Tech | June 13, 2011 | 94 comments

Fukishima "Melt-Throughs" Could Render Japan "Unlivable"

Image
squarethecircle
We have had misinformation from the institutions in charge of this incident since the beginning. Perhaps it is time to gather the truth and let the people decide how to proceed from where we have been led.
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Tech,   Green,   8 more
  2. tags:
  3.     
    |

94 comments // Fukishima "Melt-Throughs" Could Render Japan "Unlivable"

  • Clevelandchick
  • coolplanet
    • 0
      coolplanet  
    • If this were true then places like Utah and Nevada would have been unlivable for the past 60 years due to radioactive fallout thousands of times worse than Fukishima.

    • 12 months ago
  • Clevelandchick
  • coolplanet
    • -1
      coolplanet  
    • Clevelandchick:

      I agree that Fukishima is horrible. I live very near Three Mile Island and it brings back terrible fears. But I have taken the time to extensively research both sides of nuclear energy and what I see is endless misinformation and ignorance of radiation and nuclear energy.
      For instance, did you know that coal ash from power plants contains more radioactivity spewed into the air than radioactive waste from nuclear reactors? (Scientific American 2011)
      Many leading scientists and environmentalists such as James Lovelock and Jim Hansen argue that atmospheric carbon is a far bigger threat to all life on Earth than is radioactive waste.
      We must be careful not to be like the global warming deniers and believe in lies.

    • 12 months ago
  • sue4e3
    • 0
      sue4e3  
    • coolplanet:

      Before I decide that I have to step out of reading this stuff .It's very stressfull . I under stand the idea that you have to keep paying attention to stop future issue.In reality wether I stress out or not I can't do anything about it.Here's what I want to know was bomb testing and,actual bombings . a thousand times worse than this.because if I understood what I just read a few minutes ago molten core of building 1 is believed to be on the ground . it's mid week,I am tired and I may have misunderstood.

    • 12 months ago
  • squarethecircle
  • sue4e3
  • EmileZ
  • ArchDruid
  • EmileZ
    • 0
      EmileZ [removed]  
    • ArchDruid:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MJhdYtowMs

      Well they don't seem to store more than 200 comments and since I comment on a wide variety of issues it may not be easy to find one, but I had no trouble quickly and easily finding this video I posted and you made a meaningless comment about, but this is silly.

      If you are craving EmileZ comments you need look no further than this very page, post or whatever you call it.

      Why be a stupid jerk???

    • 12 months ago
  • EmileZ
  • EmileZ
  • ArchDruid
  • squarethecircle
    • +1
      squarethecircle  
    • EmileZ:

      We all agree and are interested in the truth. Understand there is no point in fighting between like minds. If you truelly care for the well being of people and Earth why do you argue with others that care too?

    • 12 months ago
  • EmileZ
  • ArchDruid
  • squarethecircle
  • Jake_Leonard
    • +1
      Jake_Leonard  
    • EmileZ:

      I simply believe that ArchDruid is posting a lot and is inadvertently "dominating the discussion," solely because it hits him hard, and it heavily interests him. That's where true journalism and reporting comes from--when people are passionate about something. Personally, I'm glad somebody is paying attention.

    • 12 months ago
  • ArchDruid
  • squarethecircle
  • ArchDruid
  • Clevelandchick
  • Clevelandchick
  • squarethecircle
  • Fishinflick
    • 0
      Fishinflick  
    • I just don't know how many more disasters will have to happen before the whole industry will be abandoned for less costly and heavily subsidized forms of energy. There is no safe solution to storing spent rods. Will the world learn from this disaster or will it end like the BP holocaust, with no oversight and more offshore permits?

    • 12 months ago
  • EmileZ
    • 0
      EmileZ [removed]  
    • You write so much and say so little ArchDruid. I will repeat my reply so as it does not get lost in your long winded..whatever it is.

      It is not about you ArchDruid.

      (or your narrative)

      Get it through your magical mystical head sir.

