Tech | November 24, 2010 | 74 comments

GLOBAL POLITICAL AWAKENING: Who Put Bill Gates In Charge of the World?

source: http://globalpoliticalawakening.blogspot.com/2010/11/who-put-bill-gates-in-charge-of-world.html

Image
GLOBALPOLITICAL
Bill Gates looks so angelic and friendly. Looks are deceptive. This man is trying to rule and ruin the world with the help of philanthropists and the scientific dictatorship.

Microsoft founder and one of the world’s wealthiest men, Bill Gates, projects an image of a benign philanthropist using his billions via
his (tax exempt) Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, to tackle diseases, solve food shortages in Africa and alleviate poverty. In a conference
in California, Gates reveals a less public agenda of his philanthropy—population reduction, otherwise known as eugenics.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, along with David Rockefeller’s Rockefeller Foundation, the creators of the GMO biotechnology, are
also financing a project called The Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) headed by former UN chief, Kofi Annan. Accepting the
role as AGRA head in June 2007 Annan expressed his “gratitude to the Rockefeller Foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and
all others who support our African campaign.” The AGRA board is dominated by people from both the Gates’ and Rockefeller foundations.

Monsanto, DuPont, Dow, Syngenta and other major GMO agribusiness giants are reported at the heart of AGRA, using it as a back-door
to spread their patented GMO seeds across Africa under the deceptive label, ‘bio-technology,’ a euphemism for genetically engineered
patented seeds. The person from the Gates Foundation responsible for its work with AGRA is Dr. Robert Horsch, a 25-year Monsanto
GMO veteran who was on the team that developed Monsanto’s RoundUp Ready GMO technologies. His job is reportedly to use Gates’
money to introduce GMO into Africa.

To date South Africa is the only African country permitting legal planting of GMO crops. In 2003 Burkina Faso authorized GMO trials.
In 2005 Kofi Annan’s Ghana drafted bio-safety legislation and key officials expressed their intentions to pursue research into GMO crops.
AGRA is being used to create networks of “agro-dealers” across Africa, at first with no mention of GMO seeds or herbicides, in order to
have the infrastructure in place to massively introduce GMO.

Farmers and civil society organizations around the world are outraged by the recent discovery of further connections between the Bill
and Melinda Gates Foundation and agribusiness titan Monsanto. Monsanto is a company that practices eugenics (I’m sorry new term
is Bioethics, how nice), and Billy and that perky little Melinda really want to destroy at least 4/5s of the population. These people make
Obama seem good.

“The Foundation’s direct investment in Monsanto is problematic on two primary levels,” said Dr. Phil Bereano, University of Washington
Professor Emeritus and recognized expert on genetic engineering. “First, Monsanto has a history of blatant disregard for the interests
and well-being of small farmers around the world, as well as an appalling environmental track record. The strong connections to Monsanto
cast serious doubt on the Foundation’s heavy funding of agricultural development in Africa and purported goal of alleviating poverty and
hunger among small-scale farmers. Second, this investment represents an enormous conflict of interests.”

More recently, the Foundation has come under fire in its own hometown. During the week of August 27, 2010, 250 Seattle residents sent
postcards expressing their concern that the Foundation’s approach to agricultural development, rather than reducing hunger as pledged,
would instead “increase farmer debt, enrich agribusiness corporations like Monsanto and Syngenta, degrade the environment, and
dispossess small farmers.” In addition to demanding that the Foundation instead fund “socially and ecologically appropriate practices
determined locally by African farmers and scientists” and support African food sovereignty, they urged the Foundation to cut all ties to
Monsanto and the biotechnology industry.

Everybody needs to flood the foundation with similar letters.

