Tech | March 14, 2011 | 76 comments

" 8 " GE Designed Nuclear Reactors in Stages meltdown in Japan. Could fallout from Japan explosion reach U.S. West Coast?

Image
gerardange
Potential consequences: How a full-scale meltdown could affect the U.S. by flying across the Pacific Ocean

Breaking News // Circa 1974 General Electric designed reactors had similar backup failures on US Nuclear Plants. These same US Nuclear Plants are asking for US Operations Renewal from our Government.

=================
March 14, 2011 |
Last updated at 2:52 PM (UK time) on 14th March 2011

America was on alert today amid fears the nuclear fallout from the Japan earthquake could reach the West Coast of the U.S.

Scientists warned of a 'worst-case scenario' in which a meltdown could blast highly radioactive material into the atmosphere.

This would be then picked up by powerful 30,000ft winds carrying the debris across the Pacific and hitting America within four days. Link also provides a larger map. Daily Mail

=================
March 14, 2011 |
Fukushima Daiichi Unit 2 fuel core meltdown reported underway
7:39AM EST March 14---We have received a report from our Japanese colleagues that Tokyo Power Electric Company is reporting that Fukushima Daiichi Unit 2 has lost all cooling water and the fuel core is completed exposed. The fuel rods are very likely melting. There is no word on efforts to flood Unit 2 to avert an uncontrolled meltdown.

Two hydrogen gas explosions have already rocked Unit 1 and Unit 3. A third explosion is now likely in Unit 2 potentially releasing significant amounts of radiation into the atmosphere if the vessel fails followed by containment failure as the result of a possible full scale meltdown.

=================
March 14, 2011 |
A great piece by The Guardian's John Vidal. Here's the lead:

The gung-ho nuclear industry is in deep shock. Just as it and its cheerleader, the International Atomic Energy Agency, were preparing to mark next month's 25th anniversary of the Chernobyl accident with a series of self-congratulatory statements about the dawning of a safe age of clean atomic power, a series of catastrophic but entirely avoidable accidents take place in not one but three reactors in one of the richest countries of the world.

=================
March 14, 2011 |
"A gigantic science experiment, with the Japanese people as guinea pigs."
Read Michio Kaku on the spiraling nuclear disaster in Japan.

=================
March 14, 2011
Nuke rods fully exposed again
Posted at noon, March 14: A Japanese utility says fuel rods at a troubled nuclear reactor were once again fully exposed hours after authorities were able to stabilize a similar emergency. Tokyo Electric Power Co. says the exposure happened at Unit 2 of the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant because a steam vent wouldn't open Monday, causing a sudden drop of water. That reactor and two others at the plant are dangerously overheating and authorities are racing to prevent meltdown. AP





FOR MOR INFORMATION:
http://www.beyondnuclear.org/

FOR LARGER MAPS:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1366055/Japan-earthquake-tsunami-Navy-cr...
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Tech,   Green,   8 more
  2. tags:
    Fraud Nuclear Nuclear Power Japan Earthquake 3 more
  3. recommended by:
    Vierotchka
  4.     
    |

76 comments // " 8 " GE Designed Nuclear Reactors in Stages meltdown in Japan. Could fallout from Japan explosion reach U.S. West Coast?

  • Tsuki_Yo
    • 0
      Tsuki_Yo  
    • I don't know if I should even read this stuff. The government won't warn us in time to act, and I don't have the money to take a bus to the next town, much less out of state. What the fuck are we supposed to do? You can't even buy a geiger counter- they're all price-gauged into the stratosphere, and different kinds measure different types and levels of radiation. Guess I'll worry about it when I glow in the dark...

    • 1 year ago
  • Jim_Sadler
    • -1
      Jim_Sadler  
    • Nuclear power can be quite safe. When politics and business gets involved then we have to watch out as these government fools can turn a safe design into a disaster waiting to happen. Japan chose to build reactors on a huge fault line which will always have severe quakes and put those reactors close to each other in a densely populated area all the while knowing that tsunamis and quakes would tare the area apart from time to time. This is a case of greed causing a disaster.

