What a scientist didn't tell the New York Times about his study on bee deaths
source: http://money.cnn.com/2010/10/08/news/honey_bees_ny_times.fortune/index.htm
-
-
- JanforGore
- added this
The long list of possible suspects has included pests, viruses, fungi, and also pesticides, particularly so-called neonicotinoids, a class of neurotoxins that kills insects by attacking their nervous systems. For years, their leading manufacturer, Bayer Crop Science, a subsidiary of the German pharmaceutical giant Bayer AG (BAYRY), has tangled with regulators and fended off lawsuits from angry beekeepers who allege that the pesticides have disoriented and ultimately killed their bees. The company has countered that, when used correctly, the pesticides pose little risk.
A cheer must have gone up at Bayer on Thursday when a front-page New York Times article, under the headline "Scientists and Soldiers Solve a Bee Mystery," described how a newly released study pinpoints a different cause for the die-off: "a fungus tag-teaming with a virus." The study, written in collaboration with Army scientists at the Edgewood Chemical Biological Center outside Baltimore, analyzed the proteins of afflicted bees using a new Army software system. The Bayer pesticides, however, go unmentioned.
What the Times article did not explore -- nor did the study disclose -- was the relationship between the study's lead author, Montana bee researcher Dr. Jerry Bromenshenk, and Bayer Crop Science. In recent years Bromenshenk has received a significant research grant from Bayer to study bee pollination. Indeed, before receiving the Bayer funding, Bromenshenk was lined up on the opposite side: He had signed on to serve as an expert witness for beekeepers who brought a class-action lawsuit against Bayer in 2003. He then dropped out and received the grant.
Reporter: scientist "did not volunteer" funding sources
Bromenshenk's company, Bee Alert Technology, which is developing hand-held acoustic scanners that use sound to detect various bee ailments, will profit more from a finding that disease, and not pesticides, is harming bees. Two years ago Bromenshenk acknowledged as much to me when I was reporting on the possible neonicotinoid/CCD connection for Conde Nast Portfolio magazine, which folded before I completed my reporting.
Bromenshenk defends the study and emphasized that it did not examine the impact of pesticides. "It wasn't on the table because others are funded to do that," he says, noting that no Bayer funds were used on the new study. Bromenshenk vociferously denies that receiving funding from Bayer (to study bee pollination of onions) had anything to do with his decision to withdraw from the plaintiff's side in the litigation against Bayer. "We got no money from Bayer," he says. "We did no work for Bayer; Bayer was sending us warning letters by lawyers."
A Bayer publicist reached last night said she was not authorized to comment on the topic but was trying to reach an official company spokesperson.
The Times reporter who authored the recent article, Kirk Johnson, responded in an e-mail that Dr. Bromenshenk "did not volunteer his funding sources." Johnson's e-mail notes that he found the peer-reviewed scientific paper cautious and that he "tried to convey that caution in my story." Adds Johnson: The study "doesn't say pesticides aren't a cause of the underlying vulnerability that the virus-fungus combo then exploits...."
At least one scientist questions the new study. Dr. James Frazier, professor of entomology at Penn State University, who is currently researching the sublethal impact of pesticides on bees, said that while Bromenshenk's study generated some useful data, Bromenshenk has a conflict of interest as CEO of a company developing scanners to diagnose bee diseases. "He could benefit financially from that if this thing gets popularized," Frazier says, "so it's a difficult situation to deal with." He adds that his own research has shown that pesticides affect bees "absolutely, in multiple ways."
-
- groups:
- Community, Tech, Green, Current Tonight, 10 more
-
- tags:
- Environment, Toxic, GMOs, Pesticides, 6 more
-
-
LivingPong
-
Australian government has mentioned that they may have given up trying to eradicate the Asian bee. Instead the focus has shifted to trying to reduce their spread and population control. The Asian honey bee is a known carrier of the Varroa mite.
- 1 year ago
-
LivingPong
-
-
utubemafia
-
Fuck the Beez! We're all dead!
Just ride it out!
- 1 year ago
-
utubemafia
-
-
artemis6
-
Ha! I knew it ! The devil IS in the details .
