Cold Fusion is Here, It's Real, and its Time has Come.
source: http://www.opednews.com/articles/Cold-Fusion-is-Here-It-s-by-steve-windisch-120202-446.html
-
-
- Dagum
- added this
This event was especially significant, since it was some professors and administration officials at M.I.T. who were leading the anti-cold fusion attack wave in the early 1990's. Pro-CF proponents, such as the late Dr. Eugene Mallove of Harvard and M.I.T. who wrote books and articles on LENR before his murder in 2004, have theorized that the vehement attacks, derision, and accusations publicly made about it then were at least partially about M.I.T. and others trying to protect the large amount of government funding they received for "hot fusion" research; which would soon become utterly obsolete if cold fusion were a reality....
Continued at:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Cold-Fusion-is-Here-It-s-by-steve-windisch-1202...
-
- groups:
- Community, News and Politics, Tech, Green, 8 more
-
- tags:
- Cold Fusion bitches!
-
-
Gravity_Man
-
A double fusion reaction can be created in car engine cylinders: combining steam first then drops of liquid air (compressed & very cold). The cold air explodes as its cold is making the hot steam collapse away in major shrinkage oops implosion => BOTH EXPLOSION & IMPLOSION HEADED AT THE PISTON HEAD.
The two excessive temperatures cancel each other out. Cold Fusion. Room temperature with LOTS A POWER. hahahaha Since 2003 too, imagine that.
It's not easy to visualize, I know. Think of it this way. When the steam collapses in Volume it makes a vacuum and then the Liquid Air explodes into that vacuum... as it heads at supersonic speed toward the piston head.
Had it since 2003. Now it's 2012. Screaming Shame eh?
- 4 months ago
-
Gravity_Man
-
-
tverdell
-
I read an article earlier this week about the tremendous scientific obstacles to fusion.
My question is why dont we use the fusion reactor we already have instead of trying to build a new one, that being the sun.
Aren't there less obstacles to harnessing the energy from the sun than creating a fusion reactor?
- 4 months ago
-
tverdell
-
-
Saladin
-
tverdell:
Solar power (on Earth anyway) is probably tens of thousands of times less lucrative than Fusion would be from an energy standpoint alone, to say nothing of production and maintenance.
As much of a boon as solar power is, it's not a replacement energy system. Although you're right, we'd be much better off focusing on that seeing as how it's effective as long as the sun is around.
- 4 months ago
-
Saladin
-
-
Varex_Sythe
-
Saladin:
Couldn't solar energy be a replacement energy system if the efficiency of solar panels was increased? As I understand it, solar panels aren't even 20% effective in converting sunlight into electrical energy.
- 4 months ago
-
Varex_Sythe
-
-
Saladin
-
Varex_Sythe:
For sure, the technology is getting better and better. . There will always be a significant dropoff in the capture rate because, even if our panels are built optimally, the atmosphere captures a significant amount of the sun's energy.
That being said, I think it's not so much a question of efficiency as much as it is production and price. You essentially need one set of solar panels per house and they run for tens of thousands of dollars per building.
It's a substantial investment without much of a return in the short run. And humanity has never really been one to plan 40 years into the future. If you think about it, had we taken this seriously in the 70's, this wouldn't even be a problem right now.
- 4 months ago
-
Saladin
-
-
Gravity_Man
-
Varex_Sythe:
20% is an achievement of shame. When H2O is heated with a solar blast it INSTANTLY goes from 1 drop liquid volume to 800 drops Steam Volume, an increase of 80,000% => PLENTY NUFF TO SPIN A GENERATOR OFF ITS SHAFT.
Solar panels will never, ever achieve that power. When Water turns into Steam that's called a "State Change". Once a State Change has begun no power on earth can stop it. Solar cells use up precious metals also, which an Advanced Solar Cooker System would not do.
Americans (and the World) have been sold a Bill of Goods. But, the thing is if people knew how much RAW POWER can be had from a State Change it would change the World... because my first car engine solution in 2003 did TWO STATE CHANGES SIMULTANEOUSLY and together.
In other words Fusion, physical fusion not atomic fusion. Fusion on our level, not microscopic atomic. I am sorry I failed to open people's eyes to Real Beauty that goes far beyond solar cells & electric cars. But, the argument against me that I didn't learn it from a college textbook (made it on my own without their college degree first) proved to be an insurmountable obstacle.
There are those who would argue that had I not put so much preaching in my posts and website pages that I could've succeeded but that is not true, because I was getting the most opposition in my first year following fixing the car engine system and at that time had not been doing the preaching. So With or Without preaching the opposition was already there.
