Tech | April 07, 2011 | 25 comments

At Particle Lab, a Tantalizing Glimpse Has Physicists Holding Their Breaths

Image
EthicalVegan
At Particle Lab, a Tantalizing Glimpse Has Physicists Holding Their Breaths
By DENNIS OVERBYE
Published: April 5, 2011



Physicists at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory are planning to announce Wednesday that they have found a suspicious bump in their data that could be evidence of a new elementary particle or even, some say, a new force of nature.


The results, if they hold up, could be a spectacular last hurrah for Fermilab’s Tevatron, once the world’s most powerful particle accelerator and now slated to go dark forever in September or earlier, whenever Fermilab runs out of money to operate it.

“Nobody knows what this is,” said Christopher Hill, a theorist at Fermilab who was not part of the team. “If it is real, it would be the most significant discovery in physics in half a century.”

One possible explanation for this mysterious bump, scientists say, is that it is evidence of a new and unexpected version of the long-sought Higgs boson. This is a hypothetical elementary particle that, according to the reigning theory known as the Standard Model, is responsible for endowing other elementary particles with mass.

Another explanation might be that it is evidence of a new force of nature — in addition to gravity, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak nuclear forces we already know and are baffled by — that would manifest itself only at very short distances like those that rule inside the atomic nucleus.

Either could shake what has passed for conventional wisdom in physics for the last few decades. Or it could be there is something they do not understand about so-called regular physics.

Giovanni Punzi, the Fermilab physicist who is spokesman for the international team that did the work, said by e-mail that he and his colleagues were “strongly thrilled at the possibility, and cautious at the same time, because this would be so important that almost scares us — so we think of all possible alternative explanations.”

Physicists outside the Fermilab circle said they regarded the results, which have been widely discussed in physics circles for several months, with a mixture of awe and skepticism.

“If it holds up, it’s very big,” said Neal Weiner, a theoretical physicist at New York University. Lisa Randall, a theorist at Harvard, said the same thing: “It is definitely interesting, if real.”

But Nima Arkani-Hamed of the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, N.J., said he did not find the bump convincing, saying it could be an artifact of how the data was sliced and diced.

The important thing, he said, was that if this and other anomalies recently reported at the Tevatron are real, then the Large Hadron Collider, a rival machine run by CERN, “will see dramatic evidence in not too long — that’s certainly what I’m waiting for.”

The key phrase, everyone agrees, is “if it holds up.” The experimenters estimate that there is a less than a quarter of 1 percent chance their bump is a statistical fluctuation, making it what physicists call a three-sigma result, enough to attract attention but not enough to claim an actual discovery. Three-sigma bumps, as every physicist knows, can come and go.

The Tevatron has been colliding beams of protons and their opposites, antiprotons, that have been accelerated to energies of one trillion electron volts, for more than two decades looking for new forces and particles. The bump showed up in an analysis of some 10,000 of those collisions collected by the Collider Detector at Fermilab, one of two mammoth detectors at the facility, which is outside Chicago.

They found that in about 250 more cases than they expected, what came out of the collision were two jets of lightweight particles, like electrons, and a heavy-force-carrying particle called the W boson were produced. The team found that in about 250 times more cases than expected, the total energy of the jets clustered around a value of about 144 billion electron volts, as if they were the decay products of a hitherto unsuspected particle with that mass-energy. For comparison, a proton weighs about one billion electron volts.

This could not be the Standard Model Higgs, Dr. Punzi and his colleagues concluded, because the Higgs is predicted to decay into much heavier particles, namely quarks. Moreover, the rate at which these mystery particles were being produced was 300 times greater than Higgs bosons would be produced.

If real, it was something totally new, Dr. Punzi said. The result had recently been strengthened, he said, by new calculations of interactions between quarks, which are notoriously difficult to compute. “It is so new, so astonishing, we ourselves can barely believe it,” he said. “We decided we had to let the whole world know.”

Dr. Punzi and his colleagues have submitted a paper that was to be posted on a physics Web site Tuesday night and has been submitted to Physical Review Letters.

Joe Lykken, a Fermilab particle theorist, said Dr. Punzi’s group would have four times as much data in an analysis later this year. “This would be enough to claim a definitive major discovery,” he wrote in an e-mail, “just as the Tevatron — and perhaps Fermilab itself — is being shut down for budget savings.”
  1. groups:
    Community,   Tech,   Random,   Current Tonight,   14 more
  2. tags:
    Nature Physics CERN Large Hadron Collider 22 more
  3.     
    |

25 comments // At Particle Lab, a Tantalizing Glimpse Has Physicists Holding Their Breaths

  • EthicalVegan
    • 0
      EthicalVegan  
    • Image
    • http://www.cnn.com/2011/US/04/08/particle.physics.tevatron/index.html?hpt=T2

      CNN...

