Monsanto's Roundup triggers over 40 plant diseases and endangers human and animal health
-
-
- JanforGore
- added this
This was yet another confirmation that Roundup was triggering SDS. In many fields, the evidence is even more obvious. The disease was most severe at the ends of rows where the herbicide applicator looped back to make another pass (see photo). That’s where extra Roundup was applied.
Don’s a scientist; it takes more than a few photos for him to draw conclusions. But Don’s got more—lots more. For over 20 years, Don studied Roundup’s active ingredient glyphosate. He’s one of the world’s experts. And he can rattle off study after study that eliminate any doubt that glyphosate is contributing not only to the huge increase in SDS, but to the outbreak of numerous other diseases. (See selected reading list.)
Sudden Death Syndrome is more severe at the ends of rows, where Roundup dose is strongest. Photo by Amy Bandy.
Roundup: The perfect storm for plant disease
More than 30% of all herbicides sprayed anywhere contain glyphosate—the world’s bestselling weed killer. It was patented by Monsanto for use in their Roundup brand, which became more popular when they introduced “Roundup Ready” crops starting in 1996. These genetically modified (GM) plants, which now include soy, corn, cotton, canola, and sugar beets, have inserted genetic material from viruses and bacteria that allows the crops to withstand applications of normally deadly Roundup.
(Monsanto requires farmers who buy Roundup Ready seeds to only use the company’s Roundup brand of glyphosate. This has extended the company’s grip on the glyphosate market, even after its patent expired in 2000.)
The herbicide doesn’t destroy plants directly. It rather cooks up a unique perfect storm of conditions that revs up disease-causing organisms in the soil, and at the same time wipes out plant defenses against those diseases. The mechanisms are well-documented but rarely cited.
1.The glyphosate molecule grabs vital nutrients and doesn’t let them go. This process is called chelation and was actually the original property for which glyphosate was patented in 1964. It was only 10 years later that it was patented as an herbicide. When applied to crops, it deprives them of vital minerals necessary for healthy plant function—especially for resisting serious soilborne diseases. The importance of minerals for protecting against disease is well established. In fact, mineral availability was the single most important measurement used by several famous plant breeders to identify disease-resistant varieties.
1.Glyphosate annihilates beneficial soil organisms, such as Pseudomonas and Bacillus bacteria that live around the roots. Since they facilitate the uptake of plant nutrients and suppress disease-causing organisms, their untimely deaths means the plant gets even weaker and the pathogens even stronger.
1.The herbicide can interfere with photosynthesis, reduce water use efficiency, lower lignin , damage and shorten root systems, cause plants to release important sugars, and change soil pH—all of which can negatively affect crop health.
1.Glyphosate itself is slightly toxic to plants. It also breaks down slowly in soil to form another chemical called AMPA (aminomethylphosphonic acid) which is also toxic. But even the combined toxic effects of glyphosate and AMPA are not sufficient on their own to kill plants. It has been demonstrated numerous times since 1984
Glyphosate with sterile soil (A) only stunts plant growth. In normal soil (B), pathogens kill the plant. Control (C) shows normal growth.
that when glyphosate is applied in sterile soil, the plant may be slightly stunted, but it isn’t killed (see photo).
1.The actual plant assassins, according to Purdue weed scientists and others, are severe disease-causing organisms present in almost all soils. Glyphosate dramatically promotes these, which in turn overrun the weakened crops with deadly infections.
“This is the herbicidal mode of action of glyphosate,” says Don. “It increases susceptibility to disease, suppresses natural disease controls such as beneficial organisms, and promotes virulence of soilborne pathogens at the same time.” In fact, he points out that “If you apply certain fungicides to weeds, it destroys the herbicidal activity of glyphosate!”
By weakening plants and promoting disease, glyphosate opens the door for lots of problems in the field. According to Don, “There are more than 40 diseases of crop plants that are reported to increase with the use of glyphosate, and that number keeps growing as people recognize the association between glyphosate and disease.”
cont.
-
- groups:
- Community, Tech, Green, Earth and Science, 6 more
-
- tags:
- Environment, Health, Monsanto, Toxic, 18 more
-
- recommended by:
- Vierotchka
-
-
Paratus
-
This stuff is bad news. Roundup will never see my property. Our garden is planted with only non GMO seeds & fertilized with organic compost. Monsanto is not our friend.
- 1 year ago
-
Paratus
-
-
corndog67
-
Paratus:
All seeds are genetically modified. Humans have been altering seeds, animals and everything else since the beginning of history. Use the biggest and best to grow the next crop, or the next generation of cattle (that's genetic modification).
To think that you can get away from it is naive.
- 1 year ago
-
corndog67
-
-
JanforGore
-
corndog67:
Wrong. Farmers have not been genetically altering seeds by introducing viruses and bacteria to them to insert DNA from a different species. Working with natural traits within the same planet genus is one thing, this is altogether different and unexplored territory.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
Derrick_Cisneros
-
stupid humans. let nature be natural
- 1 year ago
-
Derrick_Cisneros
-
-
JanforGore
-
Derrick_Cisneros:
Absolutely. Use the hands you have and yank them out!
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
M77
-
Given the drastic increase in plant disease, reduced nutrient update, and other negative impacts associated with glyphosate covered here, I’m having a hard time understanding why farmers would use this product. After all, we’re not talking strictly about externalities here, degraded plant health and lower productivity would have a direct negative financial impact on the farm. And yet farmers continue to use glyphosate, overwhelmingly in fact (I think something like 90% of soybeans and 75% of corn in the U.S.). Why?
