Tech | May 01, 2011 | 23 comments

NATO warned against strikes on Libya's Great Manmade River Project

Image
JanforGore
NATO-led air strikes on Libya could trigger a human and environmental disaster if they were to damage the country's massive Great Man-Made River (GMMR) project, which facilitates agricultural production in the middle of the Sahara Desert and provides drinking water for over 70% of the Libyan population.

The Great Man-Made River (GMMR) project – globally recognised as the largest water transport system in the world – is among the lesser-known projects undertaken by Muammar Gaddafi, who himself describes the undertaking as the eighth wonder of the world.

The Western world is virtually unaware that underneath the North African country's arid landscape lies a true ocean of high quality fresh water, discovered by chance in the 1950s as part of efforts to find oil in southern Libya.

The artificial river project was conceived in the 1960s and launched in 1984. Today, a total of 4,000 kilometres of pipelines of four metres in diameter have been laid at a depth of two to three metres, running across the country from south to north.

High-quality fossil water is being pumped from hundreds of wells hundreds of metres deep and transported from the south to populated coastal areas in the north, where most of the country's six million inhabitants live and work.

Farming in the desert

At a cost of over €23 billion, paid for with Libyan petrodollars, and owned by the Great Man-Made River Project Authority, the most expensive irrigation project in history is part of Gaddafi's plan to make Libya self-sufficient in food by irrigating remote agricultural areas in the Sahara Desert.

According to the European Commission, "over 70% of the water from this man-made river system is intended for agricultural purposes". 130,000 hectares of agricultural land are expected to derive from implementing the project, the EU executive added.

The underground ocean, called the Nubian Sandstone Aquifer System (NSAS), is the world's largest fossil water aquifer scheme to date. Libya shares it with three other African nations – Chad, Sudan and Egypt. According to the UN, at current extraction rates the NSAS is not likely to be depleted for a thousand years.

Late last year, Turkish and Libyan delegations met in Tripoli to discuss the possibility of allocating 60,000 hectares of agricultural land in Libya for Turkish investors to produce wheat and corn.

Emergency meeting

As NATO bombs continue to fall, an emergency meeting was held on Sunday (3 April) by the managing committee of the artificial river project to alert the world about the gravity of the potential consequences if the infrastructure is damaged, according to press sources.

At a press conference held in the project's ultra-modern control room in the southern suburbs of Tripoli, the project leader, Abdelmajid Gahoud warned against a "human and environmental disaster" if the infrastructure is affected by NATO air raids, AFP reported.

Gahoud told journalists that if any part of the infrastructure is damaged, the whole network will be affected and the flow of water that might escape would deprive 4.5 million Libyans of drinking water.

In a joint statement issued after the emergency meeting, the Libyan Secretariat of General People's Committee (Ministry) on Agriculture and the executive committee of the Great Man-Made River urged the UN and its specialised food and environmental agencies to demand that Western coalition forces stop aerial bombing in the regions of Brega, Ajdabia and Benghazi, in the north and east, where the artificial river system is installed, according to press sources.
  1. groups:
    Community,   Tech,   Green,   Culture,   3 more
  2. tags:
    Environment War Climate Change Water 8 more
  3.     
    |

23 comments // NATO warned against strikes on Libya's Great Manmade River Project

  • aj727b
    • +1
      aj727b  
    • I agree that this water project is greatly beneficial to the world, and will make money and food for Libya -- it should not be bombed. I also understand why many comments are critical of bombing in general -- peace IS better than war and we should work for peace. However, I do not agree with the suggestion by some that Qaddafi is anything other than a terrible burden to his people. Just because one disagrees with the NATO campaign in Libya does not require that one believe it to be an imperial conspiracy out of greed (even if some things actually are, this isn't one). The Arab League asked for intervention in this rare instance because it was, and is now, a huge problem. I don't think Obama has any interest in stealing Libya's water or oil or anything else, I think he would have loved to avoid this entirely.