In late 2003, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation was strongly criticized by “international charities, farmers’ groups and academics”
as a result of a $25 million grant it had given to “GM [genetically modified] research to develop vitamin and protein-enriched seeds for
the world's poor”. This money supported research being undertaken by two groups, the International Centre for Tropical Agriculture and
the International Food Policy Research Institute, two groups which played an integral role in the first Ford and Rockefeller Foundation-funded
(so-called) Green Revolution (see later). Both of these organizations are also part of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural
Research (CGIAR), a group of global public institutes that is “widely accused of being a creature of its two major funders – the US and
the World Bank”. However, although linked to the World Bank what most critical commentators fail to comment on is the fact that CGIAR
was formed as a result of a “series of private conferences held at the Rockefeller Foundation’s conference center in Bellagio, Italy” and it’s
work has been strongly supported by all manner of liberal foundations. Thus while a good case can be made that the Gates Foundation has
been highly influenced by other liberal foundations, like the Rockefeller Foundation, John Vidal (2003) points out that there are also “
reasons to believe that the Gates food agenda is now being shaped by US corporate and government interests”. This is because in regard
to their support for CGIAR the Gates Foundation chose to partner with the US Department of Agriculture and USAID – “two of the most
active pro-GM organisations in the world.” (Brian Tokar in his 2004 book, Gene Traders: Biotechnology, World Trade, and the Globalization
of Hunger, provides a critical overview of the US involvements in GM developments.)

Listen to internet radio with Barbara H Peterson on Truth Squad Radio

The global elite have launched a world-wide operation against an unaware population to reduce and control fertility. Vaccines and even staple
food crops have been modified to achieve these goals.

If you can’t seem to bring yourself to believe that such an undertaking is possible, or that there are human beings willing and capable;
Look back in time, this kind of conspiracy isn’t new, in fact this kind of control was idealized by Plato some 2,300 years ago in his
momentous work The Republic. Plato wrote that a ruling elite should guide society, “…whose aim will be to preserve the average of population.”
He further stated, “There are many other things which they will have to consider, such as the effects of wars and diseases and any similar
agencies, in order as far as this is possible to prevent the State from becoming either too large or too small.”

The activities of the ruling elite in controlling population, writes Plato, must be kept secret. He writes, “Now these goings on must be a secret
which the rulers only know, or there will be a further danger of our herd… breaking out into rebellion.”

The “secret billionaire club” meeting in May of 2009 primarily focused around population control, a cause célèbre embraced by David Rockefeller,
Ted Turner and Bill Gates, has been confirmed by a London Times report.

Read More: http://globalpoliticalawakening.blogspot.com/2010/11/who-put-bill-gates-in-charg...
  1. groups:
    Community,   Tech,   Health,   Opinion,   8 more
  2. tags:
    Corruption,  Monsanto,  Agriculture,  Spam,  8 more
  3.     
    |

74 comments // GLOBAL POLITICAL AWAKENING: Who Put Bill Gates In Charge of the World?

  • haydemon
    • +2
      haydemon  

    • I applaud your sentiments about the nefarious influence of big corporations on society, trying to dominate 3rd world countries, and toying with bio-engineering of our food supply. I don't know however, where your comment "worse than Obama" comes from. (Or did you mean to say "worse than Bush?"--because I'd agree with you there.)

    • 1 year ago
  • GLOBALPOLITICAL
  • haydemon
  • UtopianSky
  • haydemon
    • 0
      haydemon  
    • UtopianSky:

      Good thing Free Speech is alive & well in this country. Some people don't even know how good they have it; a sojourn to Burma or North Korea (or Iran, or... ) would do some a world of good I'm thinking...

    • 1 year ago
  • Gravity_Man
    • -2
      Gravity_Man  
    • haydemon:

      Hmm. Over there they behead ya and over here you while away your days unemployed wishing someone would come along and behead ya? I wonder if it's suicide if you leave a Note your hand accidentally hit the release switch while you were cleaning your antique toy model extry heavy duty vintage Erector Set guillotine?

    • 1 year ago
  • corndog67
    • -1
      corndog67  

    • I bet if it was your money, and doing whatever you wanted to do with it, you wouldn't bitch so much about what he does with his. Jealousy is a real bitch, isn't it? When someone else does something that you will "NEVER" be able to do, envy is all there is left.

