Tech | January 20, 2012 | 40 comments

Supreme Court Rules Works can be pulled out of Public Domain and Re-Copyrighted.

source: http://gizmodo.com/5877740/supreme-court-gives-the-go-ahead-for-re+copyrighting-public-domai...

Image
Dagum
It's like an unspoken, almost sacred concept in copyright law. It's the public domain, where cultural creations exist unfettered, without a legal owner (though often, a credited author). These works are free for re-use, reinterpretation, and sale, and a protected place where orchestra conductors, curators, and preservationists frequently roam.

But the US Supreme Court ruled Wednesday in Golan v. Holder, that Congress can remove works from the public domain and re-copyright them in order to bring the pieces into compliance with international copyright schemes. Yeah, because that doesn't run completely against the spirit of copyright law or anything.

For one reason or another, the American copyright protections of many famous, foreign works—including H.G. Wells' Things to Come, Fritz Lang's Metropolis, Prokofiev's Classical Symphony and Peter and the Wolf, Shostakovich's Symphony 14, Cello Concerto and everything by Igor Stravinsky—moved into the public domain despite still being copyrighted overseas. To "correct" this issue, Congress passed legislation in 1994 that would move the works in question back to protected status and comply with the Berne Convention, an international copyright treaty.

This week, the Supreme Court ruled on a case brought by a coalition of educators, performers, and film archivists who rely on public domain works such as these for their livelihoods. If these pieces are place back under copyright, this group (like everybody else) simply can't use them. However in a 6-2 ruling—Justices Stephen Breyer and Samuel Alito dissenting—the Court ruled that bringing these works into agreement with the international treaty did not violate the First Amendment rights of those people using the works as they are now (no, those folks will just have to pay licensing fees to perform), nor does it set a precedent for Congress to eventually push for perpetual copyright protections.

In his dissent, Justice Breyer stated that the congressional legislation,

"bestows monetary rewards only on owners of old works in the American public domain. At the same time, the statute inhibits the dissemination of those works, foreign works published abroad after 1923, of which there are many millions, including films, works of art, innumerable photographs, and, of course, books - books that (in the absence of the statute) would assume their rightful places in computer-accessible databases, spreading knowledge throughout the world."...


Continued at:

http://gizmodo.com/5877740/supreme-court-gives-the-go-ahead-for-re+copyrighting-...
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Politics,   Tech,   7 more
  2. tags:
    Supreme Court,  First Amendment,  public domain,  Justice Breyer,  1 more
  3.     
    |

40 comments // Supreme Court Rules Works can be pulled out of Public Domain and Re-Copyrighted.

more from Tech:
from the community

top videos