Officials Monitoring Rising Floodwaters at Nebraska Nuclear Plants
source: http://www.cnn.com/2011/US/06/23/nebraska.flooding/index.html?hpt=hp_c1
-
-
- EthicalVegan
- added this
http://www.cnn.com/2011/US/06/23/nebraska.flooding/index.html?hpt=hp_c1
Officials monitoring rising floodwaters at Nebraska nuclear plants
By the CNN Wire Staff
June 23, 2011 2:06 p.m. EDT
The Cooper Nuclear Station in Nebraska is under an "unusual event declaration" because of floodwaters nearby.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
Critical gear at two Nebraska power plants has been protected from flooding, the NRC says
Some of the grounds at the Fort Calhoun plant, shut down since April, are under water
Utility sets up "rumor control" page to battle false reports of flood damage
Photo: The Cooper Nuclear Station in Nebraska is under an "unusual event declaration" because of floodwaters nearby.
(CNN) -- U.S. nuclear regulators say two Nebraska nuclear power plants have protected critical equipment from the rising waters of the Missouri River even though flooding has reached the grounds of one of them.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is confident those safeguards will prevent a disaster at either plant even though the Missouri is expected to remain flooded for several weeks, NRC spokesman Victor Dricks said Thursday.
The Fort Calhoun plant, about 20 miles north of Omaha, was shut down for refueling in April. Parts of the grounds are already under two feet of water as the swollen Missouri overflows its banks. But the Omaha Public Power District, which owns the plant, has built flood walls around the reactor, transformers and the plant's electrical switchyard, the NRC said.
"They've surrounded all the vital equipment with berms," Dricks said.
Dricks said the NRC has sent additional inspectors to Fort Calhoun, which declared an "unusual event" -- the lowest level of alert -- on June 6 due to rising water. Six inspectors are now monitoring conditions there around the clock, Dricks said.
The Cooper Nuclear Station, about 80 miles south of Omaha, remains operating at full power. The plant issued an unusual event declaration on Sunday as water levels rose, but the current level is two feet below the plant's elevation, Dricks said.
The NRC will dispatch additional inspectors to the plant "if conditions warrant," Dricks said.
Heavy rainfall in Montana and North Dakota, combined with melting snow from the Rocky Mountains, have sent the Missouri urging downstream this summer. The river washed over and punched through levees in nearby northwestern Missouri over the weekend, spurring authorities to urge about 250 nearby residents to leave their homes.
The 6 to 12 inches of rainfall in the upper Missouri basin in the past few weeks is nearly a normal year's worth, and runoff from the mountain snowpack is 140% of normal, according to weather forecasters.
And CNN affiliate KETV reported Wednesday that, as a precautionary move, the Cooper facility is keeping dozens of staff members onsite around the clock. The station reported that about 60 people are sleeping on cots at the plant and that the staffers are being rotated out every two days.
It was catastrophic flooding from Japan's March 11 tsunami that knocked out cooling systems at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, resulting in three reactors melting down and producing the worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl. This year's Midwestern flooding has also led to a spate of rumors about the Fort Calhoun plant that Omaha Public Power and the NRC have been trying to knock down.
The utility has set up a "flood rumor control" page to reassure the public that there has been no release of radioactivity from the plant. An electrical fire June 7 did knock out cooling to its spent fuel storage pool for about 90 minutes, but the coolant water did not reach a boiling point before backup pumps went into service, it said.
"People are getting scared by a lot of the misinformation," Dricks said. "It's primarily coming from Internet bloggers rather than the mainstream media. None of them have bothered to check with us."
CNN's Matt Smith contributed to this report.
-
- tags:
- Nebraska, Radioactivity, Nuclear Power Plants, NRC, 9 more
-
-
wolfess
-
I looked at it from my seat on the airplane flying out of O on wdn -- sure looks flooded from the air ...