      More power to him. If it was me, I would have sold out when he was worth $68 Billion, and went vacation, forever.

    • 1 year ago
  • GLOBALPOLITICAL
  • Gravity_Man
    • -1
      Gravity_Man  
    • GLOBALPOLITICAL:

      What a waste of time protesting the elite's activities! That goes so far out in the universe of Accomplish Nothing I imagine it also clears the pail. What do you do next, fight with Superman over Lois Lane?

      Aren't you raising their collective ego spending so much time fighting their shadow? And what if one day they decide to make everybody plunge into a permanent catatonic [frozen-state] by doing something great, such as flying their fleet of ufo's over major cities in Full View?

      You would be THE ONE got slammed the worst. Not to mention it, but if they decided to develop my recent discovery of Ocean Energy I'd be right behind you. If the leopard really wants to hurt us all she needs to do is change her spots.

    • 1 year ago
  • corndog67
  • mik661
    • -1
      mik661  

    • Disease, famine or the end of poverty are the only three things that will control population. The question I would ask is who is so threatened by Bill Gates Philanthropic actions that they would come up with this load of bullshit to attempt to discredit it. Personally I would start with the eugenics angle which typically is the propoganda of the Catholic Church and right to life groups.

    • 1 year ago
  • wtthfkovr
  • freecrack
    • +1
      freecrack  

    • who Put Bill Gates In Charge of the World?

      doesnt free market capitalism state wealth puts you in charge?
      especially when regulation is lacking?

    • 1 year ago
  • Mishyana
    • 0
      Mishyana  

    • The good thing about the internet? It provides everyone with a voice. The bad thing? That voice is not always *sane*.

    • 1 year ago
  • GLOBALPOLITICAL
  • GLOBALPOLITICAL
  • GLOBALPOLITICAL
  • jubal
  • GLOBALPOLITICAL
    • +1
      GLOBALPOLITICAL  
    • Image

    • "The Coming Population Crash": The overpopulation myth

      How feminism and pop culture saved Earth from getting too crowded -- and are helping to avert planetary catastrophe

      BY MARGARET EBY

      People have been worrying about the world’s pending overpopulation for more than two centuries. Robert Thomas Malthus sounded the alarm in 1797 with "An Essay on the Principles of the Population," which predicted mass starvation and went on to influence the likes of Charles Darwin and Margaret Sanger. Paul Ehrlich’s 1968 book, "The Population Bomb," forecast a similar fate; if the population kept rising unchecked, Earth’s resources would buckle. Many of today’s environmental thinkers, such as broadcaster (and "Planet Earth" narrator) David Attenborough, have called for drastic measures to limit the planet’s population before it’s too late.

      But according to the veteran environmental writer Fred Pearce, they’re all wrong. In his latest book, "The Coming Population Crash: And Our Planet's Surprising Future," Pearce argues that the world’s population is peaking. In the next century, we’re heading not for exponential growth, but a slow, steady decline. This, he claims, has the potential to massively change both our society and our planet: Children will become a rare sight, patriarchal thinking will fall by the wayside, and middle-aged culture will replace our predominant youth culture. Furthermore, Pearce explains, the population bust could be the end of our environmental woes. Fewer people making better choices about consumption could lead to a greener, healthier planet.

      Salon called Fred Pearce in his London office to talk about the reasons behind our population peak, the high cost of our aging world, and how TV helped save the planet.

      Why write about the population debate now?

      http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2010/04/19/population_crash_ext2010

    • 1 year ago
  • GLOBALPOLITICAL
    • +1
      GLOBALPOLITICAL  
    • Image

    • Taking on the overpopulation myth

      REAL COSTS, ILLUSORY BENEFITS

      By Steven W. Mosher

      REVIEWED BY JOSEPH A. D'AGOSTINO

      "'Our health care sector is collapsed,' Kenya obstetrician Stephen Karanja says simply, opening his hands in a gesture of hopelessness. 'Thousands of Kenyan people will die of malaria, the treatment for which costs a few cents, in health facilities whose shelves are stocked to the ceiling with millions of dollars worth of [contraceptive] pills, IUDs, Norplant, Depo-Provera, and so on, most of which are supplied with American money.'"