- 1 year ago
-
artemis6
-
-
Toobizy
-
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/24/bee-pollen-and-hives-lade_n_511361.html .Article on multiple causes of bee deaths good info
- 1 year ago
-
Toobizy
-
-
Toobizy
-
Adding facts to the discussion, rather than political/philosophical opinions woud be refreshing! I'll see what I can find on news sites--anybody else want to do that?
- 1 year ago
-
Toobizy
-
-
JanforGore
-
Toobizy:
Thank you. I was doing that until the usuals took over the thread with their political back and forth. Please do that and I will do the same and just maybe we can have an actual discussion here on the topic.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
Toobizy
-
I can't possibly believe that pesticides/environmental toxins aren't involved. Also, haven't read all the comments yet but I'm sure I read something recently that implicated cellphone tower transmissions in the bees' disorientation. Anything on that?
- 1 year ago
-
Toobizy
-
-
congoboy
-
Toobizy:
if the cell phone tower thing is true then i guess the bees are a goner. too much money in communications and millions of users probably arent gonna give up their phones
- 1 year ago
-
congoboy
-
-
adamvelvetu
-
I just wanted to throw in my two cents as I can sort of see both sides of the argument (that seemed to have sidetracked into some name-calling but anywho...). I'm an atheist and certainly don't think the world was made for us (a distilled version of the religious Earth-view) or that we are its benign protectors chosen by evolution (a distilled version of the Scientific view)...we're simply another species that will get to be 'dominant' for say another ten or twenty thousand years. Its certainly not our job to ensure the Earth stays just how it was when we started scraping things out in Africa nor is it our job to simply run roughshod over it. It may be in our interest (not the Earth's interest...it'll work things out whatever the scenario) to ensure that we find ways to maintain the species that we've entered into a symbiotic relationship with. To that end, I think finding ways to genetically modify fruits and vegetables so that they last longer and then avoid the use of pesticides is a worthwhile goal.
- 1 year ago
-
adamvelvetu
-
-
JanforGore
-
adamvelvetu:
You can grow real fruit and vegetables using agroecology.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
chris50
-
As I read most of these post, I could not help but think that all the name calling and labeling going on here is what keeps us from haveing any intellegent diaolog. Since we are at each other throats, ripping each other apart, corporations and government go about their day laughing at the savages ripping each other apart. Divide and conqure.
- 1 year ago
-
chris50
-
-
JanforGore
-
chris50:
Then perhaps you could contribute some comments instead of just critiquing them.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
gurper707
-
-
This could also be a reason why imo...
- 1 year ago
-
gurper707
-
-
gurper707
-
-
This could also be a reason why imo...
- 1 year ago
-
gurper707
-
-
Mark701
-
It wouldn't surprise me in the least if the pesticides were found to weaken the bees immune system such that they became susceptible to fungal and viral attack.
- 1 year ago
-
Mark701
-
-
Daena_Smith
-
Mark701:
Strangely enough bats around the country are suffering from a disease from fungus as well. Coincidence, perhaps, or not since they do eat insects.
- 1 year ago
-
Daena_Smith
-
-
Prijedor
-
Thats how it always happens, big corp hire their own scientists, or pay them off to find the best answer that suites the corporations
- 1 year ago
-
Prijedor
-
-
daveinLA
-
If true , this is an excellent post.
- 1 year ago
-
daveinLA
-
-
adamvelvetu
-
hmm...to me this article is simply about sloppy science...a good scientist should always disclose their bias. he probably didn't mention his previous affiliations with bayer or his business dealings because it would draw speculation to what he was doing. i saw a lot of concern about whether or not this skews humans as good or bad. i don't know that it does or doesn't. we certainly act in some ways that are counter-intuitive to survival--killing off honey bees would be a good thing to avoid doing.
- 1 year ago
-
adamvelvetu
-
-
11dim
-
Pesticides effect the immune system of bees and interactions of combined low level effects can be significant; i.e. the combined fungus tag-teaming with a virus and insecticide interaction.
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/Parasiticfungi.php - 1 year ago
-
11dim
-
-
southrabbit [removed]
- This comment was removed by its owner.
-
southrabbit [removed]
-
-
JanforGore
-
southrabbit:
I couldn't agree more. And you can be sure these companies are not testing them properly or being up front about the results.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
congoboy
-
southrabbit:
even on the good pesticides?
