Terrorism News & Videos: War On Terrorism News // Current

added
19 hours ago

Did nano-thermite take down the WTC?

Could the most audacious terrorist attack in history be a “sophisticated masterpiece of demolition”? That’s... more

Anyother
added this

Pakistan created and nurtured terrorists, admits Zardari

ISLAMABAD: For the first time, Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari has admitted that militants and extremists were "created... more

conservativelyliberal
added this

Scientist's mental state at issue in NYC hearing

To government psychiatrists, Aafia Siddiqui has been faking symptoms of mental illness, hoping to avoid a criminal trial on... more

Apocalipstick
added this

Behind the Mask: Animal Rights and the Terror Debate

What does the FBI consider to be the number one domestic terrorist threat? The Animal Liberation Front. Thanks to pmpress.org,... more

GRITtv
added this

North Korea Fires Missiles

North Korea fired several short-range missiles toward the Sea of Japan on Saturday, an act that the U.S. watched closely and South... more

EmperorThan
added this

From Muslim terrorists to american citizens pt2 with

From Muslim Terrorists to American Citizens part 2 exposes the real enemies of free speech.

maasanova
added this

What do obama and Philip Dru have in common?

Barack H. Obama will forever be known as the first black president of the United States. This fact will likely be the least... more

slvrGelatin
added this

Fahrenheit 77: UK govt bans anti-terror chief's book

The British government has, at the last minute, banned a book written by the country's former head of counter-terrorism.... more

FreshPlastic
added this

Scientist speaks out about swine flue being man made.

What would cause one of the developers of the medication that is recommended as treatment for swine flu to come out with such a bold statement? Why would he risk his reputation in writing such a controversial report? Could Gibbs know something that is being hidden from the public? Could he possibly feel some remorse about the way his research and development with Tamiflu is being used?

The ABC article does not mention the prime suspect in this case, Fort Detrick, Maryland. For decades, Fort Detrick has been a center of research into biological defense and warfare. On the official website, Fort Detrick is described as "home to the United States Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, the National Cancer Institute and 37 mission partners. The primary missions include biomedical research and development, medical materiel management and global telecommunications. We are also home to a National Interagency Confederation for Biological Research and National Interagency Biodefense Campus."

Numerous researchers of these matters have long claimed that biodefense research centered at Fort Detrick has been actively developing and testing highly dangerous viruses which, if released, could spread deadly pandemics around the globe. A few researchers, such as Dr. Leonard Horowitz, even believe that rogue elements of government may have already released some of these dangerous viruses into the public to forward their own hidden agendas. Could this be what Tamiflu developer Adrian Gibbs is referring to?

Dr. Mercola, Dr. Horowitz, and many others have pointed out how the fear generated by the media and government with the avian and swine flu has made some individuals very wealthy. Former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld alone added $5 million to his investment portfolio thanks to massive sales of Tamiflu during the avian flu scare, which never materialized. Note that Tamiflu is also being recommended for the current swine flu scare.

Click on link to read the whole short article.
__________________________
5,000,000 Dollars? That's a lot of monies. Remember this man was pushing artificial sweeteners back in the day.

What do you think.
Would you get the "mandatory vaccines"? Or would you be ok with going to jail and being labeled as a terrorist?What would cause one of the developers of the medication that is recommended as treatment for swine flu to come out with such a... more

slvrGelatin
added this

0 responses

added
9 days ago

Beck's guest: The only hope for our country is if bin Laden "detonate(s) a major weapon" in U.S.

The only possible hero of America: bin Laden? Please... explain it to me one more time. We have to be attacked and in a... more

WakeUpPeople
added this

13 responses

added
11 days ago

SCOTUS rejects Sept. 11 victims' bid to hold Saudi Arabia, princes liable for attacks

The Supreme Court has refused to allow victims of the Sept. 11 attacks to pursue lawsuits against Saudi Arabia and four of its princes over charitable donations that were allegedly funneled to al-Qaida.

The court, in an order Monday, is leaving in place the ruling of a federal appeals court that the country and the princes are protected by sovereign immunity, which generally means that foreign countries can't be sued in American courts.

The Obama administration had angered some victims and families by urging the justices to pass up the case.

In their appeal, the more than 6,000 plaintiffs said the government's court brief filed in early June was an "apparent effort to appease a sometime ally" just before President Barack Obama's visit to Saudi Arabia.

At issue were obstacles in American law to suing foreign governments and their officials as well as the extent to which people can be held financially responsible for acts of terrorism committed by others.

The appeal was filed by relatives of victims killed in the attacks and thousands of people who were injured, as well as businesses and governments that sustained property damage and other losses.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York previously upheld a federal judge's ruling throwing out the lawsuits. The appeals court said the defendants were protected by sovereign immunity and the plaintiffs would need to prove that the princes engaged in intentional actions aimed at U.S. residents.

In their appeal to the high court, both sides cited the report of the Sept. 11 Commission. The victims noted that the report said Saudi Arabia had long been considered the primary source of al-Qaida funding. The Saudis' court filing, however, pointed out that the commission "found no evidence that the Saudi government as an institution or senior Saudi officials individually funded the organization."

The victims' lawsuits claim that the defendants gave money to charities in order to funnel it to terrorist organizations that were behind the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

The appeal also stressed that federal appeals courts have reached conflicting decisions about when foreign governments and their officials can be sued.The Supreme Court has refused to allow victims of the Sept. 11 attacks to pursue lawsuits against Saudi Arabia and four of its... more