Now's Your Chance to Stop Monsanto's FrankenSugar
source: http://www.capwiz.com
-
-
- JanforGore
- added this
The ball is in the USDA's court. The pro-biotech sugar industry is urging the USDA to rush through an Environmental Impact Statement so they can plant a new crop of Monsanto's Frankenbeets next year.
The only thing that can stop Monsanto's Frankenbeets now is massive public outcry. The Center for Food Safety's legal work has given the USDA, under President Obama now, the opportunity to do the right thing.
Now's our chance to press Obama's USDA to protect biodiversity and human health from contamination with FrankenGenes that never should have been released into the food system!
-
- groups:
- Community, Tech, Green, Earth and Science, 6 more
-
- tags:
- Environment, Health, Activism, Monsanto, 5 more
-
-
JanforGore
-
-
http://current.com/technology/90102240_dr-vandana-shiva-the-future-of-food-and-s...
This is an incredible lecture given by Dr. Vandana Shiva, one of the pre- eminent authorities on seeds, sustainable agriculture, GMOs, water scarcity, and environmental democracy. The danger about them is that there were no - NONE independent tests done on them before the FDA approved them. All they went by were "tests" supposedly done by Monsanto themselves, and even though subsequent testing has shown differences in how they react with the environment and other species, they were passed under the "substanital equivalence" principle to keep them from being labelled precisely because they are different, and Monsanto even knows that once people know these organisms are in their food they will not buy or eat them, and with good reason!
These unstable organisms were simply let out into our environment like a genie from a bottle and deregulated by corrupted agencies without knowing the true consequences of them interacting with the environment, other species, and our bodies. In other words, the Earth is being used as a petrie dish by Monsanto and other biotech companies while they buy up all seeds and patent traits to own our food system. For anyone who may be new to this site or anyone who doubts this is indeed happening, there is two years plus work and research on this at the Monsanto tag here, or you can go to the Sustainable Agriculture Group here to see it.
And one more comment. I am not the topic of discussion here and have tried very hard to stay out of the personal comments being placed here by the same poster who only comes into threads to rock the boat, divert the topic, and do whatever they can to make it uncomfortable for people to post here. This is an important topic regarding our biodiversity and food security and it is very serious to me. I also do not LIE, am not a "hippie" and have no other ulterior motive here but to give information people can use to be forewarned and to better their lives because to me THAT is what this site is about, and I'm not going anywhere.
So to get back to the topic, please read the petition and speak out to keep GM sugarbeets out of our environment to not contaminate more of our seeds and fight their threat to our biodiversity which is a threat to our health. We cannot live in a MONOCULTURE world and survive.
http://current.com/news/92621422_dna-from-transgenic-plants-found-in-milk-and-an...
DNA is also crossing species.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
xiola
-
JanforGore:
This is powerful stuff. "The danger about them is that there were no - NONE independent tests done on them before the FDA approved them. All they went by were 'tests' supposedly done by Monsanto themselves, and even though subsequent testing has shown differences in how they react with the environment and other species, they were passed under the 'substantial equivalence' principle to keep them from being labelled precisely because they are different, and Monsanto even knows that once people know these organisms are in their food they will not buy or eat them, and with good reason!" It reminds me of how they trusted BP when BP said they, themselves, had tested the safety of the deep-water wells and had plans in place to solve any problems--just took their word for it. It's all so out of control.
It also reminds me of the documentary "Tapped" about the bottled water industry. There is practically no oversight of the industry, and when asked, the top people don't even know what is in the plastic they use for the bottles. We must be vigilant; if not for ourselves, for our children. The people in charge are asleep at the wheel.
I can't wait to show this lecture to my husband. The more research we do on this subject, the more amazed we are at the irresponsibility. Wish everyone could see this and really listen, with an open mind. I'm so glad you provide us with this information, Jan. I, for one, am edified.
- 1 year ago
-
xiola
-
-
JanforGore
-
xiola:
Thank you for passing it on.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
xiola
-
JanforGore:
Well, it's the least I can do. You're doing all the leg work. :)
- 1 year ago
-
xiola
-
-
unclepete813
-
these devils at monnastyo is pure evil people thats trying to destroy the world with the vaticans permission. Once you keep that crap your body start to transmutate and thats how the brainwashing cont. You get knowledge and life from the food you eat thats how the Gods communicate to you by way of food NATURAL FOOD. if you do eat some of the posion just get you some toxic cleaner and that will help you out. detox all the poison out atleast once a weak. peace out
- 1 year ago
-
unclepete813
-
-
JanforGore
-
http://www.gmwatch.org/gm-crops-research-documenting-the-limitations-risks-and-a...