      This one quote from Steven W. Mosher's "Population Control: Real Costs, Illusory Benefits," from the former secretary of the Kenyan Medical Association, summarizes the state of Western-funded population control programs in the Third World. Just as Planned Parenthood, founded by eugenicist Margaret Sanger (who said she wanted "to create a race of thoroughbreds"), still has 70 percent of its clinics located in minority neighborhoods, foreign aid for health programs still target the black, brown, and yellow populations of the world for reduction. Now called reproductive health or maternal health programs, these efforts - which continue to receive billions of dollars a year from the United States and Europe even as birthrates decline to below replacement level in most regions of the world - began as population control and still have that effect.

      http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/jul/27/taking-on-the-overpopulation-myt...

    • 1 year ago
  • GLOBALPOLITICAL
  • Jeremy_Benson
    • +2
      Jeremy_Benson  

    • First of all, I'd like to point out that the end of this article tells you what the topic of the secret bilderberg meetings are. That's crap. Unless you were there, I don't want to hear you telling me what went on. That's your first sign of bullshit.

      Secondly, I'd like to state that I in no way support monsanto or the things they do.

      However, not all GM products are bad, only when developed irresponsibly or for the sole purpose of making money. I've said it before and I'll say it again: GMOs and genetic research has saved all of our asses from worldwide food crises more times than I can count. The most recent one was a rampant fungal infection that threatened to wipe out 40-60% of the world's wheat supply. GMOs saved the day on that one. Don't condemn something just because of the irresponsible actions of some.

      Also, reduction of the world population is not eugenics, though eugenics may be used towards this end. That is simply called "reduction of the world population". Nor does it necessarily have to be achieved through immoral means, and if you've seen Bill Gates speak on the subject you know that genocide or mass sterilization is not what he has been proposing (at least to the public. Perhaps he is an evil genius bent on world domination, but I am certainly not a mind reader and all real evidence points to the contrary). The definition of eugenics is a conscious guidance of our childbearing in order to reduce or eliminate birth defects, harmful genes, and hereditary diseases. When you consider the fact that this can be done through relatively simple gene therapies, not necessarily forced abortions or genocide, I don't think anyone can argue that this is a bad thing. Bill Gates has never to my knowledge discussed eugenics in any form. And considering the rate at which our population is growing and the rate at which poverty and hunger are growing, anyone who thinks we can continue on in this manner and NOT kill ourselves is a fool.

      Yes, monsanto is bad. Yes, Gates' occasional dealings with them is a little bit suspect. But the majority of the above article is nothing but guesswork, or carefully crafted rhetoric designed to beg the question and lead you to the conclusion that the author wants you to have. Is it possible? Sure. Definite? Definitely not.

      So when Alex Jones and Glenn Beck and prison planet and all those people tell you that evil people are feeding you propaganda and the government is going to take away your food and water and women and our government is a bunch of communists and nazis and socialists (oh my!) and prison camps and terror! terror! George Bush! take a step back and think: who exactly is feeding the public propaganda here?

    • 1 year ago
  • unimatrix0
  • GLOBALPOLITICAL
    • +1
      GLOBALPOLITICAL  
    • Jeremy_Benson:

      It is time to Wake Up! Of course, Bill Gates will not openly admit what he's doing!

      Do you know what the so called Bilderberg Group is doing behind closed doors? That's is the point. If they are doing good things, why not allow the media to report on their activities? I suggest you study history; do the research; you will come to believe.

      I was quite skeptical until I took the time to research the topics, extensively. These people do not care about you. You are nothing but a slave to them.

