there are limitations with regard to nearly all of them, and none of them are likely to be "game changers" over at least the next 5 years.
So the industry needs to continue to explore -- on land -- in order to keep prices at reasonable levels, continue contributing to the economy, and keep those pension funds afloat (as well, of course, as paying their top executives obscene amounts of money while distributing the dividends investors in such companies have come to expect).
Also, the opening up of 1.8 million acres does not by any stretch of the imagination mean that that area is going to be damaged beyond repair at any time in the future. The highest oil-producing area of my home state is also the most desolate and lightly populated. That does not mean that the ecosystems there are less precious or that companies should be free to rape and pillage the land and its occupants. But it is better than drilling in Yellowstone or Glacier Parks. My understanding is that the bulk of this land is similar.
BUT, the concerns about endangering the environment already expressed on this thread are certainly well-founded. For many of the same reasons that I dislike nuclear, I also dislike natural gas. Most of them boil down to the point that whenever imperfect humans are put in charge of dangerous substances, something really bad is guaranteed to happen sooner or later.
Obviously he is going to face criticism that he made that decision merely because a bunch of oil company CEOs asked him to do so. Having spent quite a bit of time in the D.C. political environment, I can say that it is very hard for a Democrat to get away with that. If the media doesn't crucify him there are many members of his own party who will be happy to do so. I am sure they asked, but I am equally sure that there were also other reasons (such as the ones I mention) for the decision.
That doesn't make it the right decision, just a more complex one. That is probably the thing I have the hardest time with on Current. So many people seem ready to jump at a two dimensional response to a three-dimensional problem...
- 1 year ago
-
cztheday
-
-
mindcruzer
-
cztheday:
One of the few on this website who is realistic and not short sighted. Well said.
- 1 year ago
-
mindcruzer
-
-
antiutopia [removed]
-
mindcruzer: This comment was removed by its owner.
-
antiutopia [removed]
-
-
mindcruzer
-
antiutopia:
"we'll have electric cars by the millions"
Cool. Where are you getting the energy to charge up those batteries?
- 1 year ago
-
mindcruzer
-
-
cztheday
-
antiutopia:
You are, in effect, saying that the demand for oil and oil products like gasoline is inelastic. It is such a necessity that people will find a way to pay for it, almost regardless of price. While that is true to a large extent, it is a cold economic calculation that does not take into account the misery suffered by the poor in having to decide between purchasing gasoline so they can get to work, to the doctor, to vocational training, etc or paying for other necessities of life like food, medicine, rent, etc. It also fails to take into account the inflationary pressures that significantly higher oil prices put on goods and services across the country.
But I also don't quite understand what gave you the impression that I advocated capitulation. I was simply pointing out that the problem the Administration faces on energy policy is more complex than the environmental issues in isolation. Yes, the environmental concerns should be among the top issues considered in this kind of decision but that would be a one-dimensional look at the problem. I suppose it would be great if Obama and his advisors could look at every problem only through the lens of environmentalism...but they can't. They have to think about pensions and stock prices and employment and inflation and international relations and public safety and even the effect of higher energy prices on the federal budget.
That kind of thinking is no better than the simplistic analysis done by single-issue legislators. I have grown to really dislike members of Congress or state legislators who think only of tax reduction, for example. There are thousands of other issues of enormous importance to their constituents, but they managed to be elected and now cannot be bothered if the issue under discussion does not relate to tax reduction or abortion rights or the death penalty or whatever their particular "thing" is...drives me crazy.
- 1 year ago
-
cztheday
-
-
treewolf39
-
cztheday:
Nice level comment. And I would add that five more years of full tilt boogie polluting may be the straw that breaks the camels back.
- 1 year ago
-
treewolf39
-
-
treewolf39
-
cztheday:
I really hear you, but without a healthy environment the only thing left to invest in is sickness. There is not another world to move to yet. No one said change would be economically pleasant and the earth is the commons for all life as we no it. Understanding his reasoning just means your buying the rhetoric. That asshole ran on a lie called change.
- 1 year ago
-
treewolf39
-
-
Pedroptz
-
Well, I prefer using natural reserves to find oil than using the oil that comes from the middle east, we are financing terrorism.
- 1 year ago
-
Pedroptz
-
-
antiutopia [removed]
-
Pedroptz: This comment was removed by its owner.
-
antiutopia [removed]
-
-
calm_incense
-
Can't wait for conservatives to criticize Obama for this. -_-
"Only 1.8 million acres? Pathetic. This guy hates America and doesn't want her to benefit from her own God-given natural resources."
