Gulf Oil Ecocide: Most toxic oil still in water columns?
source: http://afterthepress.com/?p=315
-
-
- JanforGore
- added this
Here's a direct quote from the report:
"This is important information, because the water-soluble compounds are generally the most toxic ones when exposed to marine biota. The results from these measurements show that the rising of the oil through the water column represents a kind of a "stripping" process of some of the most toxic compounds in the oil. The end result is therefore that a portion of the most toxic compounds is left in the water column."
to see the final report go to
http://afterthepress.com/?p=315
_________
But hey, the media and government told us everything is all gone, and a "study" just coming out (how timely) states that bacteria ate every little bit of the methane in three months! Gee did it chase it through the atmosphere too? Wow! What a miracle! G U L L I B I L I T Y is killing this planet. But hey, let's not seek truth or rock the boat or try to connect the dots. Afterall, it was only a little over a few million gallons of toxic oil and pounds of toxic soup mixed in.
-
- groups:
- Community, Tech, Green, Current Tonight, 12 more
-
- tags:
- News and Politics, Environment, US Politics, Water, 26 more
-
-
Robotic091
-
sucks some of the best sea fishing in the US if not the world is off the coast of Florida, Louisiana, and Alabama.
- 1 year ago
-
Robotic091
-
-
tommic
-
I was just thinking, with the hundreds of millions of barrels of oil and the millions of gallons of corexit used and the food chain, any chance that the absolute shear quantity of chemicals released over a very short time is coming home to roost. Dead birds and fish showing up like some biblical apocolypse. No pun intended. Food chains, atmospheric conditions and tidal rivers. Like I said I was just thinking.
- 1 year ago
-
tommic
-
-
Wetdog
-
tommic:
You are not allowed to think.
You are to believe what you are told. You are not to question what you are told.
Your purpose is to work your entire life to make money to buy and consume what you are told to buy and consume.
We will tell you what to buy and consume, and what to believe.
Now, get back in your place, be quiet and get back to work.
- 1 year ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
tommic
-
Wetdog:
LOLROTFPIMP
- 1 year ago
-
tommic
-
-
Wetdog
-
tommic:
You will now buy some new pants.
- 1 year ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
tommic
-
Wetdog:
Over something so sad I am sitting here quite literally laughing my ass off crying that was SO funny, you r the man
- 1 year ago
-
tommic
-
-
Wetdog
-
tommic:
glad you liked it tommic---we all need a good laugh now and then
- 1 year ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
tommic
-
Wetdog:
wetdog if the bacteria ate all the methane how come bacteria the size of volkswagons are not floating around and exploding all over the place when those southerners lite up their cigarettes NOT serious
- 1 year ago
-
tommic
-
-
Wetdog
-
tommic:
Because, everyone knows that good ole southern boys chaw their tabaccy----they jes took some long poles and pushed them over inflated bacteria back into the Gulf Stream to float up north where they belong----along with the other over inflated wind bags.
- 1 year ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
tommic
-
Wetdog:
we're in rare form tonight LOl
- 1 year ago
-
tommic
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
tommic: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
Wetdog
-
MrMxyzptlk:
Where are the buffalo? Where are the passenger pidgeons? Where are the eastern cougars? Where is the eastern elk? Where is the Carolina parakeet?
By my count, 39 species have become extinct since 1963. Over 450 since the white man arrived.
These are entirely the work of humans.
As for the deep ocean---we don't even know what species are down there. We may have wiped out species we'll never even know about.
--------" I think an oil rig blowout will be no problem."-------
Of coarse you wouldn't. There are over 27,000 oil rigs, both active and abandoned in the Gulf of Mexico.
- 1 year ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
Wetdog: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
Wetdog
-
MrMxyzptlk:
All the buffalo in the United States are descended from wood buffalo brought down from northern Alberta. Humans hunted the plains buffalo to extinction---all 80-100 million of them in about 20 years. Same species---but smaller sub species.
------------" Besides, none of them died out because of oil spills. Do you always come up with such irrelevent questions to try and derail the topic?"--------
It is not irrelevant at all----your answer is the perfect illustration of my point. Human greed and exploitation killed off every single one of those species----in just a few years. The Passenger Pigeon were present in flocks that numbered in the billions. There was a report of a flock that flew over Baltimore in 1870 that took three days to pass overhead. By 1910, they had disappeared in the wild. The last Passenger Pigeon died in a zoo in Cincinnati in 1914. Killed off by greed, exploitation and apathy----just like yours.