    • 1 year ago
  • Jeremy_Benson
    • 0
      Jeremy_Benson  
    • GLOBALPOLITICAL:

      I used to follow Alex Jones. I used to be a big fan, in fact. Made all my friends watch his shit and said to them the same thing you are telling me. And yes, secret meetings of billionaires are kinda scary. But then, the whole point of the secrecy is that you don't know. Simple. Attempting to state that 'this is definitely what they are up to' or even 'this is probably what they are up to' is jumping to conclusions. I have found more evidence that the theories touted by Jones and his ilk are outright lies than I have found evidence of any sort of evil NWO. That is not to say that there isn't corruption or conspiracy. In fact, when we begin to jump at phantoms and ascribe ourselves to an ideology that is deeply flawed and has no real proof - an ideology that is, in fact, mostly supposition - it distracts us from the real issues and the real problems and they cause more harm than anything (remember that whole 'who is really feeding you propaganda?' thing i said previously). You want to present me with concrete evidence then I'm the first to take up the cause. But in the meantime I find myself repeating that old phrase:

      WAKE UP!!

      Edit: You also seem to be trying to tell me that since Gates won't admit wrongdoing, then that is what he must be doing. This is flawed logic. If he is doing bad things then obviously he is not going to say anything. True. But then he may also simply NOT be doing any wrongdoing. There's that whole "i'm not a mindreader" thing. And neither are you.

    • 1 year ago
  • GLOBALPOLITICAL
    • +1
      GLOBALPOLITICAL  
    • Jeremy_Benson:

      I can't disagree with you. You are obviously very logical. I am, as well. Unfortunately, not every nefarious activity is easily discernible. That as why, like intelligence agencies do, I also look at trends and behavior and rely on my intuitive ability, as well.

      At the very least, I think we can agree that these issues are worth discussing/vetting to learn the truth.

      Intelligent, open minded people, like yourself, have a better chance than most.

      I do not agree with everything Alex Jones or anyone else says. We are all limited in our capacity to ascertain the truth. Alex, like many others, have attempted to shed light on the criminal activities of some very powerful people. Certainly, we can't be right about everything. We must be willing to admit when we are wrong.

      Concerning Gates, I did not say that Gates was wrong because he does not admit it. I simply stated that "he will not admit it". His lack of admission does not contribute to my belief that he is a eugenicist who employs vaccines, etc to cull the population.

      His association with Monsanto and the Rockefeller Foundation does not help his credibility in the least.

    • 1 year ago
  • Jeremy_Benson
    • +1
      Jeremy_Benson  
    • GLOBALPOLITICAL:

      There are very serious problems that we face. I will not dismiss the idea that Bill Gates or Bilderberg or anyone is trying to rule us all and make us their slaves. Neither will I ascribe to it. In the meantime we should address the problems of corruption of our government by large corporations and lobbyists, the decline of our education, and of course poverty and the economy. I believe that if we focus on the problems that we have concrete evidence of, then upon solving those any larger conspiracies will come to light. Especially since all those things are supposed to be the result of said conspiracies. We must focus our efforts the problems that are apparent and deal with new evidence and problems as they arise. If enough people are committed to doing so then no amount of money will help 'them' or anyone who is determined to harm us. If we cannot do that then we are doomed, and if there really is a conspiracy then they will have won.

    • 1 year ago
  • GLOBALPOLITICAL
  • GLOBALPOLITICAL
  • jubal
  • GLOBALPOLITICAL
  • hanzdogy
  • hanzdogy
    • 0
      hanzdogy  
    • Jeremy_Benson:

      Again I agree with you. There was a time when I would work myself up in to a frenzy when talking about conspiracy theories with my friends. I don't do that anymore because it had very little results.
      There are so many obvious and non-disputable problems in society that I have decided to ally myself with causes that can be easily proven. I am not saying that there aren't shady characters meeting behind locked doors, but I don't see the point of expending my time outing them.