- 1 year ago
-
calm_incense
-
-
csmonut
-
About this drilling...first, Americans won't see any oil coming from there for what? 5 to 10 years? So....we're still dependant on foreign oil. And to top that off....like much of the oil in that region, it will probably be shipped overseas to be refined, then shipped back to the US at an inflated rate. Basically there is no savngs.
In the meantime, it is pretty obvious the current US administration is not investing enough in clean energy...and like I have read in other articles, people don't want the wind towers, they don't want the solar panels...NIMBY attitudes is what I have read in the local paper when an energy company approaches the town councils and county commissioners.
Why is it that green energy is advocated so strongly, but not allowed to happen? It's not all "big oil". Especially when it comes to local entities.
Demand your county commissioners, town councils, etc. support these projects. - 1 year ago
-
csmonut
-
-
oppressed1
-
csmonut:
It will probably be shipped overseas to be refined... ARe you brain dead? We dont live in Iran, we have the largest capability to refine oil in the world.
- 1 year ago
-
oppressed1
-
-
csmonut
-
oppressed1:
No need to be insulting....
We may have the refining capabilities, but much of the oil is refined in Asian countries because of shipping costs. Asia is closer than Texas.
However, currently, only about 1 million barrels are "traded" each day with Canada and Mexico. - 1 year ago
-
csmonut
-
-
JanforGore
-
oppressed1:
http://current.com/news/92360825_study-shows-us-refineries-have-bad-safety-recor...
Yes, but they keep blowing up. The oil industry is one big negligent butt sore on this country.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
csmonut:
So true and that is where we have to start... our communities. And I hate to sound like a broken record, but the way we grow food in this country is a big contributor to the fossil fuel addiction we have as well as pollution and climate change. We need to return to sustainable agricultural methods in how we grow food that cut usage of fossil fuels which will in turn not only decrease carbon emissions, but cut pollution and give us healthier food. That along with investing in solar farms in our communities could go a long way to cutting that addiction.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
tylervictoria1
-
the person who finds a renewable environmentaly safe substitute for oil will be my jesus.
- 1 year ago
-
tylervictoria1
-
-
Einsam_Data_Old [removed]
-
tylervictoria1: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
Einsam_Data_Old [removed]
-
-
blaino
-
A wolf in sheeps clothing.
- 1 year ago
-
blaino
-
-
antiutopia [removed]
-
Einsam_Data_Old: This comment was removed by its owner.
-
antiutopia [removed]
-
-
Einsam_Data_Old [removed]
-
antiutopia: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
Einsam_Data_Old [removed]
-
-
calm_incense
-
Einsam_Data_Old:
Palin was the best thing that happened to McCain's campaign. The amount of rational supporters he lost was far outweighed by the number of ignorant supporters he gained.
- 1 year ago
-
calm_incense
-
-
jcamille
-
Soooo we finally wont have to depend on foreign oil anymore?
yay.Also, the government and everyone else better be on top of whoever gets to drill there as far as safety restrictions go. We can't afford another BP incident almost as much as we can't afford to buy our oil from other countries.
- 1 year ago
-
jcamille
-
-
oppressed1
-
This is some how Bush's fault.
- 1 year ago
-
oppressed1
-
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
http://current.com/news/92528896_obama-commits-nearly-2-billion-to-solar-compani...
What a shameful FAIL. Completely unbelievable especially in the wake of the BP disaster which is destroying state economies, people's lives and many ecosystems and marine life. What a slap in the face!
- 1 year ago
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
-
derk
-
booooooooo!!!!!!!!
- 1 year ago
-
derk
-
-
CalgarC
-
breaking news... american government just approved bill allowing oil companies to send massive drill up your ass and search for gas.
- 1 year ago
-
CalgarC
-
-
antiutopia [removed]
-
CalgarC: This comment was removed by its owner.
-
antiutopia [removed]
-
-
CalgarC
-
antiutopia:
SHOCKING, BP creates spill in mans ass... Hayward says toilet paper unnecessary tries plugging mans ass with 1/4" guitar cable...
- 1 year ago
-
CalgarC
-
-
jaystyx
-
Until we have a viable alternative to fossil fuels, we might as well drill our own oil domestically. Better that than increasing our trade deficit by sending more money to the Middle East.
Any new drilling should also be accompanied by strict safety regulations to avoid anything like the BP disaster.
