Tech | February 13, 2011 | 4 comments

Experts see major weaknesses in USDA review of GM alfalfa/"GM alfalfa will be everywhere"

Image
JanforGore
A major battle over Roundup Ready (RR) genetically modified alfalfa has emerged because it represents a huge contamination threat to organic and conventional agriculture, and opponents don't believe USDA's proposed plan to allow it to be grown with restrictions will work.

"More problematic"

Alfalfa is grown on 22 million acres in the US, making it the fourth major crop after corn, soybeans, and cotton.

Organic farmers use alfalfa extensively. "Alfalfa is a feed staple for all organic livestock, and the most common legume in organic crop rotations in northern states," says Jim Riddle, organic outreach coordinator at the University of Minnesota.

GM alfalfa is a huge threat because it is pollinated by bees and other insects that travel great distances and grows wild near roads, ditches, and yards. "You don't have that with corn, soybeans, or cotton," says Bill Freese, senior policy analyst at the Center for Food Safety. "Those things make it more problematic."

According to a paper by Geertson Seed Farms, one of the biggest potential problems is that GM alfalfa will cross pollinate with wild alfalfa, which will become the dominant weed variety because it has the Roundup Ready herbicide tolerant trait. Weedy GM alfalfa will in turn become a source of pollen and seed that will contaminate conventional and organic alfalfa fields.

"GM alfalfa will be everywhere," says Dag Falck, organic program manager at Nature's Path Foods.

5-mile buffer

USDA's Environment Impact Statement proposes an option whereby RR alfalfa would be grown with restrictions. The EIS lists production states according to three tiers. In 27 Tier 1 states, which include most eastern and southern states where no commercial alfalfa is grown, there would be no restrictions on RR plantings. RR alfalfa seed production would be limited in 14 Tier II and nine Tier III states where farmers must maintain isolation distances of five miles between GM and non-GMO alfalfa. Tier II states, such as Iowa, Kansas, and Missouri, are primarily in the Midwest and Tier III states, such as Arizona, California, Oregon, and Wyoming, are in the West.

EIS ignores roundup weed resistance, impacts on honey

snip

Freese and others question the need for RR alfalfa. "Only 7% of alfalfa is treated with herbicides. It grows so densely that it crowds out weeds."

Approving RR alfalfa, he says, will make it a "chemical dependent crop."

The EIS also ignores the impact on honey, and the fact that bees will gather nectar from GM alfalfa plants and convert into honey. "This is another entry point for GMOs (into foods)," says Riddle.
  1. groups:
    Community,   Tech,   Green,   Current Tonight,   7 more
  2. tags:
    Environment Monsanto GMOs transgenic contamination 10 more
  3.     
    |

4 comments // Experts see major weaknesses in USDA review of GM alfalfa/"GM alfalfa will be everywhere"

  • queenofit
    • +1
      queenofit  
    • "We are grateful to Prince Charles for cautioning (see video below)
      the world on the blind, head long rush to spread GM seeds and crops
      worldwide, especially in the Third World [1]. It has become necessary
      for him to do so because the biotechnology industry is using the current
      food and fuel crisis to push GM crops on grounds that they will speculation and diversion of food crops to biofuels, it is not a crisis of production, at least not yet, even though industrial monoculture has been failing through decades of unsustainable practices [2] (Food Without Fossil Fuels Now, SiS ...38). Second, genetic engineering so far has only achieved the transfer of single gene traits such as herbicide resistance and Bt-toxin production. Yield and environmental resilience – most relevant for food security - are complex multigenic traits, and there is no GM crop currently engineered for high yields or that produces higher yields. Quite the opposite is the case. GM crops have been a disastrous failure on all counts." Dr. Vandana Shiva and Dr. Mae-Wan Ho (much more reading at link) http://www.i-sis.org.uk/princeCharlesGMfood.php

    • 1 year ago
  • queenofit
  • Earthwalker
  • JanforGore
    • +2
      JanforGore  
    • This decision will have repercussions on biodiversity and health up the food chain. Bees carrying the GM alfalfa nectar to honey is also something that should raise flags. I suppose when bees are extinct we will then care.

    • 1 year ago
more from Tech:

top videos