GMOS: Risks and alternatives.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
http://current.com/technology/92598647_anniversary-of-a-gmo-whistleblowing-hero....
More information on research. And just to comment: The effects to humans may well be manifesting themselves in the form of allergies, diabetes, obesity, fertility problems, early puberty, etc. conditions already known, not even including the effects of Round Up on water, soil, and aquatic life as well as tests showing it as an endocrine disruptor and being harmful to brain cells in fetuses, with latent effects still to be seen over time. Therefore, it is easy to hide it and state that GMOs do not cause human health problems. But apart from that, we already know that they have caused damage to mammals they have been tested on, and traditional varieties of corn and other organic crops worldwide which have also cost farmers dearly in their livelihoods. GMOS are a biodiversity killer by the nature of their terminator technology, and Monsanto has done all in their power to gag scientists that dare do tests on them. Ignacio Chapela and Dr. Ceralini are good examples of their use of intimidation tactics to silence scientists about their findings. So perhaps that is why you are having some difficulty findng them. It isn't because they aren't there. I also know I have posted more on testing especially regarding the BT toxin remaining in gut bacteria but due to time cannot locate them now. I will try to do so tomorrow if I get a chance.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
mindcruzer
-
Gene flow issues and pesticides/herbicides aside, can someone point me towards some studies that actually suggest GMOs could be toxic to humans? I have had a hard time finding any.
- 1 year ago
-
mindcruzer
-
-
xiola
-
I'm beginning to think someone in this thread is working for or benefiting from Monsanto... I wonder who... :)
- 1 year ago
-
xiola
-
-
JanforGore
-
http://current.com/technology/89961053_pesticides-blamed-for-some-childhood-brai...
Pesticides and herbicides in general are a threat to our health.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
JanforGore: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
littlelumpo
-
MrMxyzptlk:
Lol... yes, let's liken labor intensive farming to slavery, while meanwhile we grow steadily more obese and cancerous!
- 1 year ago
-
littlelumpo
-
-
JanforGore
-
littlelumpo:
It boggles the mind, doesn't it?
Let's see, we have : agroecology, sustainable agriculture, biodynamics, integrated pest management... all used on a large scale with good yields, less use of pesticides and methods to reduce pests. All with a substanital decrease or non use of poisons and toxins which promotes healthier ecosystems throughout, healthier food, healthier soil, cleaner water and healthier people and other species along with preserving biodiversity. Oh yeah though, give me that RoundUp to douse my apples...Some people truly need to expand ther horizons.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
corndog67
-
JanforGore:
Absolutely. I work in a machine shop that is out in the strawberry fields outside Santa Maria CA. When they spray their chemicals, whether it is fertilizer or to control weeds or bugs, I don't know, but they clear the fields of illegal aliens, the driver of the tractor has a hazmat suit on, and they keep them out of the field for a day. But there we are, inside a shop that is 30 feet from the field, when they spray, a couple of the crew usually get sick the next day, a couple more seem to have severe allergies, and the rest of us just gripe about it. I guess we are an experiment in chemical exposure (like working in a machine shop isn't exposure enough!), and we'll see what happens in 20 years, right?
- 1 year ago
-
corndog67
-
-
corndog67
-
JanforGore:
Well, one of the ways to reduce pests without spraying, is to genetically alter the plants to be toxic to the bugs. Or make them taste bad.
The great majority of the fields around where I work are leased by Giant Foods (Green Giant). Lots of nitrate infiltration into the ground water, nothing but illegal aliens working those fields, but very high profits. The American Dream.
- 1 year ago
-
corndog67
-
-
JanforGore
-
corndog67:
Yes, I've seen them with hazmet suits on... and they expect us to eat that food. It is insanity.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
littlelumpo: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
bailey78
-
corndog67:
So tell us corndog how does it feel to be a guinea pig ??
- 1 year ago
-
bailey78
-
-
bailey78
-
JanforGore:
Why them chemacals are as safe as water just ask the folks that make it. I bet you couldn't get them near a feild that was just sprayed with that crap.
