Media Blackout on #OccupyWallStreet boosts alternative news

Being a great fan of the series The Tudors, there are numerous scenes of people lined up in droves with hands outstretched begging for Alms while the Queen walks by casually tossing out coins to the masses watching them scramble for them. This is the America that Corporate board of Directors envision and they almost made it. "When you have nothing, you have nothing to lose"

Anonymous: Insidiae, Psychologia, Et Liber Pericula

"Collectively, groups like Anonymous can manifest a sociopathic or psychopathic potential in certain circumstances. In the case of the actions of Anonymous actors online in their dialogues and statements, they manifest key features of what is considered psychopathic behaviors..."

https://www.infosecisland.com/blogview/16636-Anonymous-Insidiae-Psychologia-Et-L...

"America is waking up"

That is what I thought when the Tea Party movement began. I was right.

Pipe dreams of a utopia where we all hold hands and share...not possible, there will always be greed and someone wanting more than someone else. I wish it were true but alas no. You can bet this gal would not oppose the Capitalist system if she had wealth.

big props fo the kids out there protesting...the fact that the mainstream media are not cover this is only proof that they're beholden to wall st & could give a fuck about main st...shame on those assholes!

az the article points out, they'd rather draw our attention to totally useless shit like the emmy's or some freakin foreign war...all the while turnin a blind eye to the war wall st has been waging against main st (the repubz got a lot of ballz talkin bout class warfare)...their unbridled greed knows no bounds & it tiz main st which suffers the most from their antics...but try to raise attention to the devastating effects of wall st's flagrant corruption, the insane speculation, the derivatives scams & itz corrosive & poisonous effect on our government (DC) & barely a mention from the media...cnn spent months, weeks, days & hour after hour covering whats goin on in the mid-east, but barely a peep (in comparison) about the turmoil goin on here, about the huge transfer of wealth overseas, the hopelessness, the jobless, the homeless, the uninsured, the hungry etc...barely a freakin peep!

so itz quite obvious what happened to the mainstream media...we were warned long ago about deregulating the "forth estate" & gutting the "fairness doctrine"...they have become corporatized & the egregious consequences with regards to national unity & purpose have been incalculable...one needs no more proof of the mainstream media's arrogant position with regards to main st than their total disregard of those protests on wall st...they represent their masters on wall st!

LOL, America, the sleeping giant is coming. If you truly wanted change, votes are never the answer. Individuals make the nation, especially the true America made by our rebel forefathers. I guess it takes a new generation of rebels to take the nation back. Corporations have destroyed America's health, freedom, rights, integrity, truth, and mind, it is time to get it back. We need a renaissance out of our dark ages.

To say humans are a pack animal does not make us savages. Our failure to accept this makes us savages. What anarchist don't get is we are already living anarchy.I am sorry, but anarchists protesting the deregulated and lawless financial aparatus is beyond ironic. Anyone with a soul should be appaled with Franco's reign in Spain, but that does not equate to anarchy's success. Actually, Franco's ability to over take them does not speak well for anarchy. History shows lack of leadership opens the door to a monstorous form of it. Usually fascism. Anarchists frighten me because all they will do is leave a void fascism is happy to fill.

I dislike the same coruption they do. That being said, we are not savages, but we are animals that crave order. If we accept that, then we can make sure we help build our society and choose just leaders. Also, most progressive liberals are not anarchists. Anarchists are just annoyingly vocal. I respect their views, but that does not mean I have to accept them as the antidote to our problems.

The revolution will NOT be televised . The poets , right again .

Forgive me for this but did any one think that maybe the reason the msm isn't reporting this is because every one who is marching in these events that is asked what they are there for has no real Idea what it is they are marching for.
I have read these articles several times . Everyone wants change for the sake of economy and enviroment . Exactly what is it these people are asking for .There isn't an exact request .There isn't even a real platform .Just we want change and People in hell want ice water .Good luck with that

I saw this reported on at several major media websites, but it was hardly promoted (no front pages, or TV coverage to speak of). Not like I'd expect corporate media to do more than barely acknowledge the event with a blurb on a website.

Still, it was a beginning......one I wish I could have been a part of. I look forward to helping spread this message to my state and hopefully next time multiple protest sites can be identified throughout the country.