    • 1 year ago
  • Richard_Alley
    • -1
      Richard_Alley  
    • bwr's are old tech. sodium cooled fast nuetrron reactors are still safe in japan. they can burn the tailings of a bwr and use 92 or more % of the unused fuel. lets focus on the the safe efficient reactors please.

    • 1 year ago
  • JohnA
    • 0
      JohnA  
    • No need to worry. Obama announced his picks for the NCAA Championship tournament today. Everything is fine. I wonder who he picked?

    • 1 year ago
  • gerardange
    • +2
      gerardange  
    • JohnA:

      Yes I saw that too.... I was shocked... With this going on and he is talking Basketball? That says so much about who this man is deep inside...

      Obama... What an Embarrassment and, Colossal Disappointment !!!! And ~ I voted for him...

      We all need to Organize our own "Pro Democracy Movement" and get all these "Phony Corporate paid-off Impostures out of our Government- !

      If Egypt Can Do it ~ Then... WE CAN TOO !!!

      (1) We need to Get our Money Back From the 1% of the Industrialists & Bankers that stole it and ripped off all the citizens... and US Treasury.= FREEZE ALL THEIR ASSITS-!!!

      and then,

      (2) Throw the All the Corporate Criminals that ripped us all off in Real Prison...

      (3) Then... balance our Books, Re-hire teachers and rebuild an economy for all the People not just for the 1%.

      Organize!

      GA

      WeAreWi

      ~

    • 1 year ago
  • gerardange
    • +2
      gerardange  
    • Image
    • Nuke industry Continues Desperate Media Spin Effort // Disinformation Campaign.
      The Nuclear Energy Institute maintains that the radiation release from Japanese plants has been "controlled"?

      Yesterday I wrote about the emerging spin from the nuclear industry -- that Americans should be "reassured" by the Japanese disaster because U.S. power plant operators will be able to learn from mistakes there.

      Now, the industry trade group has posted a Q&A on its website that does not reiterate the "reassured" claim, but still makes some statements that deserve scrutiny.

      The Nuclear Energy Institute document, which was updated Sunday at 3:30 p.m., says in part (emphasis added):

      The events at Fukushima Daiichi show that nuclear power’s defense-in-depth approach to safety is appropriate and strong. Despite one of the largest earthquakes in world history, with accompanying tsunamis, fires and aftershocks — multiple disasters compounded one on top of the other — the primary containments at reactors near the epicenter have not been breached and the radioactive release has been minimal and controlled. This event will show that even under very severe circumstances, nuclear power plants are designed to withstand natural disasters.

      We know that roughly 200,000 people around nuclear plants have been evacuated, 150 workers have been exposed to radiation, and some crew members on an American aircraft carrier 100 miles offshore got low-level doses of radiation. Clearly, though, many of the facts are still not known, and the crisis at multiple reactors is unresolved.

      But the New York Times last night published a story that suggests, contra the industry's statement, the effects of the radiation could be long-lasting:

      Japanese reactor operators now have little choice but to periodically release radioactive steam as part of an emergency cooling process for the fuel of the stricken reactors that may continue for a year or more even after fission has stopped. The plant’s operator must constantly try to flood the reactors with seawater, then release the resulting radioactive steam into the atmosphere, several experts familiar with the design of the Daiichi facility said.

      That suggests that the tens of thousands of people who have been evacuated may not be able to return to their homes for a considerable period, and that shifts in the wind could blow radioactive materials toward Japanese cities rather than out to sea.

      Again, it's too early to say where this is going. But the early signs are ominous -- both for people in Japan and for the nuclear industry's public image.

      Justin Elliott is a Salon reporter. Reach him by email at jelliott@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @ElliottJustin More: Justin Elliott

      http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/03/14/nuclear_industry_new_spin...

