Tech | August 28, 2011 | 26 comments

Day 9 & 10: Activism across borders : Keystone XL -NO!

JanforGore
The two week protest at the White House was put on hold today because of Hurricane Irene and the clean up effort. Actually, Irene's presence at this very historical time for the climate justice movement is one more indication of why President Obama must say NO to the Keystone XL pipeline. The State Dept's recent report which reeks of corporate influence and lobbying only reiterates the perseverence we all must have now in fighting this continuation of an addiction that is killing us.

No report by the State Dept. can hide the reality of what we now see taking place around the globe due to human influence. The only way we the people will secure a sustainable healthy future for our children and theirs is to keep fighting this fight because it is right.

President Obama, you still have the final say. Do you vote to go forward which signifies clean energy, clean water and moral courage? Or do you vote with the status quo which signifies pollution, tipping points and climate catastrophe?

This is the fourth post I am making in solidarity with those who risk arrest in Washington DC in standing up for all that is positive about our future. We need to do this now.

Please join me in supporting those who are speaking for us and those species that cannot speak for themselves.

Keystone XL-NO, NO, NO!


And thank you, British Columbia.
  1. groups:
    Community,   Tech,   Green,   Earth and Science,   13 more
  2. tags:
    Environment Obama Climate Change Activism 16 more
  3.     
    |

26 comments // Day 9 & 10: Activism across borders : Keystone XL -NO! // Video

  • JanforGore
  • JanforGore
    • +1
      JanforGore  
    • Image
    • http://solveclimatenews.com/news/20110826/james-hansen-nasa-climate-change-scien...

      Unless Hurricane Irene interrupts his travel, renowned NASA climate scientist James Hansen will join demonstrators today at the White House to protest the controversial Keystone XL pipeline. U.S. Park Police officers have arrested hundreds of participants since the sit-in began Aug. 20.

      Thirty years ago, Hansen was among the first scientists to warn that burning fossil fuels was warming the Earth—and would lead to dire consequences. Frustrated that few were heeding alarms about the dangers of climate change, he turned to civil disobedience a couple of years ago. Twice he has been arrested for protesting mountaintop removal coal mining—in West Virginia in 2009 and at the White House in 2010.

      Now 70, Hansen heads the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York City. In June he joined an effort spearheaded by Bill McKibben, the Vermont author, professor and founder of the advocacy organization 350.org, to coordinate a two-week protest against Keystone XL. They want the Obama administration to reject a Canadian company's application to construct the $7 billion, 1,702-mile pipeline, which would carry heavy crude from the oil sands mines of Alberta to refineries along the Gulf Coast.

      On Friday, State Department officials released their final environmental analysis of TransCanada's proposed pipeline, saying the project will have "limited adverse environmental impacts." The administration is expected to approve or reject Keystone XL by the end of the year.

      In this interview with SolveClimate News, conducted via e-mail, Hansen talks about the link between oil sands and emissions of heat-trapping gases, and why he’s again risking arrest in the nation’s capital.

      SolveClimate News: Can you explain why you have said it's "game over" on the climate front if the Keystone XL pipeline is built?

      James Hansen: President George W. Bush said that the U.S. was addicted to oil. So what will the U.S. response to this situation be? Will it entail phasing out fossil fuels and moving to clean energy or borrowing the dirtiest needle from a fellow addict? That is the question facing President Obama.

      If he chooses the dirty needle it is game over because it will confirm that Obama was just greenwashing, like the other well-oiled coal-fired politicians with no real intention of solving the addiction. Canada is going to sell its dope, if it can find a buyer. So if the United States is buying the dirtiest stuff, it also surely will be going after oil in the deepest ocean, the Arctic, and shale deposits; and harvesting coal via mountaintop removal and long-wall mining. Obama will have decided he is a hopeless addict.

      SolveClimate News: You have referred to Keystone XL as the "fuse to the biggest carbon bomb on the planet." What actual effect would it have on the amount of carbon dioxide in the air?

      James Hansen: If released all at once, the known tar sands resource is equivalent to 150 parts per million. As is the case with other fossil fuel sources, the amount in the air declines to about 20 percent after 1,000 years. Of course, only a small fraction of the resource is economically recoverable at the moment. But if you decide you are going to continue your addiction and build a big pipeline to Texas, the economically extractable oil will steadily grow over time. Moreover the known resources would grow because there is plenty more to be discovered.

      continued

    • 9 months ago
  • JanforGore
    • +1
      JanforGore  
    • Where is the outrage? All supporters of President Obama should be telling him this cannot be allowed! This isn't about preserving your politics, this is about life and death!