This was a good thing and this is the earliest manifestation of what will eventually take over this country. I hope to translate it into a non-violent revolution by asking everyone to sign my Pledge-Petition Against Corporate Tyranny. https://www.change.org/petitions/a-pledge-petition-against-corporate-tyranny

Anarchy (from Greek: ἀναρχίᾱ anarchíā, "without ruler") may refer to any of several political states, and has been variously defined by sources. Most often, the term "anarchy" describes the simple absence of publicly recognized government or enforced political authority.[1][2] When used in this sense, anarchy may[3] or may not[4] imply political disorder or lawlessness within a society. In another sense, anarchy may not refer to a complete lack of authority or political organization, but instead refer to a social state characterized by libertarianism, or a lack of a state or ruler.[4]

Does she really want this ? lol...:)

Not to be a buzzkill, but the Anarchists continue to hold back the progressive movement. The human species is a pack species and therefore anarchy will never work. I am a liberal, and even I know the pack must choose its leaders to enforce a agreed upon set of rules

The problem is not that we have leaders, it is that most people do not realize their system has been hijacked and bastardized by sociopaths posing as leaders.

I am not sure what the best system would be. Too many people want a say, but do not do the research necessary to make informed decisions (i.e. a ton of white people in the middle to poor classes believe they are rich and that taxing the rich fairly equates to raising their taxes. News flash to the Joe the plumber with his plumbing business...you are not rich, you have more money than most, but you are on the upper end of moderate wealth. You are not part of the rich).

Monarchies are only good when an inbred king or queen ends up, by the luck of the draw, able to lead. Which rarely happens. And when it does...there are no elections. Basically, a ridiculous and archaic system.

Communism is almost too fair and therefore is ironically ripe for hijacking

Pure democracy is mob rule because most people don't have an interest in civic issues.

Capitalism is fine when regulated, but capitalist will argue otherwise. Therefore, since capitalist usually shun rules, capitalism takes an intrinsic turn towards the dark side.

The best would probably be what the founders intended, which was a democratic-republic. The basic principal was that we selected someone civic minded, with a concern for our local community's way of life to handle our affairs. This of course, has been bastardized by the corporations.

Perhaps the answer is a neo version of state's rights. I say this because the current congressional set-up is too centralized and easily hijacked by special interests.

We never get change, because they are only working for us once they have served their corporate masters that funded their election. The needs of the American people basically end up like the fish at the end of "old man of the sea".

Also, if power was fractured amongst the states, the government's war power's would be reduced to actual defense, not corporate profit in the name of defense.

Basically, the federal government would be reduced to enforcing basic human rights amongst the states, interstate transportation and organizing national defense under a fixed percentage of GDP, part of which would be border protection.

Also, corporate banking, defense and health care managers should all be dissolved.

The Banking and HMO voids would be filled by Credit Unions and Health cooperatives.

These cooperatives could compete and would not be ran by the government, with the exception that all profits beyond fairly paying employees go back to the cooperative credit unions and health care co-ops.

In my book, profiting off debt, war and refusing health care while taking premiums will always lead to incredibly unethical deeds.

Also, patents involving alternative energy or medicines that may have significant impact on the quality of life of the nations can not be bought and shelved indefinitely.

These are just some thoughts for kicking around.

In closing, I think we need to get creative and pick the road that has yet to have been taken.

Anarchy is foolish and naive.

What's sad, a fair amount of people are thinking this isn't real, or will have no real impact... They've completely lost faith, was listening to some fb friends I know pretty well go on about how they thought it was basically laughable...

They weren't just rethuglican shills either...

Beautiful to see...wish I could get there. This awakening must spread.

This , is not over yet ..... the sleeper has awakened !

glad to see anarchist hitting the streets, like she said for now small steps. Soon enough we'll get used to this, we'll have to I say..

Power to the people!

We need to go back to a time when the media was independent. Today they are all owned by bigger companies and for all intents and purposes will not go against corporate America.

Our government does not censor the media, the media censors itself so the money keeps rolling in. I would say corporate greed being put over the people's right to know is a negative aspect of capitalism.