Tech | April 27, 2011 | 41 comments

Monsanto will soon be allowed to police itself on environmental tests of GMOs

Image
JanforGore
Monsanto, enemy of organic farmers and anti-GMO advocates alike, will likely be allowed to conduct its own environmental studies as part of a two-year USDA experiment. But there is no good that can possibly come of an experiment where the company behind nearly every genetically modified crop in our daily diets is allowed to decide whether its products are causing any environmental harm. And Monsanto isn't the only biotech company that will be permitted to police itself.

As it stands, the USDA is responsible for assessing environmental impacts of new GMO crops. The agency has been lax about this, to say the least. In 2005, the USDA gave Monsanto the go-ahead to unleash its sugar beets before preparing an Environmental Impact Statement. This decision triggered a judge to rule that Monsanto sugar beet seedlings should be ripped from the ground.

Because the USDA is so bad at doing its job on time, the agency decided to see if anyone else was prepared to do its EIS work instead. And so it looks like the USDA will at least temporarily hand over environmental impact responsibilities to the biotech companies behind GMO crops. The pilot program will allow these companies to conduct their own environmental assessments of crops or outsource the work to contractors.

The USDA won't actually admit that it's bad at performing its duties--instead, the agency claims that the move will make the environmental reporting process more timely, efficient, and cost-effective, according to the Federal Register (PDF). No knock on Monsanto, which is surely made up of great, honest people, but if the company has a vested interest in getting one of its crops deregulated, why wouldn't it try to fudge the numbers on an environmental review? And why wouldn't its hired contractors do the same? If this wasn't so dangerous, it would be funny.

cont.
  1. groups:
    Community,   Tech,   Green,   Current Tonight,   7 more
  2. tags:
    Culture Environment Health Corruption 13 more
  3. recommended by:
    Vierotchka
  4.     
    |

41 comments // Monsanto will soon be allowed to police itself on environmental tests of GMOs

  • TasteHi
    • 0
      TasteHi  
    • This is ridiculous, are political officials so completely deluded or jaded that they don't see it's standard practice for ANY corporation to find its way around the law?

      If the cost to make things happen legally outweighs the cost of making something otherwise illegal, legal in the eyes of the law, then that's the way it's done regardless of whom pays the price for that "legality".

      Pass the buck, seriously...

    • 1 year ago
  • COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
    • 0
      COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM  
    • This is another step in turning control of each of you, your lives and this country over to the corporate confederacy! This is another example of our employees, government, abdicating it's responsibilities to us. They are not earning their pay, and need to be replaced. How would you do this, when normal elections are not accomplishing it?

    • 1 year ago
  • TasteHi
  • kvb1
    • +1
      kvb1  
    • This is no different than the government allowing Big Pharma to submit whatever studies they have regarding the drugs they manufacture, while hiding any studies that show that their drug is no better than what is already on the market, or worse that it causes harm. Government has been infiltrated by corporations. It no longer even tries to protect the people, for whom government was formed. Everyone needs to understand that we live in a fascist society, and everyday it becomes more overt and less covert.

    • 1 year ago
  • TasteHi
    • 0
      TasteHi  
    • kvb1:

      yes this is so true. Health policies always dictate that a doctor should not perform a procedure to correct a problem if the resulting correction does more harm than good.

      However this is not something that's practiced when prescribing pharmaceuticals. It is an accepted practice to experiment with pharmaceutical outcomes per patient even when data states the possibility of a fatality with little to no probability of a desirable outcome.

      Clearly an unbalanced process of trial and error, and especially so for those taking psychotropic and heart disease related meds.

    • 1 year ago
  • sammykatz
    • +1
      sammykatz  
    • Given the incredibly warped state of our national and state politics, why not send in the foxes to "guard" the henhouse...This is like living in some alternate reality show and not being able to change the channel...

    • 1 year ago
  • EdJoyProductions
    • +1
      EdJoyProductions  
    • A two-year USDA experiment?! Good thing that the world is ending on May 27, 2011 or in 2012 or we would really be in trouble.

      Un-fucking-believable.

    • 1 year ago
  • dalistuff
  • Earl_Dixon
  • dalistuff
  • chief_longhair
    • 0
      chief_longhair  
    • someday maybe we will have legislators with balls enough to write and enforce laws to put some major control on corporations like monsanto that pose a huge impact on people world wide.. profits over people,,,, scooter3282 said it best

    • 1 year ago
  • cclark_productions
  • Leen61
  • scooter3282
    • +4
      scooter3282  
    • It is yet another piece of the puzzle in place for total industry domination of each and every one of our lives. Big Industry wants to keep the American people sick and dying, with no recourse but to live out our lives in a diminished state of well being. They control what we eat, what environmental hazards we deal with on a daily basis, the drugs we are forced to take to medicate ourselves and the health care they decide we deserve to keep ourselves alive once they have systematically destroyed our ability to live a normal life. "Welcome my son, welcome to the Machine" as Roger Waters said it so well over 30 years ago. They decide who lives and dies and when.

