How Is Your Mobile Device or Laptop Funding Conflict Mineral Wars?
source: http://techland.time.com/2010/12/15/is-your-mobile-device-or-laptop-funding-conflict-wars/
-
-
- twohawks
- added this
====== report ===================
By Michelle Castillo, TechLand, on December 15, 2010
Many of our electronic devices are made up of minerals like tantalum, used to make the capacitors in most cell phones, and tin, which makes up the inside lining of some cell phones and is used to solder circuit boards. Unfortunately, many of these materials come from conflict-ridden areas of the Congo, where increasing profits from electronic sales help fund the inhumane treatment of people who live and work in the country. The Enough Project, an advocacy group focused on ending genocide and crimes against humanity, estimates that conflict mining is a $185 million business, which is even more shocking when you consider the World Bank says average the average miner makes only $5 a day.
According to Raise Hope for Congo, more than 5.4 million people have died from the continuous wars that ravage the country. The organization urges people to tell companies that they want conflict free products. Congo's minerals are especially attractive to electronic manufacturers because of unregulated mining practices and cheap labor. Minerals from the African nation cost half or a third as much the same materials from other countries, according to the Washington Post. Though the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Act requires manufacturers to identify and get rid of conflict minerals in their products and similar legislation will be mandated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in 2011, Congolese mines are often controlled by armed groups and militias. These groups smuggle the minerals out of the country to smelting companies on other continents, which means the origin of the minerals can often be masked even from the company commissioning the product. Even though Congo's president announced a ban on all artisanal mining in eastern Congo last August, the ruling has not been enforced by the country's national military and has even negatively affected the citizens who work in the mines as a main source of income.
A recent report from Enough Project ranked the top 21 electronics manufacturers, showing their progress in creating products with conflict-free minerals and the steps they've taken to ensure that. Leading the pack was HP with an over 30 percent improvement. The company has endorsed anti-conflict mineral legislation and advocates for strong US regulations for all manufacturers. Apple, who uses tantalum not only in their smartphones but in iPods as well, were given a yellow score, which means there is much room for improvement. (Though several of their top executives have spoken out against conflict mineral mining in the Congo, they did not weigh in on key US conflict mineral legislation.) Toshiba received the worst score of the bunch; they have barely made any changes at all according to the study. Enough Project knows it may be hard for the average consumer to tell whether or not they are helping fund a war over natural resources just by looking at a product. Still, the group hopes that especially this holiday season when people are out shopping for the latest gadgets that by being little more knowledgeable about which companies are taking a stand against genocide and human rights abuses, shoppers can judge for themselves whether or not to support these crimes against humanity.
##### ARTICLE HERE ##################
Is Your Mobile Device or Laptop Funding Conflict Mineral Wars?
By Michelle Castillo on December 15, 2010
http://techland.time.com/2010/12/15/is-your-mobile-device-or-laptop-funding-conf...
-
-
PeterErickNelson
-
This cause is a lost one. Americans couldn't care less about human suffering in distant lands. They(we) only care about our selfs and keeping up with whats new and cool. we buy this shit thinking we will become happy and end up in debt and empty inside. Give the people something shiny and their be memorized...
- 1 year ago
-
PeterErickNelson
-
-
twohawks
-
PeterErickNelson:
That the U.S., Canada, other nations, and the U.N. are banding together, even on some as yet small scale, to adjust our involvement there says to me all is not lost.
Consider, perhaps a cause is only truly lost when either
1- there is no one left to care about it, or
2- I cease caring about it myself (so its no longer in my reality), or
3- I cease caring about myself (so I couldn't care less), or
4- the condition dissipates.
I'm just saying- think about it.But I am not trying to change your mind. I am posting about these things so people who may be interested have better opportunity to find (and sort) out. Ultimately each has to make their own decision as to what has value.
I agree its pathetic that its so little so late, and even perhaps it may be too little too late. On top of that we are only scratching at a part of the problem, unable to even begin addressing other huge related issues there (and here).
But when someone turns to me and says, for instance, "wow, I had no idea. I am going to start rethinking my ideas, my care or care-less-ness, about how I am handling material things in my life and its connection here -and- there..."
...then how could that not matter?After all, without a lot of people like this 'someone', there would be no changes happening at government levels at all, and we likely wouldn't even be hearing anything about what's going on.
==============
So, with all due respect, while the opinion you represent certainly has its own potential validity, I cannot embrace your statement as either carrying any weight, or certainly not anything meaningful that I would presume to teach my (or any) children (like, eh, forget about it, there's nothing you can do about it anyway, and your lives are pathetic anyway, so don't even bother).Hmmm, I am reminded of a poem. It is entitle "Invictus".
Anyway...,
Hey, you can live where you please, just sayin' its not where -I- live, and I hope its not where my kids want to go and live either, but ultimately that will be up to them. - 1 year ago
-
twohawks
-
-
twohawks
-
Look at these numbers from just one company. Profits up 45%: RIM’s net profit of $911.1-million, or $1.74 per share, on revenue of $5.49-billion, handily beat forecasts. Analysts had expected earnings of $1.65 per share and revenue of $5.4-billion, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S.
Then consider all the stats not being shown here for, say, Apple, Toshiba, Intel, HP, just to start out.
=======
I am not meaning to bash RIM or any of them outright as "look, they are the bad guy", but hey, we need to get a clue just how powerful the money we spend is, and where it is focused.
------------Again, from the Washington Post Article just published: "Until bigger changes are made, the Enough Project estimates that armed groups will take in some $185 million annually trading in these minerals, while, according to World Bank figures, miners will make $5 a day mining them. And American holiday shoppers will pay as much as $500 for a new cellphone, with little or no knowledge of what went into making it. "
If you went thru and read some of the article posted recently you will remember that it is plainly acknowledged that the value of these minerals, being 80% concentrated in the DR Congo, is driving and feeding the conflict there. It is the axis of conflict there.
======= report excerpt ==============
RIM Boosts Profit Outlook
Toronto— Reuters
Published Thursday, Dec. 16, 2010
RIM shipped 14.2 million BlackBerry smart phones in the quarter. It added a net 5.1 million new subscribers, in a performance that matched the average forecast for this key metric.RIM’s net profit of $911.1-million, or $1.74 per share, on revenue of $5.49-billion, handily beat forecasts. Analysts had expected earnings of $1.65 per share and revenue of $5.4-billion, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S.
RIM shares were up 2.5 per cent at $60.75 in post-market trade.
#### ARTICLE HERE ###############
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/rim-profit-surges-45-per-cent/arti... - 1 year ago
-
twohawks