- 1 year ago
-
congoboy
-
-
rodstradamus
-
-
http://current.com/entertainment/movies/92696028_trailer-what-in-the-world-are-t...
"What in the World Are They Spraying", Jan? - 1 year ago
-
rodstradamus
-
-
DogBoy
-
We need our honey bees.
- 1 year ago
-
DogBoy
-
-
EtVoila
-
I've been trying to learn more about bees lately and I think that the whole
fungi-virus tag team idea is inaccurate. Such widespread death is obviously caused by something unnatural. Pesticide is what my local beekeeper holds to be the problem and I agree with him.Added to Bees group
- 1 year ago
-
EtVoila
-
-
congoboy
-
EtVoila:
unnatural and widespread, sorta like liberalism
- 1 year ago
-
congoboy
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
EtVoila: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
CalPal
-
congoboy:
As well as conservatism, capitalism, communism, absolutism, atheism, egoism...
Oh, sorry, you were trying to make a point?
- 1 year ago
-
CalPal
-
-
CalPal
-
MrMxyzptlk:
Do you realize how many species went extinct because of human interactions? Let me give you a brief example:
Woolly mammoth/rhino
Dodo bird
Quagga
Ground sloths
Tasmanian tiger
Aurochs
Great AukYou can probably find many more on the internet, should you choose to look yourself, but don't give ludicrous statements like that. Clearly the dinosaurs weren't wiped out by humans, but that doesn't mean humanity isn't capable - and responsible - for extinctions, as it seems possible right now.
- 1 year ago
-
CalPal
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
CalPal: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
CalPal
-
MrMxyzptlk:
"Even most of the extinctions of the last 50,000 years are not our fault. That and we keep finding critters that were supposedly driven to extinction by humans. We just have to look harder for them. Taking that into concideration I'd say odds are good that the bee thing is natural."
That's irrelevant information. Sure, we have found one or two species we thought we wiped out, and many species have gone extinct without humans having existed, but there are still many species we have wiped out. And those are only the ones we are aware of; there may have been species that may have gone extinct that we haven't even become aware of.
And so what if I'm critical of our species? Is it illegal to hate the negative aspects of humanity?! Sure, we're the only species to have developed civilizations on Earth - it's why we are the most successful species on Earth - but having an advanced civilization and intelligence comes with the realization that we should't always twist the world around into our favor. Nor can we be dismissive of the costs of our recklessness.
If the pesticides we're using are wiping out one of the most important insects to our civilizations - the ones who help pollinate our crops - then we better damn well realize we can't use those pesticides, regardless of whether people are making profits off it. And that's one of humanity's biggest problem that I am very critical of: our greed. Surely you and I can agree on that aspect?
- 1 year ago
-
CalPal
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
CalPal: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
CalPal
-
MrMxyzptlk:
Just because most species have died off naturally in the past doesn't mean species today are dying off naturally, as well. We've made huge impacts on the environment, whether you agree or not: Huge sections of land have had species driven off them so we can farm for our food. Toxins from industrial plants have had huge impacts on their environment when they've been accidentally released and not stopped on time. We're constantly cutting down trees. Don't tell me we're not having an impact.
The scientist's study should be questioned, because he's received funding from a Corporation that has a history of using "science" to persuade the public that they're innocent, even though many of those studies were debunked by a majority of the scientific community. The same community agrees that GMOs should further be investigated, even though Monsanto or the FDA refuse to do that.
By the way, I am not self-loathing, I am critical. I don't hate everything about our species for illogical reasons. Of course there are things I'm not impressed with, but there are many things about humanity that I enjoy. Why would I hate what I am, what I'm a part of? That's stupid of anyone to hate something they can't change or control. And stop comparing me to bigots, I am nothing like those assholes.
Sure, we can't control greed all the time, and yes its part of our nature. But when it becomes such a problem that our species, our planet, could be at risk, then its time we seriously consider punishing greedy bastards.
- 1 year ago
-
CalPal
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
CalPal: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
mindcruzer
-
EtVoila:
"Such widespread death is obviously caused by something unnatural."
You need to think that one through a few more times.
