Bright days: How India is reinventing solar
source: http://ecocentric.blogs.time.com/2012/02/13/bright-days-how-india-is-reinventing-solar/
-
-
- JanforGore
- added this
On paper, India has always had a good case for going solar. Several parts of the country are endowed with an abundance of raw material – as many as 300 days of sunshine a year – much to the envy of cloud-enveloped Germany; it has vast tracts of under-utilized land on which to embed rows upon rows of solar panels; the country’s growing and grossly underserved population and expanding industry are hungry for electricity. But the deal breaker, solar’s classic Achilles’ heel, had always been the cost factor; solar is expensive – considerably more expensive than the alternatives, coal and wind – and a seemingly extravagant venture for a developing nation struggling with double-digit poverty and ruinous public health. For years, the global solar industry has piggybacked on generous subsidies from governments – inevitably developed and wealthy – willing to foot an enormous bill to develop clean energy. India never quite fit into this elite club.
But last year, the promise of affordable solar came one step closer to becoming a reality. First, the global price of solar panels and modules that turn sunlight into electricity plummeted 30 to 40 percent, triggered by a massive expansion in China – home to the world’s leading panel makers – and a supply surplus owing to tepid demand from Europe. While this brought doom to American manufacturers unable to compete with China’s prices, it proved transformative for the industry by making solar infrastructure more accessible. Germany added a record 7.5 gigawatts of panels in 2011, more than double the government’s target. In the United States, grid-connected solar installations in the third quarter of 2011 grew 140 percent over the previous year. Indian developers too decided to join the party.
Enthused by the buzz in the industry, the Indian government decided to step outside the box. It veered from the global story by sidelining the fixed-price subsidy framework. In countries like Germany, Spain, the U.K. and U.S., governments subsidize solar power by agreeing to buy it at fixed prices for several years – a model described by solar skeptics as unsustainable and wasteful, the Economist writes. Backed by the government, solar capacities have been ramped up exponentially over the years. But this arrangement began to buckle when governments, faced with growing budget deficits and an economic crisis, started cutting subsidies, pulling the rug from under solar’s feet.
As early as 2009, Spain rolled back its subsidy program by reducing the money it paid for solar electricity and capping the amount of subsidized solar power installed each year, the Wall Street Journal reported. Following the crash in panel prices, Germany and the U.K. have been wrestling industry lobbyists to accelerate subsidy cuts. The U.S. too grapples with solar’s classic chicken and egg conundrum: developers say prices of solar energy will get competitive soon, but to achieve this they need to scale-up, for which they need generous government subsidies. Hitting at the heart of the matter, Spanish minister Jose Manuel Soria recently said, “What is today an energy problem could become a financial problem.”
MORE: The China U.S. Solar War Heats Up
India imported all these debates and problems when it entered the solar subsidy game. Driven by its ambitious new solar policy, the government agreed to buy solar power at 17.91 rupees (36 cents) for a kilowatt-hour. (India’s coal-generated energy costs 3 to 4 rupees, one-fourth the cost of solar.) But to their surprise, they received an overwhelming response from developers – Indian and overseas alike. That’s when India set up a reverse auction process, making developers compete for its business. In an auction in December – the second of two — over 100 producers bid to sell solar power to a state-owned utility. The lowest bid was 7.49 rupees (15 cents) per kilowatt-hour, less than half of what the government had offered in the beginning and about 30 percent cheaper than the global average for solar projects, Bloomberg writes. The average bid price was 8.77 rupees (18 cents) per kilowatt-hour. Germany, the world’s biggest solar-power user, pays upwards of 17.94 euro cents (23 American cents) per kilowatt-hour, according to the New York Times.
“The Indian experiment has been very successful,” says Tobias Engelmeier of Bridge to India, a New Delhi-based consultancy. Not only has India made its solar program viable, he said, but has also set a precedent by increasing competitive pressure on developers who he believes have been far too comfortable for way too long. He expects solar power in India to become competitive as early as 2016.
