Tech | February 10, 2011 | 8 comments

Oil sands destruction: Gliding past a monster

Image
JanforGore
Our canoe emerged from that unsettled land, past the confluence with the Clearwater River, and into the stunning industry of the oil sands. We coasted past high banks of bermed-up sand. Yellow machines the size of houses roared down the roads, tore into the ground, stripped up the layers of earth to get at the seams of bitumen, or tar. Our mouths fell open - the scale of it, the sounds, and the effluent pouring back into the river that we had come to know. Even without understanding the challenges of refining that sludge, the transportation required and the environmental damage being done, we knew that we were gliding past a monster.

A quarter century has passed since that summer. The oil sands strip-mining effort has continued unabated, and steadily expanded. It has gone on non-stop, day after day, year after year, decade on decade: Knocking down forest, peeling up peat, dredging bitumen-soaked sand, denuding habitat, dumping countless gallons of tainted river water.

The Chipewyan settlement of Fort Chipewyan, downstream, worries about elevated instances of kidney failure, Graves disease, and the risk of cancer from river water tainted with arsenic, mercury, other metals and sediments laced with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons - toxics commonly found in tailings pond water. Chipewyans are told not to eat fish caught in the river, but fish and game provide their traditional diet.

Polluted river water sullies the Athabasca delta, one of the world's most important wetlands and migratory bird habitats. Year by year the mining expands its footprint, a scar visible from outer space. Combined, the oil sand fields of northern Alberta cover an area of 54,000 square miles, an expanse larger than England.

Northern Alberta is far enough off the radar that it might as well be another planet. Very few people live there. It's easy to forget about that carnage, even if, like me, you've been there.

Two years ago, watching the movie Avatar it all came back.

This is an old, tired story, I thought, watching the industrial colonization of a foreign planet, the clear-cutting of ancient forest and the apocalyptic demise of the beings who lived there. But in that dark theater, I felt the canoe paddle in my hands again, felt the river beneath the hull, witnessed the assault taking place just over the Athabasca's bank. I know where this Hollywood plot is unfolding right now, I thought.

And right now I'm reminded again because trucks are hauling behemoth loads across Montana, where I live, delivering equipment on a scale even science fiction screenwriters didn't anticipate.

Mega-trucks are pulling loads nearly 600,000 pounds, three stories high and 220 feet long across Idaho and Montana. This equipment is manufactured in Asia, shipped to the west coast, transported on barges up the Columbia watershed to the port of Lewistown, Idaho, and then transferred onto trucks that wind their way through some of the West's most picturesque river canyons and mountain passes.

These are the test runs. Imperial Oil, the Canadian arm of ExxonMobil, has plans to truck 200 similarly gargantuan loads along the same route to the oil sands of the North.

The trucks will hammer the pavement, stop traffic, add nothing to local economies. Scenic lands which support recreation and tourism are at risk. Citizen groups are waging campaigns. The Missoula County Commission and several districts of the U.S. Forest Service have lodged complaints.

But we are a small state, and the pressures from industry are immense.

The oil sands produce roughly 1.5 million barrels of oil per day. Alberta's biggest customer is the United States. Long-range, the plan is to build a pipeline from Alberta through Montana and Wyoming to Denver, and perhaps on to the Gulf Coast.

The problems are tremendous. The oil doesn't flow, to start with. It has to be separated, steam-injected, and mixed with liquids before it will even move through the pipe. Once south, it has to be further refined before it can be rendered usable.

To turn one barrel of oil sands bitumen into something you can pump into your gas tank requires removing two or three tons of earth, using three barrels of water, and burning 1,200 cubic feet of natural gas in a convoluted series of expensive processes to separate the oil, liquefy it, and refine it. All of this produces two to four times the amount of greenhouse gases as refining conventional petroleum. Talk about burning the candle at both ends. The mines pull 359 million cubic meters of water from the Athabasca River each year. While land reclamation is part of the discussion, not one reclamation certificate has been awarded to date, and the challenges of returning the landscape to anything remotely approximating its original state are appalling.

It took days to regain our mental rhythm, to let "river time" reassert itself. Life, and the river, bore us on. But now, it comes stabbing back.Meanwhile, Alberta's regulators just approved the ninth open-pit mine north of Fort McMurray. An industry-led monitoring body concluded that the pit would produce "no significant adverse environmental effects on water quality."

cont.
  1. groups:
    Community,   Tech,   Green,   Current Tonight,   14 more
  2. tags:
    Environment Pollution Cancer Disease 17 more
  3.     
    |

8 comments // Oil sands destruction: Gliding past a monster

  • Wetdog
    • +1
      Wetdog  
    • The strange thing is, Alberta has lots of natural gas. They plan to burn the natural gas in order to get the bitumen out of the ground and ship it thousands of miles to refine it into oil, and then into gasoline. To run our vehicles with.

      But, our vehicles can run just fine on the natural gas itself. Without all the environmental destruction and expense.

      This is a matter of colossal waste, expense and destruction---just to maintain the status quo, purely for the sake of continuing to keep profits flowing into the same pockets.

      Obama Seeks to Slash Oil Subsidies in 2012 Budget

      http://current.com/technology/92994972_obama-seeks-to-slash-oil-subsidies-in-201...

    • 1 year ago
  • treewolf39
  • Wetdog
    • +2
      Wetdog  
    • We'd be far better off to use the natural gas to power our vehicles and leave the bitumen alone.

      At least with natural gas(methane)----we can make as much as we need using any sort of biomass at all, even sewage and landfills.

    • 1 year ago
  • good_stuff
    • -1
      good_stuff  
    • Only funny becuase I'm sure that these guys kayaking up the river didn't walk/kayak the whole way there. It is fine to crisize if you have better ideas, but taking a plane to alberta, is part of the problem not the solution.

    • 1 year ago
  • JanforGore
  • ConcernedAboutRFuture
    • +2
      ConcernedAboutRFuture  
    • With our hands tied behind our backs, and our mouths gagged by our government's lust for profit, all I can do is cry..... and plan to move to Europe. This insanity isn't goig to stop anytime soon as our society is dumbed down on a daily basis..... i fear the next generation will be even worse.

    • 1 year ago
  • JanforGore
  • JanforGore
    • +2
      JanforGore  
    • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=at2Z3Hku750

      The first step for Americans getting over this oil addiction is to admit it. This is absolute insanity. And now the State Dept. under Hilary Clinton is more than likely set to approve the Keystone XL pipeline that will pipe this toxic sludge into our country to be burned... at a time when solar, tidal wave energy and other visionary solutions must be addressed. At a time when the Gulf still lays dying. This is simply not sustainable.

    • 1 year ago
more from Tech:

top videos