    • 1 year ago
  • GLOBALPOLITICAL
  • UtopianSky
  • Gravity_Man
    • -1
      Gravity_Man  

    • Gates is in control? Then perhaps he'll choose to get my Ocean Energy depth pressure~to~energy system going. It performs the add'l purpose of getting much ocean water trucked to drought-stricken areas of the world.

      The only reason he would choose to oppose my system is if he is one of those people wants masses of humanity to die.

    • 1 year ago
  • Gravity_Man
  • Gravity_Man
  • Gravity_Man
  • AngelisaJosalisa
    • 0
      AngelisaJosalisa  

    • I've known about this for a while. It's still hard to imagine that there are people who would want to destroy entire populations. But you don't have to imagine it, because it is real. The real question is how do we counter these people in a real way? I think the first step is making sure more people understand the real agenda behind these so called "non Profit" organizations. The next step is to stand up against them in what ever way one finds possible within their limited lives. We have to remember to strive for the world we want to see. Because these corporations will always work toward their ultimate agenda. I just don't want to have lived through all this madness in an apathetic silence.

    • 1 year ago
  • unimatrix0
    • 0
      unimatrix0  

    • This is bull shit propaganda. There is nothing sinister about Bill Gates and he is not promoting eugenics.

      He correctly argues that vaccinations in the third world will ultimately reduce and help control population growth because once parents understand that their children are not in danger from disease prevented by vaccine, those same parents decide to have fewer children.

    • 1 year ago
  • GLOBALPOLITICAL
    • 0
      GLOBALPOLITICAL  
    • unimatrix0:

      "once parents understand that their children are not in danger from disease prevented by vaccine, those same parents decide to have fewer children."

      Propaganda Alert! The above quote is obviously the propaganda used to obfuscate the real agenda! Good luck to you!

    • 1 year ago
  • Psymoniac
    • +2
      Psymoniac  
    • GLOBALPOLITICAL:

      indeed, an absolut weird statement...makes me think if hes the real deal because he slips quiet often when he tries to discribe HIS agenda but i always see this nerdy guy with that whining style of speeking who seems so misunderstood and nice

    • 1 year ago
  • Mishyana
    • 0
      Mishyana  
    • GLOBALPOLITICAL:

      Propaganda Alert! The above message is designed to shut down any and all argument by calling it propaganda without making any sort of rationale of its own! Terms to follow: shill, sellout, tool of the NWO, etc etc etc.

    • 1 year ago
  • GLOBALPOLITICAL
  • Psymoniac
    • +2
      Psymoniac  

    • 2 options: hes a good guy and his "birth controll" and stuff is just misinterpreted or he bought himself in the inner circle by giving ALL his money away when he passes by (means his children or grandchildren have no possebility in saving the world with that money)

    • 1 year ago
  • Incredulous
    • +2
      Incredulous  
    • Psymoniac:

      I know what you are saying, I have literally seen the good his foundation grants have done in the world, so it's hard to believe it's all part of a larger scheme to control the entire world's food supply....just doesn't add up, but then what does? I have to count myself amongst those who don't want to believe people are capable of the atrocities we see them undertaking every single day.

    • 1 year ago
  • Jeremy_Benson
    • -1
      Jeremy_Benson  
    • Incredulous:

      The fact that families who are better off tend to have less children than poorer families isn't the result of conscious decisions. It's simple human nature. Compare the average size of an American family in the 17th and 18th centuries to now: as we got richer and healthier we moved from large extended families with many many children to the nuclear family with 1-3 children on average. Bill Gates understands and is appealing to human nature.

      Edit: I'm replying to GLOBAL POLITICAL. Clicked the wrong name heh heh.

    • 1 year ago
  • GLOBALPOLITICAL
    • +1
      GLOBALPOLITICAL  
    • Jeremy_Benson:

      I do not disagree. I simply stated that Bill Gates uses this to justify his agenda to cull the population, forcibly sterilizing young girls and women, among other activities.

      Don't forget, the Jews didn't have any reason to believe (certainly, no hard evidence) that the Nazis would murder them.