And now, even species we depend on are going extinct. Salmon for instance. And we are destroying habitat and poisoning our own habitat at an unprecedented rate.
And the organs that all these toxins destroy first are the brain, liver and kidneys.
- 1 year ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
Wetdog: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
Wetdog
-
MrMxyzptlk:
So, what other prediction have I been wrong on? So far as I know, all of the extinct species are still extinct. And I have not seen one shred of evidence from you that crude oil does not contain a witches brew of toxic components.
Trying to convince us that pouring hundreds of millions of gallons crude oil and disperants into the Gulf fishing grounds, tidal marshes, estuaries and beaches of the Gulf of Mexico is a totally harmless thing, and has no impact?
Please----a three year old has more brains and common sense than that.
----"...why beleive your side now?"---- indeed, why?
- 1 year ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
Wetdog: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
Wetdog
-
MrMxyzptlk:
----" A report marking the twentieth anniversary of the spill has found oil still persists in the region and, in some places, quote, “is nearly as toxic as it was a few weeks after the spill.” The report was put together by the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council, which oversaw restoration efforts. It states, quote, “At this rate, the remaining oil will take decades and possibly centuries to disappear entirely.”
And twenty years after the disaster, litigation against Exxon continues to drag on. In 1994, an Alaskan jury found Exxon responsible and ruled the company should pay $5 billion in punitive damages to some 33,000 plaintiffs. Exxon appealed. In 2006, the 9th US Circuit Court cut the award of punitive damages in half to $2.5 billion. Then, in a 5-to-3 ruling last June, the Supreme Court cut the amount of punitive damages again and ordered Exxon Mobil to pay just $500 million in punitive damages, one-tenth of the original jury’s ruling. That equates to about four days of Exxon Mobil’s net profits. "-----And BP is doing the same legal maneuvering right now.
The people and the environment lose.
You are supporting their actions, and you don't even get one penny of the enormous profits. Kind of hard to even imagine a stupider stooge isn't it?
http://www.democracynow.org/2009/3/24/20_years_after_exxon_valdez_oil
- 1 year ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
Wetdog: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
Wetdog
-
MrMxyzptlk:
Well..........let's see, whom should I believe? The Marine Toxicologist who lives in Cordova, Alaska, overlooking the coast and has an advanced degree in such matters---or---the unemployed locksmith in North Dakota, whom I doubt has ever even seen the ocean.
I think I'll go with the Marine Toxicologist.
-------" Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."------
Yes. It would appear to me that Exxon and BP have fooled you about 10,000 times.
Shame on you.
- 1 year ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
Wetdog: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
Wetdog
-
MrMxyzptlk:
You wouldn't know ecological damage if you tripped and fell into it face first.
- 1 year ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
Wetdog: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
Wetdog
-
MrMxyzptlk:
How would you know? You've never even seen the ocean.
- 1 year ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
Wetdog: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
Wetdog
-
MrMxyzptlk:
You went swimming in the ocean once 28 years ago, and you ate at a seafood restaurant---------some expert!
I think I have the facts straight enough----LMAO!
- 1 year ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
ras_menelik
-
BP and the Missing Methane
A brief translation into plain English of the new Science paper describing how bacteria saved BP's methane-saturated arse.By Julia Whitty on Fri. January 7, 2011 3:16 PM PDT
Nine months after BP's Deepwater Horizon disaster, a new report in the preeminent journal Science weighs in on the missing methane. The fate of this gas comprises one of the more intriguing scientific riddles surrounding the blowout.
So how much methane blew along with 4.1 to 4.4 million gallons of oil? A lot more. Somewhere between 9.14 billion and 10 billion moles (molecular weight expressed in grams)—about as much as is naturally released annually from the Black Sea, a very gassy place.
Concerns about BP's ginormous methane belch were twofold:
What would it do to the marine ecology of the Gulf?
What would happen if all that methane—a far more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide—escaped into the atmosphere?
The answer suggested in this paper could be hugely significant. And not just for the future of the Gulf, but globally too, since our warming world pretty much guarantees we'll see more methane released from thawing clathrates under the seafloor and in permafrost.As I wrote in The BP Cover-Up, the Deepwater Horizon disaster was one of the biggest baddest field experiments of all time. So here's some of what we've learned so far, highlights of the Science paper:
Methane measurements from the sea air around the spill site (a survey area roughly 25 kilometers/15.5 miles in diameter centered on the wellhead) found that even on windy days the amount of methane that escaped to the atmosphere was less than one one-hundredth of one percent of the total methane release. Clearly the gas stayed in the water.
