Tech | October 24, 2011 | 24 comments

New Obama campaign advisor lobbied for Keystone pipeline

Image
JanforGore
President Obama’s new senior campaign adviser lobbied the administration last year to approve the controversial Keystone XL oil sands pipeline, a relationship that’s feeding environmentalists’ claims that the White House is too close to pipeline developer TransCanada Corp.

Lobbying disclosure records show that Broderick Johnson lobbied in favor of the pipeline – which remains under administration review – during the fourth quarter of 2010 while he was with the firm Bryan Cave.

Johnson, a former partner with the firm, left Bryan Cave in April. He's a veteran of the Clinton White House and Sen. John Kerry’s (D-Mass.) 2004 presidential campaign.

Johnson was part of a well-connected team at at Bryan Cave that lobbied Congress, the executive office of the president, the State Department, the Commerce Department and other agencies on TransCanada's behalf, records show.

The team included Jeff Berman, the former delegate counter for Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign, and David Russell, a former chief of staff to the late Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), according to records.

The hiring by Obama’s reelection campaign comes as environmentalists are already alleging the ongoing State Department review of Keystone XL is tilted in favor of TransCanada, which is seeking federal approval for a $7 billion, 1,700-mile pipeline to bring crude from Alberta’s oil sands to Gulf Coast refineries.

Green groups have highlighted friendly emails between TransCanada lobbyist Paul Elliot — a former 2008 campaign aide to now-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton — and the State Department.

Bill McKibben, the climate activist helping to orchestrate anti-Keystone protests at the White House, slammed the announcement that Johnson is advising Obama’s reelection campaign.

“It stinks. I don't think you could conceive a more elaborate way to disrespect not just the environmental community but also Occupy Wall Street, because this is simply a reminder of the way that corporate lobbyists dominate our politics. Forget ‘Hope and Change’ — it's like they want their new slogan to be 'Business as Usual,’ ” McKibben, founder of the group 350.org, said in a statement.

Green groups and some lawmakers are also questioning the use of the firm Cardno ENTRIX to perform State’s environmental impact study of the proposed pipeline — which gave it a largely favorable review — despite the firm’s financial ties TransCanada.

McKibben and other environmentalists are pushing Obama to reject TransCanada’s proposal and are planning a Nov. 6 demonstration at the White House.

More than 1,200 people were arrested in peaceful protests against the project near the White House over the summer. The State Department plans to make a final decision on the project around the end of the year.



more at the link
http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQQEshUbrC1fVdvlb0YGkTOKpzDirD6J-RDes3xEG2990Zm-N9Mi68SNCz4
  1. groups:
    Tech,   Green,   Earth Care,   Water Is Life,   2 more
  2. tags:
    Environment Climate Change Canada Pollution 12 more
  3. recommended by:
    WakeUpPeople
  4.     
    |

24 comments // New Obama campaign advisor lobbied for Keystone pipeline

  • squarethecircle
    • +3
      squarethecircle  
    • You know they are going to okay this regardless of the wishes of humanity...Hillary has already told us that's the case. Be upset fine, but it's going to take a bit more than that to change their minds.

    • 1 year ago
  • lazloman
    • +2
      lazloman  
    • I hope this doesn't go through, but I have my doubts. Obama has not shown that he is progressive enough to stand up to the powers that be.

    • 1 year ago
  • JanforGore
  • Conniepae
    • +2
      Conniepae  
    • Thanks for posting Jan. No one is above accountability. We must watch both parties.

      It's time to listen to the science. As we have seen from the past, what they do 'does' matter. Politicians can 'move along' after 'bad' decisions, WE CAN"T! We are stuck with the aftermath of what they do!

    • 1 year ago
  • JanforGore
    • +2
      JanforGore  
    • Conniepae:

      Yes and they would see the Arctic ice free and the Boreal Forest destroyed because they think it will bring them more riches, totally dismissing that once that happens the true riches of the world are gone and this world we all live in will make money not nearly as important as they thought it was. How dare they think to threaten the future of so many all for their petty greed.

    • 1 year ago
  • Anonmaly
    • 0
      Anonmaly  
    • Thanks Jan, a wise (wo)man knows sometimes, many times, a persons best friend is indeed their harshest critic.... Some like to pick on people, or accuse them of all manner of bs simply for being honest and open about their (seemingly) preferred party's flaws, I applaud you for it...

      The president would be doing himself a favor by adding at least one serious yet fair critic to his inner circle....

      Sadly I doubt that rationale will get back to him, acted on, or appreciated... And I'd bet money this pipeline going through, once ground is broken (if it is), would be met with a rash of "environmental terrorism" the likes of which haven't been seen....

    • 1 year ago
  • artemis6
  • KB723
  • coolplanet
    • -1
      coolplanet  
    • I don't think that Obama understands that if he approves the Keystone XL pipeline he will not be reelected. There is still time for an independent like Bernie Sanders or Al Gore to enter the race.

    • 1 year ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • coolplanet:

      Was some edict or warning put out that he must be the only one? And to be honest, I'm a bit disappointed in Mr. Gore, as he stated on a Cenk Uyger interview not too long ago that he would vote for Obama, more than likely even if he approves this. Sorry, that is not something I will ever agree with him about. How can you defy this destruction and then vote for the one who allows it? This is why the system is so broken and dysfunctional. I know he is a devoted Democrat, but there comes a time when you have to stand up even to them when they are doing wrong and take it all the way. And this is just wrong.

    • 1 year ago
  • juani913
    • +3
      juani913  
    • it is a big f--cking deal actually. The enviromental impacts of this pipeline could be tremendous. Do some research and you'll see

    • 1 year ago
  • Ambill94
    • +1
      Ambill94  
    • And people get mad at me when I say the Dems let us down by not allowing any primary challenges to the Pres. There is no dialog...no one is keeping the administration honest...no one challenging the status quo on this side of the aisle; which does not bode well for those of us in the 99%.

      If the President doesn't approve the pipeline after this cozy little deal I will be shocked...I thought for a minute that Hillary might recommend against, even after the revelations in her department, but I guess I was smoking the wrong stuff again...

      It keeps getting harder to be an optimist...

    • 1 year ago
  • JanforGore
    • +1
      JanforGore  
    • Ambill94:

      And there is the truth. Obama knows people will have no other choice but to vote for him so he can essentially do whatever he wants. I personally think he needs to be sent a message regarding that. It is arrogant and disrespectful to the people who care to think that he is untoucahable regardless of what he does to our planet and our children's future and health just to please the polluters. I'm done with capitulating regarding life and death matters.

    • 1 year ago
  • Ambill94
    • 0
      Ambill94  
    • JanforGore:

      Amen. How would we send a message? Me emails to the Whitehouse are a waste of time. I can't remember when I have felt so betrayed, and its not just the Pres..it's the whole damn party!! The quintessential Catch22.

    • 1 year ago
  • Foot_Soldier_Of_Hope
  • tverdell
  • Anonmaly
  • Paratus
  • JanforGore
  • trut
  • JanforGore
  • JanforGore
  • chew_chew
more from Tech:

top videos