Tech | November 19, 2010 | 76 comments

Since the TSA molested my family, why doesn’t Obama volunteer to subject his family to the same security procedures?

Image
TomTucker
Two weeks ago, my wife flew alone out to Colorado with our two young children. Unaware that the TSA had instituted new and incredibly invasive new security procedures, my wife called me distressed after getting frisked by the TSA. Or as my wife put it, “in some cultures I would be married to my screener by now.” She was joking, but make no mistake — my wife was incredibly disturbed by how intimate a security pat down she received.

So here’s my not-so-modest proposal: If the President’s Homeland Security department is so adamant that this is the absolute best way to prevent terrorism, I think the President and his family should voluntarily submit to one of the new invasive pat down procedures. I know the Obamas don’t fly commercial at all these days, so they should probably get a pretty good idea what the rest of us are putting up with.

The President and his family — preferably with DHS Secretary Janet “The system worked” Napolitano — should show up at Dulles or Reagan airport on a weekday with a camera crew in tow, as airport pat downs are typically done in full view of hundreds of travelers. All of America will to see the TSA handling the President’s crown jewels. Then a rubber-gloved federal agent will run his hands all over his wife and daughter’s privates while he watches. Then I want him to turn to the camera and tell all of America that this is no big deal and we should all be good citizens and comply with the necessary security procedures.

It only seems fair.


Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/since-the-t...
  1. groups:
    Community,   Politics,   Tech,   TSA
  2. tags:
    Obama Police Family TSA 1 more
  3.     
    |

76 comments // Since the TSA molested my family, why doesn’t Obama volunteer to subject his family to the same security procedures?

  • Dmerza1989
    • +1
      Dmerza1989  
    • If you want to talk about police state, both sides are trying for it. So don't blame the left or the right. They both seem to be aiming towards one, just in different ways. So the question seems to be which police state are you more fond of? If you are looking to blame people for those decisions look no further than a mirror. Its easy to manipulate one of the stupidest industrialized countries.
      As far as the TSA's anyone responsible for putting these fucking things in our airports should be subject (along with their families) to go through what every one else has. It is the principle don't pass or do something for the public you would not do yourself. Its just as bad as the pharmaceutical companies. Fear is an emotion, and an emotional person is not a rational person. Ball is in your court would you like to be consumed by emotion and have a country of mental patients? Or is it time for the citizens to take some responsibility in getting their country right instead of relying on the government and corrupt political figures?

    • 2 years ago
  • addie340
    • -1
      addie340  
    • Obama is not subject to anything the rest of us little people are. He and the senators, congress, seem to think they are better than the rest of us and would never go through anything like that. Who the hell would want to search Pelosi anyway. That is one UGLY pig.

    • 2 years ago
  • Goldman
    • +2
      Goldman  
    • Image
    • Question: What's Next??!!!
      Answer: Full Body Cavity Search: nostrils, ears, mouth, navel, penis/vagina, and rectum.

      Where do you draw the line? I (and the 4th amendment) draw it before that. The airports can opt out of the TSA whenever they want and use a privet service. So just stop flying. they will get the message.

    • 2 years ago
  • tsaencounter
  • NuclearLullaby
    • 0
      NuclearLullaby  
    • tsaencounter:

      This was put forth by George W Bush, just in case you needed a reminder! Why Obama keeps it around is anyone's guess,but I guess security DID need to be stepped up!!! If we all entered airports nude,this issue would not exist,then again...That CLEARLY would cause other issues! Something does need to be done,I don't really know what!

    • 2 years ago
  • ayipis
    • 0
      ayipis  
    • bleeding heart liberals do not want to offend muslims so..to be fair..LETS SCAN EVERYBODY...

      it started out as simple as that.............

    • 2 years ago
  • Domirillo
    • +2
      Domirillo  
    • ayipis:

      This doesn't have anything to do with offending anyone. It has to do with setting a precedent that the government cannot frisk you, or take a naked photo of you, without some form of probable cause. It seems that we had once established that in 1968 with Terry v. Ohio. But the TSA doesn't really seem to care about that.

    • 2 years ago
  • ayipis
  • ThatCrazyLibertarian
  • NuclearLullaby
  • kennymotown
    • +2
      kennymotown  
    • And somehow Obama is the one responsible for this? You have got to be kidding me, he can't even get past a Congress that has blocked extending unemployment insurance! Can you Tom Tucker even think past your ass to see the trouble from the right if he did do something to get rid of the pat downs? You guys are responsible for my country being taken over by the right wing nuts, and you will all pay for your stupidity!