    • 1 year ago
  • gerardange
    • +2
      gerardange  
    • Fukushima crisis - Chernobyl on steroids' Japan is struggling to control the reactors damaged by the disasterous earthquake as radiation levels continue to rise and a partial meltdown of nuclear fuel is feared in two facilities at the Fukushima plant. Workers were withdrawn after the danger of exposure peaked - the alert also saw plans to drop water from helicopters adandoned. Energy adviser Arnold Gundersen says the Japanese nuclear crisis could have disasterous consequences.

    • 1 year ago
  • mitekillem
    • +2
      mitekillem  
    • Tragic Irony: The Japanese are paying the price for relying American technology.

      Man, I really, really hope they're able to get them patched up before it's too late.

    • 1 year ago
  • ArchDruid
  • covelogibbs
  • extracrazykiwi2008
  • ArchDruid
  • trut
    • 0
      trut  
    • ArchDruid:

      dangerous levels of radiation are now leaking. if you think there is nothing to worry about Arch, carry on like everything is rainbows and butterflies.

    • 1 year ago
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • +3
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • Say, a question...

      Does anyone know what they are doing with the saltwater used to cool down the reactors? I would imagine it might be tainted with radioactive material, no?

    • 1 year ago
  • artemis6
  • ozoneocean
  • Tsuki_Yo
    • 0
      Tsuki_Yo  
    • PoliticalAmazon:

      ^'d Yes! The salt water is a problem because it has been evaporating- basically turning to steam as it cools the reactors, creating another problem of a build-up of radioactive salt. This is going to be one of those problems in which the solutions cause more problems, too.

      Another aspect that I have not heard one single person mention, is that the radioactive material can be used to make a dirty bomb. Obviously, anyone who tried to collect it would be exposing themselves to a lethal level- but would a suicide bomber care about that? They'd just grab it, turn it over to the bomb makers, then go off and die a martyr.

    • 1 year ago
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • +2
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • In this area, we worry about Diablo Canyon going kaflooey at any moment because they built it right smack dab on top of a major earthquake fault with associated smaller faults. I'm not kidding, some people [RAISES HAND] have their iodine pills with them 24/7.

      Well, wouldn't that be a kick in the pants if we ended up getting nuked by the windblown radioactive particles from Japan's reactors?

    • 1 year ago
  • Tsuki_Yo
  • uppityprogressive
    • 0
      uppityprogressive  
    • Sorry, this won't end nuke use, any more than the financial system got fixed or the BP disaster stopped environmental abuse at sea. Corexit, the most avoidable of environmental disasters, poured into the water by the millions of gallons. Governments are so corrupt, it will happen again. There is no real regulation going on in fact the government of the great US of A seems to be complicit.

    • 1 year ago
  • Tsuki_Yo
    • 0
      Tsuki_Yo  
    • uppityprogressive:

      Most of the airplanes in use are way too old to be flying but they're kept in the air by vigilant maintenance- just like the reactors that are in use. Old things fall apart, even with the best of care. Corporations and governments are just playing the odds with our lives.

    • 1 year ago
  • toyotabedzrock
  • PoliticalAmazon
  • toyotabedzrock
  • gerardange
  • gerardange
    • +1
      gerardange  
    • Image
    • USA MEDIA ARE NOT REPORTING THE FACTS...
      The following information was NOT BROADCAST on the Following Networks: NBC, ABC, CBS, FOX, PBS
      It seems that the USA MEDIA had Professional-Nuclear Representatives spinning disinformation on how the cooling problems are not meltdowns and are Minor~ and Nuclear Energy is safe! and,,, not to worry.... > Nothing could be further from the truth...

      If you want the REAL FACTS NOT SPIN ~ GO TO THESE NETWORKS Below...
      CCTV | RT | Al Jazzera | Deutsche Welle & DemocracyNow.org they have all been 100% on topic.

      =================
      March 14, 2011

      Radiation levels around Fukushima declared "harmful to human health"

      Residents living 20 to 30 kilometers from the Fukushima Daiichi reactor complex destroyed by the power loss from the earthquake and tsunami have been urged by Tokyo Electric Power Company officials to take shelter inside because radiation levels have risen to levels "harmful to human health."