      Is It a New Particle, or Just a Fluke?

      By Elizabeth Landau, CNN
      April 8, 2011 2:36 p.m. EDT
      Click on picture to play video
      Discovery of 'new source of energy'?

      STORY HIGHLIGHTS

      Scientists say they may have found evidence of a particle never observed before
      This possible discovery happened at Tevatron at Fermilab in Illinois
      There's a 1 in 1,000 chance that it's just a fluke of statistics
      Tevatron is scheduled to be shut down at the end of September

      (CNN) -- In the search for answers to some of the most mysterious and fundamental questions about the the universe, Europe's $10 billion particle-smashing Large Hadron Collider has been hogging the spotlight in recent years.

      Suddenly, this week, physics enthusiasts' eyes turned to Tevatron, a much smaller and less powerful particle accelerator in Batavia, Illinois, that is scheduled to be shut down for good after September. And, depending on what happens with the budget crisis on Capitol Hill, it could be even sooner.

      At Tevatron, part of the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab), scientists said they may have found evidence of a particle never observed before. That would mean a brand new building-block of matter would be added to what physicists know about the universe.

      But the keyword is "may" -- there's a 1 in 1,000 chance that it's just a fluke of statistics. In the coming weeks and months, additional data from Tevatron's detectors and the Large Hadron Collider will probably deliver a more definitive answer about whether indeed a new particle has been discovered.

      "If it is true, then it's of course very important. But there's a big if," said Csaba Csaki, associate professor of physics at Cornell University, who was not involved in the experiment.

      What they're looking for

      Research at particle accelerators often addresses big questions that get at the very nature of existence: Why do we -- and everything around us -- have mass?

      One theory that has gained a lot of attention is that there is a particle called the Higgs boson that has this power of giving particles mass. For that reason it has been deemed the "God particle" in popular culture.

      The possible discovery at Tevatron is not a Higgs-like object, said Rob Roser, a scientist at Fermilab who works with Tevatron's CDF particle detector experiment, where the new data came from.

      But that doesn't rule out the potential new particle's involvement in explaining mass, experts said. Physicists Estia Eichten, Kenneth Lane, and Adam Martin said the Tevatron findings may be evidence of a "technicolor" theory involving a brand new force leading to mass. The forces we know about are gravity, electromagnetism and the strong and weak nuclear forces -- "technicolor" would add a fifth.

      That is just one explanation, though. More research needs to be done to see if this strange signal at Tevatron comes from a particle with such significance, Roser said.

      "It could just be a new particle. It doesn't have to be the end-all of what we know," he said.

      How this possible discovery happened

      How does Roser's group of some 500 scientists know what to look for? You'll need some funky technical concepts to proceed, so hold on tight:

      Tevatron smashes protons (positively-charged components of atoms) and anti-protons (negatively-charged components of anti-matter) into each other at massive energies, creating collisions that generate subatomic particles. Two detectors record what happens at these collisions, so that scientists can analyze the effects.

      The weirdness in the data announced this week has to do with things called W bosons and jets. W bosons carry the "weak force," involved in radioactive decay and nuclear fusion. Jets are sprays of other particles, and occur when a quark (another subatomic particle) emerges from a collision. Scientists looked at collision events that produced one W boson and two jets.

      Surprisingly, there was a "bump" in the data when they looked at the energies and momenta of these two jets in many instances. It appeared that a brand new particle must have produced them, based on its expected mass. But in order for the bump to be considered a discovery, the data must show no more than about a one in a million chance that it's a fluke. Current data show a 1 in 1,000 chance of being a statistical anomaly.

      Fermilab scientists also recently announced a possible discovery of something called "forward-backward top quark asymmetry." That doesn't sound as sexy as "new particle potentially discovered," but physicists are enthusiastic about it, too. These two observations could actually be related, Roser said.

      "I'm very excited because we rarely get any hint of possible new physics," Csaki said.

      The end of Tevatron, the rise of the Large Hadron Collider

      All of this could turn out to be a swan song for Tevatron, which is scheduled to have its last collisions in September. There were talks last year of extending its run until 2014, but that was turned down because of lack of funds. And there's no set budget for 2011, so the current crisis in Washington could result in a speedier shutdown, Roser said.

