Tech | January 14, 2012 | 17 comments

DOW And Monsanto in deadly race on the pesticide treadmill

Image
JanforGore
You’ve all heard the news: farmers across the country are losing their fields to superweeds so formidable and fast-spreading that they break farm machinery and render millions of acres of farmland useless. These superweeds have evolved as a direct consequence of Monsanto’s RoundUp Ready pesticide-seed package. Now superbugs are emerging, resistant to Monsanto’s transgenic insecticidal crops. Ecologists predicted this ecological disaster 15 years ago.

The big question is, can we possibly learn from this ecological and agronomic disaster? The U.S. Department of Agriculture and Monsanto’s rival, Dow Chemical, apparently cannot.

From bad to worse
Instead of abandoning this losing strategy, Dow is trying to get us running faster on the same old broken pesticide treadmill. Dow and USDA are hoping to quietly approve a new genetically engineered corn seed that basically swaps RoundUp (glyphosate) out and an even worse weedkiller (2,4-D) in. Bad idea.

As with Monsanto’s RoundUp Ready lines, the herbicide with which these seeds are engineered to be used (2,4-D) will surge in use. Dow aims to get 2,4-D-resistant corn to market this year, soy next year and cotton in 2015. These three crops dominate U.S. agriculture, blanketing over 100 million acres of mono-cropped countryside and driving the pesticide market. Only this time, the fallout will be even worse. Here’s why:

2,4-D is a more toxic herbicide, both to humans and to plants. 2,4-D is a reproductive toxicant (associated with lower sperm counts) and its formulations have been linked to cancer (in particular non-Hodgkins lymphoma), disruption of the immune and endocrine (hormone) systems and birth defects. EPA has also expressed a “concern for developmental neurotoxicity resulting from exposure to 2,4-D.”

2,4-D does and will drift off of target crops – both through spray drift and volatilization. The latter enables chemicals to travel with moving air masses for miles. Neither applicator nor innocent bystander can prevent such movement. The spread of 2,4-D across our lands will damage non-target crops and vegetation, devastate adjacent ecosystems and poses a very real threat to rural economies and farmers growing non-2,4-D-resistant crops. Conventional farmers growing their product miles away will suffer severe crop losses, while organic farmers will lose both crops and certification, resulting in business failures, job losses and an economic unraveling of already-stressed rural communities.

2,4-D-resistant “superweeds” will arise and spread just as RoundUp-resistant “superweeds” have taken over farms and countryside in the Midwest and Southeast. Where will this leave struggling farmers? What even more deadly pesticide will the biotech companies resort to next?
Corn is wind-pollinated which means that genetic material from 2,4-D corn will contaminate non-GE corn. You cannot put a GE genie back in the bottle.
What next?

Will Dow provide compensation to farmers, their children and rural communities for the harms likely to occur should the company secure approval of its 2, 4-D resistant corn? I rather doubt it. Dow has still refused to assume responsibility for the deaths and devastation arising from the pesticide explosion in Bhopal, India in 1984, so why would the company show any integrity now?

It will take an active, engaged public to get USDA back on track and in the business of serving the public interest.

What about USDA? Can we expect our public agency to carefully scrutinize the likely fallout of approving 2,4-D resistant corn? One problem is that USDA does not really want to know what the public thinks.

More at the link
  1. groups:
    News and Politics,   Politics,   Tech,   Green,   10 more
  2. tags:
    Environment Cancer Monsanto Biodiversity 14 more
  3. recommended by:
    Vierotchka
  4.     
    |

17 comments // DOW And Monsanto in deadly race on the pesticide treadmill

  • nikonwilly
    • 0
      nikonwilly  
    • This insanity needs to be fought with all available resources.
      Just think of the harm these two corporations have caused since their inception. How many have they killed for this control and greed ? How many more will die from poison for their profits ?
      We are committing suicide by allowing these corporations to thrive!