- 1 year ago
-
jaystyx
-
-
Animal_Chin
-
I'm willing to bet half a billion dollars that Haliburton will be the one to fill these contracts. Don't worry, if I lose the bet just take it out of my stimulus package!
- 1 year ago
-
Animal_Chin
-
-
ScottyT
-
-
I really wish someone would update this video. It's not as if he, or you, really had a choice. Sadly, it was the big corporations that funded his Madison Avenue campaign, and everyone bought in to it.
"Mass graves for the pump and the price is set...."
- 1 year ago
-
ScottyT
-
-
Progresshiv
-
-
What's that sound?
- 1 year ago
-
Progresshiv
-
-
csmonut
-
Progresshiv:
Yep....need more drilling equipment, more tundra buggies, more diesel engines.
My word man! We can't have the silence of Mother Earth to intrude upon our senses! We might actually learn something new and wonderful! And we wouldn't want THAT to happen, now would we?
(hope the sarcasm shows) - 1 year ago
-
csmonut
-
-
Progresshiv
-
csmonut:
Egg Zactly!
- 1 year ago
-
Progresshiv
-
-
nursediesel
-
Better here than miles below the gulf water surface. So much easier to work on something you can actually see and touch, use all your senses when working on!
Less likely to have prolonged leaks or leaks at all. Doing it right the first time easier on ground level, up close and personal! - 1 year ago
-
nursediesel
-
-
treewolf39
-
nursediesel:
Are you kidding? Take a trip to Alaska in the winter time and then tell me how easy it is to clean up. Oh wait, go in the summer when the ice has melted and the drills are only accessible by small boat and float plane. Real reason is out of sight out of mind. There are very few reporters on the North Slope.
- 1 year ago
-
treewolf39
-
-
nursediesel
-
treewolf39:
It's still easier than miles under sea level.
Besides since the recess of the ice in the northern border waters of Alaska the Russian and Chinese governments have claimed oil rights in places that we should be benefiting from. Not having those countries drill off our shores and sell the oil back to us...makes no sense, does it? - 1 year ago
-
nursediesel
-
-
treewolf39
-
nursediesel:
Ending our oil addiction makes sense. We have the biggest military on earth. I think we can keep Russia and China out of our northern ocean. Besides the whole world will benefit from clean energy.
- 1 year ago
-
treewolf39
-
-
nursediesel
-
treewolf39:
You don't understand they are already there. We had first bid on the sites but were unable to because of government restraints. So those two countries got the rights to drill there. They had the right ships for the area and no restrictions on them to bid or drill by their governments. So C'est la vie!
- 1 year ago
-
nursediesel
-
-
treewolf39
-
nursediesel:
Oh so we are not the most powerful country on earth after all. I can not believe we are having this conversation while the gulf oil is still spewing. It may not be popular but I would like my great grand children to be able to breath the air and see the absolute beauty that is being destroyed by energy production.
- 1 year ago
-
treewolf39
-
-
nursediesel
-
treewolf39:
If this would have happened else where, never mind there are not restrictions of how far away from shore drilling can be done else where.
Plus anywhere else a leak could have been addressed stat without multiple government agencies getting their politics into it. - 1 year ago
-
nursediesel
-
-
treewolf39
-
nursediesel:
Really? Had the well platform not blown up and brought attention to the gushing pipe do you think Bp would have disclosed the severity of the leak? And By the way there have been many leaks in Alaska that have gone unreported.
- 1 year ago
-
treewolf39
-
-
nicsansone
-
treewolf39:
That giant Military runs on fossil fuels...
- 1 year ago
-
nicsansone
-
-
antiutopia [removed]
-
treewolf39: This comment was removed by its owner.
-
antiutopia [removed]
-
-
treewolf39
-
nicsansone:
That reminds me We need to demand the military install sails on the ships to increase fuel efficiency.
- 1 year ago
-
treewolf39
-
-
treewolf39
-
antiutopia:
Thats what I am scared of. A nasty leak in the gulf of Alaska could really screw the west coast.
- 1 year ago
-
treewolf39
-
-
mindcruzer
-
I know in the wake of the disaster in the gulf this looks ridiculous, but we still need oil for the time being whether you like it or not. Where ever a company drills it's going to be destroying some kind of habitat, so I fail to see how that's relevant to the situation.
- 1 year ago
-
mindcruzer
-
-
treewolf39
-
mindcruzer:
Most of the oil reserves are in the middle east. What America produces is not worth the destruction and the tax incentives to oil companies are total bullshit. Oil production in America is making a few ultra wealthy and leaving the world worse off. Clean energy now. Why wait? Why not go all out and lead the world to a sustainable lifestyle?