By Niharika Mandhana
Read more: http://ecocentric.blogs.time.com/2012/02/13/bright-days-how-india-is-reinventing...
More at the link
-
- groups:
- Tech, Green, Earth and Science, Earth Care, 4 more
-
- tags:
- Environment, India, Earth, Sustainability, 2 more
-
-
jpvt
-
Imagine how great it would be if every Wal-Mart, Home Depot, Shopping Mall, and every other big, flat roofed store in the country put solar panels on their roofs. They could power their stores and sell the excess energy back to the energy grid. Couple that with solar on houses, that with proper energy management could generate surplus energy (enough to power battery cars maybe) and we would be sitting pretty! Also, they're ugly, but we've gotten used to seeing telephone poles down nearly every street. Imagine if just a quarter of those were replaced by those vertical wind turbines.
I think with the promise of turning their stores into mini power plants, the major corporations in the country would prove to be a more than formidable opponent for the existing energy lobbies. Ultimately those in the energy industry will have to adapt and shift into an "energy management" role because someone will need to manage it, and because everyone will be generating energy.
Think about it this way: in the 50s there were only a few computers and they took up whole rooms. In the 70s there were more computers but they were still massive. In the 80s computers became small enough for offices and homes but were very expensive. In the 90s computers were affordable and everywhere. In the 00s we started carrying computers around in our pockets and almost everyone in the country had one. Computers went from being something that was super expensive, not very powerful, and almost no one had, to being something inexpensive (relatively), very powerful, and almost everyone had. The same thing is happening right now with energy production! Energy companies are going to have to adapt and shift roles or die.
- 3 months ago
-
jpvt
-
-
circlesquared
-
would like to see panels on every house and building, along with small scale wind turbines and people could be free of the grid and the control meant to perpetuate profits for a few. It is great to see electricity being generated by anything other than our current means, but with this change from fossil fuels and nukes I also hope to see a fundamental change in our approach and application. Massive solar and wind plants will still maintain the stranglehold of the1% and leaves people vulnerable to the grid system's inadequacies...localize and down scale and we have less impact and more stability. A good starting point regardless, but if we are building for the future than let's consider more than just the money.
- 3 months ago
-
circlesquared
-
-
JanforGore
-
circlesquared:
It is my concern too that alternate energy will also be bought up by fossil fuel companies that will control it all again. That is one reason why we don't see it being pursued aggresively as it should be yet in the U.S. Greenwashers.
- 3 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
circlesquared
-
JanforGore:
think Kenny's post about nationalizing the energy industry might be a good way to switch over to renewable energy while funding dirty energy out of existence. At the same time the resources can be applied directly to people's need on a local and less massive scale since no individual need profit from the needs of others.
- 3 months ago
-
circlesquared
-
-
circlesquared
-
circlesquared:
could also help move us in The Venus Project direction.
- 3 months ago
-
circlesquared
-
-
artemis6
-
circlesquared:
I too see it as a bridge . We can get there , one step at a time .
- 3 months ago
-
artemis6
-
-
Swisher
-
But what will become of the poor oil executive?
- 3 months ago
-
Swisher
-
-
LivingPong
-
And West wonders why it's rapidly being caught up with an overtaken by developing nations? It takes vision and enthusiasm to grow and sustain a nation, something that is some what lacking in the establishment of many developed countries.
- 3 months ago
-
LivingPong
-
-
JanforGore
-
LivingPong:
Yes and vision beyond thinking only of yourself. This country on the whole is too much into me me me. And also, they'e being fed a line of _ by this government and media soaked in oil.
- 3 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
JanforGore
-
Hello, U.S.? Instead of the Keystone XL, how about a solar "pipeline" from Canada to the Gulf? LOTS of jobs there.
- 3 months ago
-
JanforGore
-
-
coolplanet
-
JanforGore:
It will happen when enough of us rise up, speak out and oust the big oil whores.
It MUST happen or we're toast! - 3 months ago
-
coolplanet
