Stuxnet: Another Conspiracy Theory Turns Out to Be True
source: http://www.infowars.com/stuxnet-another-conspiracy-theory-turns-out-to-be-true/
-
-
- rodstradamus
- added this
The Alex Jones Show from September 27, 2010, in which Israel and the United States were identified as being behind the Stuxnet attack.
After months of speculation, our original hypothesis that the US and Israel were responsible for the computer worm attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities was confirmed on Sunday.
US and Israeli intelligence services collaborated to develop a destructive computer worm to sabotage Iran’s efforts to make a nuclear bomb, The New York Times reported Sunday.
The newspaper quoted intelligence and military experts as saying Israel has tested the effectiveness of the Stuxnet computer worm, which apparently shut down a fifth of Iran’s nuclear centrifuges in November and helped delay its ability to make its first nuclear weapons.
Back in September, we wrote several articles in which we identified “Israel and the United States….as the prime suspects behind the Stuxnet worm attack,” following the revelation that the virus was “created by experts working for a country or a well-funded private group.”
While the US government and the compliant, castrated corporate media were dutifully regurgitating the claim that Russia or China were behind the attack, we pointed out that neither country had any motivation to launch an assault that primarily affected an Iranian nuclear campaign that both nations had largely supported.
Following our columns in late September pointing to the US and Israel as the culprits, a number of establishment websites and blogs put out hit pieces that attempted to debunk the notion that Stuxnet was a false flag.
- In an article entitled Debunking the Bunk of Stuxnet, the popular About.com website claimed that “none of the evidence” had “any direct connection” to Israel being behind the attack.
- The Economist reported that there was “no specific evidence” Stuxnet was an Israeli cyber-missile aimed at Iran.
- In an October 5 piece entitled Stuxnet: Fact vs. theory, CNet’s Elinor Mills wrote that there was “no hard evidence” behind the claim that, “The malware was distributed by Israel or the United States in an attempt to interfere with Iran’s nuclear program.”
- A Reddit piece submitted by “conspiracy debunker” entitled, “I would just to take this opportunity to debunk the conspiracy theory that Stuxnet was made by Israeli hackers,” blamed “low educated Iranians from poor backgrounds” for the theory that Israel was behind the attack.
- The Judeosphere blog labeled the charge “convoluted mental gymnastics”.
- A Jewish Chronicle article written by Miriam Shaviv labeled the claim a “ridiculous” conspiracy theory.
Don’t expect to see retractions or apologies from any of the debunkers who dismissed the obvious evidence that the United States and Israel were behind the cyber-attack, which has now been confirmed.
Exploiting the threat of cyber-attacks launched by their own cybersecurity departments, the US and Israel are not only placing in peril the Internet as a free and open forum, they are also heightening the risk of devastating environmental catastrophes and global instability.
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
January 18, 2011
more at link...
-
- groups:
- Community, Politics, Tech, The White Rose, 1 more
-
-
maasanova
-
It wasn't just AJ who called it; practically everyone knew that this was USIsrael from day 1. Even HuffPost was saying that this was USIsrael.
Hell, even the computer code of the worm had references to the "Myrtus" from the Jewish Book of Ester. HeLLO!
So I wonder how long the "conspirary theory" about Wikileaks being an intelligence front to peddle pro-war propagada and to possibly be used to shut down the internet is going to turn into "conspiracy fact."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/01/stuxnet-malware-mystery-d_n_747026.html
- 2 years ago
-
maasanova
-
-
freecrack
-
maasanova:
still not learning where this gets ya huh?
just remember what ya typed so when wikileaks is viewed contrary to that by you we can do our dance yet again - 2 years ago
-
freecrack
-
-
Prijedor
-
Who cares, they did what needed to be done to slow it down
- 2 years ago
-
Prijedor
-
-
freecrack
-
the theory is more than reasonable, as who else would want to attack iran and has that capability.its either allied western forces or the chinese, and china doesnt really give a shit.
what makes it a conspircay theory is that it came out of alex jones mouth.he talks so much shit if he said the sun will rise tomorrow it becomes questionable
- 2 years ago
-
freecrack
-
-
jubal
-
freecrack:
Are you saying that Jones is the Beck of conspiracy theorists?
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
freecrack
-
jubal:
im saying jones exists off of becks over flow.jones wish's he could be beck, but is mostly waiting for rush to overdose to take his spot.
- 2 years ago
-
freecrack
-
-
Dagum
-
freecrack:
its the other way around Jones was around long before Beck. And there was a slow shift where Beck starting stealing Jones material.
- 2 years ago
-
Dagum
-
-
freecrack
-
Dagum:
im so not invested in any of them as they are as legit as soupy sales.not to dismiss ya, just saying bullshit is bullshit regardless of the name of the source
- 2 years ago
-
freecrack
-
-
jubal
-
freecrack:
LOL I am sure Rush would really enjoy some free crack to go with his vicodin and xanax.
- 2 years ago
-
jubal
-
-
Dagum
-
freecrack:
This story isn't bullshit the Nytimes is saying the same thing.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/16/world/middleeast/16stuxnet.html - 2 years ago
-
Dagum
-
-
freecrack
-
Dagum:
lol im not arguing the facts of the story, as it is beyond reasonable.
if semi-third world nation who is hostile to the west recieves a technology based attack, it doesnt take a deductive logic master to figure out who most likely did it.and being as globalization is in full swing they wouldnt have been alone in that effort either.it isnt like we are gunna see cyber attacks eminating from new guinea anytime soon lol.of course it was western forces at work.my position is that alex jones is so full of shit so often that the most basic truths when coming out of his mouth become questionable.this attack isnt so much a matter of conspiracy theorum, but him stating it makes it seem crazy cuz he is crazy.
- 2 years ago
-
freecrack
-
-
freecrack
-
jubal:
god forbid.can you imagine rush amped up on crack.limbaugh times ten.
i think i just got a new scary character for a movie.id rather go up against a freddy or a jason than a rush on crack.
- 2 years ago
-
freecrack
-
-
Dagum
-
Here is the New york time link confirming.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/16/world/middleeast/16stuxnet.htmlIt's amazing how many stories that the thought police try to discredit as "conspiracy theory" that turn out to be true.
- 2 years ago
-
Dagum
-
-
jubal
-
Dagum:
Indeed.
- 2 years ago
-
jubal