    • 12 months ago
  • ArchDruid
  • EmileZ
  • ArchDruid
  • squarethecircle
    • 0
      squarethecircle  
    • EmileZ:

      You made it about him by questioning his identity and intent. It is understandable to be angry about this but direct your ire in a beneficial way or lose it. We who care about people and planet are on the same side.

    • 12 months ago
  • squarethecircle
  • EmileZ
    • +1
      EmileZ [removed]  
    • squarethecircle:

      I dunno, maybe he will shape up, but "direct your ire or lose it" and all the rest, you may be kidding yourself I dunno.

      I will question whoever the fuck I want to!!!!

      And they (and you) can react as they (and you) please.

      However much you and he may want it to be it is not really about his yours or my identity (but I plussed all my comments and minused all yours because I think you two are being really stupid).

      I am honestly concerned with what is actually happening for real believe it or not.

    • 12 months ago
  • ArchDruid
  • EmileZ
    • 0
      EmileZ [removed]  
    • ArchDruid:

      I am not going to read you last post. You just made it right?? Just Now???

      At last???

      Maybe later but I doubt it. I have had enough of you for today.

      I think you had your chance to redeem yourself and failed already.

      Why don't you listen to my posts???

      I think you should write poetry about the horrible disaster.

      I am TELLING you that you should do this (against my better judgement)

      It is for your own good.

      I will still demand the FREEDOM to question the...whatever of my imaginary version of your special earthquake poetry and write remarks which may make you incensed.

    • 12 months ago
  • ArchDruid
  • EmileZ
  • EmileZ
    • 0
      EmileZ [removed]  
    • ArchDruid:

      You:
      Because during the first 10 days, 750,000 terabecquerels of radiation were released and now there have been total melt downs I don't think we'll see that kind of level again.

      I believe all the bad stuff happened in the first ten days, although it could change if there was another earthquake and or tsunami, or something happened to the spent fuel storage pools.

      9 hours ago flag reply -1 EmileZ

      ME:
      Just because you belive all the "bad stuff" happened in the first ten days, doesn't mean there won't be a whole heckuvallot of "bad stuff" to come including a whole lot of sickness and death.

      Is there no such thing as radiation exposure after ten days time???

      "and now there have been total meltdowns" wasn't that a while ago, but only recently acknowledged???

      Do you have any concern whatsoever for anything other than reassuring everyone that all is well in Japan???

      Do you think if you say "750,00 terabecquerels" it means you have any sort of scientific credibility???

      Why are you so eager???

      Are you a real person???

      That was the exchange (it is there below) I stand by everything I said
      Are you even in Japan???

    • 12 months ago
  • EmileZ
  • EmileZ
  • EmileZ
  • Johnny_Los_Angeles
  • nikonwilly
    • +2
      nikonwilly  
    • With all the very safe forms of renewable energy and man decides to pursue the nasty ,dirty ,dangerous instead. When intelligence allows corrupt greed to rule and destroy, why surprise..with the outcome ?

    • 12 months ago
  • squarethecircle
  • EmileZ
    • 0
      EmileZ [removed]  
    • You people have been listening to (tolerating?) ArchDruid and his professions of concern for the earthquake victims always coupled with eternal reassurances about the safety of the nuclear situation in Japan (whatever the developments or new disclosures may be) and his declarations that he is indeed only an impartial truthseeker in all matters related to the meltdowns.

      Enough is enough!!!

      I call malarky on you ArchDruid.

      Whatever his motivations may be, you are not performing anyone any favors by mindlessly accepting this characters declarations as some sort of credible source. I urge you to look further.

    • 12 months ago
  • squarethecircle
    • +1
      squarethecircle  
    • EmileZ:

      If a gay Syrian can be a 40 year old man in England I guess we can not be certain who is who. I am a 40 year old man in SW FL with 4 kids trying to find some truth about what is going on and how to be prepared for the reality of our situation. Is it time to find a cave again?
      ArchDruid has offered numerous links to many angles of the truth on this catastrophe. Perhaps his reticence relevant to the severity of Fukishima is due more to a desire for hope rather than fear for everything Japanese. There is a careful, considering progression from ArchDruid that is not overreactionary but offers genuine thoughts on how to address this screwed up mess. I don't know for sure, but I feel you are incorrect.