- 1 year ago
-
treewolf39
-
-
mindcruzer
-
treewolf39:
"Clean energy now. Why wait?"
Really? What clean energy do you propose? I have yet to hear of anything as good as oil. The world is not about to take a step back for the sake of the environment; that much should be obvious. The only way this problem is getting solved is if we find an energy source as convenient as oil, and that we have not found.
- 1 year ago
-
mindcruzer
-
-
treewolf39
-
mindcruzer:
Perhaps if more energy and money were invested in solar instead of oil. I like the idea that was floated back in the 60's of solar satellites beaming to power stations 24/7.
- 1 year ago
-
treewolf39
-
-
maryol
-
treewolf39:
we don't yet have a great way to capture all the potential solar energy there is to be used. solar panels are bs, they cost more than they make up for. the day the breakthrough is discovered how to truly use all that is coming at us, will be the day the earth is reborn.
"Did you know that one hour is all it would take to power the entire earth's energy needs for one year if we could capture all the solar energy hitting the earth?"
- 1 year ago
-
maryol
-
-
treewolf39
-
maryol:
That is my whole point. Wave and tidal energy can also help reduce fossil fuel consumption but only if we actively invest in this technology. Greed will always seek the path of least resistance.
- 1 year ago
-
treewolf39
-
-
mindcruzer
-
treewolf39:
Yes, 'perhaps' being the key word. There are many people actively researching photovoltaics, but you've answered your own question. Our photovoltaic technology is not yet able to compete with oil and in some ways never will, unless we develop high capacity batteries. While we develop that technology, we obviously need a source of energy we can rely on, and that would be oil. Don't talk about this issue like it's the result of greedy corporations; this is the result of a greedy public. This is supply and demand buddy. After the days of peak oil you will start to see immense amounts of money going into alternative sources of energy. Necessity is the mother of invention. At the moment the necessity is present, but it isn't very large. The days of clean energy will come, but simply cutting off our use of oil before we are ready, for the sake of the environment, will cause more harm to us than it will do away with. This is a point that a lot of environmentalists miss. Sure the environment would be OK, but us? I'd hate to see what would happen to the world if we cut off a prominent source of energy in favor of alternatives that don't amount to much in comparison. And hence the reason it's not going to happen that way. Our society will evolve, but as we all know evolution takes time. Rushing this will only lead to disaster.
- 1 year ago
-
mindcruzer
-
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
mindcruzer:
"Don't talk about this issue like it's the result of greedy corporations; this is the result of a greedy public. This is supply and demand bro."
I agree with you. We can't expect corporations and politicians to actually have our best interests at heart. Corporations are greedy soulless entities just trying to make as much money as possible and politicians are greedy manipulative liars who will say anything. They will not do right by us and they will not tell us the right things to do. We have to do for ourselves. Our lifestyles are as much to blame than any business man out there; if we truly want to lessen and eventually rid our dependence on oil we have to get serious about our energy consumption, our luxuries, our food habits, practically everything (when I say "we" I mean the American public in general; I'm sure there are many people here who already take measures like this.) There is enough blame to go around but we can't always point the finger at the big bad guys, we have to take an active role in making this country what we want it to be.
- 1 year ago
-
DeliaTheArtist
-
-
artemis6
-
-
mindcruzer:
What do you think of methane from biofuels ? Better than having factory farm waste pollute the environment , for example . The main by product , compost . I think it is better than oil because you do not have to look for it , or work to get it . Saves a lot of money and energy , right there . Also , it uses waste that would otherwise be pollution , to create energy . That is 2 things better . Totally renewable . 3 . Anyone can do it . You don't need a million dollars . 4 . (This part here will be considered a drawback to the power companies , because the process is NOT patentable , and will be difficult to monopolize .) You might call it , the people's power . ( I do not consider corporations people .) In other words , don't expect any large scale investment in it . http://current.com/news/92105358_youtube-earth-report-gas-gas-gas-biogas.htm
I am going to make a prediction . The country what invests most heavily in biogas , solar and thermal power will be next super power , in 50 years . Also , I predict corporate monopolies will fight tooth and nail to prevent this . - 1 year ago
-
artemis6
-
-
JanforGore
-
DeliaTheArtist:
Tell that to the government taking our tax dollars and bailing out the banks that then give it to oil and coal companies to keep the circle jerk going. People are advocating for renewable energy sources and we CAN bring solar energy to a large part of this country within the next ten years, only the lobbyists, politicians, and wall street aren't allowing truly innovative people to even have their ideas see the light of day. Solar cell capacity is increasing, MIT has developed solar that works at night, solar cell efficiency has increased tremendously, and cost is reaching parity so much so that other countries are turning to it in greater numbers, and we are even seeing the beginning of "solar farms" right here in the US, one story just posted concerning Colorado. The market is here, the capacity is here, but what we need are people calling for it louder at community and state levels and also calling for market fariness in pricing. It is also a case of the market screwing us by giving false value to oil in order to make it appear cheaper than solar, when if you add in indirect costs (such as pollution, healthcare costs, etc) it would actually be more expensive. Hemp is also what should be advocated for as a fuel, and as something that could turn this economy around. We have all we need already, we just need the will, so I refuse to listen to the same people who constantly say we can't get off oil yet. We need to be investing MORE in solar, geothermal, wind, etc. and less in oil and coal in order to up demand in the first place. How can people advocate and change their ways when there is NOTHING being made available to change to?