    • 1 year ago
  • zeropiate
    • 0
      zeropiate  
    • Vast construction projects are dime-a-dozen among dictatorships (Aral Sea Irrigation Canal, Three Gorges Dam, etc). I am just wondering what they are compensating for. Anyway, there is probably no use in having NATO bomb it. If history is anything to go by, it will probably corrode, disintegrate, and collapse all on its own, due to shoddy construction, pervasive corruption, and just plain idiotic planning. Sound familiar? Let's hope not.

    • 1 year ago
  • artemis6
    • 0
      artemis6  
    • Ah , greed . now it is clear . The oil didn't quite make sense . If all the soldiers stopped fighting , it would be alright with me . We could , uh , share ?

    • 1 year ago
  • gump
    • +3
      gump  
    • Thank you Janforgore. I had no idea this existed. The water is worth more than all the oil. The project is similar to my impossible dream since childhood here in the low desert of arizona. I dreamed of transporting flood waters from the north and eastern US to the burning desert for life sustaining agricultural . The bush boys want it. I think nothing will stop them. Population reduction will drop this jewel into thier totalitarian hands. So I think I know what is ahead. I f I die today I will die screaming . After all the hell this world holds I expect the screaming in my head will never stop. They want everything everywhere.

    • 1 year ago
  • treewolf39
    • +2
      treewolf39  
    • This war is more than likely a cover for resource control; just like the other two. NATO is the USA's lap-dog. The corruption runs to the core.

    • 1 year ago
  • ozoneocean
    • +5
      ozoneocean  
    • These military fucktards don't really care what they destroy. You can bet that if they DO damage this project, they'll just blame it on Gaddaffi.

    • 1 year ago
  • JanforGore
  • Schnookums
  • JanforGore
    • +9
      JanforGore  
    • Schnookums:

      Bingo. Monsanto and their proteges are probably licking their chops right now. Just look at that 130,000 hectares with enough fossil water to last 1000 years. Just look at all of the farmers they could exploit and enslave with their terminator seeds.

    • 1 year ago
  • remanns
  • kennymotown
  • ThatCrazyLibertarian
  • JanforGore
    • +6
      JanforGore  
    • ThatCrazyLibertarian:

      It truly is, and I hope that opinion can be given without it being seen as a defense of Gaddafi. But on this he may be right. It may well be the eighth wonder of the world, especially a world affected by climate change, biodistress and water scarcity. And the fact that the government of Libya wants the country to be food self sufficient means no US imports, no World Bank, no IMF... That doesn't fly in the military industrial complex globalized world where any threat of any country being self sufficient ( especially in Africa) seems to be a red flag regardless of the leader.

    • 1 year ago
  • remanns
  • ozoneocean
  • Buddha2112
    • +3
      Buddha2112  
    • Its amazing what can be accomplished with some cohesive government (not saying dictators are the way to go, but at least its a streamlined system)

      We need to learn from this and start working together, so we don't have to wait for dictators to get shit done, like this for example, or the autobahn (though that's not really as helpful)

    • 1 year ago
  • JanforGore
  • artemis6
  • JanforGore
    • +5
      JanforGore  
    • And this then does put NATO is a rough geopolitical predicament. They could use this to threaten Gaddafi and ply him into leaving and this just might work because this is what he considers his crowning achievement for "his people"... but then, bombing it if he again declines would cause an environmental/ humanitarian crisis against the Libyan people of untold proportions and also ruin it for the "victor" who would most certainly take this as their spoils.

      So my question is, would you condone bombing this water system if it guaranteed he would leave, even if it caused a humanitarian crisis?

      Just how far are we prepared to go?

    • 1 year ago
  • ozoneocean
    • 0
      ozoneocean  
    • JanforGore:

      How far? NO WHERE, that's how far.
      This shouldn't have been done in Afghanistan, it shouldn't have been done in Iraq and it should not be done in Libya.

      Quite apart from the risk of destroying projects like this, simple ordinary human lives are being lost. Far more lives than if the Western countries hadn't have started military intervention.

    • 1 year ago
  • artemis6
  • JanforGore
  • Dagum
more from Tech:

top videos