- 1 year ago
-
bailey78
-
-
littlelumpo
-
MrMxyzptlk:
Sure. Call it job creation.
By the way, I work at one of these labor-intensive farms you're talking about, and it's a great time.
- 1 year ago
-
littlelumpo
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
littlelumpo: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
littlelumpo
-
MrMxyzptlk:
Like any job, that's what retirement is for! At least I'll be healthy at 50, strong as an ox. No high blood pressure, no heart disease, no obesity. Sounds pretty good to me.
- 1 year ago
-
littlelumpo
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
littlelumpo: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
littlelumpo
-
MrMxyzptlk:
lol, on the contrary, actually. the farmers i work for are 55 and look better than a lot of 25 year olds these days.
- 1 year ago
-
littlelumpo
-
-
littlelumpo
-
MrMxyzptlk:
just think about what you would look like if every day when you went to work, you were exercising. we forget in our lazy society that exercise is actually good for your body!
- 1 year ago
-
littlelumpo
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
littlelumpo: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
littlelumpo
-
MrMxyzptlk:
Well, I can't say I've been there, cause I haven't, I'm just not old enough to see how it will beat me up. But I can say that the farmers I've seen are healthier than they would be if they worked office jobs. By the way, I'm not voting down your comments, so would you lay off mine?
- 1 year ago
-
littlelumpo
-
-
JanforGore
-
http://current.com/news/90398410_study-round-up-disrupts-sex-hormones.htm
Round Up needs to be banned. - 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
littlelumpo
-
I support the fight against Roundup Ready crops because they increase the use of pesticides, limit food choice and put more money in the hands of corporations.
However, I object to the use of the term "FrankenFoods". The term's only purpose is to incite blind revulsion and unthinking support for this cause. "Reject Frankenfoods!" "Why?" "Because they're not natural!" Hmm. Suddenly the no-GMO activists don't seem very intelligent.
"Natural" is a meaningless word. How shall we define natural- perhaps as what occurs without human intervention? Then, by our own logic, agriculture itself is unnatural. Many, many things have been labeled unnatural- from homosexuality to vegetarianism- because it's a facile and convenient judgment to make. It's like comparing something we don't like to Hitler. It doesn't take any thought to produce an immediate and visceral reaction.
Of course the reason we're against GMOs ISN'T that they're "unnatural," right? We have plenty of strong, real reasons behind us. So why don't we use them? When we use terms like "FrankenFoods," we simplify our case beyond reason, and our opponents get the sense that we're simply luddites. This gives them an easy avenue to dismiss our arguments.
Let's put the term "FrankenFoods" to rest. Please.
- 1 year ago
-
littlelumpo
-
-
JanforGore
-
littlelumpo:
Well in this case it was the wording of the article so I kept it. If you look at my other posts and videos on GMOS here however, I never refer to them as that. So on that I agree to a point, but then other people do react and identify to it as well.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
corndog67
-
It's never going to change. The amount of genetically altered food is probably much higher than they let on that it is. As long as the world is corporate profit driven, and it will be until we all die off, nothing is going to change. How many signatures on any petition will change or affect anything? 500,000? No. 5,000,000? No. 300,000,000+, (the general population of the US)? Doubtful. Remember, our government is owned by big business, and it doesn't get any bigger than Agri-Business.
How many signatures are on there? How many people vote, %30?
It's a losing battle. Too much apathy. Too much ignorance. And we are raising a generation of idiots.
- 1 year ago
-
corndog67
-
-
JanforGore
-
corndog67:
Well you may well be right, but I'm not willing to just sit here doing nothing.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
royulery
-
i worked up in eastern idaho for a time and quite often a sugar beet train would stop traffic for a half an hour as it endless passed by. it is hard to comprehend the impossible volume of sugar beets grown without seeing it first hand. the problem is that; nearly the whole state is rendered sterile by round up and bio-diversity is gone.
- 1 year ago
-
royulery
-
-
CalgarC
-
The BEERS are one me tonight!
oh and i signed :D
- 1 year ago
-
CalgarC
-
-
bailey78
-
CalgarC:
What about those of us that don't drink Beer?
- 1 year ago
-
bailey78
-
-
CalgarC
-
bailey78:
the milk is on me :D
- 1 year ago
-
CalgarC
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
bailey78: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
bailey78
-
CalgarC:
and Kookies?