      Still, there's enough data from Tevatron to keep scientists at Fermilab busy for awhile after the accelerator has shut down. At least an additional year is needed to get the physics out of the data set, Roser said.

      "This result is not some sort of play to extend our running -- we're resigned to finishing our program properly," Roser said.

      Tevatron, built in the 1980s, has the ability to smash particles at energies up to 1 TeV. It was the world's highest-energy particle accelerator until the Large Hadron Collider, underground on the border between France and Switzerland, which began colliding beams in November 2009. Energies at the European machine have gotten up to 3.5 TeV, and will reach the designed goal of 7 TeV in 2014, according to the European Organization for Nuclear Research.

      Although the Large Hadron Collider is much more powerful than Tevatron, the U.S. accelerator has the advantage of many more years of data collection, Csaki said. Roser's team's results came from eight years of data, recording trillions of collisions. The European accelerator will be able to collect more data a lot faster, however.

      And that power offers hope for thousands of physicists whose theoretical work has yet to be validated.

      "There's a generation of physicists like me who grew up without any real new discoveries in particle physics," Csaki said. "We think that the things we have been waiting for for the last two decades likely would happen in the next year or two."

    • 1 year ago
  • EthicalVegan
  • UtopianSky
  • damush
  • MizPiz
  • EthicalVegan
  • dreamsenvoy
  • EthicalVegan
    • +4
      EthicalVegan  
    • Image
    • http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=fermilab-new-particle&WT.mc...

      Scientific American...

      U.S. Collider Offers Physicists a Glimpse of a Possible New Particle

      The soon-to-be-retired Tevatron collider has uncovered an unexplained signal that could be a previously unknown particle

      By John Matson | April 7, 2011

      Photo: Physicist Viviana Cavaliere of UIUC

      A HINT OF NEW PHYSICS? Viviana Cavaliere of the Tevatron's CDF collaboration explains her group's new result in a talk April 6 at Fermilab. Image: FNAL

      Physicists sifting through data generated by the Tevatron particle collider in Illinois have uncovered a signal that neither they nor the long-standing Standard Model of particle physics can explain.

      The international team of researchers work with data from CDF, one of the two Tevatron detectors where protons and their antimatter counterparts collide at nearly light speed. The wreckage of those high-energy collisions produces a variety of short-lived particles, which allows physicists a fleeting glimpse into the inner workings of the physical world. The Tevatron, at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, is the second-most powerful particle collider in the world after the Large Hadron Collider outside Geneva, Switzerland.

      Examining a very specific kind of outcome when protons and antiprotons collide inside the CDF detector, the researchers noticed an unexplained blip in their signal that could be explained by a previously undiscovered elementary particle—but not the Higgs boson, the hotly pursued particle that is theorized to imbue other particles with mass.

      The researchers reported their perplexing but unconfirmed new finding in a study posted online April 4 at the physics preprint Web site arXiv.org The researchers have also submitted their results for publication in Physical Review Letters.

      The CDF team found that the Tevatron was a bit more prolific than it should be in terms of collisions that yield a heavy elementary particle known as the W boson plus a pair of particulate jets. "What we see is that there a region between 120 and 160 GeV (giga-electron volts) where there is an excess," CDF physicist Viviana Cavaliere of the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign explained to a packed Fermilab auditorium April 6. (A giga-, or a billion, electron volts is a unit of particle mass or energy.)

      The result is compatible, Cavaliere said, with the collisions producing a W boson plus a hitherto unknown—and even heavier—particle with a mass of about 150 GeV. But that particle appears not to be the Higgs boson, which would be expected to emerge from the collisions alongside a W boson with far less frequency. If CDF has uncovered a new elementary particle, it would be the first such discovery since the tau neutrino was observed at Fermilab in 2000. But in the case of the tau physicists had predicted the particle's existence and had gone out looking for it.

      As theorists scramble to figure out just what CDF has found, experimentalists will be working to verify that the detector has found anything at all. The new analysis claims that the data disagree with existing theory to better than three standard deviations, or 3 sigma. Assuming the analysis is correct, that means that there is just a fraction of a 1 percent chance that the effect is a mere statistical glitch. But extraordinary claims demand stronger proof.

      "Five sigma is our gold standard," says Brookhaven National Laboratory physicist Sally Dawson, adding that the physics community has seen 3-sigma effects come and go. "If it's true, and if it holds up, it is of course very exciting, because it's completely unexpected," Dawson says. "If it persists, it's very hard to explain theoretically."