      =================
      March 14, 2011
      Fukushima Daiichi workers evacuating reactor complex

      Tokyo Electric Power Company has announced that it is evacuating its workers from the embattled 6 unit Fukushima Daiichi reactor complex with three of the units partially melting down (Units 1, 2 and 3) and the Unit 4 has an irradiated fuel fire initiated by hydrogen gas from loss of cooling. Unit 4 was not operational during the earthquake.

      =================
      March 14, 2011

      Fire at No.4 Fukushima reactor

      Admissions that radiation has been released. People living within 20km and 30 km (beyond 12miles) radius are being advised to shelter in place. Those living with 30km radius have been told to stay indoors. The fire is in the spent fuel pool. Unit 4 was not operating at the time of the quake/tsunami.

      Radiation levels rising significantly from 1000 microsievert per hour levels now upwards of 400 millisieverts per hour, likely being released from the fire burning from loss of cooling to irradiated fuel stored outside of containment at Unit 4. These levels of radiation will cause physical harm to people, steriliity in males, and reduce white blood cell counts.

      People living beyond the current 12 mile evacuated zone being warned to stay indoors. Dust off, remove clothes and scrub down after coming indoors from outside. "Do not hang your laundry outside to dry."

      =================
      March 14, 2011

      Third Fukushima reactor suffers explosion
      News is sketchy regarding an explosion "heard" at the Unit 2 reactor at Fukushima where some fuel rods remain exposed. Just 50 workers remain on the site. At a Tepco press conference reference was made to a loss of pressure inside the waste water pool - possibly caused by a leak. Tepco officials were grilled by a now skeptical news corps.

      FOR MOR INFORMATION:
      http://www.beyondnuclear.org/

    • 1 year ago
  • xhuffpo
    • 0
      xhuffpo  
    • CNN is reporting a fire at a fourth reactor
      From the CNNweb site
      [10:18 p.m. ET Monday, 11:18 a.m. Tuesday in Tokyo] Radiation levels at the damaged Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant have increased to "levels that can impact human health," and anyone within a 30-kilometer radius of the plant should remain indoors, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano said Tuesday.

      [10:12 p.m. ET Monday, 11:12 a.m. Tuesday in Tokyo] A fire has erupted in a fourth reactor at the damaged Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, a top adviser to Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan announced Tuesday.

      We can all be assured that this was accounted for in the design of these reactors so everything is okay.
      Don't worry, be happy

    • 1 year ago
  • Straighttalker
  • PoliticalAmazon
  • ArchDruid
  • sue4e3
  • xhuffpo
    • +1
      xhuffpo  
    • Three Mile Island and at Chernobyl; the authorities played down the actual danger and the situation was much worse than was being let out to the public. With Three Mile they got it back under control but at Chernobyl it got away from them. Yes it was two very different systems but the announcements were a bunch of BS to the public.
      Why should we believe them this time?

    • 1 year ago
  • sue4e3
    • +1
      sue4e3  
    • xhuffpo:

      not that you should believe everything without question but i think they will be more honest simply because in 86 and 79 we didn't have the information highway just look at where your at i have been reading every thing from almost every where and even though there is alot of attention grabbing head lines even the crazy sites come back to what the main stream news is saying that it is bad that what reaches the us if any is beyond small and poses no real threat and that this still is not as bad as chernobyl

    • 1 year ago
  • Shanekwa
  • simplecj
    • +2
      simplecj  
    • Image
    • Has there been a meltdown?

      The term "meltdown" is used in a variety of ways. As noted above, the reported detection of radioactive caesium and iodine may indicate that some of the metal casing enclosing the reactors' uranium fuel has melted (a "fuel-rod meltdown"). However, there is as yet no indication that the uranium fuel itself has melted. Still less is there any indication of a "China Syndrome" where the fuel melts, gathers below the reactor and resumes a chain reaction, that enables it to melt everything in its way, and bore a path deep into the earth. If there were to be a serious meltdown, the Japanese reactor is supposed to be able to handle it, preventing the China Syndrome from taking place. Reports suggest that underneath the reactor, within the outer containment vessel, there is a concrete basin designed to capture and disperse any molten fuel.