    • 1 year ago
  • EmileZ
    • +1
      EmileZ [removed]  
    • This calls to mind the environmental impact statements that offshore oil drillers were similarly tasked with preparing about their own operations.

      That was kind of confusing. I'll try it again.

      This policy of allowing companies to fabricate their own environmental impact studies is very troubling indeed. It calls to mind the similar studies done by offshore oil drilling companies in the Gulf of Mexico before the Deepwater Horizon blowout.

      Wait.. their required environmental impact statements were waived. I forgot.

      Can we seriously allow companies to police themselves???

      Well we have been, for quite a while. We appoint industry insiders on the FDA, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the EPA, the Federal Reserve, etc. etc.

      We're all DOOMED!!!!

      DOOMED!!!

      The people sitting on the boards of these companies and their CEOs are required to pursue short term profits above all else and to hell with everything and everyone else.

      And to hell is just where we are all going to go if we can't reform or replace the system!!!

    • 1 year ago
  • EmileZ
  • extracrazykiwi2008
  • August_K
    • +1
      August_K  
    • This is EXACTLY why we the people can't allow corporations to run what happens in Congress or any other dept of the government.
      They don't give a shit about anything but PROFITS and the CEO's won't live long enough to see how much death and destruction they caused a few decades down the road.....so they don't give a damn.
      It's all about short term profits for these greedy companies.

    • 1 year ago
  • Richard_Wyatt
  • August_K
    • +1
      August_K  
    • Richard_Wyatt:

      No kidding. Every time I open the fridge or grab some fruit I have to wonder if it's monster food.

      I recall years ago when a particular grocery chain started carrying organic produce and fruits
      they had a poster up about what was considered "organic".
      If it tested below a certain level for pesticides....they could "claim" it was organic.

      Unless we grow our own we can't really be sure.

    • 1 year ago
  • artemis6
    • +2
      artemis6  
    • Pure. Evil . You know what future they envision ? Patented human DNA . If you are born a humonsanto , No unauthorized breeding with the other corporation , ... until the merger , then obedience will be rewarded with adequate water rations and expanded allowable mobility programmed into you personal monitor device .... STOP BUYING THEIR FRANKENFOODS !

    • 1 year ago
  • CalgarC
    • +2
      CalgarC  
    • fuck the USDA fuck MONSATAN.... they will not survive this decade, no matter what they try.

      now i am gonna go eat my ORGANIC FAIRTRADE chocolate :D

    • 1 year ago
  • queenofit
    • +4
      queenofit  
    • The USDA must be aware of the huge movement of NON GMO citizenry who are demanding not only labeling of GMO food, but the eventual demise of it as well. But, they make a move to allow Monsanto "conduct its own environmental studies as part of a two-year USDA experiment"? The ONLY way this makes any sense, is the same people [USDA] who are making decisions such as this, are the same people [Monsanto] that will profit from this. I mean really? Also, Monsanto will never find any of their creations unsafe? Why even bother to do EIS, they won't be accurate.

      So, who is going to pay for the EIS? Let me guess.....(we will pay). This just makes me sick.

    • 1 year ago
  • hoosierdaddy
  • Vierotchka
  • letsliveinpeace
  • NiceN
    • +2
      NiceN  
    • Nice, lets have the makers of Napalm make sure that they give you something less that lethal.... NOT. What a joke the government has become, things will surely go to shit and the Earth might become sterile if Monsanto is allowed to function upon it's own accord.

    • 1 year ago
  • August_K
    • +2
      August_K  
    • Horrid. This is like asking the fox to guard the henhouse.
      WTF is the USDA thinking? Have they been bought off too like the GOP in Congress?

      Who can make a lot of noise on this? Any place we can sign petitions?

    • 1 year ago
  • JanforGore
  • artemis6
  • August_K
  • JanforGore
    • +2
      JanforGore  
    • August_K:

      We march on their headquarters in such a loud voice that the "media" in this country has no choice but to pay attention. And then, there are always acts of peaceful civil disobedience, like peacefully ripping their toxic crap out of the ground by hand. Either that, or find someone really rich willing to buy up enough stock to close them down.

    • 1 year ago
  • GeneSurber
  • letsliveinpeace
  • JanforGore
    • +10
      JanforGore  
    • This is indeed criminal and a blatant confession of the USDA's collusion to destroy our environment. And I wasn't kidding about protesting in St. Louis Missouri. DC doesn't get you anywhere. You have to go to them. It's either that, or pulling their crap out of the ground. I've had it.

    • 1 year ago
  • DeistofSurreal
  • artemis6
  • August_K
  • August_K
    • +2
      August_K  
    • artemis6:

      I prefer making them drink their own pesticides and then have them tell us in Two years how their fucking health is...if they're lucky enough to live that long!

    • 1 year ago
  • artemis6
  • JanforGore
more from Tech:

top videos