Michigan State Police Statement on Use of Cell Phone Data Extraction Devices
source: http://https://www.infosecisland.com/blogview/13248-MSP-Statement-on-Use-of-Cell-Phone-Data-...
-
-
- Paisano1
- added this
https://www.infosecisland.com/blogview/13248-MSP-Statement-on-Use-of-Cell-Phone-...
-
-
Paisano1
-
How Much Does Your Smartphone Know About You?
"I plugged my phone into my computer and opened an application called Lantern... Ten minutes later, I'm staring at everything my iPhone knows about me. About 14,000 text messages, 1,450 Facebook contacts, tens of thousands of locations pings, every website I've ever visited..."
https://www.infosecisland.com/blogview/13334-How-Much-Does-Your-Smartphone-Know-...
- 1 year ago
-
Paisano1
-
-
Paisano1
-
Warrantless Searches: Welcome To The Panopticon
"They have the ability to conduct warrantless searches per the courts since the loosening of the laws on search and seizure in places like California and Michigan where electronic media is concerned. The net effect is that our due process rights are being eroded in an ever rapid pace..."
https://www.infosecisland.com/blogview/13317-Warrantless-Searches-Welcome-To-The...
- 1 year ago
-
Paisano1
-
-
mickyjon420
-
Does anyone know the Anthem of the Nazi Party? I think it's about time we start learning it.
- 1 year ago
-
mickyjon420
-
-
Dagum
-
Does it seem kind of odd that the state police of the cash strapped state of Michigan apparently have significant enough resources and energy devoted to monitoring the internet that they can quickly identify and respond to a reference to them on a small blog posted on infosecisland.?
Unless InfosecIsland contacted the Michigan state police for comment, I would say that someone else is routinely monitoring InfosecIsland and tipped off the Michigan State police to do damage control. (D.H.S.)
- 1 year ago
-
Dagum
-
-
Paisano1
-
Dagum:
No one from Infosec Island contacted the MSP for comment. We just received a Twitter message from them this morning with a link to the statement.
Sounds to me like both sides are parsing their words. MSP may be "asking" motorists for consent to a search of their cell phones but not requiring it, and the ACLU may be trying to generate some heat on the issue by stating that the MSP is using the extraction devices routinely in traffic stops.
Of course, the key phrasing in the MSP statement is that "the MSP only uses the DEDs if a search warrant is obtained or if the person possessing the mobile device gives consent".
I am sure everyone is perfectly comfortable telling a police officer "no, you can not have my consent to search my [fill in the blank]" while undergoing a traffic stop. Right?
- 1 year ago
-
Paisano1
-
-
littlwarrior
-
"The MSP only uses the DEDs if a search warrant is obtained or if the person possessing the mobile device gives consent."
You know the thing about consent with the cops is, unless you fight scream kick and yell to stop them then you gave them consent. I remember the first time they decided to search my car, they just said step out of the vehicle we are going to search it, no questions no nothing. Just we are searching your car get out. Little did they know I was in the most foul of moods and jonesing for a scrap, I fought I kicked I screamed, I didn't win until my friends dad drove by, he is also my lawyer, pulled over chewed the polices ass and I drove away. Bastards. - 1 year ago
-
littlwarrior
-
-
extracrazykiwi2008
-
littlwarrior:
That could have really gone bad if your lawyer did not drive by. They would have maced you and locked you up overnight.
- 1 year ago
-
extracrazykiwi2008
-
-
littlwarrior
-
extracrazykiwi2008:
Then my lawyer would have had a real fit. His daughter is one of my bestest best buddies. But meh I have been maced before, long story, and it didn't hurt that bad, sure it hurt like hell but nothing I cant handle.
- 1 year ago
-
littlwarrior