- 1 year ago
-
mindcruzer
-
-
CalPal
-
MrMxyzptlk:
Odds aren't always going to explain everything. Not once has Earth ever had a civilization on it before us, so this is something we have to consider when looking at extinctions. Everything before us could be explained by nature alone, yes, but when we began building WMDs, farming land and cities, and have the ability to produce lethal toxins and by-products, that is something we need to factor in.
In regards to funding, the scientist has received donations from someone that has an interest in what data is presented. If it benefits Monsanto directly, then they can make more money. This is unscientific: NEVER let any bias come into play when presenting scientific data. Otherwise, it's just propaganda.
I never see corporations as green, by the way. Too expensive for them to be green.
- 1 year ago
-
CalPal
-
-
adamvelvetu
-
That's hysterical...such sound integrity. Sort of like the 'scientist' that decided autism is caused by vaccines.
- 1 year ago
-
adamvelvetu
-
-
NickerBocker09
-
Its an extremely troubling situation. Im surprised about the little effort thats been done to find out what the problem is.
Actually Im not surprised but Im sure people in 50 years will think "what the fuck"
- 1 year ago
-
NickerBocker09
-
-
NatasRedrumDog
-
Hopefully we are next.
- 1 year ago
-
NatasRedrumDog
-
-
jubal
-
These companies have hijacked the very agencies that are meant to police them and hold them accountable...they hijack scientific studies...and then they also have huge lobbies that work with high level policy makers to create legislation that is favorable to them and to their profits. This needs to be reformed and stopped before they unleash the final straw, the one the breaks the camels back.
I am really happy to see that Monsanto is feeling the pinch and that efforts to put them under a microscope are succeeding.
- 1 year ago
-
jubal
-
-
JanforGore
-
jubal:
Yes, I think it is us who have the ball in our court now. I find it hard to believe that with the toxic cocktail of pesticides we now use that they have no effect on bees or other species. But as you stated that information has ways of falling through some huge cracks all to preserve profit margins at the expense of our health and biodiversity. It is something we must change if we are to survive.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
congoboy
-
jubal:
i heard monasanto was hiring gays
- 1 year ago
-
congoboy
-
-
congoboy
-
JanforGore:
white sugar works best and is a tasty add to home baked products!
- 1 year ago
-
congoboy
-
-
carebearquest
-
Another classic example of why people cannot assume that science is fact. This is why it is ALWAYS important to know who is funding these "studies".
- 1 year ago
-
carebearquest
-
-
mixmaster
-
THE WHITE DEVILS, MADE TO MAKE MAN WHO DONT LOOK LIKE HIM EXTINCT, AND ANIMALS BECUASE HE DOES NOT EXCEPT THAT THEY DO LIVE THINK PLAY IN THIER OWN WORLD BUT SO WHAT, INSECYTS ARE BECOMEING EXTINKT PASS THAT WORM SOME MONEY HE LL SHUT HIS TRAP
- 1 year ago
-
mixmaster
-
-
congoboy
-
mixmaster:
hey i resemble that remark and take offense
- 1 year ago
-
congoboy
-
-
larrysnotes
-
Current flagged the truth, too funny ! Hal Lewis !!!!!
- 1 year ago
-
larrysnotes
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
- This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
Andrew_Douglas
-
MrMxyzptlk:
Well, they do have a point....humanity does kinda suck a lot of the time.
- 1 year ago
-
Andrew_Douglas
-
-
JanforGore
-
MrMxyzptlk:
This isn't about wellbeing, this is about deception that may well be costing us lives and the ability to live on this planet sustainably. But far be it for you to understand anything that doesn't conform to your own notions and your "hippie rants", which is the height of hypocrisy.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
JanforGore: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
congoboy
-
MrMxyzptlk:
white sugar makes a yummy alternative when the honey supply runs low in the winter. also good for making a thick tasty molasses for curing and cooking newly slaughtered pigs
- 1 year ago
-
congoboy
-
-
JanforGore
-
MrMxyzptlk:
This thread isn't about Al Gore, and you are now disrupting this thread by going off topic which is against the rules you agreed to when you opened your account.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
PressCore
-
JanforGore:
That's telling him, Jan. You shouldn't waste your valuable time reasoning
with people whose expressions only mirror provocatively distorted assertions
and whose minds are closed. He never learns. - 1 year ago
-
PressCore
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
JanforGore: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
JanforGore
-
PressCore:
Their tag team MO is obvious.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
MrMxyzptlk:
Your Al Gore fetish is unhealthy and I suggest you work on a way to deal with it without deferring to vicariously getting your frustrations out on me here. You will receive no more responses from me on this. Disruption of this thread to intentionally derail the conversation will be dealt with by me according to the rules of this site.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
congoboy
-
JanforGore:
mrmx, did you sign anything when opening your account? i never read the large print let alone the small. am i on here illegally? never was much into rules, guess thats why i ended up so successful.