    • 2 years ago
  • ayipis
  • ayipis
    • -2
      ayipis  
    • kennymotown:

      the "right wing nuts' wants to profile these terrorists and not bother everybody

      ..but LEFT WINGED NUTS prefer not to offend the terrorist so lets bother everybody..so welcome to your own bullshit..

      *side note....your country??? is that before or after you called it a capitalist and a facist...at any rate, do you have a job yet?? "your country" is about to end your stimulus package pretty soon..so pat downs will be least of your problems..

    • 2 years ago
  • kennymotown
  • panichead
    • +1
      panichead  
    • kennymotown:

      Dude, give the GOP a little credit. They actually voted with the POTUS yesterday and made "crush videos" illegal. Suprise, suprise, now what is our Rep. leadership supposed to do on their time off? Instead of watching little Oriental girls in their lace undies crush the heads of cute and cuddlely kittens for their sexual gradification. Now they will have to go back to solicitating prostitutes to whip them while dressed in diapers (David Vitter), or hanging out in the restrooms at the Sothwest terminal at MIA (Larry Craig), or trying to sleep with Congressional pages (Mark Foley), or sleeping with their best friends wife/campaign manager, then bribing everyone in said family with a job or money (John Ensign) or rolling around on the floor and "tickling" your staff in your office or in the flat you all share (name alludes me).

    • 2 years ago
  • panichead
  • kennymotown
  • TypeMemeHere
  • NuclearLullaby
  • PrivateBurke
    • +1
      PrivateBurke  
    • Please understand the government you live in. This has nothing to do with the Executive Branch. This is a judicial and legislative issue.

    • 2 years ago
  • SamuraiDave
  • captain_insano
    • 0
      captain_insano  
    • Tom Tucker Bush is too easy and should be ridiculed forever so hopefully we dont ever have a dum dum as president again, did you read his book? i heard it had crayola illustrations in it

    • 2 years ago
  • captain_insano
    • 0
      captain_insano  
    • Saying that you were molested by the TSA during a pat down is a slap int the face to all people who have really been molested, shut up the whining and drive or take a boat if you do not want to be searched, I can live with a couple sissy's crying about a pat down more than i can 5000 people + getting squashed into blood and guts by a giant burning building

    • 2 years ago
  • Domirillo
    • +3
      Domirillo  
    • captain_insano:

      It isn't molestation. It's a violation of your rights. End of story. I don't care how non-invasive it is. I'm not a sissy for keeping the government at arms reach. If they get the right to search you when you get on a plane, what is the difference for them to search you when you walk into any other private business?

    • 2 years ago
  • captain_insano
  • captain_insano
  • Domirillo
    • +1
      Domirillo  
    • captain_insano:

      It seems that was only half your point. The other half is that you don't mind losing your rights if that means that it prevents another 9/11. But if you can tell me what percentage of your life is spent on a plane, than I'll tell you what percentage of your life is "safer" from terrorism. Stripping Americans of their basic rights does not make us any safer. It only serves to make us more powerless to stand up for ourselves. I will not sacrifice even the smallest of my rights for a false sense of security.

    • 2 years ago
  • Domirillo
    • +1
      Domirillo  
    • captain_insano:

      Correct. No one should have to submit to a frisk, or digital strip search in order to get on a plane. More people die on the road each year by drunk drivers than they do by terrorism. More people die of heart disease, cancer, AIDS, Parkinsons, Alzheimers... you name it, and it kills more people than terrorists do. No one should have to sacrifice freedom in order to pretend that they are some how safer. You are not safer. But you are weaker. The best thing that the government has done to prevent another 9/11 was to put a lock on the pilots door, and put a pistol in their cabin.

    • 2 years ago
  • Angela_Monger
    • 0
      Angela_Monger  
    • captain_insano:

      Oh come on. I don't give a flying rat's ass what people's excuses for this crap is. There are some lines you do not cross and feeling men's penises and women's boobs is something you just don't do. You also don't look at photos of that crap. And yes, outside of an airport this behavior would be considered, you got it, SEXUAL MOLESTATION. That is what it is. Which is why I have not set foot in an airport since 9/11. There is nowhere I need to fly to that bad that I will allow total strangers to feel me up like a piece of ass. Let's be real. We all know what this is. As a matter of fact, when Hilary Clinton flies commercial, she walks into the airport and boards a plane. No one fondles her boobs, plays touchy feely with her crotch, or feels up her ass. That is solely for us little people. So yes, maybe Obama should get his penis felt up. George implemented this nonsense but Obama could put a stop to it and has not. And quite frankly I am amazed that it has taken the general public nine years to take a step back and say "you know, this is too kinky for me." They also do this crap to children. Outside of an airport someone who does that is considered a pedophile. Just because this is happening in an airport does not mean it isn't what it is. Yeah, it's sexual molestation. Anyway you look at it, that is what it is.