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
Kaveh_Kompani
-
Obama dont give in : /
- 1 year ago
-
Kaveh_Kompani
-
-
PatrioticAstronaut
-
Change you can believe in.
- 1 year ago
-
PatrioticAstronaut
-
-
controlusplease
-
I feel as though I've been raped with the word "Change".
"Change", such a meaningless goddamn word to me.
I have lost faith in this country. Have we learned nothing? Let's just hand this country to the corporations so they can control and rape the Earth until every natural resource has been depleted.
Fuck Obama. Fuck "Change". - 1 year ago
-
controlusplease
-
-
ezrierin
-
I really believed the things he said during the election campaign. I think he did as well. However, I think he is losing his nerve. Obama believes he is in a historical pivotal moment where the country can fall apart, and he is like Lincoln trying to keep it together. Lincoln is his favorite president. He has found that Corporations are so powerful he feels overwhelmed by them. I believed he was stronger then that. It is beginning to look like I was wrong. Nevertheless, what is the alternative, Jeb Bush? And third parties are a joke, seating the most cohesive big political party. We need to have Obama’s back regardless, or the Republicans will be back for their next gang rape. I mean it is all we can do, short of Secession. Oh Cascadia, how I long for thee! BUT, write the White House. Let them know what you think. I happen to know this White House actually does read all the letters to the president. You can be heard my friends! Stand up, stand up OUR President, President Obama, let him know we have his back for real change, and let us move forward. Write! YES WE CAN!!!
- 1 year ago
-
ezrierin
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
ezrierin: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
ezrierin
-
MrMxyzptlk:
I hope you are wrong
- 1 year ago
-
ezrierin
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
ezrierin: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
artemis6
-
MrMxyzptlk:
You wish .
- 1 year ago
-
artemis6
-
-
ThisIsLance
-
I saw in a interview with President Obama he would begin Clean Energy soon. I suppose this is not happening?
- 1 year ago
-
ThisIsLance
-
-
ibrake4rappers13
-
ThisIsLance:
Do you think everything he says is true?
He's simply an appeaser.
- 1 year ago
-
ibrake4rappers13
-
-
ibrake4rappers13
-
ThisIsLance:
Hes a Christian, a Muslim, an athiest, a socialist, a capitalist, a liberal, a progressive, a centrist, a populist and most of all a globalist.
Do the math.
- 1 year ago
-
ibrake4rappers13
-
-
JanforGore
-
ibrake4rappers13:
Oh, so you are against oil companies raping this planet and appeasing them? Did you then call Bush an appeaser, because I didn't post this to separate Obama from Bush on this or to play political tit for tat. You sound very hypocritical and disingenuous in trying to do so. It matters not whether it is a Republican corporate shill or a Democratic "appeaser", the point of this is that the American people are being had either way and we better wake up before it is all gone. But of course, it is way too much to expect the usual partisan political hacks to understand that. This is about THE PLANET and our future ability to live on it, not everyone's petty political grudges.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
ThisIsLance:
They'll throw some money out there just to make us think it is part of the agenda, but on the whole it won't be nearly what oil and coal will see. They like Bush believe in "clean coal" as well.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
artemis6
-
ThisIsLance:
It is , just on a smaller scale , than is needed .http://current.com/news/92370734_solar-power-plant-at-kennedy-supplying-electric... The potential is pretty good though . http://current.com/technology/88882169_solar-power-plants-could-supply-69-percen...
- 1 year ago
-
artemis6
-
-
oppressed1
-
JanforGore:
imagine that janforgore attacking people as usual.
