Tech | March 26, 2011 | 20 comments

US races freshwater ro Japan nuclear plant

Image
JanforGore
U.S. naval barges loaded with freshwater sped toward Japan's overheated nuclear plant on Saturday to help workers struggling to stem a worrying rise in radioactivity and remove dangerously contaminated water from the facility.

Workers at the stricken Fukushima Dai-ichi plant have been using seawater in a frantic bid to stabilize reactors overheating since a tsunami knocked out the complex's crucial cooling system March 11, but fears are mounting about the corrosive nature of the salt in the water.

Plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Co. is now rushing to inject the reactors with freshwater instead to prevent pipes from clogging and to begin extracting the radioactive water, Hidehiko Nishiyama of Japan's Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency said Saturday.

CBS News correspondent Lucy Craft reports radiation levels around the plant have been fluctuating, as workers struggle to stabilize the facility.

The latest threat at the Fukushima number 1 nuclear reactor is a pool of radioactive water.

Efforts to bring the plant under control have been sidelined as workers fight to bail out three of the plant's six reactors. Three workers have been burned at reactor number 3, by radiation levels that have spiked 10,000 times normal.

On Saturday a spokesman for the utility operator Tokyo Electric Power said no one is sure where the radioactive water is coming from, but they haven't had a chance to check the structural integrity of the building since the quake.

If there is a crack in the building, this TEPCO official said, there is a possibility that contaminated water has seeped in.

The situation at the stricken plant remains unpredictable, government spokesman Yukio Edano said Saturday, adding that it would be "a long time" until the crisis is over.

"We seem to be keeping the situation from turning worse," he said. "But we still cannot be optimistic."

The switch to freshwater was the latest tactic in efforts to gain control of the six-unit nuclear power plant located 140 miles northeast of Tokyo.

The switch was necessary because of concerns that salt and other contaminants in seawater were clogging pipes and coating the surface of reactor vessels and fuel rods, hampering the cooling process, NISA said.

Defense Minister Yoshimi Kitazawa said late Friday that the U.S. government had made "an extremely urgent" request to switch to freshwater. He said the U.S. military was sending water to nearby Onahama Bay and that water injections could begin early next week.

cont.
  1. groups:
    Community,   Tech,   Green,   Earth and Science,   6 more
  2. tags:
    Environment Meltdown Japan Water 10 more
  3.     
    |

20 comments // US races freshwater ro Japan nuclear plant

  • Debra_
    • -5
      Debra_  
    • This is a horrific tragedy sure to go down in history with Hiroshima. My ex-husband use to call it Jap-Jap land, and say the name the land of the rising sun was fake since the sun really never sets because their future is always so bright. But see nothing but darkness for them after this.

    • 1 year ago
  • maasanova
  • Prijedor
    • +1
      Prijedor  
    • the craziest thing about this situation is that we will not learn from it and just build more nuclear plants. we, as humans, do not learn from our past at all. I just love it how news is trying to down play this by saying "WELL THIS ONLY HAPPENED BECAUSE THERE WERE QUAKES & TSUNAMIS AT THE SAMMMMMMMMEEEEEEE TIMEEEEEEEEE" well you seem, we dont have to worry about things like that happening here in the USA so we can build more of the plants

    • 1 year ago
  • artemis6
    • 0
      artemis6  
    • Waste of water , and life - all nuclear energy is . We cannot , now fail to see , The time for a sustainable energy mosaic has come .

    • 1 year ago
  • Schnookums
  • cmc101
    • 0
      cmc101  
    • At least these guys are doing something other shouting the sky is falling only wish our nation would quit playing games with our lives

    • 1 year ago
  • JanforGore
    • +2
      JanforGore  
    • cmc101:

      They have no choice if they wish to avoid total meltdown. That is a given. Which is the point about it being so dangerous and actually so foolish as an energy choice in the world we now live in.

    • 1 year ago
  • cmc101
    • 0
      cmc101  
    • JanforGore:

      I agree nukes are not a good source of energy But we as a nation have been entertained so long about stock market and tax relief for the rich that we would have trouble trying get out of a paper bag example three wars,New Orleans while we are cleaning up the trash left behind , blaming every one, Not taking responsibility and the entertainers wanted more tax breaks and drill baby drill.
      The American people has no real journalist that can take the bull by the horns and point the way with results all I hear is cannons to the left,cannons to the right and cannons from the rear with expert commentary telling which cannon failed
      From each expert nothing about how to defend against these cannons but we got to give them a tax break so they can buy more cannons not make jobs

    • 1 year ago
  • covelogibbs
    • +3
      covelogibbs  
    • Although I'm an atheist, I'm praying my ass off right now.

      The pundits and experts that are saying our nuclear power plants are safe from every conceivable disaster are the same ones that are saying they couldn't foresee a 9.0 earthquake and 30ft tidal wave hitting Japan. In fact, they were warned. The political clout and amount of money vested in nuclear power is so huge that our politicians defend this dangerous technology even as reactors are smoking in the background.

      We need to shut down our nukes and faze in sustainable alternatives. We may even want to consider tethering alternative energy systems to every nuclear power plant as a backup for the backup's backup.

      I know the irony of powering a nuke with, say a solar hydrogen plant, is huge, but Japan revealed how woefully inadequate mankind's preparedness is for averting a nuclear disaster. We are not lacking the technology to implement sustainable alternatives on a mass scale, simply the political will power. We better start thinking outside of the CORPORATE box while we still can.

      I'm getting tired of hearing people say that we can't use alternatives because: the grid isn't set up for it, or wind turbines are too ugly, the sun doesn't shine at night, hydrogen is too explosive, solar farms take too much space, Etc., Etc., Etc.