    • 5 months ago
  • CalgarC
  • COMMONSENSEFORCOMMONGOOD_COM
  • ecoalex
    • +1
      ecoalex  
    • Conventional farmed acres usually have a mineral imbalance.The cardinal rule is 65% calcium in the soil,and a 2:1 calcium magnesium ratio in soil tests.This usually ends weed infestations.Eco principles tame weed infestations into manageable populations of weeds.Farmers can manage these weeds with mechanical means;using weeders after planting,rotary hoes,and row cultivation before crop canopies shade the soil,and inhibit weeds.No-till can also be used with a aftermath strategy of planting in a winter rye mulch,rolled before planting.Crops can be grown without herbicides ,it's better for our health and the health of the soil,water ways.

    • 5 months ago
  • LivingPong
    • +1
      LivingPong  
    • 2, 4-D resistant superweeds will be some real trouble, not that glyphosate resistant weeds aren't already a problem. But more problems means more profits. Engineering capital solutions through catastrophe at an inflating price.
      Now that they have invested in educational and research bodies it will be taught as the correct approach to pressure agricultural businesses with. Once it becomes just too expensive for any family to stay in farming, then any big agricultural businesses will all fall in line, besides they won't have any other choice with all the pollen in the air.

      You want to know how dangerous 2, 4-D is? Just try a teaspoonful, that should be enough to knock you dead pretty darn quickly. Oh I wonder why so many people are falling ill to cancer and other illnesses without any previous family history. Could it be the food chain is already well and truly contaminated? Looked at the rates of chemicals turning up in infants who have unfortunately died over recent years? Noticed how the hardest working people earn the least amount of money, while the cheating lying bastards earn the most?

      Not only have humans developed the means to mentally retard themselves, they have recently acquired the means to genetically de-evolve themselves and their surrounding environment. Well done humanity, greed has worked exceptionally well at hastening your demise. Now that is something we can all be proud of contributing to through our ignorance, arrogance and lack of will to act in our own interests. Hey, but don't listen to me, listen to some smug git who sold you Agent Orange.

    • 5 months ago
  • Anonmaly
    • +1
      Anonmaly  
    • Fortunately, whether it's do to economy or actual environmentalism... People are getting more & more into growing their own, more farmers markets keep opening up, and even some farmers who own large portions of commercial farmland are still able to get non-GE seeds and exclusively grow them...

      Short of a serious disability, most people can in some capacity at least supplement the foods they eat by growing themselves (& still work a full time job). It really doesn't take the most study, experience, financial investment... People already doing it are generally more than willing to help however they can, and if they aren't your next door neighbor you can meet them at the local farmers market when they open back up....

      If the American people decided to they could virtually run Monsanto out of business. And they could damn sure let DOW know they don't have a place messing with our food. It would take actually getting involved though.

    • 5 months ago
  • Ambill94
    • +3
      Ambill94  
    • Thanks JanforGore...there don't seem to be enough people interested in the envrionment to make a difference...maybe when they can't afford the food, or can't find potable water, or have to wear respirators or we have an epidemic of diseases and still births and birth defects...2,4-D was the chemical compound that was somehow mysteriouly contaminated during the Vietnam War and is still wreaking havoc with Viet Vets and Vietnamese people today...nice stuff...we should boycott everything they contiminate...READ THE LABELS...GET EDUCATED!!!!!

    • 5 months ago
  • JanforGore
    • +3
      JanforGore  
    • Ambill94:

      Yes I know. It isn't Sexy enough. Perhaps in ten to twenty years when we see the true consequences in the next generation then as we always do we will say, gee, we should have paid more attention. GMOs caused sterility in third generation mammals tested. Add some Agent Orange to that and then label it sustainable. F_________ng unbelievable.

    • 5 months ago
  • Ambill94
  • artemis6
  • JanforGore
  • Wyley_Wombat
    • +3
      Wyley_Wombat  
    • I was not aware that they were still using 2,4-D. I used to see them spraying it in the late 1950's and early 60's on the farm across the road from the one where I grew up. I remember that acrid odor characteristic to chlorinated hydrocarbons. The farmer doing the spraying used a respirator, neoprene hood, and gloves. They stopped using it after a couple of years and I thought it had been banned. Agent Orange had exactly the same odor.