      "We will learn pretty soon whether it's true or not," says Fermilab theorist Bogdan Dobrescu, who did not contribute to the new study. "This is pretty credible at this stage." If the results hold up, theorists will need to figure out what kind of new particle could fit the bill. "It would be a major breakthrough, especially because this is a particle that no one really predicted to the best of my knowledge," Dobrescu says. "We can try to invent some new particles and see if they have the appropriate properties that we see, but none of the answers are very expected."

      The Tevatron, which is slated to shut down for good in the fall, is still collecting data that could strengthen the case for a new particle—or sink it. Cavaliere said that the new analysis began more than a year ago and does not include the latest data from CDF. The team already has already logged a good deal more collisions that await analysis, but Cavaliere cautioned that the expanded data set would not be enough to vault the discovery into the 5-sigma range.

      But the physics community will not have to wait long before the new particle gets a reality check. Physicists working with the other detector at the Tevatron, known as DZero, are now replicating the CDF analysis with their own voluminous data set, says Fermilab physicist and DZero co-spokesperson Dmitri Denisov. "We expect we will be able to clarify this topic on a timescale of a few weeks," he says.

    • 1 year ago
  • duzins
  • EthicalVegan
  • Jeremy_Benson
  • twinite
  • echelgreen
  • EthicalVegan
  • Jeremy_Benson
    • +2
      Jeremy_Benson  
    • echelgreen:

      Actually, these very reasons are why I somewhat doubt the existence of a Higgs boson. After all, it was made up to explain inconsistencies within the current model of physics... and those get turned over all the time. I believe we've actually established a new one or heavily modified an existing model three times in the twentieth century alone. I'm waiting more for the next Einstein or Bohr than I am for Higgs.

    • 1 year ago
  • echelgreen
    • +2
      echelgreen  
    • Jeremy_Benson:

      Right on. I think Nassim is on the right track on establishing a little theory of everything, not to be confused with a big theory of everything (ie. Thomas Campbell http://www.my-big-toe.com/)

      You should also check out the work of Ruggerro Santilli who pioneered the post quantum theory of hadronic mechanics. Pretty remarkable stuff. http://www.i-b-r.org/Hadronic-Mechanics.htm

      The next Einstein will come from way out on the fringe and these three before mentioned fellows with the inclusion of Ervin Laszlo, in my opinion, are offering some of the best out the box type thinking to date. http://ervinlaszlo.com/

      All of these physicists include consciousness in their models except for Nassim Haramein, because, well simply put, his is a little TOE instead of a big TOE and doesn't entirely neccesitate it as an assumption, but in no way does he deny the importance of consciousness with respect to the larger reality systems. He is speaking purely of the physical in his theory.

      There will always be something new to learn, always!

    • 1 year ago
  • echelgreen
  • Jeremy_Benson
    • 0
      Jeremy_Benson  
    • echelgreen:

      Ah, fantastic. I have heard of the little theory of everything, but the rest are new to me. Thanks for the reads!

      Edit: oh my, that second link is huge. Guess I don't need to go to the bookstore; that'll occupy me for a little while. ^_^

    • 1 year ago
  • Jeremy_Benson
    • 0
      Jeremy_Benson  
    • echelgreen:

      Sometimes people don't make sense. I'll never understand the thought processes of some of these posters. Though, what little sense there is in downing your comment aside, we still must consider that there may very well be a Higgs boson and should not -totally- discount it. How silly would we feel devoting all our efforts to making a new model only to find we were right all along, am I right? All options must be explored equally.

      That being said, I'm not exactly holding my breath for Higgs. Even my computer doesn't believe it exists - it underlines it with a read squiggly when I type it, haha.

    • 1 year ago
  • echelgreen
    • 0
      echelgreen  
    • Jeremy_Benson:

      Right on. Yea, I haven't fully ruled it out completely, and agree that all options should be explored equally, but their approach still has many flaws. Anyways, if your are interested in free, legitimate texts, I have books by everyone I had mentioned and another 500 or so books about consciousness, mathematics, metaphysics, and physics, all available for download on the torrent tracker demonoid.me. Send me a message if you are interested in checking it out and i'll send you an invite.

    • 1 year ago
  • iowawashington
  • EthicalVegan
  • xhuffpo
  • Jeremy_Benson
  • UtopianSky
    • 0
      UtopianSky  
    • xhuffpo:

      Yes!

      God is so happy that DADT was repealed, he decided to reveal more of the universe to us!

      Conclusive proof God Loves Gays!

      He should, since God once had a three-way with Zeus and Odin.
      Yeah, I know, they were young and drunk, and it was just an "experiment".

    • 1 year ago
more from Tech:

top videos