- 1 year ago
-
bailey78
-
-
bailey78
-
MrMxyzptlk:
I don't drink sissy fruit drinks. I drink Milk, water or fruit juice that I make myself with My fruit juicer.Oh an tea I do like a nice cup of hot or cold tea.
- 1 year ago
-
bailey78
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
bailey78: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
bailey78
-
MrMxyzptlk:
I like me an my wife likes me sometimes I don't really give a rats ass if you do or don't. Oh yea I'm not a Hippy. I am I
- 1 year ago
-
bailey78
-
-
CalgarC
-
bailey78:
yes magical cookies... plus everything will be organic :D
- 1 year ago
-
CalgarC
-
-
xiola
-
MrMxyzptlk:
OK. Fine. I'll say it. bailey doesn't drink. You want to say he's a sissy because he doesn't escape life's problems by drinking and taking Vicodin like you do? Please. You're so sad. Quit the personal attacks; they just show us how weak you are.
Alright. Now I'm mad I responded to you. Fine. You got me. It won't happen again. - 1 year ago
-
xiola
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
bailey78: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
telcod
-
MrMxyzptlk:
The organic farmer I know doesn't have much of a problem with bugs or weeds. Exception to the rule? He has a PHd in History I believe. Who can say?
- 1 year ago
-
telcod
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
telcod: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
littlelumpo
-
MrMxyzptlk:
Where is this terrible fear of the past coming from? It seems to be a culture-bound syndrome in our society, like koro, the Chinese fear of one's penis shrinking. Don't worry, time travel is not yet possible!
- 1 year ago
-
littlelumpo
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
littlelumpo: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
littlelumpo
-
MrMxyzptlk:
No one here is threatening to take away your meds. They're just, like you are, concerned about their futures. They want to live in a world where they don't have to fear for their health and survival. Their motivation and yours is the same.
- 1 year ago
-
littlelumpo
-
-
bailey78
-
MrMxyzptlk:
Well I do like my carrot juice but we pull the weeds and I use a nontoxic soap on the bugs.
- 1 year ago
-
bailey78
-
-
bailey78
-
CalgarC:
Now thats my kind of party ;-}
- 1 year ago
-
bailey78
-
-
ReverandG
-
Signed and sent. Good post Jan.
- 1 year ago
-
ReverandG
-
-
xiola
-
Thank you for letting us know about this, Jan. I, too, signed the petition. This is a very important issue that ALL people should be concerned about. It's not about politics and it shouldn't be about money; it's about wholesome natural food for ourselves and our children.
The thought of the longevity studies on this genetic engineering makes me shudder. If nothing else, the Gulf oil leak should wake us up to the fact that big business and government often (usually) doesn't have our health or best interests at heart; they're just concerned with lining their pockets--consequences be damned.
I really can't tell you how much I appreciate your diligence in drawing attention to this. While I respect all opinions, I really don't think you should waste your energy on people who personally attack you--people who don't provide any hard facts on this issue, just venom and personal opinion. Everyone can see that you have your facts straight and you're dedicated. Please don't allow folks to get under your skin. Just keep doing what you do and know many of us appreciate it. It is so important. - 1 year ago
-
xiola
-
-
JanforGore
-
xiola:
Appreciated, agreed, and will definitely take your advice. Believe me though, I have practiced great restraint of late. ;-).
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
bailey78
-
JanforGore:
I think you have done real good dealing with us YoYo's Just remember breath deep and count to ten. Besides life is to short to worry about YoYo's
- 1 year ago
-
bailey78
-
-
JanforGore
-
http://www.grist.org/article/not-a-sweet-proposition/
Article on resistance to Gm sugarbeets and what the EPA did at the behest of Monsanto. Poisoning us is no big deal when it means a larger share of profits for their benefactors. But it will be interesting to see how this eventually plays out as Monsanto is also being sued by their institutional shareholders for keeping back information regarding glyphosate sales. Round Up sales are floundering just as the DOJ is being prodded by some senators to end its monopoly investigation to see other generic brands of Round Up be allowed on the market. So basically even concerning theh DOJ, their investigation isn't to hold Monsanto accountable for its willfull poisoning of our environment it is to allow others to enter the market to do the same thing. How this will all influence APHIS and the USDA's environmental impact statement will be something we need to look out for.
