Tech | March 02, 2012 | 7 comments

Breaking: BP Reaches Settlement with Plaintiffs' Attorneys Over Gulf Oil Spill Claims

Image
EthicalVegan
The Washington Post...

.

AP NewsBreak: BP reaches settlement with plaintiffs’ attorneys over Gulf oil spill claims


By Associated Press, Updated: Friday, March 2, 8:02 PM

.



NEW ORLEANS — BP PLC reached a settlement late Friday night with a committee representing the largest group of plaintiffs suing over the 2010 Gulf oil spill, a federal judge said. Specific terms have not been released.

There was no mention in the order by Judge Carl Barbier of the status of BP’s talks with the federal government, involved states or individual plaintiffs not represented by the committee.



Phone messages left for representatives with BP or the plaintiff’s steering committee were not immediately returned Friday night.

As a result of the settlement that will be filed with the court for approval, the trial that was scheduled to begin Monday has been postponed for a second time, Barbier said. No new date was immediately set.

The settlement will require substantial changes to the current trial plan but he didn’t elaborate, the judge said.

The Deepwater Horizon rig exploded in the Gulf of Mexico off Louisiana in April 2010, killing 11 workers and spewing more than 200 million gallons of oil from an undersea well owned by BP. The rig, owned by Transocean Ltd., sank two days later.

Transocean and cement contractor Halliburton Co. have rejected recent overtures to settle their claims with BP and pay billions of dollars, according to two people close to the case who spoke on condition of anonymity because the talks are confidential.

“Delays or deals made by other players do not change the facts of this case and we are fully prepared to argue the merits of our case based on those facts,” Transocean said in a statement.

The spill soiled sensitive tidal estuaries and beaches, killing wildlife and shutting vast areas of the Gulf to commercial fishing. Barbier, in New Orleans, was assigned to oversee nearly all of the federal claims spawned by the Deepwater Horizon rig explosion.

After several attempts to cap the well failed, engineers finally were successful on July 15, halting the flow of oil into the Gulf of Mexico after more than 85 days.

The main targets of litigation resulting from the explosion and spill were BP, Transocean, Halliburton and Cameron International, maker of the well’s failed blowout preventer. BP, the majority owner of the well that blew out, was leasing the rig from Transocean.

The Justice Department sued some of the companies involved in the ill-fated drilling project, seeking to recover billions of dollars for economic and environmental damage. The department opened a separate criminal investigation, but that probe hasn’t resulted in any charges.

The companies also sued each other, although some of those cases were settled last year. In one of the pending lawsuits, BP has sued Transocean for at least $40 billion in damages.

Trial preparations have produced a staggering 72 million pages of documents and included depositions of more than 300 witnesses. The trial also is designed to determine whether Transocean can limit what it pays those making claims under maritime law.

A series of government investigations have spread blame for the disaster.

In January 2011, a presidential commission found that the spill was caused by time-saving and money-saving decisions by BP, Halliburton and Transocean that created unacceptable risk. But the panel also concluded that the mistakes were the result of systemic problems, not necessarily the fault of any one individual.

In September 2011, however, a team of Coast Guard officials and federal regulators issued a report that concluded BP bears ultimate responsibility for the spill. The report found BP violated federal regulations, ignored crucial warnings and made bad decisions during the cementing of the well a mile beneath the Gulf of Mexico.

BP has repeatedly said it accepts some responsibility for the spill and will pay what it owes, while urging other companies to pay their share.

BP established a $20 billion claims fund to resolve many claims out of court. As of Jan. 17, the Gulf Coast Claims Facility has paid out nearly $6 billion from the fund to more than 569,000 individuals and businesses.

BP waived a $75 million cap on its liability for certain economic damage claims under the 1990 Oil Pollution Act, though it denied any gross negligence.

.
  1. groups:
    Community,   News and Politics,   Politics,   Tech,   27 more
  2. tags:
  3. recommended by:
    EthicalVegan
  4.     
    |

7 comments // Breaking: BP Reaches Settlement with Plaintiffs' Attorneys Over Gulf Oil Spill Claims

  • Wetdog
    • +2
      Wetdog  
    • -------------" In September 2011, however, a team of Coast Guard officials and federal regulators issued a report that concluded BP bears ultimate responsibility for the spill. The report found BP violated federal regulations, ignored crucial warnings and made bad decisions during the cementing of the well a mile beneath the Gulf of Mexico."---------------

      Good post. Voted ^.

      Thanks EV.

      northernexpat------------" Does this mean that the people that settled will actually see some money?"------------

      Don't hold your breath on that one----you might turn very purple.

    • 1 year ago
  • circlesquared
    • 0
      circlesquared  
    • Wetdog:

      they also drilled three wells on one permit and did no impact study of their site as is required by law. I think they should seize BP and turn it over to the people. We could then use it's own resources to promote and convert to renewable, sustainable energy and get rid of fossil fuel altogether. Justice through right action.

    • 1 year ago
  • Wetdog
    • 0
      Wetdog  
    • circlesquared:

      Good idea.

      We have ethanol. Flex Fuel engines can use petroleum gasoline, or E85(85% ethanol)----or any combination in between. Flex Fuel vehicles cost no more to produce than conventional gasoline only vehicles.

      We have diesel engines. Diesel engines can run on petroleum diesel or up to B100(100% biodiesel). Diesel engines need no modifications to run on biodiesel.

      We have engines that can run on CNG(compressed natural gas). We've had CNG vehicles for over 90 years. CNG is methane, CH4. Methane is both a fossil fuel(natural gas) AND a biofuel(biogas). Same stuff, CH4. Fossil methane and biomethane can be mixed in any proportion with no loss of performance in any application. There are already over 14 million CNG vehicles on the road worldwide----most of them are bi-fuel, they can run on either petroleum or methane at the flip of a switch.

      We even have vehicles in manufacture, on sale, and in use on the road by consumers that can run on a whole range of liquid and gaseous fuel. The Siena Tetrafuel is made by Fiat for the Brazil and Argentina markets. The Siena can run on gasoline, gasoline and ethanol mixtures, pure hydrous ethanol, and/or CNG. The Siena has been on sale to the public for over 4 years.

      We need to mandate that all new vehicles sold in the US should be multi-fuel and biofuel capable.

      We need to end the petroleum monopoly and give consumers the choice of what fuel they want to use to drive their vehicles.

    • 1 year ago
  • northernexpat
    • +2
      northernexpat  
    • Does this mean that the people that settled will actually see some money? Or will it drag out like the Valdez case in Alaska where people are still waiting to receive anything from the settlement.

    • 1 year ago
  • circlesquared
  • circlesquared
  • circlesquared
more from Tech:

top videos