    • 2 years ago
  • TomTucker
  • NuclearLullaby
    • 0
      NuclearLullaby  
    • TomTucker:

      Okay...I Could Blame Chaney I guess...Hmmm...Bush Sr ? Yeah that works too!!! I think I'll blame Palin too even though she's not involved in this might as well blame her anyway just because she's so dumb!!!!

    • 2 years ago
  • TomTucker
  • ozoneocean
    • -1
      ozoneocean  
    • It wasn't him that was responsible for this you tool.
      "molested"...? man up. It's not cool, but it's hardly "molesting".

      Such ridiculous hyperbole! When you think what the poor people of Iraq and Afghanistan, and even Pakistan have gone through for this stupid "war on terror" and we have these little cry-babies screaming bloody murder because they're scared about someone seeing their shrivelled willies... It makes me ashamed to be a human being!

    • 2 years ago
  • TomTucker
  • TomTucker
    • -2
      TomTucker  
    • ozoneocean:

      I willing to bet if bush was president you would see this situation differently but you have to blindly support your puppet president. Heh, what is with you and all the obama supporters and the childish name calling. LOL! I knew he had young supporters but WOW!

    • 2 years ago
  • Domirillo
    • +2
      Domirillo  
    • ozoneocean:

      You, and everyone else it seems, are missing the point. This doesn't have to do with ANY president. It has to do with the overreaching power of the TSA, which has little to no oversight from the President or Congress. We are protected by the fourth amendment from unwarranted search and seizure. That amendment, coupled with the judicial precedent created by the case of Terry vs. Ohio, guarantees that you cannot be searched or frisked by any law enforcement officer without probable cause that you have committed or are about to commit a crime. It takes more balls to stand up for your rights than it does to walk through the line like a sheep, and pretend that you're somehow safer because of it.

    • 2 years ago
  • noxidereus
    • +2
      noxidereus  
    • ozoneocean:

      You should be ashamed because you are way off base. This stupid "war on terror" is a scam. If you admit it is stupid, then why should we give up our freedom for security in the name of the phony "war on terror"? We are all victims of it. The answer isn't to pretend that people complaining about it is wrong. People standing up for their rights is not equivalent to being a cry-baby. The answer is for everyone to keep standing up for their rights, and against the overreaching, fake, bullshit "war on terror". "Molested" is an appropriate term for what they are doing. You are the tool.

    • 2 years ago
  • panichead
  • NuclearLullaby
    • 0
      NuclearLullaby  
    • Domirillo:

      "About to commit crime" those are the very words they use to justify this sort of thing taking place! However, our world has never been safe & honestly never will be! even without wepons it would STILL be possible (though less likely) for someone to hijack a plane! The kinda creepy thing is actually new flight technology being tested that a five year old could control! Though I DO think some flight screenings are needed,I DO think things are going a little overboard now! I am not 100% sure how to deal with this problem aside from everyone showing up at airports nude,but that would likely lead to other issues! On one hand though the seach would take less time!!!

    • 2 years ago
  • RMattnerTours
    • +1
      RMattnerTours  
    • I also see both sides of the argument here. But firstly using the TSA to launch a personal attack on the President is ridiculous. He had nothing to do with implementing the security at the airports.
      Remeber aircraft were flown into buildings during the Bush regime and that is when airport security changed.
      This situation is a dog chasing it's tail, the bettter security gets the better the badies get. It is a never ending story. What really bothers me is the whole airport thing is a big show often manned by not so bright people.
      But what is going on in the areas that are not visible to the public. What about security at powerstations, oil refineries, harbours etc. zip.
      As far as I'm concerned the scanners are an expensive health risk and only an idiot would try something via an airport now, as has recently been proven.
      As the president recently mentioned one would be better off jacking up the intelligence as was prooved to be successful with the recent bomb attempt from Yemen. That was nipped in the bud by informants to intelligence.
      The only person benefiting from the scanners are the seller whose made a packet and the buyer who most probably also made a packet.

    • 2 years ago
  • TomTucker
  • TomTucker
  • noxidereus
    • +2
      noxidereus  
    • TomTucker:

      Pretending like the Bush administration isn't responsible for the horrible situation we are in, or simply forgetting that fact serves no one. As adults with the ability to comprehend complex thoughts, we should be able to remember Bush AND still go after Obama for what we don't like about him. Stop defending Bush by being indifferent to what that fuckface did to our country! There is no reason to forget! It's not one or the other. It's not like you blame either Bush OR Obama. Both presidents need to be held accountable.

