UPDATE: House Vote Rejects Repeal of Light Bulb Efficiency Standards
source: http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/112/house/1/563
-
-
- Swisher
- added this
The House is expected to vote as early as Monday night on a measure to repeal efficiency standards for light bulbs that are scheduled to take effect at the beginning of next year.
5:55 p.m. | Updated The vote is now anticipated on Tuesday.
Click here to see vote results: http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/112/house/1/563
The Republican-sponsored repeal bill, H.R. 2417, would undo part of a 2007 energy bill that passed with broad Republican support and was signed into law by former President George W. Bush. The primary author of the light bulb provision in the 2007 law was Representative Fred Upton, Republican of Michigan, now the chairman of the Energy and Commerce committee and the scourge of the Environmental Protection Agency.
Mr. Upton reversed his position on light bulb efficiency late last year while campaigning for the chairmanship of the powerful Energy and Commerce committee. The bulb standard, which does not ban incandescent bulbs but requires them to be more energy-efficient, was opposed by Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and other conservatives as an assault on personal choice.
Mr. Upton said that his support for the original measure had been misinterpreted.
“It was never my goal for Washington to decide what type of light bulbs Americans should use,” he said in a statement. “The public response on this issue is a clear signal that markets – not governments – should be driving technological advancements. I will join my colleagues to vote yes on a bill to protect consumer choice and guard against federal overreach.”
The sponsor of the measure to repeal the bulb law, Representative Joe Barton, Republican of Texas, argues that the new incandescent bulbs, as well as compact fluorescent bulbs and light-emitting diodes, will be far more expensive than traditional bulbs. “We don’t think the federal government should tell people what kind of lighting to use in their homes,” he said on Fox News last month.
The repeal measure will be brought up under a House rule that requires a two-thirds vote for passage, and it is far from clear that enough Democrats will join a near-unanimous Republican caucus to ensure its passage. But even if the House approves the measure, its prospects in the Democratic-run Senate are dim.
Steven Chu, the secretary of energy, said that consumer choice would be preserved and households would see considerable savings in their electric bills when the new bulbs are fully in use.
“These standards do not ban incandescent bulbs,” Mr. Chu said in a conference call with reporters on Friday. He said the new bulbs look like current bulbs, turn on instantly and can be used with dimmers, unlike some compact fluorescents.
“The only difference is they will help American consumers save more money,” he said.
The Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental advocacy group, said that the average American family’s energy costs would be reduced by 7 percent or about $85 a year when the new light bulb standards are fully in place.
In a study released last week, the group said that replacing inefficient old bulbs with new units would eliminate the need for 33 large power plants, lowering electricity costs and harmful pollution.
“Clearly, consumers, the economy and the environment will suffer if these standards are repealed,” said Jim Presswood, the group’s federal energy director. “It also will send the wrong signal to the lighting industry, which has already started making better bulbs.”
One manufacturer of LED lighting systems vigorously defended the new bulb standards, saying they would help create jobs, lower electricity costs and keep the United States competitive with other nations.
“Improvements in energy efficiency can reduce the need for investment in energy infrastructure, cut fuel costs, increase competitiveness, improve consumer welfare, and significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions,” said Jim Haworth, chief executive of Lighting Science Group, a Florida based manufacturer.
“Lighting is the low-hanging fruit in reducing energy consumption: it accounts for 19% of the world’s energy use,” he added. “There are 4.4 billion traditional light sockets in the United States alone offering a rapid and practical path for billions of dollars in energy savings through the installation of more efficient lighting.”
-
-
Mark701
-
“We don’t think the federal government should tell people what kind of lighting to use in their homes,” he said on Fox News last month." -Joe Barton
Only the goddamn GOP could come up with a such lame excuse for a non-issue. I mean really are these guys for real?
First the bill doesn't prevent either the manufacture or use of incandescent bulbs. It requires manufacturers to make them more efficient and consequently less costly to operate. Yeah, the public just hates saving money. I figure the real reason for the objection is that light bulb manufacturers (who contribute to GOP campaigns) don't want to change their product or manufacturing process because it will cost them money.