- 1 year ago
-
oppressed1
-
-
fun_size
-
ibrake4rappers13:
lol? That was a joke post right?
- 1 year ago
-
fun_size
-
-
Armageddon_Now
-
Now, how can Sarah Palin take credit for this?
- 1 year ago
-
Armageddon_Now
-
-
JanforGore
-
Armageddon_Now:
MIss "drill baby drill" takes much of the credit for it. It's about the only thing her "mama grizzly" mind can understand. But of course, her hypocritical ass won't be out here thanking Obama for doing her bidding either. Phony.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
treewolf39
-
WTF I have lived in Alaska and have witnessed some of the worst environmental treatment there is. Alaska is huge and way less accessible then the gulf coast. Easer to hide the destruction.
The new guy just does not get what got him elected. I want some fucking clean energy, not Geo-engineering.
- 1 year ago
-
treewolf39
-
-
JanforGore
-
treewolf39:
He definitely needs some cajones, and he's not even the only one.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/energy/2006-08-08-pipeline-usat_x.htm
Is this a gift to BP even though they exhibit the same negligence here as they have in the Gulf? According to this, BP runs Prudhoe Bay along with Conoco Philips and Exxon Mobil.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
ibrake4rappers13
-
Dont get your hopes up.
- 1 year ago
-
ibrake4rappers13
-
-
Omnomynous
-
Well Biden is getting older, and Palin & Obama are looking more and more like they are on the same page.
I can see it now "Obama Palin" 2012.... I can't wait then we wont be able to blame everything (politically wrong in this country) on white males.
- 1 year ago
-
Omnomynous
-
-
EmperorThan
-
Not: "Obama to invest in more energy efficient technologies like solar powered electric cars." interesting...
- 1 year ago
-
EmperorThan
-
-
artemis6
-
So much for this habitat .
- 1 year ago
-
artemis6
-
-
JanforGore
-
artemis6:
Yes, and they always use the excuse that we have to get off foreign oil ( though also piping in CO2 intensive toxic tarsands from Canada I suppose doesn't count as "foreign") for our national security... yet we have Prudhoe Bay already, so where is all of that oil going? To the American people? Last I read it was exported to Japan, and so will this oil more than likely be exported to China or some other country for profit. The American people are naive to the extreme if they think this will bring them a continuous flow of their oil drug and as it may take years to get to it. Of course, in the meantime we will reach a climate balance tipping point as we will continue to use the Arctic as our new epicenter of our rape of the planet. Russia already planted their flag in the Arctic, and Canada is even sending military on maneuvers with the US, China and Norway among other countries set to claim its share of the pie. When is enough enough? Yet, for all of their talk about getting off foreign oil hemp is still illegal. So, we all know that the flimsy excuse about getting off foreign oil for security is total bs. Sorry for going on, but this hurts deeply, because the last pristine areas of this planet do not belong to these bastards they belong to all of us and the species that inhabit them. Politics has completely turned this country against itself at the expense of our pride in the beauty of our land and moral judgement. I am so disgusted.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
artemis6
-
JanforGore:
It is disheartening at times .
- 1 year ago
-
artemis6
-
-
currentlyreading
-
Would it be wrong to say that everything the oil (industry) touches it destroys. I really don't like the word LEASE that they use, it takes time to get back an area used for oil drilling, if you even try.
- 1 year ago
-
currentlyreading
-
-
SB420
-
For shame...
- 1 year ago
-
SB420
-
-
JanforGore
-
Well, you heard it first. They PROMISED to protect critical migratory bird and caribou habitat... so of course, NO SPILLS will happen even though they are COMMON THERE. Now tell me again what the hell difference there would be in this regard between Obama being in the White House and McCain? I am DISGUSTED with these two faces regarding the environment. And environmental organizations really think this administration is going to pass a climate bill that comes even CLOSE to tackling climate change with these kinds of actions? Where are the same people who would trash Bush in a heartbeat for this in criticizing Obama? This is the WRONG direction to be going in, but it appears Salazar and the entire crew there doesn't really care for anything else but keeping their benefactors happy to get votes.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
andreii
-
JanforGore:
Why do we always have to make it a party thing... obviously its wrong, but shit sometimes the politics just gets annoying.
- 1 year ago
-
andreii
-
-
JanforGore
-
andreii:
Well gee, that was my point
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
andreii
-
JanforGore:
Oh my bad, I read that completely wrong. I see what you're saying.
- 1 year ago
-
andreii