GM Crops - Contamination without Representation
source: http://www.salem-news.com/articles/november172011/gm-beets-as.php
-
-
- JanforGore
- added this
(SALEM, Ore.) - A public hearing is being held in Corvallis, Oregon this Thursday, November 17th to determine if Genetically Modified sugar beets will be deregulated in Oregon.
Meanwhile, the public comment period maybe just a local distraction giving way to full federal deregulation without any representation of organic and conventional crop farmers.
Let us not forget that the U.S House of Representatives, Committee on Agriculture held a formal hearing on Genetically Modified (GM) Alfalfa on Jan 20, 2011.
The hearing corresponded with an open 30-day comment period, designed to provide relevant testimony with regard to deregulation of Genetically Modified Alfalfa.
The democratic process neglected to include a single organic or conventional farming representative. Throughout the two hour hearing various legislators publicly humiliated the Secretary of Agriculture, Tom Vilsak for even suggesting any compromise through talks with the organic and conventional communities. They all but ordered him to stand down his conversations with anyone but pro-GM enthusiasts (1:43:16).
Representatives left no seed unturned in honor of their allegiance to biotech crops and complete penetration into all foreign and domestic markets. In fact, Minnesota's Representative Collin Peterson referred to organic producers and consumers as "our opponents"[1](12:29).
Vilsak, even with his ties to Monsanto, was attempting negotiation with "so called Option 3" containing a minimal stop gap as an alternative to absolute contamination of organic and conventional alfalfa. In essence, planting barriers would have been implemented to maintain protective measures for the integrity of all seed varieties. Legislators blatantly mocked him and even pulled rank, saying that the Secretary of Agriculture does not have the authority to do anything but fully deregulate the crop without further ado. (35:38, 1:25:50, 1:29:15, 2:18:47)
It can be noted that Vilsak testified no less than three times that we were in the midst of the 30 day comment period, and in his opinion, the talks among all sides were providing necessary elements worthy of analysis for all agricultural markets concerned. (29:00, 1:44:00, 1:51:54)
The theme of the hearing centered around the economic burden of GM farmers if full deregulation didn’t go forth immediately (1:44:00). It was insisted by every representative that their loyalties were to the biotech community and that full deregulation was unquestionable without consideration for any form of barrier to protect other crops from cross contamination.
In regard to preservation of non GM crops, Texas Representative Michael Conaway begs the question, "how much of this is a definitional issue"? He questions organic standards and even insists that he "suspects that Genetically Engineered seeds will become the new organic". He blatantly suggests that legislative steps be considered to modify the language and thus re-define organic standards so that Genetically Modified crops can freely contaminate without restriction. He insists that it is merely a marketing issue and not an issue of health and safety. Conaway asks if we are just "hung up on the phrase organic, meaning something we grew ourselves in the backyard with whatever?"(2:33:00).
Concern was expressed by a number of speakers that GM crops are being promoted throughout the world as being no different than conventional crops, and if word got out that we established restrictive planting barriers, then it might be assumed that the GM crops were somehow different. That could put a damper on GM producers and their marketing potential. (30:45, 1:58:17, 2:18:47)
It was apparent, by the end of one sided discussion, that full deregulation and contamination remains unquestionable from the perspective of our democratic leaders. In other words, it is most notably a flagrant case of Contamination without Representation.
If Oregon allows GM sugar beets to be deregulated, we may not stand a chance against full federal deregulation of all GM crops. Public comments are being heard on Thursday from 4 PM – 9 PM at LaSells Stewart Center Construction and Engineering Hall 875 Southwest 26th St., Corvallis, Oregon.
Please see the full length video of the U.S House of Representatives, Committee on Agriculture forum on GM Alfalfa, Jan 20 2011.
http://agriculture.house.gov/hearings/hearingDetails.aspx?NewsID=1269
-
- groups:
- Tech, Green, Culture, Earth and Science, 9 more
-
- tags:
- Politics, Environment, Health, Climate Change, 68 more
-
-
Dagum
-
Since the federal government is not just passive but actively promoting the spread of GMO's into the environment that will probably never be removed, I am thinking tactically it might be better to lobby local counsels and governments to pass ordinances banning the planting GMO within there jurisdiction. At the very least halt the planting and force GMO's peddlers to appear for a very public hearing in front of the local counsel.
- 6 months ago
-
Dagum
-
-
JanforGore
-
Dagum:
That is having somewhat of a positive effect in other countries. Here we are just seeing ballot initiaitives to label GMOs coming forward. California will have a labelling initiative on the 2012 ballot. However, with ALEC also now influencing state legislation, I don't know how easy it would be to do this. I do agree that this as well is something we have to take upon ourselves.. Seed banks along with continuing to spread information on what companies use GMOs and educating the public to what they are is essential.
- 6 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
ecoalex
-
The big lie that gm foods are no different that conventional,is repeated just as rGBH milk was.Ohio did find a significant difference;a higher leukocyte count (pus) in the milk,and lower quality.GM crops are different.The gm industry still trying to force gm crops on all,but many countries do respect the connection between food and health,and reject gm foods on a study basis showing organ problems,cancer, mortality, allergies and infertility in people and animal studies.
Conventional crops grown using herbicides and pesticides are bad enough causing birth defects cancer ,water pollution.
- 6 months ago
-
ecoalex
-
-
JanforGore
-
ecoalex:
Yes, the classic tactic of repeat it enough times and people start believing it. Substantial equivalence was their big coup. In my mind however, if these seeds were equivalent why would we need them at all? They do nothing but bring profits for the companies holding the patents.
- 6 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
I don't see how anyone could support the Occupy movement and not care about this. This is the epitome of corporate ownership of life itself. This is the brass ring so to speak. Once they control your seeds and of course your water, they control you.
- 6 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
http://current.com/technology/93549096_wave-of-suicides-among-indian-farmers-lar...
GMOs must be stopped. But like climate change, have we allowed it to go too far?
- 6 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
-
http://www.yesmagazine.org/planet/vandana-shiva-alternatives-to-monsanto-in-indi...
Dr. Vandana Shiva on alternatives to Monsanto in India and the history of how this all got started as well as the effects of climate change. This is an excellent talk.
These alternatives, such as seed banks will work for us here in America as well. The day they make saving seed illegal across the board is something they have been hoping for, which is why they do not recognize the effects of transgenic contamination and have found loopholes regarding the obvious differences between natural seed and GMOS. We must never allow them to win this fight for our food freedom and sovereignty.
- 6 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
Again, we see the same thing with GM crops we see regarding climate change: politicians pimping for their corporate masters who are not scientists and who do not know the science making decisions that will adversely affect the health of humans, other species and our environment. Another fight and important issue for our survival getting the media backburner. This is also part of the Peoples' Tribunal trial taking place in Bangalore, India next month which will put on trial, Monsanto, DOW, Dupont, Bayer, BASF and Syngenta for systematic human rights abuses. And it is a good thing too that I hope gets exposure. The people are obviously not welcomed in their own Congress.
http://current.com/technology/93547118_monsanto-bayer-and-dow-face-trial-for-sys...
- 6 months ago
-
JanforGore