- 11 months ago
-
Mark701
-
-
JohnA
-
Mark701:
If they are cheaper and more efficient, the free market will demand them. If you build a better mousetrap, people will buy your product. It is called capitalism. No government mandate is required. But what am I saying, there are no capitalists on Current!
- 11 months ago
-
JohnA
-
-
Mark701
-
JohnA:
I agree, sort of, with your first sentence. But they have to improve and manufacture them first, which they will never do unless forced to. I mean lets face it, it's a lot easier and cheaper to maintain the status quo, not change anything, and rake in the profits. But there are times when the status quo must change for everyone's good. The auto industry fought seat belts because it would be cheaper not to place them in cars. So the government had to step in and force them to design cars with them.
Capitalism, like any economic system, always works on paper, However in real life, it fails horribly in a number of ways as do all economic theories. Not because it's not a good idea but because people can be lazy, greedy and corrupt.
- 11 months ago
-
Mark701
-
-
JohnA
-
Mark701:
People can be lazy, greedy, and corrupt. Just look a Washington is you don't believe that. But I believe in the inherent good in people and there is more of that. You don't have to force people to recycle, just explain it to them and they will do it. My parents do it, people everywhere do it. The government fought for seat belts because the people understood and wanted them, so the car companies would have had to put them in anyway, because the people wanted them. You don't give the people nearly enough credit I think. But then again, they voted for Bush twice and Obama once, so you may have a point.
- 11 months ago
-
JohnA
-
-
milojacks
-
NPR, Planned Parenthood, Voter ID, Light bulbs? - These are the priorities they are placing on the house voting schedule.
No jobs bills and playing extortion on the debt ceiling while filibustering everything they can (even their own bills). They have openly stated that their #1 priority is to hurt Obama's presidency, and they're willing to damage the American people to do it. - 11 months ago
-
milojacks
-
-
BrushwithDeathToothpaste
-
I think this Fox News forum post says it all.
"In the winter time all that "inefficiency" is ***100%*** used to heat the house. What's wrong with that?.. and the bulbs are nicer on the eyes too.. and the government is telling us we aren't smart enough to understand this?"
Read more: http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2011/07/12/house-turns-out-lights-bulb-ban#ixz...
- 11 months ago
-
BrushwithDeathToothpaste
-
-
Swisher
-
See how the idiots voted - mostly along party lines...
http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/112/house/1/563 - 11 months ago
-
Swisher
-
-
northernexpat
-
Light bulbs? They are concerned with light bulbs? This congress thinks that this is more important they creating jobs and saving the economy. What a waste of time. And you wonder why the government can never get any environmental issues passed. The whole idea with the changes to the light bulbs was to make them more energy efficient and save money. Oh I forgot, the GOP don't believe in the importance of science, it interfers with their religious dogma.
- 11 months ago
-
northernexpat
-
-
Saladin
-
This tea-party shit is out of control.
Republicans don't even care if something is a good idea anymore, if it conflicts with their dogma, it must go.
- 11 months ago
-
Saladin
-
-
cherry5000
-
I prefer the energy saving bulbs.
- 11 months ago
-
cherry5000
-
-
nashkildare
-
Debt ceiling is about to fall and the house is talking about light bulbs? I'm bad ass cause the light bulbs in my mouth are energy efficent. Isn't that right, Michael. Four sentences and I'm done talking about light bulbs. Fix the ceiling!!
- 11 months ago
-
nashkildare
-
-
Day0
-

-
“Clearly, consumers, the economy and the environment will suffer if these standards are repealed,” said Jim Presswood, the group’s federal energy director. “It also will send the wrong signal to the lighting industry, which has already started making better bulbs.”
While this statement is correct in the short term, most users of CFL bulbs aren't bright enough to go through the proper recycling channels and the bulbs wind up in land fills. From there the mercury winds up in the ground water and we end up with another mess that takes years to clean up, if it ever gets done. Until people adopt the exclusive use of LED bulbs, this debate will continue.
Go LED and make a real dent in your electric bill and the pocket of the polluters who sell the electricity. I'm purchasing the LEDs suggested by SandyBerman as soon as they are available (http://switchlightbulbs.com/).
- 11 months ago
-
Day0
-
-
andyjb45
-
How long do you think the lobbyist whore had to spend on his or her knees in that alley to get Mr Fred (dim bulb) Upton to change his mind?