      Could there be a Chernobyl-like disaster?

      Experts say this is highly unlikely. The chain reaction at all Fukushima reactors has ceased. The explosions that have occurred have taken place outside the steel and concrete containment vessels enclosing the reactors, which apparently remain solid. At Chernobyl an explosion exposed the core of the reactor to the air, and a fire raged for days sending its contents in a plume up into the atmosphere. At Fukushima the explosions - caused by hydrogen and oxygen vented from the reactor - have damaged only the roof and walls erected around the containment vessels.

      Could there be a nuclear explosion?

      No. A nuclear bomb and a nuclear reactor are different things.

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-12732015

    • 1 year ago
  • xhuffpo
    • 0
      xhuffpo  
    • simplecj:

      These reactors are in totally uncharted territory. Everything that is happening and being said is now in the realm of theory, no wait except for the part that is actually happening. The how to solve it part is theoretical.
      The seawater is destroying the casing rods that have the nuclear material contained it is a race to shut all fission down or have the tubes corrode and then what happens is a guess.

    • 1 year ago
  • gerardange
    • 0
      gerardange  
    • simplecj:

      Correction: One is a Breeder Reactor that is failing has Plutonium the others have uranium fuel. This is a extremely bad situation that is getting worse...

      The Nuclear Industry has populated the all media with PR professionals that are spinning the truth = they are everywhere.

    • 1 year ago
  • southrabbit
  • Gravity_Man
    • 0
      Gravity_Man  
    • southrabbit:

      THE JAPANESE HAVE BEEN NUKED ALL OVER AGAIN, and by a US corporation too! They didn't require the services of the US military this time!!!

      => Corporatocracy has the Power to NUKE CIVILIANS!
      => Corporatocracy has the Power to NUKE CIVILIANS!
      => Corporatocracy has the Power to NUKE CIVILIANS!
      => Corporatocracy has the Power to NUKE CIVILIANS!

      Science Officer Spock to Captain Kirk => Jim, California, in danger.

    • 1 year ago
  • riverratt50
  • Leen61
    • 0
      Leen61  
    • Of course the fall out from Japan could reach the U.S. If the fall out gets into the jet stream and is not dissipated by rainfall, it's highly possible. But they will still hawk the benefits of this "safe" energy.

    • 1 year ago
  • simplecj
    • +1
      simplecj  
    • I don't believe these reactors are going to explode. From what I read the meltdown would be thru the bottom of the containment vessel, releasing radiation into the ground and surrounding area. Bad for Japan, but far from the nuclear explosion that would be required to throw radioactive "fallout" into the jet stream.

      I'm so sick of fear mongering... anything that could "possibly" go wrong and people jump all over it. Are we addicted to this kind of shit or what?

    • 1 year ago
  • xhuffpo
    • +2
      xhuffpo  
    • simplecj:

      When insanely high temperature materials melt down into the ground and then hit the water table, they are on the ocean it is not very far down, the result is a massive build up of steam pressure and it expands rapidly, sort of like an explosion, and blows the core pieces up into the surrounding area. This will spread the radiation just as if the core exploded, with the added plus of going into the water table.

    • 1 year ago
  • simplecj
  • xhuffpo
    • +2
      xhuffpo  
    • simplecj:

      Yes they were designed for earthquakes and tsunamis too, don't forget that the systems for cooling were so redundant that they wouldn't be able to all fail at the same time. So I guess none of this is actually happening .

    • 1 year ago
  • xhuffpo
  • ejasun
  • Vierotchka
    • +7
      Vierotchka  
    • France, Germany and Switzerland (and likely other European countries) are freezing all plans for building new nuclear plants and revising their whole nuclear energy policies.

    • 1 year ago
  • oly90808
  • covelogibbs
  • artemis6
    • +4
      artemis6  
    • Nuclear Pompeii , exactly . It ain't SAFE ! Other sources , that are FAR safer and more renewable should be explored to their fullest potential , BEFORE we turn to anything like they , and we may not even have too .