- 1 year ago
-
congoboy
-
-
congoboy
-
JanforGore:
i prefer a good paddling on my bare behind, any takers?
- 1 year ago
-
congoboy
-
-
ras_menelik
-
MrMxyzptlk:
You forgetting ... http://current.com/news/91529119_climetgate.htm
- 1 year ago
-
ras_menelik
-
-
southrabbit [removed]
- This comment was removed by its owner.
-
southrabbit [removed]
-
-
congoboy
-
southrabbit:
plenty o honey bees in my area. guess the others will just have to evolve and adapt like every living creature facing a shortage. bats are pretty good at spreadin pollen and much prettier than a bee too.
- 1 year ago
-
congoboy
-
-
Incredulous
-
"The study "doesn't say pesticides aren't a cause of the underlying vulnerability that the virus-fungus combo then exploits...."
BINGO! It is indeed plausible that the virus-fungus combo is dealing the death blow, but this is like telling someone unprotected sex with someone who is HIV positive could cause AIDS. The virus-fungus combo has been implicated many places, but what lies beneath, what conditions are causing this particular disease pattern to proliferate remains undisclosed, not addressed, another one of the elephants in the room, because we want to devise a solution without ever admitting we created the problem.
It is simple ecology really, and we have seen it over and over again. When you wipe out one species, another proliferates, balance is hard work, never passive, and always in flux.
- 1 year ago
-
Incredulous
-
-
Saladin
-
Well, the cool thing about science is that there's no conspiracies allowed.
If you make something like this up, then when you try to fix it based on a phony solution it won't work.
So if the guy was really taking money from Bayer to put out a false study (which seems pretty unlikely) his study won't assist in ending CCD and he'll be exposed.
This is a results based system, lies won't work like they do in politics.
- 1 year ago
-
Saladin
-
-
larrysnotes
-
Saladin:
Hal Lewis (The American Physical Society)
- 1 year ago
-
larrysnotes
-
-
larrysnotes
-
larrysnotes:
Current flagged the truth above, too funny
- 1 year ago
-
larrysnotes
-
-
NickerBocker09
-
Saladin:
He may not be able to tamper with the results but I thought I read that they didn't even test the pesticide. So he kind of did help Bayer out.
- 1 year ago
-
NickerBocker09
-
-
congoboy
-
Saladin:
except al gores science, conspiracies and junk science only please!
- 1 year ago
-
congoboy
-
-
XasthurNortt
-
AHH Shit!
the happening is happening.
- 1 year ago
-
XasthurNortt
-
-
JETaylor
-
Is it just the honey bees or are all the bees equally important?
- 1 year ago
-
JETaylor
-
-
UtopianSky
-
JETaylor:
All- not just bees, but all insects that carry pollen from one flower to another are currently in decline.
- 1 year ago
-
UtopianSky
-
-
congoboy
-
JETaylor:
just like people my friend, all bees are created equal. but down at the animal farm some animals are created more equal than others
- 1 year ago
-
congoboy
-
-
congoboy
-
UtopianSky:
guess you'll have to put on your sensible shoes and step outside and spread a little pollen around yourself
- 1 year ago
-
congoboy
-
-
UtopianSky
-
congoboy:
No, I'll just leave that for insects like you.
- 1 year ago
-
UtopianSky
-
-
congoboy
-
UtopianSky:
thanks sweet heart
- 1 year ago
-
congoboy
-
-
JanforGore
-
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Will-Australia-be-the-Coun-by-amicus-curiae-090...
I am an amateur beekeeper. Since discovering the incredible intricacies of their lives and habits, I have been doing a lot of reading and question asking. Particularly, I have been looking at Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD).