So where did it go? Well, based on the quantity of methane measured underwater in June 2010, the researchers expected Deepwater Horizon methane to persist for years.
But their August to October surveys found no elevated methane—just normal ambient Gulf levels.
Other anomalous measurements (of fluorescence and dissolved oxygen) strongly suggest the team didn't simply miss the methane plumes.
Faced with the apparent disappearance of methane, the team hypothesizes that methane-eating bacteria had, by August, gobbled it all.
If these results holds true—still an "if"—then this is unusually encouraging news for our warming world:We suggest that a vigorous deepwater bacterial bloom respired nearly all the released methane within this time... Our work suggests by analogy that large-scale [methane] release to the deep ocean from gas hydrates or other natural sources may foster a rapid methanotrophic response leading to complete oxidation of [methane] to [carbon dioxide] within a matter of months. Thus, aerobic methanotrophic bacterial communities may act as a dynamic biofilter that responds rapidly to large-scale methane inputs into the deep ocean.
Thanks, bacteria!
The paper:
John D. Kessler, David L. Valentine, Molly C. Redmond, Mengran Du, Eric W. Chan, Stephanie D. Mendes, Erik W. Quiroz, Christie J. Villanueva, Stephani S. Shusta, Lindsay M. Werra, Shari A. Yvon-Lewis, and Thomas C. Weber. A Persistent Oxygen Anomaly Reveals the Fate of Spilled Methane in the Deep Gulf of Mexico. Science. DOI: 10.1126/science.1199697.
. - 1 year ago
-
ras_menelik
-
-
JanforGore
-
ras_menelik:
W H I T E W A S H.
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE65L6IA20100622
How much oxygen was also eaten?
"(Reuters) - As much as 1 million times the normal level of methane gas has been found in some regions near the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, enough to potentially deplete oxygen and create a dead zone, U.S. scientists said on Tuesday.
Texas A&M University oceanography professor John Kessler, just back from a 10-day research expedition near the BP Plc oil spill in the gulf, says methane gas levels in some areas are "astonishingly high."
Kessler's crew took measurements of both surface and deep water within a 5-mile (8 kilometer) radius of BP's broken wellhead.
"There is an incredible amount of methane in there," Kessler told reporters in a telephone briefing.
In some areas, the crew of 12 scientists found concentrations that were 100,000 times higher than normal.
"We saw them approach a million times above background concentrations" in some areas, Kessler said.
The scientists were looking for signs that the methane gas had depleted levels of oxygen dissolved in the water needed to sustain marine life.
"At some locations, we saw depletions of up to 30 percent of oxygen based on its natural concentration in the waters. At other places, we saw no depletion of oxygen in the waters. We need to determine why that is," he told the briefing.
Methane occurs naturally in sea water, but high concentrations can encourage the growth of microbes that gobble up oxygen needed by marine life."
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
Wetdog
-
ras_menelik:
So, what species of bacteria ate all the methane, and where are they now?
- 1 year ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
JanforGore
-
Wetdog:
In the bowels of some birds and fish perhaps? Flowing through the ocean conveyor belt around the continents?
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
Wetdog
-
JanforGore:
Not likely Jan. The only species of bacteria I know of that utilizes the KEGG cycle, metabolizes methane, is Archeus. A very ancient and slow growing bacteria. I have seen reports estimating the reproductive generation times of Archeus at between 100 to 2000 years.
The report that ras-menelik cites was written in Oct., just two months after the well was capped. It was published in Dec. To propose that Archeus species completely metabolized the enormous amounts of methane in so short a time seems utterly preposterous to me. The metabolic rate for Archeus would be so slow as to be completely off the scale in terms of the time frame for other species. Besides, just the detritus alone would produce shear mountains of waste. Even if it were consumed by bacteria----it had to be changed into something else, it would not "just disappear".
Just like every other article I have seen about the Mecondo blowout since the well was capped in August:
-----" So how much methane blew along with 4.1 to 4.4 million gallons of oil?"-------
gives me a clue. Every article I've seen starts off with this same ridiculously low estimate of the amount of oil released. Any sane person looking at the live feed videos running for 4 months on CNN would know this figure is pure hogwash.Since fines can be levied on a per gallon released basis, and we had reports of BP placing hundreds of scientists in the area under contract even before the capping of the well, it is my belief that what we are seeing is the BP legal team working overtime to sell the idea that this oil spill was as harmless as dropping a quart of orange juice.