    • 1 year ago
  • oly90808
  • pukemnukem
    • 0
      pukemnukem  
    • oly90808:

      Where is Japan supposed to put solar towers? Your talking about a country that has to utilize every arable foot of land for food production. Furthermore...do you even recognize the climate of the country might not facilitate the usage of solar towers?

    • 1 year ago
  • artemis6
  • pukemnukem
    • 0
      pukemnukem  
    • artemis6:

      For a country dependent on shipping and the ocean to meet its food requirements, blocking off large sections of access to the oceans is not an easy solution. Furthermore, as much as people here seem to love tidal generators, your placing industrial equipment in very sensitive marine life zones. Most of the life in the ocean are pretty close to shore (within 5 miles). Your going to cause major disruptions in migration, breeding, and feeding grounds.

      Its not that easy to make a choice for a nation without consideration for all the potential negatives and the costs.

    • 1 year ago
  • artemis6
    • +1
      artemis6  
    • pukemnukem:

      Dear puke , Not aware of the current designs , are you ? Well here , from the evergreen state ! http://www.hydrovolts.com/PR?WIREC%20Hamner%20Tidal%20Power%20Show.pdf These turbans are vertical . They are far beneath surface . 100 thousand homes can be powered . MY point , is we have not developed this to its potential . At all . Combine it with solar and wind , we may not even need nuclear power . Until we try , we cannot know . The reason truly renewable energy is not being pursued , is money . Real renewables all have decentralization in common . Power and influence cannot be concentrated . This is the greatest corporate fear , for them to be irrelevant .

    • 1 year ago
  • pukemnukem
    • 0
      pukemnukem  
    • artemis6:

      Actually I am. I currently am a fifth year mechanical engineering student and have worked with the Department of the Army in regards to alternative power sources. The actual technology that your attempting to push is so far in its infancy that it is decades away from full implementation.

      Furthermore, you seem perfectly willing to ignore a major issue with these systems, they are more effective the larger the amount of water flow they interfere with. Basically, for the system to work on a large scale, your going to end up with an environmental impact similar to the effect of a damn.

      Furthermore, the power generated would be very cyclic...just like the tides. You would not be able to get a consistent power generation throughout the day and night. This would greatly complicate things as the system could not effectively respond to changes in demand as other sources of power do.

      Generating power is not the issue at all. Its effectively delivering it to meet demand. Unfortunately we are much more effective at generating power than delivering it. A prime example of this is the massive amount of energy that is wasted throughout the world through losses just in high power lines. Just as problematic is our massive consumption of energy which we are all guilty of.

    • 1 year ago
  • Tsuki_Yo
  • Tsuki_Yo
    • 0
      Tsuki_Yo  
    • artemis6:

      ^'d That's exactly it- money. Oil needs to be constantly pumped out of the ground, constantly refined, constantly transported, generating trillions of dollars all along the process. Solar panels are installed- and that's it. Aside from occasionally needing some maintenance or a repair, it's a one-time cost that will become cheaper and cheaper as production volume increases. You can already buy solar powered landscaping lights for a buck each. $300 solar phone chargers are already going for about eight bucks on Ebay. Solar panels used to be crazy-expensive, but when you think about the relatively recent trend right before the economy crashed- everybody redoing their kitchens in travertine marble- for about the same price, they could have put solar panels on the roof. It's a matter of priorities, and educating the public that the prices are coming down. That's something the oil companies don't want us to know.

    • 1 year ago
  • artemis6
  • artemis6
    • 0
      artemis6  
    • pukemnukem:

      There are energy storage devices , i have posted about them here , they are in peoples homes . The days of centralized energy is over . It is NOT sustainable , never was . No one is to blame for your unfortunate choice of degree , you will have to adapt . Good luck to you .

    • 1 year ago
  • artemis6
    • 0
      artemis6  
    • Tsuki_Yo:

      You are so right , we have reached the tipping point , and people are starting to realize this . You can get a solar charger for your e car or bike , one that you can park it under . I live it a conservative test market area . E cars are popping up even here . In ten years , They will be everywhere . Power to the people !

