Tech | July 16, 2011 | 30 comments

Arctic ice at record low: NSIDC director Serreze: 'ice free summer by 2030/downward spiral'

Image
JanforGore
We’re at a record low Arctic sea ice extent and volume:

The area of the Arctic ocean at least 15% covered in ice is … lower than the previous record low set in 2007 – according to satellite monitoring by the US National Snow and Ice Data Centre (NSIDC) in Boulder, Colorado. In addition, new data from the University of Washington Polar Science Centre, shows that the thickness of Arctic ice this year is also the lowest on record.

In the past 10 days, the Arctic ocean has been losing as much as 150,000 square kilometres of sea a day, said Mark Serreze, director of the NSIDC.

“The extent [of the ice cover] is going down, but it is also thinning. So a weather pattern that formerly would melt some ice, now gets rid of much more. There will be ups and downs, but we are on track to see an ice-free summer by 2030. It is an overall downward spiral.“

The trend is painfully obvious to all who aren’t blinded by ideology. Indeed, many, including me, believe we’ll see virtually ice-free summers within a decade.

What do the experts — and deniers — predict for the September sea ice extent minimum? The Study of Environmental Arctic Change (SEARCH) has released its second Sea Ice Outlook report for July. Just about all the cryo-scientists think the Arctic will easily beat last year’s minimum:

More at the link
  1. groups:
    Community,   Tech,   Green,   Earth and Science,   6 more
  2. tags:
    Environment Climate Change Earth Agriculture 16 more
  3.     
    |

30 comments // Arctic ice at record low: NSIDC director Serreze: 'ice free summer by 2030/downward spiral'

  • EmperorThan
  • IceKat
  • Wetdog
    • +2
      Wetdog  
    • IceKat:

      The use of coal and petroleum is destroying the air, the water and the land. Coal and petroleum both come from strip mines now. The environmental damage from oil spills in waterways and acid leaching from mines is too great to calculate. It doesn't take a genius or graphs to look at the air major in cities and SEE the damage to the air.

      Your constant blather about mundane trivia related to climate science is boring and pointless. Your "business as usual" advocacy in light of the immense damage happening as a daily occurrence due entirely to man made disasters is just too stupid for words. Even my dogs have the sense to get off of the railroad tracks when a train is approaching and it blows its whistle.

      My dogs are smarter than you are.

    • 1 year ago
  • IceKat
  • Wetdog
  • warman1138
    • 0
      warman1138  
    • Wow...the last estimate I read about said 2050 and now it's 2030, that sucks.What's almost as bad are all the corporate interests that want to take advantage of ice free polar areas.

    • 1 year ago
  • Richard_Wyatt
  • hurleyburly
  • Johnny_Los_Angeles
  • JanforGore
    • +1
      JanforGore  
    • Johnny_Los_Angeles:

      The indigenous people of this planet aren't doing it. The children dying of malnutrition in Somalia/Kenya aren't doing it. They don't deserve to die for our gluttony. But just out of curiosity, do you include yourself or those you love in that wish?

    • 1 year ago
  • squarethecircle
  • Gravity_Man
  • JanforGore
  • Gravity_Man
  • squarethecircle
  • southrabbit
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • southrabbit:

      People need to see the reality of what it is doing and hear the stories of those living it. They will get that chance.

      http://current.com/technology/93336588_24-hours-of-reality.htm

      And I agree about the education. We need climate scientists to come out and tell people about the connection. Al Gore did it very well, but again, he was then only used as the political whipping boy of haters who cared more about maligning him as usual to detract from the message. So, people will now have to see what all of their political backbiting and hatred has brought us all.

    • 1 year ago
  • squarethecircle
    • -1
      squarethecircle  
    • Living in FL I have been looking for a raise in water level and there has been very little change if any. Where is it all going? Perhaps through the energy transfer device under Antarctica straight to Mars? What happens to us and our planet if we blindly let the few drain Earth of H2O so they can go rape the next resource rich world in our solar system in comfort.