- 11 months ago
-
wolfess
-
-
Leen61
-
This is another area I wouldn't want to be living near. The MSM never mentioned this was going on. Rachel mentioned it the other night. She said she will keep tabs on this story. This could be our Fukushima. And now we just had a big earthquake in Alaska. What next?
- 11 months ago
-
Leen61
-
-
wolfess
-
Leen61:
This is another area I wouldn't want to be living near.
Can we move to Wisconsin??? This is exactly where I live -- in between the 2 nuke plants > we're stuck between a rock and a hard place :-). But hey, with all the rain my lawn looks great ... s'pose it'll glow in the dark after the meltdown :-)????
- 11 months ago
-
wolfess
-
-
Leen61
-
wolfess:
Sure, you can move to WI, wolfess. You live between the 2 nuke plants? Bummer. Take care.
- 11 months ago
-
Leen61
-
-
oldbanjo
-
If the Main Stream Media had said some thing about these Plants earlier it would have helped.
- 11 months ago
-
oldbanjo
-
-
ArchDruid [removed]
- This comment was removed by its owner.
-
ArchDruid [removed]
-
-
oldbanjo
-
ArchDruid:
Japan put out info that no one believed, now they are putting out correct/better info. Russia lied to everyone.
- 11 months ago
-
oldbanjo
-
-
ArchDruid [removed]
-
oldbanjo: This comment was removed by its owner.
-
ArchDruid [removed]
-
-
oldbanjo
-
ArchDruid:
Your right, when they started spraying water on these Plants I couldn't understand why no one ever mentioned that they were contaminating the ground water. Then when they got readings in the sea water they said that they didn't know where it was coming from. I didn't just get off a turnip truck, when they started spraying water on these Plants they were washing contamination off the walls, piping and everything that had gotten contaminated into the ground water.
- 11 months ago
-
oldbanjo
-
-
PoliticalAmazon
-
ArchDruid:
Yeah, but, on the other hand, some of the stuff claimed to be "disinformation" turned out to be true, and TEPCO turned out to be liars. We have the same problem with our own government in the U.S.
A question... My understanding about dry-cask storage is that the rods are cooled by air. But that would conflict with how they describe the situation with Fort Calhoun's dry-cask storage.
Any help you can provide in shining some light on this question would be very much appreciated.
------------------------
[http://iowaindependent.com/57751/nrc-spokesman-no-need-for-nebraska-spent-nuclea...]
"A Nuclear Regulatory Commission spokesman told The Iowa Independent Friday that dry cask storage of spent nuclear fuel rods at two Nebraska facilities are not being protected from flood waters because the situation poses no public or environmental threat.
Victor Dricks, an NRC Region 4 spokesman, said by phone Friday afternoon that the regulatory agency continues to closely monitor conditions along the Missouri River where floodwaters are rising at the Cooper and Fort Calhoun nuclear power stations. Flooding, brought on by heavy rainfall and snow melts in northern states, is expected to continue for several weeks.
The Cooper facility, which is owned and operated by Nebraska Public Power District, continues to operate at full power. Fort Calhoun, owned by Omaha Public Power District, was shut down for refueling on April 7. Although workers have finished refueling, the facility will be kept offline until the flood waters recede.
Following an earlier report published by The Iowa Independent about flooding at the nuclear facilities, questions were raised about the placement of dry cask storage of spent nuclear fuel rods with some questioning if the facilities storing these rods were within flood protection barriers.
“They are not within the flood protection barrier,” Dricks said. “There’s no reason for them to be. Those are large, sealed canisters that are bolted down — no risk with the floodwaters.”
Spent fuel rods are first cooled in a spent fuel pool for a year before being placed in dry cask storage. The fuel is surrounded by inert gas inside a large container, typically steel cylinders that are either welded or bolted closed. That container is then surrounded by another protective layer — typically steel or concrete — as a further radiation shield. Additional technical information on the process of dry storage can be found in a December 2010 report by the U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board (PDF).....
-----------------------
- 11 months ago
-
PoliticalAmazon