    • 1 year ago
  • artemis6
  • aaron1972
  • gerardange
    • +3
      gerardange  
    • Image
    • I really feel like we are all living today in a Nuclear Pompeii... We all need to get filtration Masks very quickly.... This is as awful and as ugly as it gets...
      Thank you Very Much Greedy Corporate Criminals!

      General Electric ~ pushed their Nuclear System down everyones throats for the soul purpose making Lots and Lots of Money!!!! Their motivation is the same Greed Machine Globally as Monsanto pushes their GMO poison to the world... Our Government is their bought and paid off ~ front man.

      General Electric's same Reactors designed and built in 1974 are also here in the Mid West.... And, Amazingly the same Emergancy Backup Pumps after 40 years were just recently tested and They discovered that all of the Pumps here in the USA were also defective and they didn't work! So, No surprise in Japan right?"~ As much as they to explain away the truth... with who is responsible for the pending Nuclear Disaster... Remember they always sang a song of ~ how safe Nuclear Power was.. But, Today the truth is revealed... and Today you me and every living thing on this planet.... will now All pay for their CORPORATE GREED. We all will be poisoned by their unending Desire to make Billions and know that It was always more important to them to make MONEY than to listen to the people and our concerns of common sense... and health.

      THE GREED of GE, Westinghouse, Monsanto, AIG, Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan Bank of America etc... These are all the Villains that worked together to destroy the planet and the Human Race...

      We can't blame Nature for Corporate Greed...

      With all these bastards... And, the are bastards... It's first always about MONEY FIRST and always about People and safety last. These corporations are as evil is it gets... They have looted our US Treasury, sucked the money from our pockets and forclosed on our homes and they still want more... Now the same greedy people have poisoned our planet.... And that's OKAY?

      It's time to prosecute and, lock up these greedy corporate thieves and reclaim the money they have all stolen and looted from us ... It is Time WE ALL balance all our books! = Because that is where all the money went.

      But the damage is really done now... The Sickness and pain caused by their selfish plan has come home to roost... So there is no turning back anymore for any of us.... They really screwed all of us this time...

      ~

    • 1 year ago
  • oly90808
  • sandinbrick
    • +6
      sandinbrick  
    • Yes Nuclear Power is clean energy, but who wants to take a chance on a disaster that will kill us. Solar, Wind and Hydo Power, YES!

    • 1 year ago
  • pukemnukem
    • -2
      pukemnukem  
    • sandinbrick:

      You cannot get a dam built in this country. Since the 60's the US has been demolishing dams. If you build one, your essentially killing off the ecosystem of the river. Almost all dams currently in use in the US were built around the great depression. Its impossible to build one today without violating a half a dozen EPA rules.

      Solar and wind are not quite the answer either. A big issue with power supply is that we have to produce a consistent amount of electricity at all times. Our power network cannot store large amounts of power. You simply cannot build a battery large enough to store power during the day to consume at night.

      The big issue is that Americans are power hogs. We consume massive amounts of energy for our daily lives. Its not enough to just walk instead of driving. Our entire economic, industrial, and communication systems are based on consuming large amounts of power. I mean...lets be honest with ourselves, how much energy are we consuming right now leaving messages to each other on this website?

    • 1 year ago
  • covelogibbs
    • +2
      covelogibbs  
    • pukemnukem:

      You can build a battery big enough, it's called hydrogen gas, which you make in the day via solar power and use in the dark. Concentrated solar tower power stations can keep generating electricity for up to 5 hours after dark. We can compress air into tanks or underground caverns during the day and release it at night, etc.

      Think outside the box.

      Conservation can accomplish a lot, you're right about that.

    • 1 year ago
  • pukemnukem
    • -1
      pukemnukem  
    • covelogibbs:

      No...you can't. We are talking on a scale of gigawatts. The fact that you even suggest that underground tanks of compressed air could work shows you don't even understand the scale. Even if we had your magical hydrogen gas batteries (which I am assuming your butchering the concept of a fuel cell), our power grid is not designed to function in such a way. I think most people's concept of the power grid is based on the items they use everyday but that doesn't reflect reality. You can't just make massive batteries to store this much energy. These substances don't exist. You also can't just hook up batteries indefinitely. You can try this at home. Try hooking up about 100 AA batteries to run your TV and see what happens.