      After saying that, I do think that, much like a well in the Gulf leaking day after day, the irradiation of Japan continues to build up as long as containment is still lost. With each passing minute the levels of radiation must be further saturating the Earth. The worst could not have passed...even if it was contained...we are going to have to live with the radiation for a very long time

    • 12 months ago
  • EmileZ
    • 0
      EmileZ [removed]  
    • squarethecircle:

      "Perhaps his reticence relevant to the severity of Fukishima is due more to a desire for hope rather than fear for everything Japanese".

      You sound like a really nice guy, but if there is any meaning to that sentence, it seems to me like it is related more to psychoanalysis than to what is going on with the Japanese nuclear reactors.

    • 12 months ago
  • squarethecircle
  • ArchDruid
  • EmileZ
  • EmileZ
    • +1
      EmileZ [removed]  
    • ArchDruid:

      "But there is no more danger today than during the first ten days when all the damaged happened."

      That is either deliberately misleading or outright baloney depending on how you are interpreting it.

      You have continued to make such statements for quite some time now (mixed in with your heartfelt and unimpeachable expressions of sympathy for the victims of the quake often framed as urgent updates).

    • 12 months ago
  • EmileZ
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • 0
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • ArchDruid:

      David, everyone has their own go-to sources for information. For me, it's the LATimes first.

      As much as I respect your first-hand experience and apparent science background, if you held an opinion or said something different than what the LATimes reported, I would believe the LATimes first, but would compare both opinions/articles looking for where the contradictions were and then checking those out with other sources.

      Just sayin'...you know I love you, darlin'...

    • 12 months ago
  • PoliticalAmazon
    • 0
      PoliticalAmazon  
    • Image
    • EmileZ:

      EmileZ, I vibe with what you're saying, and I don't give more weight to one article over another just because of where the author is living, but let me just say this:

      There can be more than one source for "truth," and the "truth" for each may be different.

      It's very hard to be completely objective when emotions are involved. Everyone with a brain has emotions about the threat from Fukushma.

      David is a foreigner living in Japan now, and he has stated he loves Japan and its people. As you can imagine, he is heartsick over what has happened, probably much, much more than many of the rest of us.

      So David is going to have some first-hand, foreigner-on-the-street insight, as well as insight from local news sources (that those of us not living in Japan won't have), as well as other news sources, of course. However, it is true that the Japanese government appears to have allowed Tepco to lead it around by the shorthairs for decades, and Japan--and perhaps the rest of the world--will pay the price for it.

      I cannot be any more sure that the information coming from some of the news sources in Japan is any more reliable (as far as what is being allowed to be printed re Fukushima and other problems following the earthquake/tsunami) than it was right after it happened.

      But then I don't feel I can be sure that what my own government allows to be published is true, either.

      David didn't do anything to deserve having to pay that price, nor did the vast majority of Japan's people, I would guess. So this has to be a bitter thing to live through.

      Just sayin....

    • 12 months ago
  • ArchDruid
  • EmileZ
  • EmileZ
  • squarethecircle
    • -2
      squarethecircle  
    • HAARP was active and broadcasting on the same frequency as the earthquake for a week. In addition the USS Reagan was escorting our mobile HAARP when the earthquake struck so close to Japan there was concern about how irradiated the aircraft carrier got when it passed through the radiation plume from Fukishima.

    • 12 months ago
  • CaptSutter
    • +1
      CaptSutter  
    • It is more important that we start thinking like humans again. First and foremost the Japanese need our help and our understanding.

      Humanity needs to start thinking strategically about its survival, and that means: We are all in the same boats and we need to work together.

      Atomic Power always was a dead-end, too damned expensive and only profitable to the "After me the deluge" crowd.

      Now we have the cost and we need to pay it. end period full stop.