- 11 months ago
-
andyjb45
-
-
JanforGore
-
Well gee, if they believe people should be able to have a choice in the kind of lightbulbs they buy, shouldn't we also then have the same kind of choice at the PUMP and not be consigned to what some polluting OIL COMPANY tells us we have to put in our tanks? I don't see them caring about that infringement on our freedom. What Hypocrisy on the part of these oil whores in Congress. Take away the light bulbs, but damn it you better leave my oil subsidies alone!
- 11 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
JanforGore:
Hey oil shill who keeps voting me down... stop being a coward and show yourself.
- 11 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
nobsartist
-
JanforGore:
Break up EXXON like Stanard Oil was broken up 100 years ago. Oh, I forgot, EXXON was created by our favorite parkinsons patient, bill clinton.
- 11 months ago
-
nobsartist
-
-
SandyBerman
-
SandyBerman: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
SandyBerman
-
-
northernexpat
-
SandyBerman:
The same idiot that votes down every single environmental issue. Whoever they are they certainly have a hard on for JanforGore. It pisses me off because while we're having a great conversation they down vote every single comment. I wish they would get a life. By the way I'm looking forward to the LED lightbulbs for my home. My headlights on my vehicle are LED and living in the Arctic, where for six months its mainly dark, they are fantastic. I've never had such a clear view driving in the dark before. Thanks for the heads up on them. See what happens if you force industry to improve their products?
- 11 months ago
-
northernexpat
-
-
David_H [removed]
-
northernexpat: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
David_H [removed]
-
-
northernexpat
-
David_H:
Hi Dave, I'm doing pretty well. We are having extremely hot weather. It got to 33 degrees celcius today, yesterday it was 31 and we are expecting to have this heat wave until at least Friday. Because of the dry hot weather we have a lot of fires up here threatening different communities. How about yourself? Has your weather improved any?
My LED lights came with my vehicle - a 2008 Acadia. I think that the newer vehicles are using the LED lights because of the clarity. I've seen them advertised on TV, so you should be able to go to say NAPA or the parts department of your dealership to get them. Just make sure if you install them yourself that your line them up correctly so you don't blind someone with them because they very bright.
As far as voting on comments, it's not so much the fact that someone votes you up or down that bothers me, but that there is someone that comes on here that will vote down every single comment dealing with the environment. I don't know if they have a problem with us talking about the environment or have it in for JanforGore, since it seems to happen all the time on any article she posts. But if they have nothing to add to the conversation except to vote everyone down that is there problem not ours.
Hope you have a nice evening and a better tomorrow if I don't find you on another thread tonight.
- 11 months ago
-
northernexpat
-
-
David_H [removed]
-
northernexpat: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
David_H [removed]
-
-
northernexpat
-
David_H:
Your right. I just look it up on the sticker that came with the vehicle. I had attached it to my bill of sale. It says they are High Intensity Discharge (HID) Headlamps. I could have sworn that the dealer told me they were LED. But that was a couple of years ago and maybe he meant they were like LED. They certainly have a longer, clearer range than regular headlights. I love them because my night vision isn't as good as it used to be.
- 11 months ago
-
northernexpat
-
-
David_H [removed]
-
northernexpat: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
David_H [removed]
-
-
northernexpat
-
David_H:
I know what you mean. I used to have to pull over and clean the headlight lenses on my old van because they were so cloudy that the least amount of dirt made them dim. I see now you can get len polish than can clear up the cloudyness. I wish they had that a couple of years ago.
All my emergency lights and the flashlights that I use in my house are LED now. What a difference to candles or lanterns. I am looking forward to LED lightbulbs. I just hope that they are easier to dispose of when they do quit working.
- 11 months ago
-
northernexpat
-
-
David_H [removed]
-
northernexpat: This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
David_H [removed]
-
-
northernexpat
-
David_H:
Thanks Dave, you've been a fount of information tonight.
- 11 months ago
-
northernexpat
-
-
GRC54
-
And once again the lights flicker in Washington as some idiots in congress need to see the light and make the electric companies richer. This is the only reason for such a stupid bill, besides wasting time and energy for some serious bills to be passed in congress.
