Leading scientist says agroecology is the only way to feed the world
source: http://www.non-gmoreport.com/articles/december2011/scientistsaysagroecologyfeedsworld.php
-
-
- JanforGore
- added this
Dr. Herren has earned numerous awards that recognize his research achievements. These include the 2002 Brandenberger Preis for improving the living standards of Africa's rural population, the 2003 Tyler Prize for Environmental Achievement, and the 1995 World Food Prize for his work developing a successful biological control program that saved the African cassava crop, and averted Africa’s worst-ever food crisis.
Dr. Herren’s work in agroecology in Africa has been credited with saving millions of lives by enabling African people to produce the food they need. He developed the “push-pull” system that uses simple but powerful bio-control strategies to effectively manage corn pests, resulting in large increases in yields.
There is much discussion today about the need to “feed the world” because of the growing global population. What do you think needs to be done in order to ensure there is adequate food for everyone in the world?
HH: The issue is less on how to feed the world than how to nourish the poor and hungry. Today we produce 4600 calories per person per day, so there is enough food to feed twice the present population. The problem is that we produce mostly cheap commodities rather than quality food. These cheap products, in addition to being of low nutritional value, are based on a few crops that carry a large ecological, social, and economic footprint. What is needed is to support farmers in developing countries to grow their own healthy food by providing information, know-how, financial support for inputs, and support for them to access markets, among others.
Food security is achieved when availability, access, stability, and utilization are assured equally for all. There is also a need for new and participatory research into sustainable agricultural practices, based on the principles of agroecology and organic farming, which would free farmers from dependence on external inputs such as chemical pesticides and fertilizers.
Some agricultural “experts” are calling for another Green Revolution. What are your thoughts on this?
HH: What we need least is another Green Revolution. What is needed now is to move forward with the lessons learned from the Green Revolution, taking forward what has worked and leave behind most of it, since the Green Revolution has left agriculture dependent on external inputs that are non-sustainable and becoming more and more expensive since they are based on oil, a finite resource, and also synthetic fertilizers, also based on finite natural resources.
The way forward is to understand and work with the system in a holistic and integrated manner. Silver bullets, reductionism as often promoted by the agri-chemical industry are not solutions.
More at the link
-
- groups:
- Tech, Green, Culture, Earth and Science, 7 more
-
- tags:
- Environment, Climate Change, Oil, Pollution, 16 more
-
-
hombre76
-
untill we stop expanding our agricultural space on the horazontal plane of the ground we will not stop the deforestation that is the true threat to nature from agriculture. we will not stop the use of pesticides untill we remove our agriculture from the habitat of the pests. we need to start building vertical inclosed agricultural complexes that recycle their waste for reuse and generate clean energy through solar, wind and gravity fed water ways from the hieght of the complex. we need to use some technical know how and remove our agricultural burrden from mother earth.
- 5 months ago
-
hombre76
-
-
hombre76
-
hombre76:
this would have emense repercusions on the freshness of produce the cost and use of petrol for transpertation and alow for a variety of food types to be grown. as well as generate jobs in every area they are built.
- 5 months ago
-
hombre76
-
-
JanforGore
- This comment was removed by its owner.
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore:
Agroecology is the method being used in Haiti, which is important due to Haiti's rate of deforestation which exacerbates soil erosion due to not having buffers from storms. It also brings communities together and allows rural farmers a chance to make decisions based on their own well being rather than of a multi-national. Haiti was also the country which held a ceremony to burn the gm seeds sent to them by Monsanto after the quake.They know the price paid because of their chemical and oil intensive agriculture and above all realize that agriculture should be about preserving the seed and freedom.
- 5 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
remanns
-
Added to "Culture". +^d
- 5 months ago
-
remanns
-
-
artemis6
-
Great post . I actually thought it was commonly agreed on that this was so . Getting the word out , is good !
- 5 months ago
-
artemis6
-
-
JanforGore
-
artemis6:
You would think so wouldn't you. It is amazing to me how this is now seen as foreign. It only shows the pervasiveness of industrial agriculture and how much their minions have brainwashed people to think their way is the best when we now know that is not the truth.
- 5 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
-
Dr. Vandana Shiva on the Green Revolution. The only green seen from this revolution has been in Monsanto's/Bayer's/DOW's bank accounts.
- 5 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
MSII
-
JanforGore:
Very well said by a very wise and knowledgeable person of integrity!
- 5 months ago
-
MSII
-
-
JanforGore
-
MSII:
She is an incredible human being.
- 5 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
MikeBallantine2012
-
I think it is more than that. With big agribusiness concerns producing food, we lose the connection between the land and the people. There are substantial opportunities to create micro-farms in urban areas that can produce high-quality vegetables using hydroponics. These farms cannot compete with the large ag concerns that produce substandard quality. If we begin to add the impact on the environment to the foods produced by big-ag we can make these micro-farms more competitive. This would also provide additional employment in urban areas as well as better produce for low-income families. Ignoring the impact on the environment may make food cheaper in the short-term but it will make the cost to repair the environment greater in the long-run.
- 5 months ago
-
MikeBallantine2012
-
-
rerushg
-
Good post, Jan. Thanks again. I think Herran's work is valid (as in: "duh.. no brainer") with reservations:
> World Bank. Hate 'em. Wolfowitz & Zoellick both neocons. Probably to be run by Hillary Clinton. They say cool stuff and will help finance you but in the end a lot of people walk away with a lot of money, they own your nation, and people are still hungry. I hope Herran can get some separation from them.
> WHO is great on paper but suspect in practice. Remember H1N1?
> Herran is a little too quick to dismiss the Green Revolution. There was some good work done there by well-intentioned people. The problem was, and remains, governance. We just don't manage technology very well. [Don't get me wrong here. You want to organize a party to torch Monsanto plants and dance around the fire? I'm there. :) ]Point is: What's being "sold" here is, in many ways, 50-year-old technology. The acknowledgement that our farmer grandparents knew exactly what the hell they were doing is heart-warming but let's stop and think real hard before we sentimentally pay through the nose to get back there. We need to take a good, strong look at not just what the technology is but how we're going to implement it, especially basic human needs (food, water, base energy needs).
USDA? We could hope, but with even the "good guys" in this government living way up the corporate butt, my enthusiasm is limited. I'm more hopeful that we can move projects more toward the open-source model by pulling together existing and new institutions that focus on making things happen without the emphasis on capitalization and profit.
Rant over. Got a little OT. Sorry. It happens.
- 5 months ago
-
rerushg
-
-
JanforGore
-
rerushg:
Don't much like the World Bank either that's for sure. However, I agree with him about the Green Revolution... it brought us to this point of ownership of seed by multi-nationals and too much of a reliance on nitrogen fertilizers which are now proving detrimental to soil, waterways and yields. It was supposed to lift India out of starvation and yet today millions in India suffer from hunger as farmers part of this "revolution" commit suicide. And agroecology is not sentimental it is based on science. In developing nations it has proven to be the only way to increase yields without harming soil health which is needed in order to be sustainable, especially in a world of water shortages and climate change.
- 5 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
This is what we need from the head of the USDA.
- 5 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
artemis6
-
JanforGore:
I wish !
- 5 months ago
-
artemis6