      And then we need to move forward and ignore the idiots who still want to make money off of the misery of our children and grandchildren. After me the Deluge is a winning strategy for the individual and a disaster for the community.

    • 12 months ago
  • oldbanjo
    • +2
      oldbanjo  
    • I hope someone is looking into relocating the population of the Island of Japan if it becomes necessary. I think it will be necessary and should have already started. Everyone is lying to the people of Japan, they will lie to us when this happens in the US.

    • 12 months ago
  • Stiv
    • -1
      Stiv  
    • Remember when we used to resent the Japanese for kicking our asses economically? How did they ever get to this stage? It's very reminiscent of the collapse of the Soviet Union.

    • 12 months ago
  • NiceN
  • hombre76
    • +2
      hombre76  
    • the first woes of man predicted by edward casey in psycic explorations of the future of mankind and end times was that this was the time when the first woe would come to pass. he said that Japan would suffer a great burning of the flesh and that it would leave the islands barren and uninhabitable. and now it has come to pass. If your interested in knowing more about america's greatest psycic google Edward casey predictions or visit the on line archive of his writing preserved by his foundation.

    • 12 months ago
  • squarethecircle
  • attilatheblond
  • squarethecircle
  • hombre76
  • attilatheblond
  • attilatheblond
  • EthicalVegan
  • squarethecircle
  • ArchDruid
  • squarethecircle
  • EmileZ
    • 0
      EmileZ [removed]  
    • ArchDruid:

      "but there is no more danger than..."

      Perhaps... perhaps not. How can you be so sure?

      Over time, the leaks and exposure spread and over time it gets absorbed by more and more life forms in increasing quantities.

      Take care man. Take a few deep breaths.

    • 12 months ago
  • ArchDruid
  • EmileZ
    • 0
      EmileZ [removed]  
    • ArchDruid:

      Just because you belive all the "bad stuff" happened in the first ten days, doesn't mean there won't be a whole heckuvallot of "bad stuff" to come including a whole lot of sickness and death.

      Is there no such thing as radiation exposure after ten days time???

      "and now there have been total meltdowns" wasn't that a while ago, but only recently acknowledged???

      Do you have any concern whatsoever for anything other than reassuring everyone that all is well in Japan???

      Do you think if you say "750,00 terabecquerels" it means you have any sort of scientific credibility???

      Why are you so eager???

      Are you a real person???

      Are you even in Japan???

    • 12 months ago
  • Buckeye_Bill
    • +2
      Buckeye_Bill  
    • EmileZ:

      All valid questions.

      Care to respond, ArchDruid? What are your credentials?

      Just inquiring. One never really knows who we communicate with on these intertube sites. A person could be a 13 year old kid copying and pasting or a smelly 50 year old living in a basement somewhere. Or, they could have enough sheepskin diplomas to wallpaper a kitchen!

      Anonymity is prevalent. Cave emptor is the rule.

      But hey, what do I know? I'm just an average, ordinary, north of middle age guy.

    • 12 months ago
  • sue4e3
    • 0
      sue4e3  
    • EmileZ:

      No it is much better to dwell on death and destruction that you can not change.So wether any of us like it or not this is what happened and we need to find a way to deal with it .people are going to get cancer and maybe die but since none of us know ,who ,what ,when ,or where .it is best to deal with today.In hopes of mitigating issues tomorrow. Based on other nuclear tests and accidents this one will:
      render a swath of japan unlivable
      depending on who you ask just noticable to very obvious spike in cancer in Japan
      possible birth defects in Japan
      depending on who you ask negligible up to 30% spike in cancer on the west coast
      there are a few who believe the end is near (there always is)
      these are the probable effects that go with the release of 750,000 terabecquerel of radiation.
      on a personal note shame on you if you were in Japan you would want to look for the hope too

    • 12 months ago
  • attilatheblond
    • 0
      attilatheblond  
    • sue4e3:

      Can't change what has happened, true dat. But dwelling on it does have a purpose. How are we to force change if we do not 'dwell' on the catastrophes and the lies of industry which brought them to us? How will we force the issue of real, sustainable, SAFE energy technologies if we don't expose the decades of lies and wishful thinking of the older ones?