Don't expect any impartial coverage from the media----it seems clear to me that the media is nothing more than a mouthpiece for the BP legal team at this point.
- 1 year ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
JanforGore
-
Wetdog:
Absolutely. As with everything else, it's all about money. And I agree, it is preposterious, and IMO criminal.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
tommic
-
ras_menelik:
Now NOTHING just dissapears, I didn't fall off the turnip truck just yesterday. That much methane was not eaten by bacteria, if that was the case the bacteria would either be the size of volkswagons or there would be a reproductive explosion of bacteria that would end mankind, oh wait maybe I'm on to something. LOL But there is something going on and its not good, that for sure
- 1 year ago
-
tommic
-
-
JohnA
-
The Gulf Coast States will suffer now unknown effects for generations to come. We only thought Katrina was bad. We have to live with this the rest of our lives.
- 1 year ago
-
JohnA
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
- This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
Wetdog
-
MrMxyzptlk:
Would you like a nice tall refreshing glass of gasoline to go with your gulf shrimp with crude and dispersant sauce?
- 1 year ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
Wetdog: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
Wetdog
-
MrMxyzptlk:
Yes, there are natural things in the environment we should avoid. But that doesn't mean it is OK to go around destroying the environment by filling it with toxins. The environment is the environment. What is there naturally, we and the environment are evolved to handle----industrial toxins just stay in the environment---and make it toxic.
If you live in a toxic environment, you will get sick.
- 1 year ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
Wetdog: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
Wetdog
-
MrMxyzptlk:
If you live in a toxic environment, you will get sick.
- 1 year ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
ThatCrazyLibertarian [removed]
- This comment was removed by its owner.
-
ThatCrazyLibertarian [removed]
-
-
JanforGore
-
-
ThatCrazyLibertarian:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/07/gulf-oil-spill-kill-zone_n_793092.html
This is one reason to me why fishkills and dead birds and crabs in the thousands happening in proximity to this ecocide and the ocean conveyor belt are not just "natural."
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
keithponder
-
JanforGore:
It seems as if there are only a handful of regulars on Current that demonstrate enough courage and spiritual insight to challenge the media and our government's position on this animal loss catastrophe.
I'm glad that you're here Jan.
- 1 year ago
-
keithponder
-
-
JanforGore
-
keithponder:
Thank you. Glad to have you here too. It is our duty as citizens to question government regardless of party especially regarding matters of life and death, which this is definitely one. I am very disturbed that this is getting no play in the media anymore.The people who also live there are being gagged as I simply cannot believe all is back to normal. Look at what happened after Hurricane Katrina over five years ago and many stilll live in FEMA trailers!
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
Wetdog
-
JanforGore:
Very interesting video Jan. Dated 12/10/10
I never saw this report on any of the major media outlets. At all. This is the first I've seen of it.
"BP is working hard to make it right------for ourselves."
BP-----"We want our profits back!"
Thanks for posting that-----I think that is worth posting as separate submission.
- 1 year ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
Wetdog
-
keithponder:
Keith----I completely agree with you, thanks for saying so out loud.
- 1 year ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
ayipis
-
and just imagine..liberal zombies just handed our healthcare system to the same "corrupt" government..
- 1 year ago
-
ayipis
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
ayipis: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
Wetdog
-
ayipis:
And now your buddies want to take it away again.
- 1 year ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
Wetdog
-
MrMxyzptlk:
Maybe because liberals only say it is corrupt when it actually is corrupt? Like giving bribes and parties to MMS employees to not enforce safety and environmental rules.
- 1 year ago
-
Wetdog
-
-
ejasun
-

-
Oil and Gas Extraction Kills - Bird Deaths a year: 2 to 4 million?
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service reports that million's of birds died landing in oil pits to bathe and drink in.
Fish and Wildlife says cleaning & netting has improved that situation somewhat?
There are no overall estimates for the number of wildlife,fish, birds affected by oil and gas spills, and oil and gas extractions (and transport.)
http://www.currykerlinger.com/birds.htm
BP THANKS FOR CUTTING CORNERS FOR PROFIT$
- 1 year ago
-
ejasun
-
-
JanforGore
-
ejasun:
We will live the effects of this for decades. And BP gets to rebuild their image and drill some more. Where the hell is the justice?
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
ayipis
-
-
JanforGore:
shall we impeach now??
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9n_p7YJA4I..
or that mind control too strong and too deep LOL!!!
- 1 year ago
-
ayipis