With the average age of farmers in the U.S. at around 55, most would have worked for many years prior to the introduction of glyphosate-resistant crops and thus would have ample experience farming without glyphosate. Why would they consciously choose to use a product with such destructive effects on the health of their crop and, consequently, their productivity and financial security?
- 1 year ago
-
M77
-
-
JanforGore
-
M77:
Well gee, I notice you have a name with a letter and a number, and you have no other posts on this site. Forgive my hesitation then in thinking your comment is legitimate, or in thinking you are someone else here who has been barred from responding under some other name and decided to use this name to do so. If not, please forgive me. I can give you a three pronged response to this question since you may also not know the manipulation and downright criminality of Monsanto's jackbooted tactics.
Why do farmers still use it in light of this?
1. Coercion: Farmers worldwide from the US to Argentina to India where farmers have drunk RoundUp to commit suicide are coerced into having no other choice but to buy this crap as a prerequisite of buying the BT toxin seeds. For Monsanto it has been a goldmine.... develop a seed and make it "RoundUp Ready", and make it necessary to buy the herbicide RoundUp that must be sprayed on the seed. Farmers have no choice but to purchase this poison in order to buy the seeds, and since they can't save them from year to year, well, I think you get the idea.
2. False Advertising: Monsanto was also cited and found guilty of false advertising for this by telling people in France Roundup was "biodegradable" which it isn't. Monsanto has been cited for other types of coercion such as Bribery ( Indonesia comes to mind) as well as coercion in selling their BT toxin cotton seeds in India which has resulted in poverty and debt for many farmers who saw prices go up while yields went down, and actually, farmers in areas of drought did not see what they were told they would see hence the suicides which actually hit an all time high in 2009.
3. Market Saturation: What happens when you knock all of your competitors off the market by exercising the first two options here? Well, people have no other choice but to buy your product.
The good news is that sales of RoundUp have been going down, and organizations like Navdanya founded by Dr. Vandana Shiva and other seed banks across the world are coming into place where such manipulations to sell a product are not necessary. Of course, Monsanto attributes this decline to "Chinese competition" in the market, but I think it is mainly because people are starting to see the lies behind this and moving away from it as weeds become resistant to it and pests become more prevalent contrary to its intended use. Thankfully people like Jeffrey Smith and Don Huber are making sure the truth about this gets out before anymore people, fish, or other species die because of it.
I hope that helped a bit. So welcome to Current, that is, unless you work for the company and were just "fishing."
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
Sarah_Honea
-
Wow, big surprise! So what next: " An EPA study finds the main byproduct of Cow Flatus is Methane!"
- 1 year ago
-
Sarah_Honea
-
-
JanforGore
-
Sarah_Honea:
Well actually, that would be news and a surprise to the ignoramuses in Congress in the tea party, particularly Boehner who think cows fart CO2.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
corndog67
-
I just used Roundup on my weeds in my yard in the last week. Very effective product, I recommend it heartily.
- 1 year ago
-
corndog67
-
-
dadevil
-
Machines of War: Blackwater, Monsanto, and Bill Gates.
Cofer Black, known for his brutality as one of the directors of the CIA, was the one who made contact with Monsanto as director of Total Intelligence, entering into the contract with the company to spy on and infiltrate organizations of animal rights activists, anti-GM and other dirty activities of the biotech giant.
Contacted by Scahill, the Monsanto executive Kevin Wilson declined to comment, but later confirmed to The Nation that they had hired Total Intelligence according to Monsanto only to keep track of "public disclosure" of its opponents.
http://english.pravda.ru/business/companies/14-10-2010/115363-machines_of_war_bl...
- 1 year ago
-
dadevil
-
-
JanforGore
-
I also wonder how much of it is winding up in rivers and lakes and killing fish.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
-
http://current.com/technology/92901658_the-poison-of-the-pampas-effects-of-glyph...
This is what it's doing in Argentina.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
dadevil
-
-
Why Monsanto can get away with murder. Close ties to BUSH administration.
FOR 25 Years our Governments have been dominated by the Companies they regulate.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZ6Z182pvbk
*MUST WATCH* Monsanto
- 1 year ago
-
dadevil
-
-
JanforGore
-
dadevil:
Yep, just a regular revolving door. It is criminal to the extreme.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
alexandrek:
Trolls don't care about such things.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
ejasun
-
Why are millions of people against Monsanto?
Why Monsanto is a threat to life on Earth.
TheMonsanto company many people believe, is one of the most dangerous and evil global businesses because it is responsible for poisoning people, wildlife, farm animals and the environment at large - in other words Monsanto are a deadly threat to life on Earth.
http://hubpages.com/hub/Why-are-millions-of-people-against-Monsanto
- 1 year ago
-
ejasun
-
-
JanforGore
-
-
This is the way one vineyard is controlling weeds organically. I think this is pretty cool. This is a small Caval tractor from the Bordeaux region of France that fits between rows of vines planted strategically in line with weeds. When the weeds are snipped they are only snipped to the root system which then biodegrades allowing the root system of the vine to be fed by the organisms left naturally without the use of poisonous herbicides. That's the kind of wine you want to drink. Now you might not be able to employ this in your own garden because this is mainly used in larger areas but it does show that there are ways to avoid herbicides.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
ThatCrazyLibertarian:
Yes, it is inherently evil to me that such a product exists and that Monsanto is allowed to market it as something good for plants. They do nothing but create products that kill all that is good about this world.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
This is information you need to know especially if you use Roundup. You may want to think about stopping that practice.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
JanforGore: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
MrMxyzptlk [removed]
-
-
JanforGore
-
MrMxyzptlk:
Actually in your case I hope you use more.... be my guest. Drink up.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