      When told to stop 'dwelling' on an issue, my curiosity really peaks. What is there to find out that some wish remains hidden?

    • 12 months ago
  • EmileZ
  • EmileZ
  • sue4e3
  • sue4e3
    • 0
      sue4e3  
    • EmileZ:

      I do have children and i am defending there hope .as a parent if the whole world fell down around our feet we ,have to keep standing as long as they are alive .I wish there was no nuclear ,no radiation , and no global warming .For my children is where my fear lies. I can't give that to them but i can keep standing even in the face of something very scary

    • 12 months ago
  • sue4e3
  • EmileZ
  • EmileZ
    • +1
      EmileZ [removed]  
    • sue4e3:

      Very little of what I have heard is in sync with his posts. There is a lot of good stuff on Democracy Now. Actually their coverage is among the best I have found.

      ArchDruids posts seem more in sync with what the Japanese government or the NRC are continually forced to admit.

    • 12 months ago
  • sue4e3
    • +1
      sue4e3  
    • EmileZ:

      I went to democracynow.org and read all they had to offer on fukushima and nothing I read contradicted anything arch druid posted .There is some extra speculation on what could happen ,but as far as what has actually happened to date the info is the same. and just for the sake of info main stream media is reporting far less amounts of radiation being released than arch druid has stated .to find those numbers I had to go digging and I i did and they are legit.

    • 12 months ago
  • EmileZ
    • 0
      EmileZ [removed]  
    • sue4e3:

      I don't think you are being entirely honest, but whatever.

      It looks to me like things are pretty bad for the Japanese and for others as well.

      What I have been hearing from ArchDruid is not to worry, perhaps it is just his bogus interpretation.,but there it is, day after day after day after day after day. Everything is OK it is not as bad as they say. Am I wrong????

      You can say 1 or 10 or 100 but if you are interpreting the data in a misleading way you are LYING!!!!!! And people will get sick.

    • 12 months ago
  • sue4e3
    • 0
      sue4e3  
    • EmileZ:

      http://did.an

      people are going to get sick .everyone knows that . I am being honest with you. What I took from arch druids post is that this bad (not the end of the world).That the concentration of sickness and possible death begins in fukushima and lessens the further you go out.
      here is what is well documented for sure
      25 years ago 5000 miles away from the east coast U.S chernobyl blew the entire contents of it core into the atmoshere. Allowing radioactive particles to travel easily . I am 36. I live in N.J and I was 11 years old when this happened .There was no internet to post fall out numbers on. we knew they found radiation in milk on the east coast (that was in the news)
      I know even less about nuclear bomb tests.I know there was several test done on open land in the 50's, and 60's.I also know testing continued up to and through the 90s
      I am still here cancer free,along with most people I know
      with numbers we have now fukushima has put out about 60% of what chernobyl did and most of that was not blown into the atmosphere .I know there was some explosions that is why I said most .it is about 6000 miles from the west coast U.S

      it is my opinion when I say that I believe fukushima seems worse because if it released all of the radiation it had the capacity to release it would out strip any accident we have had to date(a collapse of building or pool ,an explosion dropping or blowing radioactive material in the open ) .I also believe that there is fear that we would be lied to if that happened . I don't believe it has because almost all non government readings still coincide with government ones.Trust me I am digging. I reitterate that this last paragragh is only what I believe the rest is pretty well gone over material

    • 12 months ago
  • Buckeye_Bill
    • 0
      Buckeye_Bill  
    • sue4e3:

      I prefer to know what a person is posting is legitimate information based on knowledge obtained by study and experience.

      What's wrong with that?

      Ggggggs, Louise. Just because it's read on the intertubes doesn't mean it's the gospel.

    • 12 months ago
  • ArchDruid
  • sue4e3
  • sue4e3
  • squarethecircle
more from Tech:

top videos