    • 1 year ago
  • Jeremy_Benson
    • -1
      Jeremy_Benson  
    • GLOBALPOLITICAL:

      I see no evidence of forced sterilizations. If I have missed something then I am open to new evidence, but in the meantime I'm going to have to say that the idea of Bill Gates forcibly sterilizing women and children is bullshit. Notice the fear words of 'forcibly' in conjunction with 'women and children' designed to make you go "OH SHIT not the children!! DAMN YOU BILL GATES!" I simply do not believe it nor do I have reason to.

    • 1 year ago
  • GLOBALPOLITICAL
    • +1
      GLOBALPOLITICAL  
    • Jeremy_Benson:

      Do you believe that women and children are forced to accept vaccinations which cause miscarriages and infertility? Do you know that Gates funds vaccines which contain hCG, which causes infertility and miscarriages? If so, have you asked yourself why?

      Don't forget, the Jews didn't have any reason to believe (certainly, no hard evidence) that the Nazis would murder them.

    • 1 year ago
  • Jeremy_Benson
    • -1
      Jeremy_Benson  
    • GLOBALPOLITICAL:

      See, I knew you were going to go there. Vaccines can sometimes have harmful effects. But this is a very small percentage of cases. Think less than 5%. This means we have a 95% success rate (at least!) of preventing debilitating and deadly diseases. The benefits greatly outweigh the risks, so much so that I can't believe I have to make this case. Those risks are also not necessarily engineered, they are most likely simply the result of imperfect science. And whenever a vaccine does have a side effect, it tends to be a much better situation than the disease itself would leave you in. So I say to you the same thing I say every time this comes up: tell your children to enjoy their polio.

    • 1 year ago
  • GLOBALPOLITICAL
  • GLOBALPOLITICAL
  • GLOBALPOLITICAL
  • Jeremy_Benson
    • -1
      Jeremy_Benson  
    • GLOBALPOLITICAL:

      Give me a minute to watch this before I respond to it. Also, mind telling me where you found it? And links to more evidence besides a single documentary. Preferably papers from the scientific community, but I'll read and deconstruct anything you can throw at me. Maybe you'll reconvert me, hmm? ;)

    • 1 year ago
  • jubal
  • GLOBALPOLITICAL
    • +1
      GLOBALPOLITICAL  
    • Jeremy_Benson:

      Let me be clear. I'm not hear to prove anything. I haven't claimed to possess irrefutable evidence or knowledge on the subject. Based on my research, I do not trust the pharmaceutical industry, vaccines, etc. Although I haven't taken the time to stockpile data, I have done far more than most Americans to learn about the subject. I believe, based on logic and intuition, that no person should trust the government or the corporations. If Bill Gates turns out to be innocent, I will apologize for my accusations. Unfortunately, his activities and associations are highly questionable....Not to mention, the known, proven, conspiracies amongst people like him.

    • 1 year ago
  • GLOBALPOLITICAL
    • +1
      GLOBALPOLITICAL  
    • Jeremy_Benson:

      It's simple, you can find most of the information on YouTube and other sites. It takes hours, days, months to research these issues in order to connect the dots; trends/relationships begin to manifest. Can you prove everything? No! However, you will find hard data.

    • 1 year ago
  • Jeremy_Benson
    • +1
      Jeremy_Benson  
    • GLOBALPOLITICAL:

      Fairly compelling but nothing to really to suggest that if AIDS came from polio vaccines that it was done on purpose. Nothing to condemn current vaccines or Bill Gates. Also, a couple parts were obviously biased and that kind of throws the whole thing into question. So-so documentary. I watched all three parts, btw. Moving on to the next one.

    • 1 year ago
  • Jeremy_Benson
    • 0
      Jeremy_Benson  
    • GLOBALPOLITICAL:

      This one is crap. Just complete and utter crap. I can't believe you're seriously trying to use this video as evidence. I mean... I don't even know where to start. Also, I know of Carley. Her presence does not lend any credibility, believe me.