Varroa mites are neither new or especially more prevalent lately. In countries that have had them for many years, they have never been a colony threatening problem -- more an annoyance, from all the data I could find.
New Zealand had an outbreak, but seems to have eradicated it now. Even when the mites were found, we did NOT have massive bee deaths.
Now I find that rather strange, if Varroa was the sole cause, there should have been issues.
I read that Bayer is being taken to court in the EU, over selling chemicals that they knew were harmful to bees and bats (!) which are also dying in masses in the US. hmm? Also affected are small vertebrates (mice, voles and whatever other native fauna eat the bugs).
I believe that the GM pollens combined with physically affecting pesticides, allows the Varroa mite to prey more heavily on already weakened bees.
Recently, last autumn, just before the moratorium on GM crops was supposed to come up for discussion, in Victoria, Australia, it was lifted without public assent, and done very quickly by the state government. Suspiciously so, I believe. Western Australia followed suit recently also.
The 258 GM R/R Canola crops were dud :-) The highest yield was, (feel very free to laugh very loud) 1 whole tonne per hectare! [hectare (ha) = 2.47 acres, or 10,000 square meters]
Next best was 0.65 tonnes/ha. Rather a low average indeed.
That aside, the Kool-Aid crew of farmers, who have seen and heard Moe Parr mr Murray and even Percy Schneider, and still (?) think they know better, and that Monsanto and Dow always tell the truth... are pushing to put in ten times the area of the same dud Canola, from 100+ growers in 285 sites, to 1,000 on heaven knows how many places.
The bees I am affiliated with are run on native trees, and occasionally on organic only orange trees. Almonds, clovers and lucerne aren't so good for them; too many pesticides are being used. The keepers who are happy to lose bees to those issues can. We won't.
Now, as we have no Varroa, and until recently had no GMO either, it will be of great interest to see if the bees on the canola areas begin to die off.
I firmly believe they will, and that maybe this fact would be enough to STOP GMO plants being further approved in my country, and hopefully elsewhere in the world too.
I am adding some info on the Bayer story, and the bats die off also.
cont.
_________________________
Another reason why they patent their seeds... even the pollination process belongs to them, so if you wanted to do research on it to see if it is causing CCD in part you wouldn't be able to. Patenting nature is part of this problem in getting to a solution. - 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
mik661
-
JanforGore:
unbelievable. Do you leap over tall buildings in your spare time?
- 1 year ago
-
mik661
-
-
Incredulous
-
JanforGore:
I have heard that there are those who want to control all food and water supplies, worldwide...this would certainly be one way to do it.
- 1 year ago
-
Incredulous
-
-
PressCore
-
JanforGore:
Bravo, Jan. I also aim to build and own my own greenhouse by and by.
And keep bees there too. I'm glad you're keen on this topic. I'm learning
a lot from your insightful posts beyond this citizen Journalist's star & Email
blog storing my sources. Thanks. Keep up the good work. - 1 year ago
-
PressCore
-
-
congoboy
-
mik661:
no, but she can almost out con a con artist. does that count?
- 1 year ago
-
congoboy
-
-
s_peak
-
Well, it's VERY, VERY unlikely that some virus and fungus combo just popped up out of nowhere. They have probably been around for a while, but have been unable to take hold. I stand by my assumption that SOMETHING must have been compromising the bee's system in order to allow this fungi-virus tag team to take hold. Just like in humans, improper nutrition, or presence of specific toxins will lead to disorders disease, fungi, etc.
This doesn't prove Bayer's innocence at all.
- 1 year ago
-
s_peak
-
-
JanforGore
-
s_peak:
I agree. I think this pesticide weakend their nervous systems and may well have made them more susceptible to giving into a virus. The fact that they all just left the hive leaving the queen proves there was more to this than just a fungus in my eyes. And while I am no scientist, I would think that bees trying to pollinate GMO crops with BT toxin may well have had an effect on them too. Animals seem to be much more intelligent and sensitive when it comes to nature than humans will ever be.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
Incredulous
-
s_peak:
correct...geneticists have only recently discovered the mechanistic workings of the virus-fungus combo, but the implications for both plant and animal disease have been far reaching.
- 1 year ago
-
Incredulous
-
-
JanforGore
-
http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Bayer-CropScience-Monsanto-Enter-Agreeme...
