Tech | January 31, 2011 | 7 comments

9/11 Eyewitness: “As the bombs were going….I sat and watched few of them explode”

source: http://www.infowars.com/91101-eyewitness-as-the-bombs-were-going-i-sat-and-watched-a-few-of-...

maasanova
New video footage surfaces from the huge NIST Freedom of Information Act dump aquired by the International Center for 9/11 Studies back in November 2010 . This critical video evidence on the collapse of WTC 1, 2 and 7 has been completely ignored by the mainstream media, many alternative news outlets and alleged whistleblower website Wikileaks.

Nearly all of the 9/11 eyewitnesses, including all mainstream newscasters reported bombs exploding before and during the collapse of the twin towers, but 9/11 government apologists and false-flg deniers continue to make excuses and claim that the eyewitnesses were confused about what they saw, heard and felt as the towers were collapsing.

So many of these suppressed & never before seen clips would have been bombshell revelations if released 5 years ago, and would have been heavily debated. Yet, in the form of a mass data dump after NIST was forced to answer an FOIA in 2010/2011, there is little notice or discussion of media that continues to confirm was 9/11 truth activists have argued for years.
  1. groups:
    Community,   Politics,   Tech
  2. tags:
    Internet,  Iraq,  Iran,  Terrorism,  11 more
  3.     
    |

7 comments // 9/11 Eyewitness: “As the bombs were going….I sat and watched few of them explode” // Video

  • freecrack
    • 0
      freecrack  

    • colin powell goes on the air and tells us to be weary of the "terror" industrial complex, wich is forgoten as much as it is true, and this random yahoo's 39 second story is a "bombshell".lol

      if stories of the wtc exploded out in ascending order, would that stand as reason or proof that aliens did it with retractable explosive technology from above?

      gee i wonder how much of the materials on any given floor of the wtc when heated to extreme temperatures would explode? gee i wonder if that happened on the 29th floor, what would prevent that from creating an identical event on the 28th floor and so on?
      how long does one have to heat a structure that conducts heat before things start blowing up?
      i wonder what happens when a structure is heated to the point of melting and has water and electrical systems running through them?
      i bet it looks like an explosion.

      like every fire that explodes is the result of bombs and not basic physics lol

      and im just pulling shit out of my ass.imagine if some one who had actual knowledge were to evaluate this.not any random jack off with an opinion based in nothig?

    • 1 year ago
  • maasanova
    • 0
      maasanova  
    • freecrack:

      They said that Osama, 19 Muslims armed with boxcutters and planes brought caused the fire that down the buildings.

      They determined as they cleaned up all the steel before there was an investigation could take place.

      We have literally hundreds of eyewitnesses reporting massive explosions and we even have them and the explosives caught on video, so there's no reason to bring up your bullshit about aliens.

      For the buildings to collapse that quickly all of the joints would have to be broken simultaneously and that is not possible in a 100 story building without some sort of explosive force. Osama, 19 Muslims armed with boxcutters and planes could not cause that explosive force.

    • 1 year ago
  • freecrack
  • maasanova
    • 0
      maasanova  
    • freecrack:

      Actually, I do get it. You can't address the facts so you start bringing in nonsense about aliens and things like that.

      It's typical behavior of psuedo intellectuals, 9/11 debunkers, government apologists and false-flag deniers.

    • 1 year ago
  • freecrack
    • 0
      freecrack  
    • maasanova:

      if you got it, you wouldnt post your conspiracy theory crap.like i said im sorry you dont get how your stuff is just as rediculous as the alien stuff.

      the sad part is, im a conspiracy minded person myself.i like a good conspiracy theory.i love breaking down the layers of bullshit we erroniously believe.but i need it to be reasonable.like how the gps manufacturers are probably subsadized by big oil, so that is why gps's have us making needless turns, adding mileage and gas usage.
      we probably in all actuality arent running out of oil anytime soon, cuz just like the diamond insustry, big oil can pretend thier is little product out thier to raise the price of it.it isnt like we can check, and we know they are greedy to a fault.

      im all for reasonable exposures.but this 9-11 stuff is all just absurd.

      realisticaly, it probably was an inside job.false flags are hardly new or rare.and if not a false flag an attack via omission, in that bush let it happen to exploit it even though he didnt orchestrate it.these are reasonable conclusions that basic deductive reasoning states.but unfotunately no actual evidence exists to prove it one way or the other.and that is where it ends.no matter how many firemen or random other witness's say what ever they say, until some one in the know can prove something, it is just spinnng wheels.

      cemtex, or aliens.all the same level of plausability at this point.

    • 1 year ago
  • Incredulous
  • freecrack
    • 0
      freecrack  
    • Incredulous:

      according to mel brooks they pay in space-bucks.but the universe has had a spaceship mortgage crisis, and a space buck doesnt go as far as it used to.damn space bankers who were to big to fail.

    • 1 year ago
more from Tech:
from the community

top videos