Excerpt:
'As you may know, Roundup Ready sugar beets are genetically altered to resist Monsanto's toxic weed killer, Roundup, and its active ingredient, glyphosate. But here's the scary truth about these beets:
When the USDA first approved GE sugar beets for commercial planting in 1998, the EPA also increased the maximum allowable residues of glyphosate on sugar beet roots from just 0.2 parts per million to 10ppm. That's a staggering 5,000 percent increase of allowable toxins on beet roots. And, it's little surprise that EPA made this policy change at the request of Monsanto.
Sugar beet roots contain sucrose that's extracted, refined, and processed into the sugar used in the foods we eat. What this means is that the more GE ingredients that find their way into our food, the greater the likelihood that we are ingesting more toxic chemicals.
Thankfully, GE sugar beets have never been grown in the U.S. for sale to food manufacturers -- that is, until this year, when Western farmers planted their first crop of Monsanto's Roundup Ready sugar beets. Right now, over half of the sugar used in U.S. processed foods comes from sugar beets, with beet and cane sugars combined in those products. What's most disturbing is that once GE sugar beets hit the market, which could be as early as next year, there will be no way to know if we're eating GE sugar because GE ingredients are not labeled.'
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
csmonut
-
Signed, and I added a bit more about lack of independant research in this country due to patent laws.
Thanks - 1 year ago
-
csmonut
-
-
JanforGore
-
csmonut:
Thank you. And I also added a bit more about labelling foods with GMOs in them as well.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
-
We have an opportunity and the voices to tell this administration to stop allowing Monsanto to use us as their guinea pigs for profit. Please sign the petition if you want to preserve the biodiversity of your food system.
Thanks.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
telcod
-
JanforGore:
Are you aware that the Obama administration has at least 2 Monsanto execs running around? Little scary, I'd say. And you want to do just what to try and influence these political scum suckers?
- 1 year ago
-
telcod
-
-
JanforGore
-
telcod:
I'm well aware of the Monsanto cronies Obama has in this administration, just like the last one. I've been covering this for years. We want labels and accountability from them and to keep this dangerous irresponsible technology out of our food.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
xiola
-
telcod:
We have to try. What we buy speaks for us. What you say is right; our government is in the pockets of big business. Still, we can't just give up. The squeaky wheel gets the oil, right? :)
- 1 year ago
-
xiola
-
-
dalistuff
-
JanforGore:
Thanks 4 clip...sent it to several friends,hopefully they'd do the same...
- 1 year ago
-
dalistuff
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
- This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
JanforGore
-
MrMxyzptlk:
So what? So what if you're an annoying idiot and the consequences are beyond your capacity to think. Do some reading for once instead of letting your grudges and your johnson determine everything you mindlessly type here.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
JanforGore: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
csmonut
-
MrMxyzptlk:
"Personaly I think more food on less acres is a good thing."
Your ignorance shows through.
Do some real research before you make statements such as that. And I mean real research, not just a few articles written by the very same companies that produce GM foods. - 1 year ago
-
csmonut
-
-
telcod
-
MrMxyzptlk:
Talk to the farmers in India about the benefits of Monsanto and GMO's and the reduced crop yields and the death gene that means no seeds for next year. Give me that old time capitalist/free market religion brother. Will capitalism fix every problem it causes??? Ask the people in Bhopal, India.
- 1 year ago
-
telcod
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
telcod: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
csmonut: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
Ad_Ja_Si: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
Ad_Ja_Si
-
MrMxyzptlk:
A) Yes, I screwed my comment up. Happy? I know that Roundup is a herbicide. It was 1 AM or so (EDT). I don't even know.
B) I still don't agree with using manufactured products that require more manufactured products that are harmful to the environment (read your own article on Glyphosate) along with seeds that we have no idea what could go wrong with. Especially when 2 out of 3 of those products encourage a monopoly on the US agricultural market (Monsanto), especially when most/many consumers are not familiar at all with how what they are buying is connected to the corporation. And Roundup use is expected to be coupled with heavy amounts of fertilizer. That's the only way that plants can survive on the soil contaminated by it.
C) That's why there's selective breeding and greenhouses. It takes time for all the traits to breed through. Mendel squares and similar formulas help with that. It's all quite scientific. And the best seeds are used, yes, and judged based on their traits along with those of the parent plant. It's very different from purposefully making extreme modifications to a plant, barely testing it, and using the entire US agricultural system as a test lab. Along with encouraging use of chemicals that we also don't know the effects of. (There was quite a bit about that in your Glysophate article.)