    • 5 months ago
  • JanforGore
  • Wyley_Wombat
    • 0
      Wyley_Wombat  
    • JanforGore:

      Oh I know. Just let the companies self regulate and of course they will do the right thing. Bullshit! Even if a product is deemed too toxic to be sold in the US, they will sell it in other countries where the regulations are few. I remember going into the local village store in Non-Soong, Thailand where they sold Paraquat out of a 55 gallon drum. You had to bring your own container and people did; usually soda bottles. With this in mind you can see how compounds like Agent Orange wound up being sprayed on the rain forests bordering the Amazon river. People do not realize just how dangerous these corporate monsters are.

    • 5 months ago
  • JanforGore
    • 0
      JanforGore  
    • Wyley_Wombat:

      Yes so true. Monsanto has also just been found guilty of false advertising in India as well because of Bollgard. They prey on poor countries where literacy rates are low and lie outrightly to people about how "rich" they will become by using these "totally safe" seeds and herbicides. Then when the imputs become too expensive and farmers go into debt they cannot get out of and drought kills their crops because they weren't also told that would happen, they drink Round Up and commit suicide. It is evil personified.

    • 5 months ago
  • JanforGore
    • +3
      JanforGore  
    • http://www.agentorangecanada.com/killme.php

      What is 2,4-D?

      2,4-D is a moderately persistent chemical with a half- life between 20 and 200 days.Unfortunately, the herbicide does not affect target weeds alone. It can cause low growth rates, reproductive problems, changes in appearance or behaviour, or death in non-target species.

      2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid is one of the most common and most toxic herbicides used on US and Canadianlawns and gardens. 2,4-D has a notorious past. It was one of the two chemicals in the defoliants Agent Orange and Agent Purple. It was also one of the two chemicals in Agent White.

      These carcinogenic herbicides were heavily used during the Vietnam War and now the Vietnamese population and Vietnam war veterans are haunted by the horrific effects of these herbicides, including miscarriages, birth defects, and cancer.

      Presently, 2,4-D is one of the top five herbicides used most frequently by professional lawn care applicators. Lawn care companies used to put a skull and crossbones sign on your lawn after they sprayed, now they put a figure of a human with a slash through it, meaning that you should not walk on any sprayed area.

      You only have to watch the applicators who work for the lawn care companies to notice that they wear rubber gloves, rubber boots and a mask.

      If this chemical is so harmless as supporters of the use of this chemical claim, then why the protection? Why the signage?

      2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic is being banned by municipalites, provinces and countries worldwide. In turn, the lawn care industry is fighting back with misleading information and science that is questionable as to the safety of this herbicide.

      The following organizations support the banning of 2,4-D

      Agent Orange Association of Canada
      Canadian Cancer Society
      Canadian Medical Association
      Canadian Public Health Association
      Ontario College of Family Physicians - For their study on pesticides/herbicides (click here)
      Ontario Public Health Association
      Registered Nurses Association of Ontario
      Childrens Hospital of Eastern Ontario
      Humane Society of Canada
      Ottawa Humane Society

      Despite industry efforts claiming the safety of this chemical, there is a large body of evidence indicating major health effects from cancer to immunosuppression, reproductive damage to neurotoxicity. The teratogenic, neurotoxic, immunosuppressive, cytotoxic and hepatoxic effects of 2,4-D have
      been well documented.

      The report by the Ontario College of Physicians linked 2,4-D exposure during pregnancy and childhood to a two-fold increase in the incidence of leukemia
      and in their study they also found links to sterility, respiratory problems, atrophy and non-hodgkins lymphoma.

      Sweden, Norway and Denmark have de-registered the use of 2,4-D. The Province of Quebec enacted legislation banning the sale and use of toxic lawn and garden chemicals, such as 2,4-D in 2006. More than 70 Canadian municipalities, includingToronto, Montreal, Vancouver and Halifax have pesticide/herbicide bylaws. The list is growing monthly

      Pesticide companies say that the Pesticide Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) of Health Canada has approved 2,4-D, and it is safe when used as directed.

      But 2,4-D manufacturers spend millions of dollars each year pressuring governments worldwide to re-register 2,4-D based on safety studies which they fund. W5, an investigative news program, exposed another pesticide industry strategy by reporting that PMRA receives 25% of its funding from pesticide manufacturers.

      When a government agency responsible for reviewing and certifying a product receives funding from the manufacturers of that product, all transparency and accountability is corrupted.

    • 5 months ago
  • JanforGore
more from Tech:

top videos