Truth is Varex that President George Walker Bush hired retired engineers to watch for proponents of Global Warming and "shout them down" wherever they saw one online, especially someone like me MAKING SENSE. But in 2003 I had barely heard of Global Warming and was NOT a proponent of it => they assumed I was a GW champion. So they shot down my "Physics Fuel" Engines along with the real proponents of Global Warming.
So the reason you guys do not have any of my fantastic engine systems traces back to George W. Bush, your Presidente? Yep. He was the one. But I fought the good fight tooth & nail non-stop til finally at a News Conference blasted all over the tube he stated "THERE IS NO MAGIC WAND ENERGY".
President Bush was the Green Energy Assassin of all Time.
President Bush was the Green Energy Assassin of all Time.
President Bush was the Green Energy Assassin of all Time.
President Bush was the Green Energy Assassin of all Time.
President Bush was the Green Energy Assassin of all Time.Bush was not a President => he was an evil instrument of Satan's Group Political Anti~Christ. Bush is the sole reason you are still fighting this energy battle I solved long ago, and engine pollution!!! => for my engine produces NO EXHAUST AT ALL. It doesn't have an exhaust system, no catalytic converter or muffler, uses no poisonous antifreeze, has no cooling system, no radiators & hoses to break.
The Future you should have had 7+ years ago was stopped from happening by an oil-loving, riches-loving President George Walker Bush who sold all of you down the river and over the Falls without a barrel to be dashed on the rocks below. He was not a President of the United States of America he was on the Anti~Christ's payroll doing the Devil's Work & Bidding.
Bush sold everyone out. Just like your next President will also do. Selling out one's fellow Americans beats heck out of watching your children die and your Wealth & Riches given to the candidate who agrees to do it. Bush chose the reward of the coward while in the Oval Office... as your next President will also do.
The hamster wheel you all run inside is not going to come to a stop.
- 4 months ago
-
Gravity_Man
-
-
Ambill94
-
Nuclear scares me when we have plenty of safe alternatives...why does the discussion seem to always lead back to some sort of safe nulear energy...non of it is safe...it is the same discussion the POTUS and others want to have over "clean coal"...as if...
- 4 months ago
-
Ambill94
-
-
Saladin
-
Ambill94:
Fusion is completely different from Fission.
It has no serious radiation side effects because you're not using heavy, nasty metals like uranium and blowing them apart.
- 4 months ago
-
Saladin
-
-
Ambill94
-
Saladin:
No thanks saladin..that's too simple and the jury is far from united on this as yet...
- 4 months ago
-
Ambill94
-
-
Saladin
-
Ambill94:
Uh, no, the "jury" has been decided on that for about seven decades now.
Nuclear science is very well understood. Fusion (as far as I know) doesn't create nasty radiation because energy is being joined together, not blown apart.
- 4 months ago
-
Saladin
-
-
Ambill94
-
Saladin:
Thanks
- 4 months ago
-
Ambill94
-
-
Varex_Sythe
-
Though interesting, I'm not sure if I buy into it.
- 4 months ago
-
Varex_Sythe
-
-
Gillian_Marktoo
-
Varex_Sythe:
You don't have to buy into it, you could go out and get educated enough to understand the topic. No need to buy into something if you actually know how something works.
- 4 months ago
-
Gillian_Marktoo
-
-
shaunandelly
-
Not this old chestnut again
- 4 months ago
-
shaunandelly
-
-
Gravity_Man
-
The majority of people will never believe it til one is hooked up to their house and they see the electric meter on the ground stabbed through its heart.
- 4 months ago
-
Gravity_Man
-
-
ThirdSection
-
So, what's next, perpetual motion?
- 4 months ago
-
ThirdSection
-
-
Gravity_Man
-
ThirdSection:
No such thing as perp, but you can have perpetual power that keeps "passing through Go" over & over. And over. Til whenever ya turn it off.
Part of the definition of perpetual motion is that it never stops, but perpetual power could. It can do that by defeating the Law of Entropy. When Motion runs completely OUT ~and momentarily STOPS at the Go Mark~ all Kinetic Energy exhausted the moving parts gain another 100% of Potential Energy for the next cycle.
And so on, and so on, like that.
Piece a Cake. Governor Arnold said it well. He called it "going to failure". But he applied it to bodybuilding. Duh.
- 4 months ago
-
Gravity_Man
-
-
Mitekillem1
-
Gravity_Man:
perpetual motion and perpetual energy are both accessible.
A perfect example of perpetual motion would come from the ground you stand on. It's currently moving at the rotational rate of 1040mph. At present, it's been uninterrupted for billions of years.
Utilizing magnetic and gravitational forces can mimic this effect, and generate energy. ...Free energy.Further more, even if that does not work, the air we breathe is teeming with electricity in the form of charged particles. If someone found away to harvest that energy in one device we could have a home generator and an AC unit in one.