C) Oh, and I don't see starvation in European countries for lack of these products.
- 1 year ago
-
Ad_Ja_Si
-
-
s_peak
-
MrMxyzptlk:
You need to look at some of the possible negative effects of using roundup ready crops. Why would an entire country of farmers BURN round-up ready seeds?
http://www.truth-out.org/haitian-farmers-commit-burning-monsanto-hybrid-seeds596...
Mono-culture farms don't, and can't work. Period. There's actually no need to use pesticides if you farm properly. We can't expect to just throw chemicals on our problems and hope they go away. Pesticides end up in the water we drink, and they are killing off lots of beneficial species as well.
Also...
GMOs from Monsanto are notorious for cross-pollinating with and then taking over other people's fields. When that happens, Monsanto sues the farmer who's land has been invaded:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/04/26/eveningnews/main4048288.shtml
You think a company that holds that moral low-ground gives a shit about giving food to the world? No fucking way. Pesticides are also implicated in Colony Collapse Disorder now (big surprise) and monoculture farms MUST promote the use of pesticides because they can't survive without them on that scale.
- 1 year ago
-
s_peak
-
-
s_peak
-
MrMxyzptlk:
Wider world view? For someone with a wider world view you seem to have a very elitist attitude. Going around calling everyone a hippie makes you look like a conceited asshole... just saying... if you want to have a wider world view, you should consider being less divisive. We're all just people looking for answers, and labeling people just makes you look dumb... which tends to weight your arguments in a way that doesn't help you.
With that in mind... pesticides are unnecessary and entirely avoidable if proper farming practices are used. I honestly think you're arguing a point that's moot... for a system that is based around the use of pesticides (built-in or sprayed on) can never be sustainable. Insects are already becoming resistant to the pesticides we use, we means we spray more, which means more toxic groundwater. And for the number of detrimental pests on a plant there are probably more than that amount in beneficial species, and those ones die too when a plant is covered in round-up. GMOs have been about profit, and nothing more. Further... if we support smaller, polyculture farms that serve locally, as opposed to shipping all over the country, then we can knock out the problems of pesticide AND fuel use in one fell swoop.
So if you want to talk about efficiency then that's really what you should be focused on. The system we use is 100% unsustainable... and it can't work long term. We're seeing it fail now. And that's not just hippie shit. It would be a shame of you to write this all off as nothing more than hippie bullshit. There is an efficient way to produce food, and the system we have is built around profit, not efficiency. The whole system needs to change.
- 1 year ago
-
s_peak
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
s_peak: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
littlelumpo
-
MrMxyzptlk:
I am sympathetic to your point that having a domestic sugar industry may be more environmentally and ethically sound than continuing to import from poor countries. A similar argument exists for hydrofracking for natural gas in the area where I live. Anti-fracking activists don't want our environment to be degraded, yet while alternative energy progress stalls at the governmental level, we continue to wreak havoc on those abroad.
We shouldn't have to choose between two evils, though- cannot we have a sustainable domestic sweetener (such as honey or agave), or a clean energy future (wind, water, solar)?
- 1 year ago
-
littlelumpo
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
littlelumpo: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
littlelumpo
-
MrMxyzptlk:
I'm not sure you can compare clean energy or domestic honey production to a mythological creature. Real people are doing these things right now. Have a little hope!
I'm also not sure you can say that hippies want to "drag us back" and make us live like the Amish. The Amish are very much dependent on fossil fuels. I don't see any of them erecting wind farms or practicing IPM. That's pretty new technology there.
Just as a counterpoint, this article really isn't about growing your own food. It's just about asking for higher safety standards on a technological product. Same as seatbelts. Same as pharmaceutical research. The point many people are trying to make is: just because it's new and shiny doesn't mean it's not dangerous. Take thalidomide babies: I bet a lot of people wish they'd done an impact study before all those women gave birth to deformed children... don't you?
- 1 year ago
-
littlelumpo
-
-
telcod
-
MrMxyzptlk:
I buy local and go for organic as much as possible. Don't buy at Walmart and I don't drink milk. Gave up the booze, disturbed my aim. Everything on the farm is petro chemical these days. Fertilizer, feed, pesticides, transportation, treatment, storage, and on and on all to produce crappy food.