So far none have come out of that deranged body so far. - 11 months ago
-
GRC54
-
-
hurleyburly
-
Yet another 1 in a long line of jobs bills I presume. Why don't they just pray the CFL away. As soon as I saw Joe Barton (TX rep..who apologized to BP) was cheerleading this..I thought finally a serious republican about getting down to creating jobs....heehawhaw.
- 11 months ago
-
hurleyburly
-
-
SandyBerman
- This comment was removed as a violation of community guidelines.
-
SandyBerman
-
-
COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
-
SandyBerman:
Well, I feel compelled to write the senators just to encourage them to stick to their convictions. They seem too easily swayed by too much today.
- 11 months ago
-
COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
-
-
Fishinflick
-
Dim bulbs for dim bulbs... go ahead morons, pay more for your electricity bill.
- 11 months ago
-
Fishinflick
-
-
lazloman
-
So, they were for it before they were against it. Whatever. I've been using energy efficient bulbs for some years now and haven't looked back, I couldn't care less about this. The rethuglicans passed this bill a couple of years ago, so what epiphany caused them to back track? Why wasn't personal choice an issue back then? Why is it an excuse now? Sounds like some hard working lobbyists to me.
- 11 months ago
-
lazloman
-
-
Steamed_N_More
-
Who knows! Maybe we'll get back to oil lamps on every table!
- 11 months ago
-
Steamed_N_More
-
-
June_Brooker
-
Leave the purchase of which light bulb we buy up to the American People. We want the freedom to choose.
- 11 months ago
-
June_Brooker
-
-
Paratus
-
Well at least I have a good supply of the old bulbs we bought when that stupid light bulb bill was signed. Another example of where he gov. should not go.
- 11 months ago
-
Paratus
-
-
Swisher
-
Paratus:
Right, what happened to my leaded gasoline and my leaded paint? Gov. shouldn't take away my right to kill the world...is that the American way?
- 11 months ago
-
Swisher
-
-
AJILIVIZION
-

-
Paratus:
We get it. You believe that people and business ought to regulate themselves. Because nothing says business will hold itself accountable than politicians that have been bought off, pushing to allow corporations to create products that would harm customers and the environment. Superb logic.
- 11 months ago
-
AJILIVIZION
-
-
Paratus
-
Swisher:
Let's see, not changing light bulb types will kill the world. Sorry, that's a leap I can't make and I doubt if you can substantiate. We had some but the quantity and quality of light makes them a non starter not to mention the problems they cause if they break or you need to trash them. I have no problem with using more energy efficient bulbs, I will put my home and it's construction against anyones, but the ones that were being forced on us by the gov. is not a solution.
- 11 months ago
-
Paratus
-
-
Paratus
-
AJILIVIZION:
Read your second sentence five times. What are you trying to say?
If you think the government is so all fired concerned about our safety and better health you may want to look at the FDA and the Dept of Agriculture. - 11 months ago
-
Paratus
-
-
nobsartist
-
Paratus:
It figures that chimpy would pass a bill that forces us to use mercury laden lightbulbs.
I will bet that the republiCONs blame this on obama also. - 11 months ago
-
nobsartist
-
-
AJILIVIZION
-
Paratus:
I'm trying to say that corporations have bought off politicians that lie to the American people about why we need to deregulate the businesses. I'm trying to say that tragedy after tragedy, corporations continue to avoid responsibility. I'm trying to say you need to come up with a better idea than allowing corporations to run wild and unregulated. I am saying that the people you trust as a source of information are telling you what you think you want to hear in order to persuade you to defend the people sponsoring their operations. Got it?
- 11 months ago
-
AJILIVIZION
-
-
stew54
-
Paratus:
you go ahead waste your money i changed every bulb in my house years ago to save money not because of some bill passed by the goverment and by the way climate change is real just because idiot republicans deny it. lies are lies and the truth is truth
- 11 months ago
-
stew54
-
-
cmc101
-
Paratus:
the repugs are trying to privatize those departments into Conagra
- 11 months ago
-
cmc101
-
-
cmc101
-
AJILIVIZION:
you are so right this fight has been going on since the Molly Browns in England rebelled
in the 1700's - 11 months ago
-
cmc101
-
-
Mark701
-
Paratus:
Yeah, more efficient bulbs = energy cost savings. Americans HATE saving money.