Another reason to keep it quiet? And look here, Bayer and Monsanto are now partners in crime. They can contaminate the food supply, lie to consumers, and still be in business making millions while the biodiversity of this planet is threatened and we are used as a science experiment along with bees and other species. Who knows how many other species have been affected by their toxic pesticides and products that go unreported?
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
H2O_4U
-
I knew it! I knew it! It was always corporations and business causing this! This is what happens when you give into the libertarian right laissez faire attitude!
- 1 year ago
-
H2O_4U
-
-
shanklinmike
-
-
H2O_4U:
So the FDA in bed with Bayer is free market?!? Give me a break, Bayer is state corporatism, not laissez-faire free market capitalism.
This company is laced with the state...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_t9cSDrcsJcYou think Freedom does this, but corporate socialism and crony corporatism is what oligopolizes these industries. Companies love tainting laws away from the free market and towards their advantage to help them remain in business while pushing out competitors...resulting in very few competitors in the market.
As if libertarian principles have been in charge....that is just not true. We're the ones who are laughed at for not getting enough attention, and now it's our fault?!?
Do you really believe the republicans are free marketists?!?!? Do you really not understand the difference between neocons and libertarians?!? You sound ridiculous, seriously....
- 1 year ago
-
shanklinmike
-
-
JanforGore
-
shanklinmike:
Can we please not turn this into a political grudge pissing contest and concentrate on why this is happening? Don't we get enough of this political back and forth in every other thread on this site? This is about a serious crisis facing our biodiversity and environment and I didn't post it because of any political OR religious leanings but because I care about this planet and preserving its natural processes for the future and know others do as well. Holding whoever is responsible for this irrespective of politics is what should be the concern.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
mindcruzer
-
H2O_4U:
Hey friend, it's me again. I'm going to give you a good life tip. If you want to be taken seriously, don't say stupid things.
- 1 year ago
-
mindcruzer
-
-
mik661
-
shanklinmike:
laissez-faire free market capitalism is a fantasy right up there with your libertarian utopia.
- 1 year ago
-
mik661
-
-
NickerBocker09
-
JanforGore:
It is related.
- 1 year ago
-
NickerBocker09
-
-
congoboy
-
mik661:
besides we tea party folks prefer white sugar in our tea. i also hear white sugar is preferred in most koolaid drinks!
- 1 year ago
-
congoboy
-
-
JanforGore
-
NickerBocker09:
Perhaps, but it shouldn't be the overriding focus as it is so many times here that always devolves into getting personal.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
NickerBocker09
-
JanforGore:
True :p
- 1 year ago
-
NickerBocker09
-
-
gurper707
-
mindcruzer:
First sentence, ok. Second sentence, retarded.
- 1 year ago
-
gurper707
-
-
gurper707
-
mik661:
You know nothing of Libertarianism
- 1 year ago
-
gurper707
-
-
gurper707
-
JanforGore:
You cant throw the baby out with the bathwater though. If the discussion about bees goes towards politics because it pertains, then we should go there.
- 1 year ago
-
gurper707
-
-
mik661
-
gurper707:
The preamble outlines the party's goal: "As Libertarians, we seek a world of liberty; a world in which all individuals are sovereign over their own lives and no one is forced to sacrifice his or her values for the benefit of others." It's Statement of Principles begins: "We, the members of the Libertarian Party, challenge the cult of the omnipotent state and defend the rights of the individual." The platform emphasizes individual liberty in personal and economic affairs, avoidance of "foreign entanglements" and military and economic intervention in other nations' affairs and free trade and migration. It calls for Constitutional limitations on government as well as the elimination of most state functions. It includes a "Self-determination" section which quotes from the Declaration of Independence and reads: "Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of individual liberty, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to agree to such new governance as to them shall seem most likely to protect their liberty." It also includes an "Omissions" section which reads: "Our silence about any other particular government law, regulation, ordinance, directive, edict, control, regulatory agency, activity, or machination should not be construed to imply approval. So, we see open immigration, isolationism from the rest of the worlds affairs, an elimination of the state and state agencies and the ability for individuals who dont like goverment to abolish it. Please, master, explain to grasshopper how you possibly think that we will even long remain a nation if we were to truly adopt these goals. I would like to hear actual, concrete steps and name the names of whats going. I happen to know someone who is running for congress on a tea party platform. Every time I ask him to explain to me EXACTLY what he is going to do and how all I hear is these pledges to be "true to his ideals" and "vote with his conscience and stand firm".