      We put a man on the moon. We can do all of these things and more. Sure it will be expensive, but do we want to keep giving all our money and lives over to the military industrial complex and profit driven corporations? If corporations are "people", we should be able to lock them up and prevent them from hurting other people. Now is the time for us to stand together as one.

      They will say nukes in stable, low seismic areas are safe. They will say that nukes are the only thing cable of reversing climate change. They will say newer nukes will be safe. They will say mini-nukes will be safe. They will say low levels of radiation are safe. They will say we will be able to solve the problem of nuclear waste. They will say since 9-11 they have thought of everything. They will say that new studies prove our nukes are safe. They will say we can beat mother nature. They will say we are not endangering our children.

      THEY WILL LIE.

      "Don't Taze me bro."

      One World. One People. We are one.

      P.S. NO NUKES!

    • 1 year ago
  • JanforGore
    • +3
      JanforGore  
    • covelogibbs:

      I'm tired of hearing it too. We can do whatever we truly want to do, and that is the indictment of the human species....we make up all sorts of excuses to cover up our own prejudices, biases, selfishness and greed. We could have solar, wind, geothermal, tidal wave energy and a host of other renewables not even mentioned yet if we really wanted as a whole to see progress. However, it is known that the human species is inherently a warlike species so to do this would just about negate any reason to kill other humans and hold them down in order for the elites to maintain power, and of course, that just can't be allowed where doing so keeps those certain few rich from maintaining control. The world you and I and others speak of is too tolerant, too equal, too peaceful... Too human.

      I pray as well for the people of Japan in the face of this disaster. This does not look good at all.

    • 1 year ago
  • JanforGore
    • +3
      JanforGore  
    • Another reason why nuclear must see the end of its days. In a world of increasing potable water scarcity, nuclear is simply not an option. Look at all of the freshwater they will now have to inject into this plant to try to cool the reactor. This while people in Africa, Asia and all over the world struggle with lack of access to the water and sanitation (as well as people in Japan because of this disaster!) they need to live. All for the almighty profit when there are already sources of energy we could be using that are not a threat to our water access.

      Nuclear is a fool's choice.

    • 1 year ago
  • queenofit
    • +1
      queenofit  
    • JanforGore:

      So true Jan, I read yesterday people in Japan are being told not to drink the water, yet given no viable option. Yet here they are dumping fresh water on the reactors as a last ditch effort to cool them. This is deja vu of the gulf oil crisis. I hope we learn something from this.

    • 1 year ago
  • Schnookums
    • +1
      Schnookums  
    • JanforGore:

      The irony is that the people of Africa wouldn't have such a problem with access to clean water if they had cheap, widely available electricity. I agree with your stance about nuclear, though. It isn't worth it. The hard hard reality is that the people of the world are going to have to get used to a world with less complexity, less mobility, a narrower variety of good and services to choose from, and less energy consumption.

    • 1 year ago
  • JanforGore
    • +2
      JanforGore  
    • Schnookums:

      Actually the other side to that coin is that Africa is experiencing drought, desertification, water evaporation and lack of potable water due to the socalled "cheap" energy we use here that is exacerbating biodistress and pollution in parts of the world whose footprint isn't even close to what we use here. Corporations continue to plunder these lands to satisfy our oil addiction, and that too uses and pollutes water they could use for themselves. And also in part from having their resources privitized by entities in business only to profit by deforesting land to use it to grow fuel instead of food. Solar energy is actually making a better headway in Africa than it is here despite this however. Go figure.

    • 1 year ago
  • JanforGore
  • ozoneocean
    • +1
      ozoneocean  
    • JanforGore:

      Solar energy is more popular in China too- anyone can set up their own panels and get free, reliable electricity that they themselves control.
      Coal, oil and nuclear are only "cheap" when you pretend all the other costs don't exist, it's like buying anything cheap really- the costs always add up much more expensive in the end.

    • 1 year ago
  • ArchDruid
  • queenofit
    • 0
      queenofit  
    • ArchDruid:

      I am glad they are finally getting water from healthy sources. I was listening to an interview on NPR who was speaking with individuals living in the area where the [water] ban was and the people NPR were speaking with told this information. There is so much information, dis-information, and uniformed right now, it is hard to discern the facts from fiction. One minute the levels are reported out the roof, one hour later it's taken back. I pray every day for the dear people of Japan who are living through this.

    • 1 year ago
  • ArchDruid
  • queenofit
    • 0
      queenofit  
    • ArchDruid:

      I don't watch tv, don't own one. (my choice) It is not called "tv programing" by accident, words do matter. I rely on news from various Internet sources and try to check facts, and never upon opinions. Even factual news sources are sending out news alerts that are one number and a few hours later the number changed, here is an example: (http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/27_24.html)

      Tokyo Electric Power Company has retracted its announcement that 10 million times the normal density of radioactive materials had been detected in water at the Number 2 reactor of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant.

      The utility says it will conduct another test of the leaked water at the reactor's turbine building.

      The company said on Sunday evening that the data for iodine-134 announced earlier in the day was actually for another substance that has a longer half-life.

      The plant operator said earlier on Sunday that 2.9 billion becquerels per cubic centimeter had been detected in the leaked water.

      It said although the initial figure was wrong, the water still has a high level of radioactivity of 1,000 millisieverts per hour.

      Sunday, March 27, 2011 22:02 +0900 (JST)

      -------------------------
      Me again, so even the most reliable of sources can be unreliable at times. As I stated, when I heard the water report, it was a NPR reporter on site at one of the emergency shelters in Japan, I don't know why I wouldn't believe that? But again, one minute we get one report and the next another. I feel for you guys, If I did not care, I would be watching a movie and not even reading or listening. bless you my friend.

    • 1 year ago
more from Tech:

top videos