- 11 months ago
-
Mark701
-
-
Mark701
-
Swisher:
Hey don't forget chlorofluorocarbons and DDT! Screw the eagles let us live under a hole in the ozone if we want to!!
- 11 months ago
-
Mark701
-
-
Mark701
-
Paratus:
The government isn't FORCING anything on you. You can still buy and use Chinese manufactured incandescent bulbs to your hearts content. The bill requires manufacturers of incandescent bulbs to make them more efficient which saves energy and money.
- 11 months ago
-
Mark701
-
-
nobsartist
-
This sounds like a "JOB KILLING BILL". I thought the republiCONs were "job creators". I guess, since none have ever actually had a job, it is hard to distinguish what a "job" is.
- 11 months ago
-
nobsartist
-
-
Paratus
-
nobsartist:
Na dude you have it all wrong. Who do you think pays all the taxes besides us independents with two jobs.
- 11 months ago
-
Paratus
-
-
cmc101
-
nobsartist:
Two thumbs up
- 11 months ago
-
cmc101
-
-
nobsartist
-
This moron is an embarrasment to the stae of michigan but not to our asshole governor. Here is another moron that signed something without reading it. How do morons like this loser and the WHORE bachmann mange to get positions of authority while being so stupid? As far as being the scourge of the EPA, I am beginning to wonder what spineless loser is in charge of the EPA and allows this crap to happens.
By the way, the biggest contributor to greenhouse gases is the COW. How come the EPA doesnt do something about the amount of flatulence produced by cows? Why are cows not rquired to have some sort of emissions device like the "catalytic converter"?
I am going to have a hamburger.
God told me that I am hungry now.
He also told me to run for Congress but I cannot deal with hanging with such a large number of assholes in one place.
- 11 months ago
-
nobsartist
-
-
cmc101
-
nobsartist:
Did you grow your own?
it might have cellulose and animal products as filler such as worm meal and Rat clippings that fell in. if you pray to the right god it might become real T bone - 11 months ago
-
cmc101
-
-
letsliveinpeace
-
Good post!
- 11 months ago
-
letsliveinpeace
-
-
chew_chew
-
"The Republican-sponsored repeal bill, H.R. 2417, would undo part of a 2007 energy bill that passed with broad Republican support and was signed into law by former President George W. Bush."
With all that is going on in our country and the world, THIS is what the Republicans find *important* enough to bring to a vote?
Really?
- 11 months ago
-
chew_chew
-
-
xhuffpo
-
....."opposed by Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and other conservatives as an assault on personal choice..........The public response on this issue "
These two partial quotes define the republicans. It isn't what is good for the country, it is what is good for a tiny minority of people that listen to right wing lamestreem media, to borrow a phrase, want there minions in congress to do. - 11 months ago
-
xhuffpo
-
-
sharin
-
what? they've run out of bills sponsored by Democrats to attack and so are now eating their own?
- 11 months ago
-
sharin
-
-
cmc101
-
sharin:
what the Repug wanted yesterday and the dems like it now they must repeal
- 11 months ago
-
cmc101
-
-
kvb1
-
I have been changing my bulbs over for years, first to fluorescent, and now to LED. The LED are getting much better and the color saturation is much better now. Plus, I do not have to deal with the heat from incandescents. I have yet to have an LED burn out.
- 11 months ago
-
kvb1
-
-
Imzadi
-
What this article failed to point out is the "radio right" are getting all weewee'd up over this saying it is infringing on our rights and their rabid followers are lapping it up like there is no tomorrow.
You'd think they were being told they would have to spend the rest of their lives in the literal dark (not to be confused with their current condition of being idealogically and intellectually in the dark.)
- 11 months ago
-
Imzadi
-
-
Swisher
-

-
This is the mentality we're dealing with.
- 11 months ago
-
Swisher
-
-
Swisher
-
Should the public have the choice? If so, our future is doomed. Once again, I smell the efforts of lobbying here...
- 11 months ago
-
Swisher
-
-
cmc101
-
Swisher:
Lonesome Beck states the bad climate is judgement from God because the world is coming to an end and the tea party is goP answer for salvation..
- 11 months ago
-
cmc101