Still not shedding any light on the third world experience with the jack-booted Monsato types, which was my pitch to you in the first place. Add a question about uncontrolled messing with Mother Nature. Had a thought that it might get kinda dicey if the old Mosanto death gene goes sideways and contaminates all the crops, like ice-nine (see "Cats Cradle").
- 1 year ago
-
telcod
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
littlelumpo: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
littlelumpo
-
MrMxyzptlk:
hm, i guess we're mostly in agreement there. i do think government should subsidize clean energy and let the technology take off.
but i guess the only difference is that simple lifestyle sounds kind of nice to me. i like the satisfaction of hard work. it's like a day-long bike ride, only with visible results afterwards. i love plants, and i love food.
i bet i would miss a lot of modern comforts. for example: i would miss the internet for about a year. but i bet i would be closer to my family and friends if this device weren't in the way. i always feel like a zombie when i'm staring at screens.
i really don't take any other issue with what you're saying though. so why do we fight?
- 1 year ago
-
littlelumpo
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
littlelumpo: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
littlelumpo
-
MrMxyzptlk:
Yeah- I'm not sure what I think about that whole free market thing, since in my lifetime I've only seen corporations hold onto fossil fuels past the point of utility. But you may be right. That's not my area of expertise.
That sucks that your immune system's wack... wonder what happened there. BTW I didn't know real people even used hand sanitizer.
But basically you're trying to tell me that I'm too idealistic and not realistic enough. Thanks for the tip! :D At least living this way makes me feel like I'm doing good, working toward a future I'd be proud to live in. That's what activism's about.
Bottom line is, to quote you, "The best way to live under such restrictions would be an amish way. Do your own food growing because fuel and refrigeration will be too costly for long distance transport of foods. Massive agriculture will be gone because without fuel and chemicals it just wont pay, unless we go back to slavery which I don't think will happen.
So the world changes. Instead of large urban areas supported by technologicaly advanced agriculture people have to grow their own food."
That is the change I'd like to see in the world.
- 1 year ago
-
littlelumpo
-
-
bailey78
-
We can all make a diffrance if we grow what we can help ourselves. It does not take much to grow a small Garden an it helps to releave stress after a hard day at work.
- 1 year ago
-
bailey78
-
-
JanforGore
-
bailey78:
That and buying local if possible.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
JanforGore: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
lamborghini
-
MrMxyzptlk:
I hope the mods see your harrassing behavior towards Jan and put an end to it.
- 1 year ago
-
lamborghini
-
-
bailey78
-
JanforGore:
We have a farmers market but they don't sell much in the way of food products So I guess it's not much of a farmers market. But thats what they call it.
- 1 year ago
-
bailey78
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
lamborghini: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
JanforGore
-
bailey78:
Yes, you have to really be careful about some of them as well. Growing your own of course is the best way if you can do it. For those of us who can't however, labels should be the least we have.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
bailey78
-
MrMxyzptlk:
Becareful not to get run over while in the middle of the road.
- 1 year ago
-
bailey78
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
bailey78: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
Ad_Ja_Si
-
MrMxyzptlk:
I don't believe that's the intent of this particular product...
- 1 year ago
-
Ad_Ja_Si
-
-
bailey78
-
MrMxyzptlk:
I mean what I say an I say what I mean if you want to take it as B.S. thats fine. I'm easy to get along with. How ever i have seen folks get the boot for less than that. You seem to be good at stiring the pot an would really hate to see ya get booted for doing so. Ok?
- 1 year ago
-
bailey78
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
bailey78: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
bailey78
-
MrMxyzptlk:
No Jan is a good person that is trying to fight the good fight even I myself can see that . Just because She has a large vocabulary is no reason to pick on Her. She has sent me to the Dictionary more than once just so I would know if I was being put down or not. I was and I was glad of it. I'm many things but I'm not above learning. Sure She can be moody but what woman isn't?
- 1 year ago
-
bailey78
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
bailey78: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
xiola
-
bailey78:
bailey, you crack me up! OK. "All women are moody" crack aside: I think it's admirable you are trying to reason with unreasonable people. But I think experience on Current has taught us that there are certain people here that aren't here to be reasonable or consider new angles on issues. Some people are here for name-calling and starting fights, period. I know sometimes it's hard to ignore these types, but ignoring them is the only thing that takes their "power" away.
- 1 year ago
-
xiola