    • 2 years ago
  • captain_insano
    • 0
      captain_insano  
    • TomTucker:

      Two years?? and we had Bush for eight years and you never figured out someone was tying his shoes for him? Can you recognize intelligence?? Say you are for Palin in 2012 and answer the question for me

    • 2 years ago
  • NuclearLullaby
  • NuclearLullaby
  • Swisher
    • 0
      Swisher  
    • Assume I'm not on either side of this debate. I surely see both sides. But I ask you to question this: If the TSA does back down and returns to the previous methods, and then we have an "underwear" bomber who succeeds with his task (as last year's nearly did), who would be the first to pounce on Obama for allowing it to happen?

      Does this significant inconvenience supersede the lives of perhaps 300 humans?

    • 2 years ago
  • lu7cky
    • 0
      lu7cky  
    • Swisher:

      A great point and a sign of the times we live in. I believe the safety of those 300 humans far outweighs whatever inconveinance or embarassment one may feel when going through these checks.

    • 2 years ago
  • TomTucker
  • panichead
    • +1
      panichead  
    • Swisher:

      I agree with ya. We Americans bitch about our "personal freedoms" to keep us safe like a bunch of spoiled little girls. I did 2 tours in Afghanastan as a grunt "protecting American's freedom and security", and from where I stand the inconvenience, we as travelers go through isn't really a big deal. It's to much of an invasion of privacy to be x-rayed or frisked to get on a plane, but one image that will never leave my mind for as long as I live is of a little Afghan girl about 4 or 5 whose body was burnt and actually "bubbling" and missing half a right arm and a whole right leg (do to an errant bomb that wiped out about half a village), cryin' and still alive being held by her mother with a "1000 mile stare". When I hear people bitchin', I think back to that little girl and wonder if what she went through was an inconveneince for OUR safety? Get in the fuckin' x-ray machine, get on the fuckin' plane and shut the fuck up!

    • 2 years ago
  • noxidereus
    • -2
      noxidereus  
    • panichead:

      No, it is more like being a "little girl" (as in sheepish, scared, meek) when we are so scared of the big bad terrorists that we will agree to anything for the daddy government to protect us. Your ridiculously idiotic and stupid comparison of Americans to that poor Afghan girl is way off base! The only comparison that should be made is that we are all victims of the same bullshit "war on terror". She didn't die for American freedom. She was a victim of American greed and bloodlust for oil. You shut the fuck up!

    • 2 years ago
  • panichead
  • Swisher
  • Swisher
  • Swisher
  • NuclearLullaby
  • Angela_Monger
    • 0
      Angela_Monger  
    • lu7cky:

      Well, I don't. Looking at a guy's dick in his pants is not going to save anyone or prevent anything. I mean really. What if some boogey man shoves an explosive up his ass? Are you going to drop your drawers and let someone put a hand up your ass so we can prevent another situation like that?

    • 2 years ago
  • lu7cky
    • 0
      lu7cky  
    • These new procedures are, unfortunately, a necessary part of air travel today. Really, I go through more of a check getting into a club in downtown Baltimore. It isn't as big of deal as some are making it and anyone who does should volunteer to go molest themselves.

    • 2 years ago
  • TomTucker
  • NuclearLullaby
  • good_stuff
    • +1
      good_stuff  
    • He's a president, not a reality TV show star. Oh, wait you probably want a reality show TV star to be president.

      Hmmmm.... Should we pick Snooki or Palin?

    • 2 years ago
  • TomTucker
  • NuclearLullaby
  • NuclearLullaby
  • TomTucker
  • Paratus
    • -2
      Paratus  
    • Absolutely. Said it myself when this nonsense began but don't expect our rulers to have to go through the same procedures as the common people. There is one bright light in the mix, however. Saw on Drudge, I believe, that two Republican representatives are going to opt out of the Congressional health care system because they and their peers should have to live under the constraints the rest of us do. A refreshing change. WE will see if that continues.

    • 2 years ago
  • CarlosIsDown
  • Paratus
  • Dagum
  • Mark701
  • ThatHarlemKat
  • RMattnerTours
  • noxidereus
  • UtopianSky
    • +5
      UtopianSky  
    • Paratus:

      No, you are thumbing him down because he is right, and you don't like that he is right.

      Bush began Homeland Security.
      Bush began all of these Airport screenings.
      Yet, morons like you want to blame everything on Obama.

    • 2 years ago
  • captain_insano
  • NuclearLullaby
more from Tech:

top videos