The Web Means the End of Forgetting

The article needs a subscription to be accessed.
FAIL.

When books and printing came along , people lost their long memories . Honetslt , I think TV made them even shorter , It dependes on how fragmented things are , on how well the cross indexing gets and stays . We'll see .

The internet will never forget what it learns . What ever you put out there is there forever an ever isn't that just great?

What's frightening is that they have the storage just lying around to archive tweets and facebook posts and all of that, do we get a choice? NO
that's why my twitter and facebook fall under 2 different names, take that google and library of congress

http://Current.com

Here's a thought. Question: Does the Current.com organization
archive all the articles posted on from day 1 of it's existence ?
The format has changed, but has all the content remained ?
Any thoughts on this, pjacobs 51 ? I'm a 49er, so this isn't my
1st BBQ either. But I realy would like to research ther totality
of web pages that can be retrieved. Catching quality news is
like catching salmon swimming upsteam in the fast moving
current. If you don't land them, the readers won't digest them.

Admittedly , I am by no means a computer expert ; but I wonder, where all the data from the 90's is. Da ole lady needs a pattern to replace my parachute pants... , if the internet 'never forgets' where are the 'old pages'? Why ,when I do a search that doesn't include some political event or academic paper... nothing returns from more than a few years old?

I can understand being nervous for one's character that the internet faithfully remembers one's flaws. Although I too have some concerns in that regard, in my mind, the fact the internet remembers so much also means that one is less likely to be forgotten entirely. THAT is a tremendous value.

It is a tragedy for any human being to have lived but for there to be no or very little record of that life. More and more I'm finding one great value in an active online life is the fact that one's "spirit" can live on beyond the self through the contributions one makes to the human record stored and preserved in "the cloud". As a writer, I'm all too aware of the tremendous value in recording one's thoughts that they might have a life of their own. So too, recording one's thoughts and feelings, one's wishes or hopes and vision for what might be in whatever form - words, photos, recordings, video, artwork, etc. - when taken in total serve to create a virtual version of one's self which either in a cohesive collection or in scattered bits continues to influence others and help to build whatever is to come in the future. It's an "immortality" of sorts. One's life can continue to count for something more than it might have without that record and long after one has passed.

Yes, the internet may remember things one wishes would pass quietly away, but perhaps it may also remember the good things and that is certainly worth saving.

No one - no one - should be forgotten. Perhaps the internet is ensuring that far fewer of us will be.

The dangers of having real, or even distorted, information about one distributed and used on the internet against your knowledge or interests, are huge, and ever-present.

All of us here implicitly trust current.com and other sites to maintain our privacy and not to abuse it themselves, AFTER the fact we have given up that information.
It's not AT ALL likely the modest ethical safeguards for the use and abuse of that information will remain in place over time in all cases.

It may very well be that it is constantly abused, in one way or another, in most all cases.
That would, in our shared sad modern experience, actually be more true to form in large contemporary business and government practice.

Facebook and Twitter and other social networking sites have become so integrated into the lives of the masses now that some things that occur on or through them actually do make the news. Since so many people use it, it has become a relevant topic for news reporters... whether we like it or not.

But here's a thought: there is such a constant stream of content and information online that, while it's true that past posts and photos can remain on the Web for years, many people do tend to "forget" about those things because there is so much information coming at us all the time.

I guess the Web could mean the end of forgetting permanently. We can always be reminded!

what a miss leading statement,

when something can be edited on a whim and then becomes common "speak" rather then fact, it is not forgetting it is an easy method to change or alter history perspective and opinion.

the web is a double edge sword, it has the chance to create and promote knowledge and change. but it can also be used against anyone trying to step out of the status quo.

when you are always connected and trust companies like google to guide you to information, you will find their interests govern what you find. – example BP

Just for got what I was gonna type...Guess I'll regret it when I remember

Not true and not news...

this line right here;

"With Web sites like LOL Facebook Moments, which collects and shares embarrassing personal revelations from Facebook users, ill-advised photos and online chatter are coming back to haunt people months or YEARS after the fact.

I think most of us learned to quit sending nude photos to strangers along enough time ago that it shouldn't matter. That and those seeking to post other things of a controversial nature have learned to do so under conditions of anonymity, and if you haven't I hate it for you.

How is this a Current.com permalink when you have to log in and create an account with the NYTimes just to read the story? WTF Current? More site promotion?

you can google the title if you want to read without a NYT account.