- 4 months ago
-
Mitekillem1
-
-
Saladin
-
ThirdSection:
They're not the same, that's a totally unfair comparison.
Perpetual motion machines violate the laws of energy. Cold Fusion wouldn't violate any such principles, we just know of no other way than extreme heat to cause fusion.
- 4 months ago
-
Saladin
-
-
GRC54
-
All the eggheads wanted hot fusion because with cold fusion you could power a vehicle for years. Power heat and cool your house for years. Pay once and forget. It's harder to do fusion hot than cold. All the utilities want hot fusion for a reason. Can you all guess the reason.
- 4 months ago
-
GRC54
-
-
ThirdSection
-
GRC54:
Do you even know what nuclear fusion (as opposed to fission) is?
- 4 months ago
-
ThirdSection
-
-
ThrowtheMarxistsOut2012
-
Look at the timing for this. How convenient. Just in time for the 2012 Presidential election. I'm sure come fall, Barry will be prancing around like a messiah telling all the voters how he gave them cheap energy and he'll gain back the halo.
- 4 months ago
-
ThrowtheMarxistsOut2012
-
-
ThatCrazyLibertarian [removed]
-
ThrowtheMarxistsOut2012: This comment was removed by its owner.
-
ThatCrazyLibertarian [removed]
-
-
ThirdSection
-
ThatCrazyLibertarian:
Here's the science: In order to mash the nuclei of two atoms together in order to form heavier elements (fusion), you need a lot of energy. The most common occurrence of fusion in nature is when vast amounts of matter condense together, resulting in a massive gravity well which does the job neatly and produces immense amounts of light and heat--star formation in a nutshell.
Cold fusion is the idea that we can smash atoms together and reap the benefits of the energy produced without first putting energy into the process: an impossibility under the law of conservation of energy.
Further reading: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_energy
- 4 months ago
-
ThirdSection
-
-
FoosMaster
-
ThatCrazyLibertarian:
Because they can only think of one thing, "Obama is the anti-christ". Sad, isn't it?
- 4 months ago
-
FoosMaster
-
-
FoosMaster
-
ThirdSection:
Maybe you should read this: http://www.lenr-canr.org/
- 4 months ago
-
FoosMaster
-
-
The_Wanderer_Kansas
-
ThirdSection:
LOL Yeah, because man's laws of physical sciences have always proven right? Bwahahaha
- 4 months ago
-
The_Wanderer_Kansas
-
-
MSII
-
FoosMaster:
That's their approved dogma, it's all they have.
- 4 months ago
-
MSII
-
-
Dagum
-
ThirdSection:
Did you even read the article?
Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR), is an alternative theory to "cold fusion" that explains the same thing, same observable phenomenon, but without calling for a fusion reaction or violating the laws of thermodynamics.
- 4 months ago
-
Dagum
-
-
Gillian_Marktoo
-
ThatCrazyLibertarian:
because it would take most people 2 or 3 semesters of calculus and 2 or 3 semesters of physics to actually understand the topics well enough to come up with informed opinions. When only about 10% of any given population can actually do calculus - it's difficult to get large numbers of people on board.
- 4 months ago
-
Gillian_Marktoo
-
-
Gillian_Marktoo
-
ThirdSection:
IF you actually had access to real databases filled with research papers you would see that the arguments against LENR were initially based on over simplifications that almost nobody bothered to research. Recent papers are showing holes in the QM logic that is employed by naysayers.
- 4 months ago
-
Gillian_Marktoo
-
-
rerushg
-
I can be hopeful but I see this as an effort to get funding and establish patent presence prior to full implementation ACTA. After 20 years of being deemed impossible it's suddenly proven viable? Timing is extraordinary.
The suggestion, been happening a lot lately, is that awesome new tech is just around the corner. So perhaps we should back off the push for renewables? I don't think so. - 4 months ago
-
rerushg
-
-
The_Wanderer_Kansas
-
rerushg:
Saddly I think you are right. I have had a long held interest in cold fusion and fission discoveries since a young age, and I have witnessed stories since 1987 that have claimed repeatable successful experiments in this field, and between 1998-2006 seemed to see one every couple of months from all around the world. Somebody knows something more then has been shared with any of us!
- 4 months ago
-
The_Wanderer_Kansas
-
-
ThatCrazyLibertarian [removed]
- This comment was removed by its owner.
-
ThatCrazyLibertarian [removed]
-
-
percipi224
-
thank you for the article. fusion will happen eventually, the same push back and brick bats were thrown in front of it. i was wondering if you had heard anymore about the "star in a bucky ball" that creates a giant solar collector? this was being done in texas.
- 4 months ago
-
percipi224
-
-
Novek
-
percipi224:
that's hot fusion and it's in a torus.
- 4 months ago
-
Novek