      A bunch of youtube videos isn't really helping your case, anyway. And I can't say I enjoy watching a video split into fifteen 3-minute segments.

    • 1 year ago
  • Mishyana
    • 0
      Mishyana  
    • GLOBALPOLITICAL:

      What evidence? People like you go on, and on, and on, AND ON, about all this so-called evidence, but all you provide is obscure internet-based 'documentaries' that seem to be full of nothing so much as sketchy research and bad connections. Provide evidence, don't just talk about it. And I'm not talking about whatever you dig up off the Infowars forums.

    • 1 year ago
  • Mishyana
    • 0
      Mishyana  
    • GLOBALPOLITICAL:

      "find most of the information on YouTube and other sites".

      ....

      Really? I can find a load of websites that say George Bush and his family are secretly lizard creatures from the center of the Earth. That Jesus is coming back tomorrow around noon sometime. That scientists are merging mice and humans. Surprisingly, my ability to find these things does not make them true. You are failing at making any sort of rational argument; and not that it's up to me to answer for Jeremy Benson, but you have, in fact, claimed to "possess irrefutable evidence... on the subject".

    • 1 year ago
  • GLOBALPOLITICAL
    • 0
      GLOBALPOLITICAL  
    • Jeremy_Benson:

      You obviously want to debate the issue. I don't have time. The documentaries I posted are from a variety of sources which deal with a rather complex issue. They provide compelling information from experts. The information I provided to you was a courtesy. It is your choice what you do with it.

      Don't forget, the Jews didn't have any reason to believe (certainly, no hard evidence) that the Nazis would murder them.

    • 1 year ago
  • GLOBALPOLITICAL
    • 0
      GLOBALPOLITICAL  
    • Mishyana:

      I simply provide information which I hope will cause you to think about what's happening. I do not claim the accuracy of every word spoken by others. I simply suggest that Bill Gates relationships and activities raise many questions. I choose to believe that he does not have my best interest at heart. Peace!

      Don't forget, the Jews didn't have any reason to believe (certainly, no hard evidence) that the Nazis would murder them.

    • 1 year ago
  • GLOBALPOLITICAL
    • 0
      GLOBALPOLITICAL  
    • Mishyana:

      You are illogical! I never said that any information, much less all the information, on YouTube or elsewhere is irrefutable evidence. I simply suggested that information is available on YouTube which provides evidence of nefarious behavior concerning vaccines, etc. You have to decide for yourself, based upon careful research, what you believe.

      Don't forget, the Jews didn't have any reason to believe (certainly, no hard evidence) that the Nazis would murder them.

    • 1 year ago
  • GLOBALPOLITICAL
  • GLOBALPOLITICAL
    • 0
      GLOBALPOLITICAL  
    • Mishyana:

      "find most of the information on YouTube and other sites".

      Listen very carefully! I do not think all information is true simply because it's available....I was asked where he could find some documentaries dealing with the subject. I posted a few sections here and told him that the docs are avail on YouTube.

      Yes, you can find all kinds of info on the internet; some really crazy ideas such as, Bill Gates has your best interest at heart and global warming, overpopulation, etc.

      None of which has been proven!

    • 1 year ago
  • Incredulous
    • +4
      Incredulous  

    • disturbing, but hard to prove intent, although did watch that TED video where ol Bill's CO2 equation argument strongly suggests population control...makes that UN vote on killing gays take on an even more sinister undertone.

      You are absolutely correct about one thing, people do not want to believe their leaders are capable of these types of atrocities, but then history does tell us otherwise.

    • 1 year ago
  • Dagum
    • +1
      Dagum  

    • Excellent post. Not too many people are aware of Bill &Melinda Gates foundation and their involvement with Monstanto along with their Eugenicist tendencies .

      I am glad you joined current. It's good to get more perspectives here.

    • 1 year ago
more from Tech:
from the community

top videos