    • 9 months ago
  • JanforGore
  • JanforGore
  • artemis6
  • Snails
    • +2
      Snails  
    • Keep the fight alive Jan! I hope he does the right thing, I know all the signs are pointing to him siding with the oil lobby, but at least we know about it and we can spread the word.

    • 9 months ago
  • JanforGore
  • Snails
  • Almibry
  • Almibry
    • +2
      Almibry  
    • I hope that people reading this realize that at no point in history has anyone given up power because you ask them nicely or manage to persuade them to hand it over. Force has always been necessary. And before you start chewing on my extremities, know that force doesn't always equal violence.
      Read "Deep Green Resistance" for a lovely dissertation of different kinds of force and the percieved morality of each.

    • 9 months ago
  • Snails
    • 0
      Snails  
    • Almibry:

      But could we use violence if we wanted to lol? Again, I have to admit, I'm thinking about eating Karl Rove, but lets just talk in generalities for now...

    • 9 months ago
  • Almibry
    • 0
      Almibry  
    • Snails:

      Well, if you're itching to punch someone I'm not going to get in the way, but I'm not going to hurt anyone unless it's in self defense. There are many cases throughout hisory were violence was needed. Just look at the French Revolution. If there was any situation that should have been resolved through negotiation, it should have been that one and it should have gone like this:
      Peasents: We're starving so stop putting our food in your hair.
      Aristocrats: OK!
      Instead it went like:
      Peasents: We're starving so stop putting our food in your hair.
      Aristocrats: You can go eat cake!
      ...
      The French aristocrats debate like some members of current...
      Anyway, that one had to be resovled with violence, but in some other situations like the one in Harlan County (miners striking for a better contract), just the threat of violence was enough to get things moving in the right direction. They had protested non-violently for 10 months but after being fired on multiple times by the mine supervisor and the replacement/temporary workers without getting any support from local law enforcement even though it was caught on tape, and one of the strikers was fatally wounded, they decided to hold their line with pistols drawn. About a week later, they got their contracts.
      But that won't work for every situation, so I'm not going to give you permission (like you need it anyway) to go and get yourself injured or killed or put in jail for way too long.

    • 9 months ago
  • Hardytoo
    • +4
      Hardytoo  
    • Thanks Jan for posting the Title video - there were many voices heard here at that protest - and lots of well informed kids!!!

      NO to a tar sands pipeline thru Vancouver or anywhere on the BC Coast.

    • 9 months ago
  • JanforGore
  • JanforGore
  • Schnookums
    • +2
      Schnookums  
    • Why not just refine it and distribute the finished products to central Canada and the upper Midwest?

      Oh right.

      International corporations want to be able to ship it anywhere.

    • 9 months ago
  • Hardytoo
    • +3
      Hardytoo  
    • Schnookums:

      Yes, they do and will, if we let 'em. They want access to the big refineries in the Gulf, and they want another pipeline (even tho one of their blew up 4 yrs ago, destroying 100 homes (See Jan's posted video at the Title) - THEY WANT IT ALL, THEIR WAY, ALL THE TIME. Humans be damned. Oily bunch o' bastards.

    • 9 months ago
  • Vic_Romano
  • JanforGore
  • JanforGore
  • JanforGore
  • JanforGore
  • JanforGore
    • +5
      JanforGore  
    • Image
    • http://www.tarsandsaction.org/54-arrested-white-house-environmental-community-ex...

      WASHINGTON, DC — As almost the entire environmental community condemned the final State Department report on the environmental impact of the proposed Keystone XL tar sands pipeline released this morning, another 54 Americans were arrested at the White House today to push President Obama to stand up to Big Oil and deny the pipeline the permit necessary for construction.

      “The U.S. State Department’s final report on the Keystone XL today is an insult to anyone who expects government to work for the interests of the American people,” said the Sierra Club in a press release this morning. “The Sierra Club and our 1.4 million members and supporters are looking to President Obama for bold action and we urge him to reject this abomination.”

      NASA scientist Dr. James Hansen will join a large delegation of interfaith leaders for next Monday’s sit-in. Actor and natural gas fracking activist Mark Ruffalo will join Tuesday’s demonstration before a large contingent of former youth organizers for Obama risk arrest Wednesday morning.

      Environmental author Bill McKibben, who is spearheading the protests, said that the release of the State Department EIS would not dampen the spirits of the 2,000 Americans who will participate in the Tar Sands Action.
      “We knew from past experience that State might do something like this, which is why we’ve always said it’s going to be Obama’s call,” said McKibben. “They can’t get the climate science right, but maybe they can get the politics right.”
      _______________________________
      Mrs. Clinton, shame on you.

    • 9 months ago
  • JanforGore
  • JanforGore
more from Tech:

top videos