      Also, if underground tanks work so well as containment vessels, why do gas stations pollute ground water all the time? Furthermore, why would we put them underground (your compressed tanks)? So that it would be impossible to inspect or maintain them? Or perhaps to make a potential explosion thousands of times? The scale of the tank your talking about would be thousands of miles in volume...how would we even design such a theoretical vessel. The hoop and linear stresses alone (assuming we are talking about a typical compressed cylinder just magnified to the billion, billion size would alone put it past any known structural material. Care to explain what magical material your going to make this out of?

      Also, great idea...let's take a threatened ecosystems, underground caverns, filled with an ecosystem found no where else on the planet, and destroy it by filling it with high pressure air...never mind the simple fact that caverns aren't air tight.

      "Thinking outside of the box" and just saying random silly stuff not based in any sort of reality are not the same thing.

    • 1 year ago
  • covelogibbs
    • +2
      covelogibbs  
    • Image
    • pukemnukem:

      I definitely don’t have all the answers, or pretend that I do. The “magical gas hydrogen batteries” that I’m talking about exist and the main thing preventing appropriate technologies like this from coming to scale is political will power and fairy dust, but I’m assuming you know that already.

      We sent a man to the moon in the 20th Century, we can meet our energy needs in the 21st Century without endangering half the planet in the process.

      To me thinking inside the box is “our power grid is not designed to function in such a way.” So your idea is silly. How about redesigning the grid? Maybe millions of people hooking up to a smart grid with, wind, solar, hydro, geothermal, or their electric cars excess power could be part of the solution. How about generating decentralized power self sufficiently and bypassing the grid altogether?

      Comparing storing compressed air to gasoline doesn’t seem fair. Also, I wasn’t suggesting magnifying a compressed gas cylinder to “the billion, billion size,” just that some type of compressed air application might help to meet some of our needs. The underground cavern storage idea is just one possibility. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=a-solar-grand-plan
      Your 100 AA battery to run a TV experiment sounds like an exercise in futility. I’ll stick with my 8 L16 batteries, which when charged with my solar panels power my TV just fine. It’s what I’m seeing on the television that’s not so pleasant.
      Just in case you thought I was serious about the fairy dust, my alma mater, Humboldt State University did actually build a pilot project, the Schatz Solar Hydrogen Project, or SERC.

      “The Schatz Solar Hydrogen Project is a full time, automated, stand-alone energy system that demonstrates that hydrogen can be used to store solar energy.”
      http://www.schatzlab.org/projects/real_world/schatz_solar.html

      If we all join together on this issue we might just be able to make a little magic together.

    • 1 year ago
  • artemis6
    • 0
      artemis6  
    • covelogibbs:

      It is cool you got to see the solar hydrogen combo up close . I like the future sustainable power , to an energy mosaic . Decentralized . Combined with radical conservation , the process will be improved over time , as all things are . It is a reality , that we are late for our best destiny , because the bouncer would not let us in to the party , trying to squeeze out as much money as he could . All while poisoning the future for generations . I have had enough . I think we all have .

    • 1 year ago
  • BKsaysAction
  • H3ADLINE
    • +6
      H3ADLINE  
    • BKsaysAction:

      Because people creating their own energy means the most profitable industry in the history of human civilization will have to find a new way to make money, and they would rather squeeze this current system for as long as they can while they build up a way out. That's why companies like GE, who produced the power plants in Japan currently in meltdown, are investing in wind and solar production plants. When they finally run out of the methods they know best, they want to be there to own the next century, too.

    • 1 year ago
  • COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
    • +8
      COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM  
    • The moral of this story is? We do not seem to be able to out design the forces of God or nature. Either we accept the devastation and loss to life as the inevitable price of nuclear energy, or we put our money into non hazardous forms of energy.

    • 1 year ago
more from Tech:

top videos