      Alright I know this is a crazy scenario...the point being we must act for a union of all individuals living through there hearts towards a better tomorrow. There is a blatant harvesting of resources, as if they can't be destroyed fast enough. Is it us doing this to ourselves? It is if we let it happen another day. Each day how much more is lost...never to be seen by us again on our current path. Assess every action you make and decide, is this going to better humanity and Earth, before you do it. Our "civilization " is wrong and it is time for right action no longer reaction.

    • 1 year ago
  • CreditFigaro
    • 0
      CreditFigaro  
    • Rationalists don't need any more evidence. Skeptics won't use any more evidence.

      You just have to educate those who haven't been influenced yet.

    • 1 year ago
  • JanforGore
  • chew_chew
    • +3
      chew_chew  
    • When I was a teenager, as summer neared, the local radio stations would have a "Guess the first day the temp goes over 100, if it does" promotion. There were prizes from local businesses, etc. Sometimes, nobody won since the temp wouldn't get above 100.

      Were they to do that today, the contest would need to change. It would need to be, "Which day this summer will the temp be *below* 100?"

      Whether it's called climate change or global warming, we are running out of time, imho. Business will not stop polluting until it either becomes more profitable for them to *not* pollute, or strong regulations with strict enforcement are in place to stop and prevent them from polluting.

      The only place I am aware of to peacefully make that happen, is in the voting booth.

    • 1 year ago
  • squarethecircle
  • northernexpat
    • +3
      northernexpat  
    • Almost every article you've posted on global climate change I've mentioned the fact that the Polar Ice Cap is melting. I just can't understand why most people don't seem to care. In some instances I think the average person is in survival mode and so are not paying attention to what is happening. But what about our governments? Canada is losing part of its soverignty, why aren't they acting to prevent if from getting worse?

      I was reading an article the other day about the erosion on both the West and East Coasts of America. Along with the erosion, they will soon be putting up with rising sea levels. The world is changes quickly and we must act quickly to stop this from getting any worse.

      When you reach 90 degrees for an extended length of time in the Arctic like we've been having, the time for action is now.

    • 1 year ago
  • Dusty_King
  • northernexpat
    • +2
      northernexpat  
    • Dusty_King:

      I really question the Canadian government's commitment to enviromental issues. They are as addicted to oil as the US. I also have a concern with Alberta's tar sands. Which they want to pipe down to the States. How many pipeline breaks do you need before you realize that it is not environmentally safe? And why doesn't either country care?

    • 1 year ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • northernexpat:

      Governments, Canada's no exception are looking to make a profit from this. They don't care about the damage done to the planet or to us. You've seen Russia planting their flag there and other countries Canada again included even increasing military presence. Greed blinds us to the true urgency of the consequences because they are more concerned about the $$$$$ and power sucking the Arctic dry will bring them even if it tips the climate scale and catapults the globe into catastrophe. In simple terms they need an intervention. Either that, or one day soon we may be reporting about the Arctic War.

    • 1 year ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • northernexpat:

      It would be so much better for the planet, the economy and us to install a Solar Highway along the same route that the Keystone XL pipeline would run. I think that would be absolutely incredible. It would also create many "green" jobs, protect the environment and the Ogallala aquifer, protect crops against spills ( and the panels or even towers could be placed in such a way as to not effect their growth) and most definitely bring solar into parity. Oil companies have way too much power in this country and in Canada. And for me, I think you are a phony if you say we need to get off "foreign" oil, and then support piping it in from Canada. It's just a ploy to control the market yourself. We need to get off all fossil fuels and the only way we will do that before we truly get to the point of no return is to transition now. It is truly disappointing to think I lived in a country where supposed leaders had imagination and vision, only to see the same year after year after year even in the face of the facts of what our behavior is doing to change this face of this planet and to our own health.

    • 1 year ago
  • cmc101
    • 0
      cmc101  
    • JanforGore:

      I understand the pipe line follow T.Boone Pickens water rights holdings from Nebraska to Huston ,Texas
      cooperation tax breaks and no jobs no money, The Bible Belt will become cannon fodder and will justify self fulfilling prophecy for the bible thump-ers of Wichita

    • 1 year ago
  • NiceN
    • 0
      NiceN  
    • What did you think Mother Earth was going to use to counter act the radioactivity and garbage poured into her oceans? Space ice?

    • 1 year ago
  • squarethecircle
more from Tech:

top videos