- 1 year ago
-
mik661
-
-
JanforGore
-
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/business/s_673968.html
Bayer also had to pay damages due to Liberty Link rice contaminating US farmer's rice crops.
http://current.com/news/92316225_bayer-intentionally-contaminated-u-s-rice.htm
http://current.com/news/92094688_bayer-must-pay-1-5-m-to-ak-ms-rice-farmers-for-...
They knew it contaminated farmer's rice, yet covered it up. What else are they covering up? What were these GM crops sprayed with?
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
http://beecharmers.org/index.html
Is an insecticide made by Bayer killing all of our bees?
Is "Colony Collapse Disorder" just a label for a corporate cover up?
Below are articles from around the globe.
France & Italy ban neonicotinoids. In the past six years, a new group of nicotine-based pesticides have emerged called neonicotinoids. The most common is imidachloprid. Ironically, these were originally manufactured to be less lethal. But about four years ago, French and Italian beekeepers complained that imidachloprid crop spraying was killing their honey bees. So the French and Italian governments banned the nicotine-based pesticides.
Germany bans chemicals linked to honeybee devastation Germany has banned a family of pesticides that are blamed for the deaths of millions of honeybees... The move follows reports from German beekeepers in the Baden-Wuerttemberg region that two thirds of their bees died earlier this month following the application of a pesticide called clothianidin."It's a real bee emergency," said Manfred Hederer, president of the German Professional Beekeepers' Association. "50-60% of the bees have died on average and some beekeepers have lost all their hives." Tests on dead bees showed that 99% of those examined had a build-up of clothianidin. Source/Full Story: The Guardian, May 23 2008
Jerry Hayes, Chief, Apiary Section, Florida Dept. of Agriculture, Gainsville, Florida: "The interesting thing about the Colony Collapse Disorder is that bees are leaving the colony and not coming back, which is highly unusual for a social insect to leave a queen and its brood or young behind. They are seemingly going out and can't find their way back home. Imidachloprid, when it is used to control termites, does exactly the same thing. One of the methods it uses to kill termites is that the termites feed on this material and then go out to feed and can't remember how to get home. And it also causes their immune systems to collapse, causing what would be normal organisms to become pathogenic in them (bees).
What 60 Minutes didn't air The cause is imidacloprid, plain and simple," said David Hackenberg, the beekeeper who was the subject of a 60 Minutes story that aired Oct. 28.Hackenberg, who has tended bees his entire adult life, said he told 60 Minutes about this imidacloprid theory in these same direct terms. After editing Hackenberg's comments, however, the venerable CBS program quoted some scientists who said they weren't sure, thereby leaving doubt in everyone's mind. Here's the background you need to understand: The primary product used to control grubs on your lawn, or insects on your fruit trees, or termites in your basement, contains a chemical compound known as imidacloprid, a synthetic nicotine, which is most commonly marketed as Merit. No one debates that imidacloprid is toxic to bees, yet Bayer, the exclusive patent holder from 1988 until this year, denies its product causes CCD.
The cause of CCD has been greatly disputed. Everything from radio waves to cell phone towers were blamed initially, with the most recent high-profile theory involving Israeli acute paralysis virus that was detailed in a scientific paper released Sept. 4. Many beekeepers and other scientists, however, state that the Israeli virus is only a symptom and that imidacloprid is the true culprit.
Products that contain imidacloprid other than Merit include Admire, Confidor, Connect, Evidence, Leverage, Muralla, Provado, Trimax, Premise and Winne. Though imidacloprid has been patented since 1988, . its use on American crops escalated significantly in the past three years, just as products containing diazinon came off store shelves. In the case of bees, the imidacloprid apparently does not directly kill the hives, but disorients the bees and causes them to disband — at least according to beekeepers who are closely observing bees' behavior. That's why, when Colony Collapse Disorder is the problem, no dead bees can be found near the hive. That, said Hackenberg and others, is the biggest indicator that imidacloprid is involved. Entire Story
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
