Comment: The Clean Water Act: A legacy worth saving
source: http://water-is-life.blogspot.com/2011/07/comment-clean-water-act-legacy-worth.html
-
-
- JanforGore
- added this
And at that time in history, those lessons were more important than ever to be learned. Just three years prior in July of 1969, the Cuyahoga River in Ohio became so contaminated with industrial waste and pollution that it literally caught on fire. Rivers from the Hudson to the Potomac to the Mississippi were little more than open sewers with untreated waste and industrial byproducts being dumped with little regulation. Public health alerts and fishkills were commonplace. Rivers burning, pictures of raw sewerage flowing in rivers, oil fires and fish floating dead in rivers was more than enough for the public to demand action and accountability for what had been done to our waterways by an out of control corporate assault for profit. Of course, the polluters fought against any type of regulation of their crimes against nature citing as usual that it would be financially cumbersome to act responsibly. But on October 18, 1972, the voices of the people were heard with the passage of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, commonly known as the Clean Water Act. The main goal of this act was to ensure to "restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of our nation's waterways" and to make them cleaner by 1985. Other provisions were subsequently added to assure that once these goals were met that they would be adequately maintained.
Almost forty years after its passage there is much to be proud of regarding this act. It has been a success. Billions have been saved in dollars and in destruction and pollution to our waterways. More than one billion pounds per year of toxic pollutants have been removed from waterways. Point source pollution has been greatly reduced and the Cuyahoga is cleaner and actually making a profit. Of course, there are still great obstacles as we see this same irresponsible corporate mentality seeking to turn back the clock, but on the whole the Clean Water Act has been the one piece of legislation that has withstood the test of time... until now. The lifeblood of our country is now once again under attack by those in our Congress more beholding to the corporate entities that support them than the people they should be supporting.
A bill, H.B. 2018 also known as the "Clean Water Cooperative Federalism Act of 2011," would null and void decades of progress that have made our waterways cleaner and safer. The bill supported both by Rep Nick Rahall and Rep. Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia(coal country) seeks to undo two key provisions of the Clean Water Act that would undermine the EPA's ability to hold states accountable for water quality standards. In other words, corporate entities (coal companies) holding sway over state governments would be the final arbiter on water standards even if evidence proves that doing so would be a threat to human and aquatic health. Again, even if evidence proves that doing so would be a threat to human and aquatic health. How unconscienable. How irresponsible. How morally bereft.
To see this total apathy towards the source of all life and the disrespect for all who have sacrificed so much to ensure a cleaner planet is reprehensible. And I admit that now forty years after I first learned of the Clean Water Act passing at the age of 13 after being scared for the future I am again and this time moreso as this important issue has not gotten the media coverage now that it did then. This is why the Internet and social media are so crucial in getting this type of information out to the public. Our media has been co opted by these same corporate entities seeking to escape culpability for their crimes against nature just to save a buck even at the expense of our health and that of our children.
So are you incensed yet? Do you want to do someting to let them know that you will not go back to rivers in flames and rivers and streams from coast to coast flowing with industrial and human waste, coal excrement, nuclear waste and anything else those who buy policy in DC deem too expensive to take responsibility for? We need the same loud voices that we heard in the 1970s. We need that urgency. We need that caring. Those voices, the voices of our young selves that stood in the streets crying for environmental justice must now be heard again. Those who perceive themselves as masters of our fate must be sent a message that it is we who are the masters of our fate. Our children deserve better than that. They deserve clean water! Please , speak out for our rivers. Our lifeblood. The soul of America. Remember Cuyahoga and say, never again!
Thank you.
-
- groups:
- Community, Tech, Green, Earth and Science, 10 more
-
- tags:
- Environment, Congress, Earth, Pollution, 10 more
-
-
percipi224
-
thank you jan, i just posted via alternet the actions being taken by the U.N. handing over 100 billion dollars in money to the IMF to control water. They claim it is to keep it clean etc. but Sourcewatch.org and the Sierra Club say otherwise. Water is a huge issue here in colorado and there is a constant battle over water from locals and outsiders. I remember at 14 in 72 realizing in a flash of insight we are heating the planet up. I told my mother and she said it was a good thing as we would have more trees. I knew better, it didn't make sense. I had an art teacher who was into "ecology", remember, that is what they called it then? And made us aware of these issues. Tree hugger since day one!
- 1 year ago
-
percipi224
-
-
JanforGore
-
percipi224:
Handing money to the IMF can only mean one thing: privatization. The battle for our water has begun. And yes, I remember it well. I took "ecology" in high school and college and belonged to an ecology group when I was in grade school. We did neighborhood cleanups and tried to raise awareness. And I too spoke to my mom about solar power and how we could do so much with it, even clean water with it. Honestly didn't think forty years later we would still be waiting.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
wynnmeg61
-
The water act and the clean air act have worked so well that few remember when we had to chew our air and our rivers were on fire. I would hate to have to go back there, unfortunately it looks like that is just were we are headed.
- 1 year ago
-
wynnmeg61
-
-
JanforGore
-
wynnmeg61:
That's why we have to fight it. I can't believe we could do it in the 70s but we give up all hope now. If that is the case, we deserve what we get.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
jackshin
-
"corporate entities (coal companies) holding sway over state governments would be the final arbiter on water standards", like this isn't already happening, but your right, without these federal mandates, there would be no legal way to pursue polluters on the federal level. Gutting the Clean Water Act would be like legally given the states the final authority on civil rights.
Pollution, however, rolls down stream, affecting the nation without bias. States need to really consider how much Canada has to pay to keep their borders clean with the US. Without the federal government, just like Canada, states would be helpless, forced to use their taxes to clean up another state's pollution. IMHO, gutting a federal mandates like the Clean Water act, is taking away a state's right as much as it takes away a citizen's right.
- 1 year ago
-
jackshin
-
-
JanforGore
-
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_R-FZsysQNw
The more things change...
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
artemis6
-
JanforGore:
I remember that as a kid , it rang so true .... thanks for posting ...
- 1 year ago
-
artemis6
-
-
EvilDoer
-
JanforGore:
I remember seeing that many times. Not sure if that was the one that made me aware, but I've always been aware of the environment. There was so much more awareness in the 70's.
- 1 year ago
-
EvilDoer
-
-
JanforGore
-
EvilDoer:
Yes, people did seem to care more and you saw more out in the streets. Perhaps that is one drawback of technology. People too comfortable behind their modems.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
artemis6:
You're welcome. We need ads like this now, and ads for renewable energy. Sick of only seeing ads for oil, natural gas and pharmaceuticals.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
artemis6
-
JanforGore:
Well , we could use THIS add , only , no one in the MSM would air it !
- 1 year ago
-
artemis6
-
-
hurleyburly
-
Tree Hugger and Proud....."Save the whales and kill the seals..let them know how it feels". just substitute seals with anyone wanting to undo the clean air act.
- 1 year ago
-
hurleyburly
-
-
Vic_Romano
-
Because we can't live on vodka and sludge.
- 1 year ago
-
Vic_Romano
-
-
JanforGore
-
I'm also sending this to Reps Rahall and Moore-Capito. NO going back.
- 1 year ago
-
JanforGore